Volume 25, Number 5—May 2019
Research
Serologic Prevalence of Ebola Virus in Equatorial Africa
Table
Country | City | Risk group | Collection period | No. samples | No. (%) EBOV neut+ | No. (%) EBOV LIPS+ | No. (%) EBOV ELISA+/no. tested | No. (%) EBOV confirmed | 95% CI, %† |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Uganda | Unknown | AIDS | 1997 | 106 | 0 | 1 (0.9) | 0/1 | 0 | 0–1 (0–0.9) |
Cameroon | Unknown | AIDS | 1997 | 96 | 0 | 4 (4.2) | 0/4 | 0 | 0–4 (0–4.2) |
Ghana | Unknown | AIDS | 1997 | 48 | 0 | 0 | 0/0 | 0 | 0 |
Cameroon | All locations | Illness of unknown etiology | 2011–2012 | 160 | 2 (1.3) | 4 (2.5) | 2/6 (33.3) | 2 (1.3) | 0–6 (0–3.8) |
Cameroon | Djoum | Illness of unknown etiology | 2011–2012 | 35 | 0 | 1 (2.9) | 0/1 | 0 | 0–1 (0–2.9) |
Cameroon | Ebolowa | Illness of unknown etiology | 2011–2012 | 80 | 0 | 1 (1.3) | 0/1 | 0 | 0–1 (0–1.3) |
Cameroon | Sangmelima | lllness of unknown etiology | 2011–2012 | 45 | 2 (4.4) | 2 (4.4) | 2/4 (50.0) | 2 (4.4) | 2–4 (4.4–8.9) |
ROC | All locations | HIV surveillance | 1999 | 458 | 4 (0.9) | 9 (2.0) | 9/13 (69.2) | 9 (2.0) | 0–13 (0–2.8) |
ROC | Madingou | HIV surveillance | 1999 | 149 | 1 (0.7) | 1 (0.7) | 1/2 (50.0) | 1 (0.7) | 0–2 (0–1.3) |
ROC | Nkayi | HIV surveillance | 1999 | 149 | 0 | 3 (2.0) | 3/3 (100.0) | 3 (2.0) | 0–3 (0–2.0) |
ROC | Owando | HIV surveillance | 1999 | 160 | 3 (1.9) | 5 (3.1) | 5/8 (62.5) | 5 (3.1) | 0–8 (0–5.0) |
DRC | Kinshasa | Blood donors | 2011–2012 | 752 | 12 (1.6) | 38 (5.1) | 8/38 (21.1) | 15 (2.0) | 5–38 (0.7–5.1) |
DRC | Kasaï Oriental | Monkeypox surveillance | 2007 | 810 | 15 (1.9) | 52 (6.4) | 15/54 (27.8) | 27 (3.3) | 1–54 (0.1–6.7) |
Total | NA | NA | 1997–2012 | 2,430 | 33 (1.4) | 108 (4.4) | 34/116 (29.3) | 53 (2.2) | 6–116 (0.3–4.8) |
*Confirmed seroprevalence rates are based on reactivity in >2 different assay formats. DRC, Democratic Republic of the Congo; EBOV, Ebola virus; LIPS, luciferase immunoprecipitation system; NA, not applicable; neut, neutralization assay; ROC, Republic of the Congo; +, positive.
†Based on number of samples reactive in all 3 assays to number of samples reactive in a single assay (values in parentheses).
1Current affiliation: University of Veterinary Medicine, Hannover, Germany.
Page created: April 17, 2019
Page updated: April 17, 2019
Page reviewed: April 17, 2019
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.