Volume 27, Number 1—January 2021
Research
Delineating and Analyzing Locality-Level Determinants of Cholera, Haiti
Karolina Griffiths
, Kenny Moise, Martine Piarroux, Jean Gaudart, Samuel Beaulieu, Greg Bulit, Jean-Petit Marseille, Paul Menahel Jasmin, Paul Christian Namphy, Jean-Hugues Henrys, Renaud Piarroux, and Stanislas Rebaudet
, Kenny Moise, Martine Piarroux, Jean Gaudart, Samuel Beaulieu, Greg Bulit, Jean-Petit Marseille, Paul Menahel Jasmin, Paul Christian Namphy, Jean-Hugues Henrys, Renaud Piarroux, and Stanislas Rebaudet
Table 2
Characteristics for each classification identified for analysis of locality-level determinants of cholera, Haiti*
| Information for each locality | Class 1, n = 651 | Class 2, n = 941 | Class 3, n = 61 | Class 4, n = 77 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median no. suspected cholera cases (IQR) | 0 (0–1) | 0 (0–3) | 0 (0–3) | 6 (1–17) |
| Median no. houses (IQR) | 46 (23–86) | 79 (42–127) | 52 (26–79) | 146 (75–315) |
| Median estimated population (IQR) | 212 (106–396) | 364 (194–585) | 240 (120–364) | 673 (346–1,452) |
| Median estimated incidence, cases/10,000 population (IQR) | 0 (0–15.80) | 0 (0–72.31) | 0 (0–111) | 83.0 (8.6–197.2) |
| Median altitude, m (IQR)*† | 665 (520–816) | 287 (232–352) | 284 (227–414) | 339 (265–461) |
| Median distance to nearest improved water source, m (IQR)*† | 1,213 (665–1,819) | 712 (429–1,203) | 721 (263–1,357) | 338 (233–585) |
| Median distance to nearest unimproved water source, m (IQR)*† | 576 (331–1,080) | 439 (317–593) | 163 (136–183) | 347 (274–533) |
| Median distance to nearest river, m (IQR)†‡ | 2,932 (2,047–4,434) | 805 (447–1,346) | 177 (156–193) | 578 (353–1,407) |
| Median distance to nearest road, m (IQR)†‡ | 1,544 (882–2,462) | 390 (133–816) | 210 (70–594) | 135 (29–279) |
| No. (%) markets† | 0 | 0 | 2 (3) | 48 (62) |
| No. (%) rural locations† | 651 (100) | 941 (100) | 57 (93) | 40 (52) |
| Standardized incidence ratio (95% CI), p value | Referent | 1.28 (0.96–1.71), 0.0896 | 1.71 (1.02–2.87), <0.05 | 1.69 (1.25–2.29), <0.01 |
*Class 1 was the reference class, situated at high altitude, and furthest from river and sources. Class 2 was not much more at risk, characterized by a medium distance to roads. Classes 3 and 4 were much more at-risk. Class 3 localities were closer to a river or an unimproved water source and class 4 localities were more often urban with a market. †Active variables used in classification analysis. ‡Transformed to categorical variables for analysis.
Page created: November 23, 2020
Page updated: December 21, 2020
Page reviewed: December 21, 2020
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
Content Credential