Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 26, Number 3—March 2020
Research Letter

Metagenomics of Imported Multidrug-Resistant Mycobacterium leprae, Saudi Arabia, 2017

Qingtian Guan, Talal S. Almutairi, Tahani Alhalouli, Arnab Pain1Comments to Author , and Faisal Alasmari1
Author affiliations: King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal-Jeddah, Saudi Arabia (Q. Guan, A. Pain); King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia (T.S. Almutairi); King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh (T.S. Almutairi, T. Alhalouli, F. Alasmari)

Cite This Article

Abstract

Using shotgun metagenomics, we identified an imported case of multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium leprae in a Filipino resident of Saudi Arabia in 2017. We determined the phylogenomic lineage (3K1) and identified mutations in rpoB and rrs corresponding to the multidrug-resistance phenotype clinically observed. Metagenomics sequencing can be used to identify multidrug-resistant M. leprae.

Leprosy is a chronic dermatologic and neurologic disease caused by the infectious agent Mycobacterium leprae and can lead to severe disabilities; >200,000 new cases are reported annually worldwide, according to the World Health Organization. A total of 242 leprosy cases were reported in Saudi Arabia during 2003–2012; however, little is known about the subtypes and prevalence of drug resistance among these M. leprae cases (1).

In May 2017, a 30-year-old woman from the Philippines sought treatment at the dermatology clinic of King Fahad Medical City (KFMC) Hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, for painful systemic skin nodules and joint pain without joint swelling. She had no medical history of leprosy. The initial clinical diagnosis of this patient was inconclusive, but her initial signs and symptoms were suggestive of a connective tissue disease such as systemic lupus erythematosus, and initial clinical improvement was recorded after a short course of empiric steroids and hydroxychloroquine treatment. Other suspected diagnoses included lepromatous leprosy with type 2 erythema nodosum leprosum reaction or other nontuberculosis mycobacterial infection.

We performed a punch skin biopsy of the extensor surface of the forearm and performed Ziehl-Neelsen staining; we observed a florid histiocytic proliferation containing numerous Mycobacterium bacilli without an obvious granuloma (Appendix Figure 1). We referred the patient to the infectious disease clinic, which performed QuantiFERON-TB Gold (QIAGEN, https://www.quantiferon.com) and took a biopsy for bacterial and fungal culture, and all test results were negative. Mycobacterial culture showed >9 acid-fast bacilli/high-power field on smears, and no growth was observed on Lowenstein-Jensen slants after 8 weeks of incubation.

Her treatment started with a daily regimen of clofazimine (50 mg), dapsone (100 mg), and rifampin (600 mg). Treatment with moxifloxacin (400 mg/d) and macrolides was briefly added (clarithromycin and azithromycin were both stopped because of gastrointestinal side effects) in case of possible nontuberculosis mycobacterial infection. The patient had multiple relapses during 12 months of follow-up and became steroid dependent (i.e., her skin lesions reappeared shortly after steroid treatment ended).

Because initial test reports were inconclusive and the etiologic agent was unconfirmed, we attempted to confirm the etiology by subjecting the patient’s skin biopsy sample to metagenomic sequencing; a DNA sequencing protocol without target DNA–enrichment steps (2) was needed to unambiguously identify the etiologic agent. From the metagenomics datasets, we reconstructed the near-complete genome of the M. leprae species (which we named KFMC-1) at 99.2% completeness when compared with M. leprae TN, a strain commonly used for reference (3). We assembled the 3.24-Mb genome of M. leprae KFMC-1 in 19 DNA segments, and average coverage was 20.02× (Appendix Table 1, Figure 2, panel A). A single-nucleotide polymorphism comparison of M. leprae KFMC-1 with a globally representative set of M. leprae revealed KFMC-1 was most closely related to 3K1 Ryukyu-2 (Appendix Figure 2, panel B), which was originally isolated in Japan (4).

We identified 158 polymorphic sites in the genome (Appendix Table 2), which corresponded to 136 single-nucleotide polymorphisms and 22 insertion/deletions. In total, 53 of the 158 changes were new, and 63 appeared within gene-coding regions, a couple of which helped us predict the multidrug-resistance profile. We identified a G→T nucleotide change, which leads to a nonsynonymous change (Q438H) in the rpoB gene (Appendix Figure 2, panel C). This substitution results in rifampin resistance (5), matching our clinical records. The C1414A mutation in the rrs locus is predicted to confer capreomycin resistance, as observed previously in M. tuberculosis (6).

After we confirmed the clinical diagnosis as an M. leprae infection, we halted moxifloxacin treatment and kept the patient on 3 standard antimicrobial drugs (clofazimine, dapsone, and rifampin). Afterward, the patient left Saudi Arabia and continued her antimicrobial drug course in her country of origin.

The predominant genotypes of M. leprae strains in the Middle East are subtypes 2 and 3 (7). Most 3K cases are found in countries of East Asia, such as China (8), Japan (9), Korea (2), and the Philippines (8). In addition, >37% of the leprosy cases in Saudi Arabia occur in persons from other countries (1). Our results suggest that this case of leprosy was imported from the patient’s country of origin. Saudi Arabia hosts a massive number of expatriates from all over the world, including persons from M. leprae–endemic countries, and also hosts one of the largest recurring religious gatherings in the world. Therefore, genomics-guided infection control efforts are needed to monitor the potential importation and prevent the spread of M. leprae infections in the region.

Mr. Guan is a graduate student in the Pathogen Genomics Laboratory of King Abdullah University of Science and Technology. His research focuses on the applications of bioinformatics tools in understanding of pathogens and infectious diseases.

Top

References

  1. Alotaibi  MH, Bahammam  SA, Ur Rahman  S, Bahnassy  AA, Hassan  IS, Alothman  AF, et al. The demographic and clinical characteristics of leprosy in Saudi Arabia. J Infect Public Health. 2016;9:6117. DOIPubMed
  2. Schuenemann  VJ, Avanzi  C, Krause-Kyora  B, Seitz  A, Herbig  A, Inskip  S, et al. Ancient genomes reveal a high diversity of Mycobacterium leprae in medieval Europe. PLoS Pathog. 2018;14:e1006997. DOIPubMed
  3. Cole  ST, Eiglmeier  K, Parkhill  J, James  KD, Thomson  NR, Wheeler  PR, et al. Massive gene decay in the leprosy bacillus. Nature. 2001;409:100711. DOIPubMed
  4. Hosokawa  A. A clinical and bacteriological examination of Mycobacterium leprae in the epidermis and cutaneous appendages of patients with multibacillary leprosy. J Dermatol. 1999;26:47988. DOIPubMed
  5. Kai  M, Nguyen Phuc  NH, Nguyen  HA, Pham  THBD, Nguyen  KH, Miyamoto  Y, et al. Analysis of drug-resistant strains of Mycobacterium leprae in an endemic area of Vietnam. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52:e12732. DOIPubMed
  6. Suzuki  Y, Katsukawa  C, Tamaru  A, Abe  C, Makino  M, Mizuguchi  Y, et al. Detection of kanamycin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis by identifying mutations in the 16S rRNA gene. J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36:12205. DOIPubMed
  7. Monot  M, Honoré  N, Garnier  T, Zidane  N, Sherafi  D, Paniz-Mondolfi  A, et al. Comparative genomic and phylogeographic analysis of Mycobacterium leprae. Nat Genet. 2009;41:12829. DOIPubMed
  8. Weng  X, Xing  Y, Liu  J, Wang  Y, Ning  Y, Li  M, et al. Molecular, ethno-spatial epidemiology of leprosy in China: novel insights for tracing leprosy in endemic and non endemic provinces. Infect Genet Evol. 2013;14:3618. DOIPubMed
  9. Benjak  A, Avanzi  C, Singh  P, Loiseau  C, Girma  S, Busso  P, et al. Phylogenomics and antimicrobial resistance of the leprosy bacillus Mycobacterium leprae. Nat Commun. 2018;9:352. DOIPubMed

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2603.190661

Original Publication Date: February 04, 2020

1These senior authors contributed equally to this article.

Table of Contents – Volume 26, Number 3—March 2020

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Arnab Pain, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, BESE Division, Thuwal-Jeddah, 239556900, Saudi Arabia

Send To

character(s) remaining.

Comment submitted successfully, thank you for your feedback.

Top

Page created: February 20, 2020
Page updated: February 20, 2020
Page reviewed: February 20, 2020
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external