Volume 27, Number 1—January 2021
Research
Precise Species Identification by Whole-Genome Sequencing of Enterobacter Bloodstream Infection, China
Table 2
Proportion of Enterobacter species recovered from blood in genomic study of Enterobacter bloodstream infection, China
| Species* | No. (%) |
|
|---|---|---|
| Strains from blood in this study | Strains from blood in GenBank | |
| Enterobacter xiangfangensis | 21 (43.8) | 221 (63.3) |
| Taxon 1 | 8 (16.7) | 69 (19.8) |
| E. bugandensis | 4 (8.3) | 7 (2.0) |
| E. cloacae | 3 (6.3) | 4 (1.1) |
| E. asburiae | 2 (4.2) | 14 (4.0) |
| E. roggenkampii | 2 (4.2) | 7 (2.0) |
| E. hormaechei | 2 (4.2) | 0 |
| E. huaxiensis | 2 (4.2) | 0 |
| E. ludwigii | 1 (2.1) | 6 (1.7) |
| E. sichuanensis | 1 (2.1) | 1 (0.3) |
| E. chuandaensis | 1 (2.1) | 0 |
| Taxon 2 | 1 (2.1) | 2 (0.6) |
| E. kobei | 0 | 10 (2.9) |
| Taxon 3 | 0 | 2 (0.6) |
| Taxon 4 | 0 | 2 (0.6) |
| Taxon 5 | 0 | 1 (0.3) |
| Taxon 6 | 0 | 1 (0.3) |
| E. chengduensis | 0 | 1 (0.3) |
| E. mori |
0 |
1 (0.3) |
| Total | 48 (100.0) | 349 (100.0) |
*Taxons 1–6 represent 6 Enterobacter spp. without assigned names. Their most closely related Enterobacter spp. are listed in Appendix 1 Table 2 and shown in Appendix 1 Figure 1).
1These authors contributed equally to this article.
Page created: November 24, 2020
Page updated: December 21, 2020
Page reviewed: December 21, 2020
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.