Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 26, Number 10—October 2020
Research Letter

Streptococcus equi Subspecies zooepidemicus and Sudden Deaths in Swine, Canada

Matheus de O. CostaComments to Author  and Brad Lage
Author affiliations: University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA (M.O. Costa); University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada (M.O. Costa); Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands (M.O. Costa); Maple Leaf Agri-Farms, Landmark, Manitoba, Canada (B. Lage)

Cite This Article

Abstract

Historically described as a commensal of the swine upper respiratory tract, Streptococcus equi subspecies zooepidemicus was previously reported as an important swine pathogen only in Asia. Here we report the isolation and whole genome characterization of S. equi subsp. zooepidemicus associated with a sudden death outbreak in pigs in Canada.

Streptococcus equi subspecies zooepidemicus is considered a commensal and opportunistic pathogen of several warm-blooded hosts, including humans, horses, canines, and swine. It is a gram-positive, β-hemolytic coccus belonging to the Lancefield group C and can cause severe disease characterized by pneumonia, septicemia, and meningitis (1,2). S. equi subsp. zooepidemicus has been suggested as a normal inhabitant of the palatine tonsils of pigs, being detected by both culture and high-throughput sequencing in samples collected from healthy animals (3). However, strains virulent to pigs have also been reported, particularly associated with high-mortality outbreaks of sudden death and respiratory disease in China (4). No vaccines are available for this pathogen, and control and prevention methods are rarely applied because of its normally harmless commensal nature in swine. Here, we report an outbreak of sudden death associated with S. equi subsp. zooepidemicus in pigs housed in intensive commercial rearing facilities in Canada.

In April 2019, an outbreak of sudden deaths and abortions occurred in 4 loose-housed, commercial sow farms (»9,000 sows) in a large vertically integrated swine system in Manitoba, Canada. This outbreak increased the cumulative death in the 3 affected sow herds by >1,000 animals over a 12-week period. The abortion rate during this time was »11× normal.

The sows were often described as apparently healthy during morning checks. However, over the course of hours, infected sows would become unwilling to stand, develop fever and lethargy, then die with no other apparent clinical signs. Other sows would abort and then go on to develop similar symptoms. Stress factors, such as mixing groups of sows and the presence of other sick animals, appeared to exacerbate outbreaks within pens.

Animals were electronically fed a commercial grade, nutritionally balanced diet and had ad libitum access to water. Gross postmortem examination of multiple animals, either euthanized or recently deceased, revealed rhinitis (mild, diffuse mucopurulent discharge); pulmonary edema; gall bladder edema; and hemorrhagic lymphadenopathy (tan-colored to hemorrhagic), consisting of submandibular, cervical neck, and bronchial lymph nodes. These signs, taken together, suggest sepsis. We used real-time PCR to test all of the dead sows for porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus, Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae, simian immunodeficiency virus A, and porcine circovirus types 2 and 3; results were negative for each.

In parallel, we observed gram-positive cocci in imprints from heart and submandibular lymph nodes. After aerobic bacterial culture followed by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry for identification of isolates revealed varying levels of S. equi subsp. zooepidemicus in liver, kidney, heart, brain, lung, spleen, and submandibular lymph nodes. Isolate identification was confirmed by 2 different veterinary diagnostic laboratories. We found isolates SAMN13058951, SAMN13058952, SAMN13058953, SAMN13058954, SAMN13058955, SAMN13058956, and SAMN13058957 resistant to lincomycin, neomycin, and tetracycline and susceptible to ampicillin, ceftiofur, penicillin, and tilmicosin in a Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion assay.

We extracted DNA from isolates using DNeasy Powersoil Pro kit (QIAGEN, https://www.qiagen.com), quantified by Nanodrop (3300) and PicoGreen (Quant-iT dsDNA; Invitrogen, https://www.thermofisher.com), then processed it for sequencing using a Illumina Nextera XT library prep kit (Illumina, https://www.illumina.com). We performed sequencing using MiSeq Nano V2, 2×250 paired-end (Illumina). Samples yielded an average of 149,017 high quality reads, suggesting 50× coverage. We conducted genome assembly, annotation, and downstream analyses using the PATRIC package (5). Genomes averaged 2.1 million bp in size and 41.34% in guanine-cytosine content.

Figure

Thumbnail of Phylogenetic tree (all-shared proteins) of Streptococcus equi subspecies zooepidemicus whole-genome sequences obtained from outbreak in pigs from Canada (blue blocks, PRJNA578379), compared with previously characterized genome sequences from GenBank (n = 28). Tree inferred using BLAST (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov), followed by FastTree within the PATRIC package (5). Support values shown indicate the number of times a particular branch was observed in the support trees using gene-

Figure. Phylogenetic tree (all-shared proteins) of Streptococcus equi subspecies zooepidemicus whole-genome sequences obtained from outbreak in pigs from Canada (blue blocks, PRJNA578379), compared with previously characterized genome sequences from GenBank (n =...

All isolates were similar to previously published S. equi subsp. zooepidemicus genomes (Figure), demonstrating a whole-genome average nucleotide identity score of 99.7% to strain ATCC35246. This particular strain was isolated from a septicemic pig during an outbreak that killed >300,000 pigs in Sichuan Province, China, in 1976 (6). All isolates had an average nucleotide identity score of 97.3% compared with S. equi subsp. equi strain 4047, an isolate considered virulent and obtained from a horse diagnosed with strangles in the United Kingdom (7). In addition, all isolates obtained from pigs, regardless of from which outbreak, were profiled as multilocus sequence type 194, including strains ATCC35246 and CY (also recovered from a diseased pig in China) (8). Antimicrobial resistance genes identified in isolates from this outbreak included gidB, S12p (streptomycin-resistant), rpoB (rifampin-resistant), S10p (tetracycline-resistant), kasA (triclosan-resistant), PgsA, LiaR, LiaS (daptomycin-resistant), folA, Dft (trimethoprim-resistant), folP (sulfadiazine-resistant), and FabK (triclosan-resistant). Virulence factors found, including the previously described szm, szp, lmb, fbpZ, skc, and has operons and mga regulon (9), help explain the high virulence of these isolates.

Taken together, these findings suggest the emergence of S. equi subsp. zooepidemicus sequence type 194 as a cause of death in pigs in Canada and possibly other regions of North America. This specific sequence type seems to be particularly virulent to pigs, for reasons that remain unexplained. Given the clinical presentation described here, this pathogen requires special attention and should no longer be overlooked when conducting diagnostic investigations, despite its historically accepted status as a commensal organism.

Dr. Costa is an assistant professor at the University of Minnesota, USA, and Adjunct Professor at the University of Saskatchewan, Canada, and Utrecht University, the Netherlands. His research interests include swine bacterial pathogens for which no preventive or control methods are available besides antibiotics. Dr. Lage is the head veterinarian at Maple Leaf Agri-Farms, the swine division for Maple Leaf Foods, in Landmark, Manitoba.

Top

Acknowledgment

We acknowledge the Manitoba Veterinary Diagnostic Services for its assistance.

Top

References

  1. Pelkonen  S, Lindahl  SB, Suomala  P, Karhukorpi  J, Vuorinen  S, Koivula  I, et al. Transmission of Streptococcus equi subspecies zooepidemicus infection from horses to humans. Emerg Infect Dis. 2013;19:1041–8.
  2. FitzGerald  W, Crowe  B, Brennan  P, Cassidy  JP, Leahy  M, McElroy  MC, et al. Acute fatal haemorrhagic pneumonia caused by Streptococcus equi zooepidemicus in greyhounds in Ireland with subsequent typing of the isolates. Vet Rec. 2017;181:119. DOIPubMed
  3. Kernaghan  S, Bujold  AR, MacInnes  JI. The microbiome of the soft palate of swine. Anim Health Res Rev. 2012;13:11020. DOIPubMed
  4. Feng  Z, Hu  J. Outbreak of swine streptococcosis in Sichan province and identification of pathogen. Anim Husbandry Vet Med Lett. 1977;2:712.
  5. Wattam  AR, Davis  JJ, Assaf  R, Boisvert  S, Brettin  T, Bun  C, et al. Improvements to PATRIC, the all-bacterial Bioinformatics Database and Analysis Resource Center. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:D535–42.
  6. Waller  AS, Robinson  C. Streptococcus zooepidemicus and Streptococcus equi evolution: the role of CRISPRs. Biochem Soc Trans. 2013;41:143743. DOIPubMed
  7. Kelly  C, Bugg  M, Robinson  C, Mitchell  Z, Davis-Poynter  N, Newton  JR, et al. Sequence variation of the SeM gene of Streptococcus equi allows discrimination of the source of strangles outbreaks. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44:480–6.
  8. Mao  Y, Fan  H, Zhou  Y, Lu  C. Immunoproteomic assay of antigenic surface proteins in Streptococcus equi ssp. zooepidemicus. Agric Sci China. 2011;10:1096105. DOI
  9. Xu, B., Zhang, P., Zhou, H., Sun, Y., Tang, J., & Fan, H. (2019). Identification of novel genes associated with anti‐phagocytic functions in Streptococcus equi subsp. zooepidemicus. Vet Microbiol, 233, 28–38.

Top

Figure

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2610.191485

Original Publication Date: September 02, 2020

Table of Contents – Volume 26, Number 10—October 2020

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Matheus de Oliveira Costa, University of Minnesota, 1988 Fitch Ave, St. Paul, MN 55346, USA

Send To

character(s) remaining.

Comment submitted successfully, thank you for your feedback.

Top

Page created: July 09, 2020
Page updated: September 17, 2020
Page reviewed: September 17, 2020
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external