Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 25, Number 7—July 2019
CME ACTIVITY - Synopsis

Prescribing Patterns for Treatment of Mycobacterium avium Complex and M. xenopi Pulmonary Disease in Ontario, Canada, 2001–2013

Sarah K. BrodeComments to Author , Hannah Chung, Michael A. Campitelli, Jeffrey C. Kwong, Alex Marchand-Austin, Kevin L. Winthrop, Frances B. Jamieson, and Theodore K. Marras
Author affiliations: West Park Healthcare Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (S.K. Brode); ICES, Toronto (S.K. Brode, H. Chung, M.A. Campitelli, J.C. Kwong); University of Toronto, Toronto (S.K. Brode, J.C. Kwong, F.B. Jamieson, T.K. Marras); University Health Network and Sinai Health System, Toronto (S.K. Brode, T.K. Marras); Toronto Western Family Health Team, Toronto (J.C. Kwong); Public Health Ontario, Toronto (J.C. Kwong, A. Marchand-Austin, F.B. Jamieson); Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA (K.L. Winthrop)

Main Article

Table 2

Proportion of patients with MAC PD and M. xenopi PD who had ever received each antimicrobial drug and select drug combinations and duration during first treatment episode, Ontario, Canada, 2001–2013*

Treatment† MAC PD, n = 688
M. xenopi PD, n = 142
No. (%) Mean duration ± SD, d No. (%) Mean duration ± SD, d
Individual drug
Macrolide
Any 599 (87.1) 447 ± 367 120 (84.5) 359 ± 312
Clarithromycin 318 (46.2) 369 ± 364 66 (46.5) 319 ± 367
Azithromycin 354 (51.5) 424 ± 348 66 (46.5) 335 ± 244
Rifamycin
Any 403 (58.6) 437 ± 366 69 (48.6) 349 ± 228
Rifampin 384 (55.8) 434 ± 363 61 (43.0) 351 ± 233
Rifabutin 30 (4.4) 323 ± 285 9 (6.3) 294 ± 217
Ethambutol 483 (70.2) 456 ± 357 84 (59.2) 363 ± 284
Fluoroquinolone
Any 232 (33.7) 369 ± 353 63 (44.4) 312 ± 189
Moxifloxacin 82 (11.9) 318 ± 382 27 (19.0) 251 ± 195
Levofloxacin 56 (8.1) 226 ± 239 11 (7.7) 240 ± 282
Ciprofloxacin 137 (19.9) 328 ± 333 36 (25.4) 283 ± 181
Gatifloxacin ≤5 (≤0.7) 126 ± 163 0 NA
Norfloxacin 8 (1.2) 197 ± 288 0 NA
Linezolid 0 NA 0 NA
Isoniazid
NA
NA

<5 (<3.5)
160 ± 110
Drug regimen
Standard triple: macrolide + ethambutol + rifamycin ± others 326 (47.4) 369 ±269 51 (35.9) 241 ± 173
Macrolide + ethambutol 91 (13.2) 315 ± 283 11 (7.7) 159 ± 83
Macrolide + rifamycin 49 (7.1) 284 ± 392 10 (7.0) 251 ± 208
Macrolide + fluoroquinolone 65 (9.4) 267 ± 278 20 (14.1) 228 ± 153
Other macrolide-containing combinations‡ 115 (16.7) 346 ±276 31 (21.8) 295 ± 156
Nonmacrolide combination§ 63 (9.2) 258 ± 298 19 (13.4) 198 ± 187
Macrolide monotherapy 141 (20.5) 262 ± 358 34 (23.9) 330 ± 509
Nonmacrolide monotherapy 201 (29.2) 206 ± 226 40 (28.2) 253 ± 207
No. drugs given, mean ± SD 2.5 ± 0.9 2.4 ± 1.0
No. drugs given
1 142 (20.6) 37 (26.1)
2 121 (17.6) 24 (16.9)
3 372 (54.1) 69 (48.6)
4 53 (7.7) 12 (8.5)
No. switched regimens¶
0 401 (58.3) 85 (59.9)
1 177 (25.7) 33 (23.2)
2 72 (10.5) 14 (9.9)
>3
38 (5.5)


10 (7.0)

Maximum no. drugs used at any 1 time, mean ± SD 2.4 ± 0.9 2.3 ± 0.9

*MAC, Mycobacterium avium complex; M. xenopi, Mycobacterium xenopi; PD, pulmonary disease.
>60 continuous d of treatment with >1 drugs/classes commonly used to treat MAC PD or M. xenopi PD (macrolide, ethambutol, rifamycin, fluoroquinolone, linezolid, inhaled amikacin, or for M. xenopi PD, isoniazid), started within 1 y of any positive culture for the causative nontuberculous mycobacteria species/complex. Patients may have received >1 drug from an antibiotic class, and/or>1antibiotic regimen during their first treatment episode, so values do not add up to 100%. According to privacy regulations, values representing <6 persons are reported as <5, and data are presented as a range of values for categorical variables where back-calculation is possible.
>2 drugs excluding: macrolide + fluoroquinolone, macrolide + EMB, macrolide + rifamycin.
§>2 drugs (e.g., ethambutol, a rifamycin, a fluoroquinolone (or for M. xenopi PD, isoniazid), without macrolide.
¶Change in treatment lasting >60 d, in the first treatment episode.

Main Article

Page created: June 17, 2019
Page updated: June 17, 2019
Page reviewed: June 17, 2019
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external