Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 26, Number 11—November 2020

In-Flight Transmission of SARS-CoV-2

Edward M. Choi, Daniel K.W. Chu, Peter K.C. Cheng, Dominic N.C. Tsang, Malik Peiris, Daniel G. Bausch, Leo L.M. PoonComments to Author , and Deborah Watson-JonesComments to Author 
Author affiliations: London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK (E.M. Choi, D.G. Bausch, D. Watson-Jones); The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China (D.K.W. Chu, M. Peiris, L.L.M. Poon); Department of Health, The Government of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Hong Kong (P.K.C. Cheng, D.N.C. Tsang); Public Health England, London (D.G. Bausch); National Institute for Medical Research, Mwanza, Tanzania (D. Watson-Jones)

Cite This Article


Four persons with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection had traveled on the same flight from Boston, Massachusetts, USA, to Hong Kong, China. Their virus genetic sequences are identical, unique, and belong to a clade not previously identified in Hong Kong, which strongly suggests that the virus can be transmitted during air travel.

In 2019, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) emerged in China, ultimately causing the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. Many persons with SARS-CoV-2 infection have since flown into and out of COVID-19–affected areas (1). Some countries quarantine arriving passengers. Airports are also screening passenger body temperatures before boarding and after arrival. Recent investigations have shown that SARS-CoV-2 can be transmitted before symptom onset, posing a challenge to outbreak control (2). Although risks for SARS-CoV-2 transmission have been extensively investigated, in-flight transmission of the virus has not been formally confirmed. Airline staff members have voiced concerns over acquisition of SARS-CoV-2 infection (3). Given that flights are still departing to and from COVID-19–affected countries, determining whether in-flight transmission of SARS-CoV-2 occurs is essential.

The Study

We examined public records for 1,110 persons with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 in Hong Kong, China, recorded from January 23 through June 13, 2020; we used Centre for Health Protection (CHP) public records and the Vote4HK COVID-19 in HK database for case-patients who had traveled before diagnosis (4,5). At the time, the Hong Kong government had yet to introduce mandatory quarantine and airport screening (6). We identified a cluster of 4 persons with COVID-19 (henceforth referred to as patients A–D) associated with a commercial flight that departed from Boston, Massachusetts, USA, on March 9 and arrived in Hong Kong on March 10, 2020. The airplane, a Boeing 777-300ER, flew for »15 hours and carried a maximum of 294 passengers. The cluster comprised 2 passengers and 2 cabin crew members. Although these persons did not fulfill the criteria for SARS-CoV-2 testing at the time of arrival, results of reverse transcription PCR conducted in local healthcare settings within 5–11 days of arrival were positive. All 4 case-patients subsequently recovered (Appendix Figure 1).

Patients A and B were a married couple. Patient A was a 58-year-old man with underlying disease who sat in a window seat in business class on the airplane (Appendix Figure 2). On March 10, fever and productive cough developed; on March 13, he had mild abdominal discomfort, followed by diarrhea 2 days later. His 61-year-old wife, patient B, also had underlying illness. She sat directly in front of him in a business class window seat. On March 10, she had a sore throat. One day later, fever and cough developed. As their symptoms evolved, they sought healthcare and were hospitalized on March 14. On March 15, respiratory samples (collected March 14 for patient A and March 15 for patient B) were positive for SARS-CoV-2. No public record indicates what their underlying diseases were or whether these 2 passengers were symptomatic during the flight. Before the flight and within the 14-day incubation period, they visited Toronto, Ontario, Canada (February 15–March 2); New York, New York, USA (March 2–5); and Boston (March 5–9). CHP classified the couple as imported cases into Hong Kong.

Patient C was an asymptomatic 25-year-old man identified through contact tracing by the Hong Kong government and the airline as a close contact of patients A and B. He was a Hong Kong–based business class flight attendant who served patients A and B during the flight. After patients A and B received their diagnoses, the airline informed patient C, and he attended an outpatient clinic on March 16. He was positive for SARS-CoV-2 on March 17 and was subsequently quarantined and hospitalized. Patient C stayed in Boston during March 5–9. Patient D was a 51-year-old female Hong Kong–based flight attendant on the same flight. Fever and cough developed on March 18, SARS-CoV-2 test result was positive on March 21, and patient D was hospitalized. There is no publicly available information of her travel history before the flight or her contacts with the other patients on or after the flight. Descriptions of the disease experienced by patients C and D were unavailable. CHP categorized patients C and D as close contacts of a person with an imported case.

To generate genetic evidence for transmission between the 4 patients, we sequenced their viruses. Samples were collected under public health authority, and individual patient identities are known to CHP. Retrospective analysis of leftover samples without individual consent was permitted under local regulations and approved by the institutional review board of the University of Hong Kong/Hospital Authority West Cluster (reference UW 20-168) and the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine Ethics Committee (reference 22384). Stored upper respiratory samples were sent to a World Health Organization reference laboratory at the University of Hong Kong. We deduced near full-length genomes (sequence length >29,760 nt) by using the Illumina sequencing method and previously described primers and protocol (7). All deduced sequences had a minimum coverage of 100. While sequencing and analyzing the specimens, we were blinded to patient status as passenger or crew.


Phylogenetic tree of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) viruses isolated from passengers and airline crew members who traveled on the same flight from Boston, Massachusetts, USA, to Hong Kong, China. Human SARS-CoV-2 WIV04 is selected to be the root of this phylogenetic tree. The tree was constructed by using the neighbor-joining method. Only bootstrap values >80 are shown. Representative viruses from clades L, S, V, G, GH, GR, and O (others) are included in the analysis. Virus sequences from patients A–D reported in this study are grouped to clade G (GISAID [] accession nos. EPI_ISL_476801 to EPI_ISL_476804). EPI ISL accession nos. for sequences retrieved in GISAID ( are provided. Scale bar indicates estimated genetic distance.

Figure. Phylogenetic tree of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) viruses isolated from passengers and airline crew members who traveled on the same flight from Boston, Massachusetts, USA, to...

The near full-length viral genomes from all 4 patients were 100% identical and phylogenetically grouped to clade G (Figure). Other than these 4, none of the 189 viral sequences deduced from samples collected in Hong Kong (January 21–May 12, 2020; GISAID,, belong to this clade (data not shown) (K.S. Leung et al., unpub. data, Conversely, in March 2020, virus sequences related to those of patients A–D with only 2 nt differences were isolated in Toronto, New York City, and Massachusetts (Table), making it plausible that patients A and B acquired a similar virus during their visit. Worldwide during January 10–June 13, »30,000 complete SARS-CoV-2 genomes with high coverage were deposited into the GISAID database. None shares 100% identity with the sequences of the viruses in the cluster reported here.


Given the case histories and sequencing results, the most likely sequence of events is that one or both of passengers A and B contracted SARS-CoV-2 in North America and transmitted the virus to flight attendants C and D during the flight. The only location where all 4 persons were in close proximity for an extended period was inside the airplane. Passengers and cabin crew do not generally go through the same check-in process at airports before boarding. Although we cannot completely rule out the possibility that patients C and D were infected before boarding, the unique virus sequence and 100% identity across the whole virus genome from the 4 patients makes this scenario highly unlikely. Patient D may have acquired infection from patient C, but because their test results were positive within 1 incubation period, it is more likely that patient D was infected by patient A or B. We therefore conclude that these 4 patients belong to the same in-flight transmission chain.

Our results strongly suggest in-flight transmission of SARS-CoV-2. No other COVID-19 cases associated with this flight have been identified. We were unable to quantify the virus attack rate on this flight because not all passengers were tested.

Previous reports of probable in-flight transmissions of SARS-CoV-2 lack genetic evidence (8,9). During January–March 2020, the International Air Transport Association received 3 reports of suspected in-flight transmission (10). Contact tracing of 2 passengers who flew from China to Canada has yielded no indication of secondary infections from the flight (11). Nonetheless, SARS-CoV-2 test results have been positive for hundreds of flight attendants and pilots; at least 2 have died (12,13). Our results demonstrate that SARS-CoV-2 can be transmitted on airplanes. To prevent transmission of the virus during travel, infection control measures must continue.

Dr. Choi is an assistant professor at the London School and Hygiene & Tropical Medicine. His research interests include viral infections and vaccine development.



We gratefully acknowledge the staff from the originating laboratories responsible for obtaining the specimens and from the submitting laboratories where the genome data on which this research is based were generated and shared via GISAID. This work is supported by grants from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (contract HHSN272201400006C) and the Health and Medical Research Fund (COVID190205). The UK Public Health Rapid Support Team is funded by UK aid from the Department of Health and Social Care and is jointly run by Public Health England and the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine.

The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the National Health Service, the National Institute for Health Research, and the Department of Health and Social Care.



  1. Ng  O-T, Marimuthu  K, Chia  P-Y, Koh  V, Chiew  CJ, De Wang  L, et al. SARS-CoV-2 infection among travelers returning from Wuhan, China. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:14768. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Furukawa  NW, Brooks  JT, Sobel  J. Evidence supporting transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 while presymptomatic or asymptomatic. Emerg Infect Dis. 2020;26: Epub ahead of print. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Burridge  T. BA cabin crew virus fears after long-haul flights [cited 2020 Jun 24].
  4. The Government of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. Latest local situation of COVID-19 [cited 2020 Jun 15].
  5. COVID-19 in HK [cited 2020 Jun 15].
  6. Saiidi  U. Hong Kong is putting electronic wristbands on arriving passengers to enforce coronavirus quarantine [cited 2020 Jun 24].
  7. Sit  THC, Brackman  CJ, Ip  SM, Tam  KWS, Law  PYT, To  EMW, et al. Infection of dogs with SARS-CoV-2. Nature. 2020; Epub ahead of print. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Qian  GQ, Yang  NB, Ding  F, Ma  AHY, Wang  ZY, Shen  YF, et al. Epidemiologic and clinical characteristics of 91 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in Zhejiang, China: a retrospective, multi-centre case series. QJM. 2020;113:47481. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Eldin  C, Lagier  JC, Mailhe  M, Gautret  P. Probable aircraft transmission of Covid-19 in-flight from the Central African Republic to France. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2020;35:101643. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. International Air Transport Association. Restarting aviation following COVID-19 [cited 2020 Jun 24].
  11. Schwartz  KL, Murti  M, Finkelstein  M, Leis  JA, Fitzgerald-Husek  A, Bourns  L, et al. Lack of COVID-19 transmission on an international flight. CMAJ. 2020;192:E410. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Wallace  G. 100 American Airlines flight attendants have coronavirus, union says [cited 2020 Jun 24].
  13. Mutua  K. Covid-19: KQ hero pilot Daudi Kibati laid to rest in Kitui [cited 2020 Jun 24].




Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2611.203254

Original Publication Date: September 18, 2020

Table of Contents – Volume 26, Number 11—November 2020

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Leo L.M. Poon, School of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong, 7 Sassoon Rd, Hong Kong, China

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: September 08, 2020
Page updated: October 19, 2020
Page reviewed: October 19, 2020
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.