Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 27, Number 2—February 2021
Synopsis

Characteristics of Patients Co-infected with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 and Dengue Virus, Buenos Aires, Argentina, March–June 2020

Lucila M. Carosella, Daniel Pryluka, Aldo Maranzana, Laura Barcan, Rosana Cuini, Cristina Freuler, Alfredo Martinez, Tomás Rivero Equiza, Carolina Rodriguez Peria, Diego Yahni, Martin E. StryjewskiComments to Author , and for the COVIDENGUE Study Group1
Author affiliations: Centro de Educación Médica e Investigaciones Clínicas, Buenos Aires, Argentina (L.M. Carosella, A. Martinez, T. Rivero Equiza, M.E. Stryjewski); Sanatorio Otamendi, Buenos Aires (D. Pryluka); General Hospital de Agudos Parmenio Piñero Gobierno de la Ciudad, Buenos Aires (A. Maranzana); Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires (L. Barcan); Hospital de Agudos Dr. Teodoro Álvarez, Buenos Aires (R. Cuini); Hospital Alemán, Buenos Aires (C. Freuler); Sanatorio de Los Arcos, Buenos Aires (C. Rodriguez Peria),; Sanatorio Mutual del Transporte Automotor, Buenos Aires (D. Yahni)

Cite This Article

Abstract

An epidemic of dengue virus and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) co-infections occurred in Argentina during 2020. We describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes in a cohort of patients hospitalized because of co-infection. We retrospectively identified 13 patients from different hospitals in Buenos Aires who had confirmed infection with SARS-CoV-2 and dengue virus and obtained clinical and laboratory data from clinical records. All patients had febrile disease when hospitalized. Headache was a common symptom. A total of 8 patients had respiratory symptoms, 5 had pneumonia, and 3 had rash. Nearly all patients had lymphopenia when hospitalized. No patients were admitted to an intensive care unit or died during follow up. Co-infection with SARS-CoV-2 and dengue virus can occur in patients living in areas in which both viruses are epidemic. The outcome of these patients did not seem to be worse than those having either SARS-CoV-2 or dengue infection alone.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which produces coronavirus disease (COVID-19), and dengue caused an epidemic in Argentina during 2020. During March 3–October 25, 2020, a total of 1,090,589 confirmed cases of infection with SARS-CoV-2 were reported in this country. Of these cases, 143,990 were reported in Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires (1). During January 4–June 13, 2020, there were ≈7,300 confirmed cases of dengue virus infection in this city (2).

Although co-infection with these 2 virus is a major concern, it has only been reported in individual patients (35). Information from cohorts of co-infected patients is still lacking. We describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes in a cohort of patients co-infected with SARS-CoV-2 and dengue virus in Buenos Aires.

Methods

Using a network of colleagues (COVIDENGUE Study Group), we retrospectively identified patients co-infected with SARS-CoV-2 and dengue virus during March–June 2020. Seven sites were in Buenos Aires, and an additional site was in the surrounding area. Through June 30, 2020, healthcare admission was mandated in Argentina for any patient with confirmed COVID-19. Therefore, all patients had complete information regarding signs and symptoms at hospitalization, as well as their hospital course. Clinical data were obtained in a predesigned clinical report form by reviewing medical records.

Infection with SARS-CoV-2 was diagnosed by using real-time PCR of nasopharyngeal swab specimens, as approved by the Ministry of Health in reference laboratories. Dengue was diagnosed by either detection of nonstructural protein 1 (NS1), real-time PCR, or serologic conversion. Severe dengue was defined by presence of respiratory distress, severe bleeding, or organ impairment. Mild COVID-19 was defined by absence of pneumonia or pneumonia without impairment in oxygenation for otherwise stable patients. Patients requiring supplemental oxygen were considered to have moderate-to-severe COVID-19. Patients were followed up for 4 weeks from their initial hospitalizations. Descriptive statistics were used. This study was approved by the Ethic Committee of Centro de Educación Médica e Investigaciones Clínicas (Buenos Aires, Argentina).

Results

A total of 13 patients who had co-infections with SARS-CoV-2 and dengue virus were identified. Most patients were relatively young (median age 37 years), 46% were female, and 54% reported >1 concurrent condition. All patients had febrile disease at hospitalization (Table). The median duration of fever was 7 days; 9 (69%) patients had fever for >5 days. Headache was a common symptom among co-infected patients. A total of 8 patients (62%) had respiratory symptoms. Symptoms of lower respiratory tract infection were present in 4 (31%) patients; 5 (38%) patients had ground glass opacities consistent with viral pneumonia on computed tomography (CT) scans. Two patients had bilateral infiltrates on a chest radiograph or computed tomography. Rash appeared in 3 patients early in the course of the disease and before resolution of fever. Two of these patients had concomitant pneumonia and rash. Lymphopenia was observed in all but 1 patient (92%), and thrombocytopenia was observed in 46%.

Among patients with fever <5 days, suspicion of dengue was based on a history of recent mosquito bite (2 patients), frontal headache (3 patients), intense myalgia (3 patients), or thrombocytopenia (2 patients). All patients had a diagnosis of COVID-19 by real-time PCR of nasopharyngeal swabs specimens. Dengue was diagnosed by detection of NS1 in >50% of co-infected patients; 4 cases were diagnosed by real-time PCR of serum and 1 by serologic conversion. The patient who had serologic conversion had a first serum sample negative for IgM and IgG. One week later, a second serum sample was positive for both antibodies. All but 1 patient (92%) had mild COVID-19. No patients had severe dengue infection, required admission to an intensive care unit, or died during follow up. All patients fully recovered from their symptoms after 4 weeks.

Discussion

This report of patients co-infected with SARS-CoV-2 and dengue virus provides several useful observations. First, in geographic areas in which both viruses are circulating, co-infections can occur. This concerning possibility, which might impose an additional burden on healthcare systems, has been reported previously (6). In Latin America, >3 million cases of dengue were reported during 2019 (7). Dengue virus circulates epidemically in Argentina, particularly in the northeastern region of this country (8). The most recent epidemic occurred in 2016 (2). In Buenos Aires, the number of cases reported during 2017–2019 was relatively low. For example, during 2018 only 151 cases were reported and during 2019 only 51 cases in this city. However, during 2020, the magnitude of the dengue epidemic in Buenos Aires surpassed case counts for the preceding 10 years. Therefore, given the current circulation of SARS-CoV-2 at high levels, a new epidemic of dengue virus during early 2021 (warm months) could substantially increase the risk for co-infections.

Second, in this scenario of concomitant circulation of SARS-CoV-2 and dengue virus, the distinction between clinical diseases among febrile patients is crucial. Certain clinical characteristics among these co-infected patients are relevant. All patients who had co-infections had fever at hospitalization, and most had fever duration for ≥5 days. Also, >50% of patients with COVID-19 did not have fever at admission (9). Prolonged fever has been associated with more severe disease in patients with COVID-19 (10). Therefore, for most patients with mild COVID-19 in this study, prolonged fever was a clinical clue for suspecting co-infection. Other than fever, headache was the most common symptom in patients with co-infection. Although headache is common in patients who have dengue infection (>90%) (11) it is less commonly observed in patients with COVID-19 (≈13%) (9). For some co-infected patients, a clinical overlap based on hallmarks of both diseases was also noted. For example, 2 patients had pneumonia, suggesting COVID-19, as well as a rash, which can be a hallmark of dengue virus infection. The duration of fever longer than expected for mild COVID-19, headache, rash, or absence of respiratory symptoms should raise the suspicion of a concomitant infection with dengue virus. Therefore, clinical suspicion based on epidemiologic grounds might alert clinicians to order tests for both viruses.

Third, all patients had favorable outcomes for both COVID-19 and dengue virus infections. There is conflictive data on the clinical outcome of co-infection with dengue and other viruses (1214). All but 1 of our patients had mild COVID-19, and none had severe dengue. Our preliminary findings, based on limited data, do not suggest that co-infection with dengue and SARS-CoV-2 viruses worsens clinical outcomes.

Our study had several limitations. False-positive IgM results for dengue have been described for 2 patients who had COVID-19 (15). However, only 1 of our patients had a serologic diagnosis of dengue, and this diagnosis was based on serologic conversion for IgM and IgG. Almost all our patients had positive results for virus NS1 tests or real-time PCR of serum for dengue. Because these tests for dengue have high specificity for acute infection (16), a false-positive diagnosis is unlikely (17). Immune response was not evaluated in our study. Analyzing the immune activation for these co-infected patients would help to clarify the clinical outcomes of these patients who have simultaneous viral infections.

Finally, our data are limited by a small sample size. Our observation on the unaltered clinical course of COVID-19 concomitant with dengue infection needs to be confirmed in larger cohorts of patients, including a comparative analysis of persons infected only with SARS-CoV-2 or dengue virus, and patients who are co-infected with both viruses.

In conclusion, co-infection with SARS-CoV-2 and dengue virus can occur in patients living in areas in which both viruses are epidemic. Some clinical clues can orient physicians to suspect both diseases. Based on limited data, our study suggests that the clinical outcome of these co-infected patients may not be worse than for patients who have either SARS-CoV-2 or dengue infection alone.

Dr. Carosella is a chief resident of internal medicine at the Centro de Educación Médica e Investigaciones Clínicas, Buenos Aires, Argentina. Her primary research interests are cardiology and COVID-19.

Top

Acknowledgments

Members of the COVIDENGUE Study Group: Claudio Basile, Pablo Bonvehi, Patricia Chabay, Mariana De Paz, Cecilia Ezcurra, Diana Ferreño, Margarita Gaset, Daniel Lopez, Cecilia Losada, Veronica Paz, Sandra Paz, and Pedro Wainer.

M.E.S. is a consultant to Basilea and a speaker for Pfeizer.

Top

References

  1. Ministry of Health. Argentina. Daily reported [in Spanish] [cited 2020 Oct 26]. https://www.argentina.gob.ar/coronavirus/informes-diarios/reportes/octubre2020
  2. Weekly Epidemiological Bulletin. Autonomous city of Buenos Aires [in Spanish] [cited 2020 Nov 17]. https://www.buenosaires.gob.ar/sites/gcaba/files/bes_200_se_23_vf.pdf
  3. Bicudo  N, Bicudo  E, Costa  JD, Castro  JALP, Barra  GB. Co-infection of SARS-CoV-2 and dengue virus: a clinical challenge. Braz J Infect Dis. 2020;24:4524. DOIPubMed
  4. Epelboin  L, Blondé  R, Nacher  M, Combe  P, Collet  L. COVID-19 and dengue co-infection in a returning traveller. J Travel Med. 2020;27:taaa114.
  5. Pontes  RL, de Brito  BB, da Silva  FAF, Figueredo  MS, Correia  TML, Teixeira  AF, et al. Coinfection by SARS-CoV-2 and dengue virus in a dual viral circulation setting. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2020;37:101862. DOIPubMed
  6. Lorenz  C, Azevedo  TS, Chiaravalloti-Neto  F. COVID-19 and dengue fever: A dangerous combination for the health system in Brazil. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2020;35:101659. DOIPubMed
  7. Gutierrez  L. PAHO/WHO Data. Dengue cases. Pan American Health Organization/World Health Organization [in Spanish] [cited 2020 Nov 17]. https://www.paho.org/data/index.php/es/temas/indicadores-dengue/dengue-nacional/9-dengue-pais-ano.html?start=1
  8. Integrated Surveillance Bulletin. Ministry of Health, Argentina [in Spanish] [cited 2020 Nov 17]. https://www.argentina.gob.ar/sites/default/files/biv_500_se_24.pdf
  9. Guan  WJ, Ni  ZY, Hu  Y, Liang  WH, Ou  CQ, He  JX, et al.; China Medical Treatment Expert Group for Covid-19. Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:170820. DOIPubMed
  10. Ng  DH, Choy  CY, Chan  YH, Young  BE, Fong  SW, Ng  LF, et al. Fever patterns, cytokine profiles, and outcomes in COVID-19. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2020;7:ofaa375.
  11. Domingues  RB, Kuster  GW, Onuki de Castro  FL, Souza  VA, Levi  JE, Pannuti  CS. Headache features in patients with dengue virus infection. Cephalalgia. 2006;26:87982. DOIPubMed
  12. Carrillo-Hernández  MY, Ruiz-Saenz  J, Villamizar  LJ, Gómez-Rangel  SY, Martínez-Gutierrez  M. Co-circulation and simultaneous co-infection of dengue, chikungunya, and zika viruses in patients with febrile syndrome at the Colombian-Venezuelan border. BMC Infect Dis. 2018;18:61. DOIPubMed
  13. Vogels  CBF, Rückert  C, Cavany  SM, Perkins  TA, Ebel  GD, Grubaugh  ND. Arbovirus coinfection and co-transmission: A neglected public health concern? PLoS Biol. 2019;17:e3000130. DOIPubMed
  14. Perdigão  AC, Ramalho  IL, Guedes  MI, Braga  DN, Cavalcanti  LP, Melo  ME, et al. Coinfection with influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 and dengue virus in fatal cases. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2016;111:58891. DOIPubMed
  15. Yan  G, Lee  CK, Lam  LTM, Yan  B, Chua  YX, Lim  AYN, et al. Covert COVID-19 and false-positive dengue serology in Singapore. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20:536. DOIPubMed
  16. Tang  KF, Ooi  EE. Diagnosis of dengue: an update. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2012;10:895907. DOIPubMed
  17. Chaterji  S, Allen  JC Jr, Chow  A, Leo  YS, Ooi  EE. Evaluation of the NS1 rapid test and the WHO dengue classification schemes for use as bedside diagnosis of acute dengue fever in adults. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2011;84:2248. DOIPubMed

Top

Table

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2702.203439

1Members of the COVIDENGUE Study Group are listed at the end of this article.

Table of Contents – Volume 27, Number 2—February 2021

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Martin E. Stryjewski, Centro de Educación Médica e Investigaciones Clínicas, Coronel Diaz 2423, Buenos Aires 1425, Argentina

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: December 02, 2020
Page updated: January 23, 2021
Page reviewed: January 23, 2021
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external