Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 27, Number 11—November 2021
Dispatch

Epidemiologic Analysis of Efforts to Achieve and Sustain Malaria Elimination along the China–Myanmar Border

Fang Huang, Li Zhang, Hong Tu, Yan-Wen Cui, Shui-Sen Zhou, Zhi-Gui XiaComments to Author , and Hong-Ning ZhouComments to Author 
Author affiliations: National Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (Chinese Center for Tropical Diseases Research), Shanghai, China (F. Huang, L. Zhang, H. Tu, Y.-W. Cui, S.-S. Zhou, Z.-G. Xia); NHC Key Laboratory of Parasite and Vector Biology, Shanghai (F. Huang, L. Zhang, H. Tu, Y.-W. Cui, S.-S. Zhou, Z.-G. Xia); World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Tropical Diseases, Shanghai (F. Huang, L. Zhang, H. Tu, Y.-W. Cui, S.-S. Zhou, Z.-G. Xia); National Center for International Research on Tropical Diseases, Shanghai, China (F. Huang, L. Zhang, H. Tu, Y.-W. Cui, S.-S. Zhou, Z.-G. Xia); Yunnan Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Puer, China (H.-N. Zhou)

Main Article

Table 2

Characteristics of implementation of the 1-3-7 approach to malaria surveillance and response in 18 counties in China along the border with Myanmar, 2013–2019*

County
 No. reported cases
 Days from illness onset to diagnosis, median (IQR)
 Days from diagnosis to treatment, median (IQR)
 Case reported within 1 d, %
 Case investigated within 3 d, %
 Foci response within 7 d, %
Zhenkang 6 4.5 (4–7.3) 0.0 (0–0.75) 100.0 100.0 –
Menghai 3 10.0 (6–12) 0.0 (0–0.5) 100.0 100.0 –
Lancang 9 7.0 (3–11) 0.0 (0) 100.0 100.0 –
Jinghong 14 5.0 (3–6) 0.0 (0) 100.0 92.9 –
Gengma 29 3.0 (1–6) 0.0 (0–1) 100.0 82.8 100.0 (4/4)
Mengla 30 2.0 (1–5) 0.0 (0–1) 100.0 93.3 100.0 (1/1)
Menglian 20 3.5 (0–7.5) 0.0 (0–2.25) 100.0 100.0 100.0 (1/1)
Lushui 18 6.5 (3–10) 0.0 (0) 100.0 100.0 –
Ximeng 4 4.5 (3.8–6) 0.5 (0–1) 100.0 100.0 –
Fugong 11 4.0 (3–6.5) 0.0 (0) 100.0 100.0 –
Cangyuan 35 4.0 (2–7.5) 0.0 (0) 100.0 97.1 –
Longchuan 69 2.0 (1–4) 0.0 (0–1) 100.0 82.6 100.0 (20/20)
Longling 75 3.0 (2–5) 0.0 (0) 100.0 98.7 85.7 (6/7)
Gongshan 5 4.0 (1–5) 0.0 (0–5) 100.0 100.0 100.0 (1/1)
Mangshi 112 3.0 (1–4) 0.0 (0–2) 100.0 92.0 96.2 (25/26)
Tengchong 525 2.0 (1–4) 0.0 (0–2) 100.0 95.6 98.0 (48/49)
Yingjiang 895 2.0 (1–4) 0.0 (0) 100.0 88.4 98.5 (256/261)
Ruili 362 2.5 (1–5) 0.0 (0) 100.0 97.2 100.0 (19/19)

*IQR, interquartile range, –, no focus reported.

Main Article

Page created: August 25, 2021
Page updated: October 19, 2021
Page reviewed: October 19, 2021
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external