Volume 26, Number 10—October 2020
Antibody Responses to SARS-CoV-2 at 8 Weeks Postinfection in Asymptomatic Patients
We compared levels of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 neutralizing antibodies in recovery plasma from 7 completely asymptomatic coronavirus disease patients with those in symptomatic patients in South Korea. We found that serologic diagnostic testing was positive for 71% (5/7) of completely asymptomatic patients, but neutralizing antibody response occurred in all 7 patients.
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), a new strain of betacoronavirus that causes coronavirus disease (COVID-19), quickly spread worldwide; the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a pandemic on March 11, 2020 (1). Recent studies showed that a substantial number of asymptomatic COVID-19 patients contributed to the rapid dissemination of SARS-CoV-2 (2). In hospitalized COVID-19 patients, neutralizing antibody production was shown to increase after the first week of symptom onset, which correlated with disease severity (3,4). However, the neutralizing antibody response in asymptomatic patients is unclear.
In this study, we analyzed the completely asymptomatic COVID-19 patients who were isolated in a community treatment center (CTC) operated by Seoul National University (SNU) Hospital in response to a huge COVID-19 outbreak in Deagu, South Korea. During the CTC stay, physicians and nurses comprehensively evaluated the patients using a video consultation system twice daily (5–7). The completely asymptomatic patients were defined as those with body temperature <37.5°C and no symptoms (e.g., subjective fever, myalgia, rhinorrhea, sore throat, cough, sputum, chest discomfort) during the entire CTC stay. A total of 15 completely asymptomatic patients were confirmed among 113 patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection in the CTC (8). We also evaluated COVID-19 patients with pneumonia who were admitted to the Biocontainment Unit in SNU Hospital and SNU Bundang Hospital (Seongnam, South Korea). We classified pneumonia cases as subtle pneumonia (infiltrations were observed only in the computed tomography images) or apparent pneumonia (infiltrations were observed in chest radiograph) with mild or severe manifestation; case-patients with severe pneumonia required oxygen therapy.
We semiquantitatively measured SARS-CoV-2 IgG using a commercial ELISA kit (Euroimmun, https://www.euroimmun.com) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Optical density ratio (sample/calibrator) was interpreted as positive (>1.1), borderline (>0.8 to <1.1), or negative (<0.8) according to the manufacturer’s recommendation. We performed neutralization assays as previously described (9), using the BetaCoV/Korea/SNU01/2020 virus (10) and 2-fold serially diluted plasma samples (2-fold to 4,096-fold). We recorded the highest dilution of plasma that showed inhibition activity of SARS-CoV-2 as the neutralizing antibody titer. We performed the assay in duplicate with negative control samples from healthy volunteers and patients 7–12 months after recovery from laboratory-confirmed Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection. The Institutional Review Boards of Seoul National University Hospital approved the study (IRB no. H-2004-158-1118).
Seven completely asymptomatic COVID-19 patients from the CTC and 17 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia from SNU-affiliated hospitals participated in this study (Appendix Table). Of the completely asymptomatic patients, ELISA showed positive results in 5 (71%) patients, borderline result in 1 (14%) patient, and negative result in 1 (14%) patient. ELISA showed higher optical density value in patients with pneumonia; titers correlated with disease severity (Figure). All patients showed neutralizing antibody response. We calculated the geometric mean titer of neutralizing antibody in all asymptomatic patients and in 4 of each type of pneumonia patient (subtle, mild, or severe); geometric mean titer was 78 in asymptomatic patients (n = 7), 256 in patients with subtle pneumonia (n = 4), and 3,158 in patients with apparent pneumonia (n = 8; 4 mild and 4 severe cases).
Neutralizing antibodies play an essential role in virus clearance and have been considered a critical immune player for protection against viral diseases. Knowledge of the neutralizing antibody response in asymptomatic patients is critical for diagnosing the disease, understanding pathogenesis, and interpreting seroepidemiologic data to define prevalence and risk factors for infection. Production of neutralizing antibodies in asymptomatic COVID-19 patients was reported recently. Wu et al. reported that ≈30% of recovered mild COVID-19 patients generated a deficient level of neutralizing antibody titers; in 10 of the 175 patients, the level was below the limit of detection (F. Wu et al., unpub. data, https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.30.20047365). The difference in results from our study compared with the previous study might be caused by differences in the timing of the test. In the previous study, antibody tests were performed 2–3 weeks after symptom onset, whereas we tested 2 months after symptom onset or laboratory diagnosis. Seroconversion in asymptomatic patients might take longer.
In our study, the neutralizing antibody titer correlated with the severity of the disease. This result suggests that patients with more severe disease might be more protected against reinfection and those with asymptomatic or mild disease could be more vulnerable to waning immunity over time because the initial immune response was not as strong as in patients with more severe disease.
The ELISA results showed good agreement with the neutralizing antibody results. Negative ELISA results in some asymptomatic patients may be a limitation of the ELISA or may be attributed to patients with cross-neutralizing antibodies in their serum. Despite the limitation of our small sample size, our findings suggest that seroepidemiologic studies may detect mild COVID-19 infection in completely asymptomatic patients by the presence of neutralizing antibodies at 8 weeks postinfection.
Dr. Choe is a clinical scientist at Seoul National University Hospital. His research interests focus on preventing healthcare-associated infection and responding to emerging infectious diseases.
We thank Kyung Sook Ahn for the administrative support, and Areum Jo and Su Jin Choi for the technical support.
This study was supported by the research fund of Seoul National University Hospital (grant no. 04-2020-0030).
- World Health Organization. WHO Director-General’s opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19, 11 March 2020. 2020 [cited 2020 Mar 12]. https://www.who.int/dg/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19---11-march-2020
- Kimball A, Hatfield KM, Arons M, James A, Taylor J, Spicer K, et al.; Public Health – Seattle & King County; CDC COVID-19 Investigation Team. Asymptomatic and presymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections in residents of a long-term care skilled nursing facility—King County, Washington, March 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69:377–81. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Perera RA, Mok CK, Tsang OT, Lv H, Ko RL, Wu NC, et al. Serological assays for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), March 2020. Euro Surveill. 2020;25. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Long QX, Liu BZ, Deng HJ, Wu GC, Deng K, Chen YK, et al. Antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in patients with COVID-19. Nat Med. 2020;26:845–8. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kang E, Lee SY, Jung H, Kim MS, Cho B, Kim YS. Operating protocols of a community treatment center for isolation of patients with coronavirus disease, South Korea. Emerg Infect Dis. 2020 Jun 22 [Epub ahead of print]. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Choi WS, Kim HS, Kim B, Nam S, Sohn JW. Community treatment centers for isolation of asymptomatic and mildly symptomatic patients with coronavirus disease, South Korea. Emerg Infect Dis. 2020 Jun 22 [Epub ahead of print]. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lee Y-H, Hong CM, Kim DH, Lee TH, Lee J. Clinical course of asymptomatic and mildly symptomatic patients with coronavirus disease admitted to community treatment centers, South Korea. Emerg Infect Dis. 2020 Jun 22 [Epub ahead of print]. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Choe PG, Kang EK, Lee SY, Oh B, Im D, Lee HY, et al. Selecting coronavirus disease 2019 patients with negligible risk of progression: early experience from non-hospital isolation facility in Korea. Korean J Intern Med (Korean Assoc Intern Med). 2020. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shen C, Wang Z, Zhao F, Yang Y, Li J, Yuan J, et al. Treatment of 5 critically ill patients with COVID-19 with convalescent plasma. JAMA. 2020;323:1582–9. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Park WB, Kwon NJ, Choi SJ, Kang CK, Choe PG, Kim JY, et al. Virus isolation from the first patient with SARS-CoV-2 in Korea. J Korean Med Sci. 2020;35:
e84. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
FigureCite This Article
Original Publication Date: June 24, 2020
1These first authors equally contributed to this article.
Table of Contents – Volume 26, Number 10—October 2020
|EID Search Options|
|Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.|
|Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.|
|Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.|
Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:
Wan Beom Park, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, South Korea; ; Eu Suk Kim, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 82, Gumi-ro 173 Beom-gil, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, 13620, South Korea