Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 27, Number 5—May 2021
Research Letter

COVID-19 Co-infection with Legionella pneumophila in 2 Tertiary-Care Hospitals, Germany

Author affiliations: University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany (H.L. Verhasselt, J. Buer, J. Dedy, F. Herbstreit, T. Brenner, P.-M. Rath); Paracelsus Medical University, Nuremberg, Germany (R. Ziegler, J. Steinmann)

Cite This Article

Abstract

We describe screening results for detection of co-infections with Legionella pneumophila in patients infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. In total, 93 patients were tested; 1 was positive (1.1%) for L. pneumophila serogroup 1. Co-infections with L. pneumophila occur in coronavirus disease patients and should not be missed.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, which causes coronavirus disease (COVID-19), is characterized by severe respiratory distress, fever, and cough. High death rates, especially in older persons and those with underlying health conditions, have been described (1). According to World Health Organization guidelines and public health agencies, persons with cardiovascular disease, chronic respiratory disease, diabetes, and cancer are considered to be at increased risk for severe COVID-19. Moreover, the risk of becoming severely ill increases with age >60 years (https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/covid-19-and-ncds).

Groups at risk are largely the same for COVID-19 and Legionnaires’ disease (LD), a severe and potentially fatal pneumonia caused by Legionella spp. These bacteria are found in many environments, including complex building water systems. In Europe and North America, Legionella spp. account for ≈1%–16% of all community-acquired pneumonias that require hospitalization (2); in 2017, the overall notification rate was 1.8/100,000 population for the European Union/European Economic Area (European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications-data/legionnaires-disease-annual-epidemiological-report-2017). L. pneumophila is responsible for >90% of LD cases; specifically, serogroup 1 causes 70%–80% of LD cases in the United States and Europe (3). Currently, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Study Group for Legionella Infections give warning of increased risk for Legionella spp. infections resulting from stagnant or standing water in plumbing systems after the temporary shutdown of buildings and reductions in normal water use (4,5). A single person with SARS-CoV-2 revealed L. pneumophila co-infection in the context of travel (6). This case underlines the importance of making differential diagnoses during the COVID-19 pandemic by diagnostic microbiology to identify other infectious microorganisms causing similar symptoms.

In this retrospective analysis, we evaluated the co-occurrence of infections with L. pneumophila in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2. We performed urine antigen tests for detection of L. pneumophila serogroup 1 (BinaxNOW Legionella; Abbott Rapid Diagnostics Germany GmbH, https://www.de.abbott). We analyzed urine samples from 93 patients from 2 tertiary-care hospitals in Germany: University Hospital Essen, Essen, and General Hospital Nürnberg, Nuremberg. This retrospective study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty at the University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany (approval no. 20–9335-BO).

The cohort was mostly male (71.0%) and had a mean age of 65 years; 90% had symptoms of pneumonia (Table). All were hospitalized, and 38.7% received mechanical ventilation. More than one third of the cohort had >2 underlying conditions and reflected the groups at risk for infection with Legionella spp.

We detected 1 L. pneumophila serogroup 1 antigen in the entire cohort (1.1%). The patient with L. pneumophila serogroup 1 co-infection was a 41-year-old man with severe acute respiratory deficiency syndrome and bronchial asthma as underlying disease; he initially came to the hospital with fever, cough, and dyspnea and had no recent travel history. Before admission to the University Hospital, he was treated with azithromycin and ceftriaxone for 4 days, until a switch to levofloxacin on day 1 after first diagnosis of LD in the referral hospital. In the University Hospital, urine antigen test was still positive, and detection of Legionella spp. DNA from bronchoalveolar fluid revealed a PCR cycle threshold value of 34 (ampliCube Respiratory Panel 1; Mikrogen Diagnostic, https://www.mikrogen.de), which was assessed as negative. To exclude a false-positive antigen test result, we retested this specific urine sample after boiling for 5 min and centrifugation (5 min at 12,000 × g), which yielded a positive result again (7). As of July 2020, the patient was still critically ill, receiving mechanical ventilation and intravenous levofloxacin (500 mg 2×/d; day 6 of levofloxacin treatment).

Xing et al. reported L. pneumophila, detected by indirect immunofluorescence in 20% of COVID-19 patients, as the second most prevalent bacterium causing respiratory disease (Q. Xing et al., unpub. data, https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.02.29.20027698v2). However, cross-reactivity of indirect immunofluorescence tests with other bacterial species has been described. Antibody titers without follow-up should be interpreted with caution because antibodies can be generated even after mild infections and can persist over years.

In view of epidemiologic data, detection of only L. pneumophila serogroup 1 antigen in urine is a suitable diagnostic approach for outpatient-acquired and travel-associated pneumonia, with varying sensitivity and specificity (8). The false-negative rate of this diagnostic approach is low because antigen excretion starts 24 hours after first symptoms and generally persists for weeks, and in rare cases even months (9); positive urine antigen tests can be found after initiation of antimicrobial drug treatment. However, pretest probability of L. pneumophila pneumonia should be reasonably high to have clinical utility (10).

The findings from our small cohort study in 2 geographically distinct areas in Germany indicate that co-infections with L. pneumophila serogroup 1 can occur in patients with COVID-19. Clinicians treating patients positive for SARS-CoV-2 should be aware of possible co-infections with L. pneumophila and should use appropriate diagnostic approaches.

Dr. Verhasselt is a research associate and laboratory head of the serology section of the Institute of Medical Microbiology at University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany. Her primary research interests are diagnosis and therapy of fungal infections and antifungal susceptibility testing.

Top

References

  1. Guan  WJ, Ni  ZY, Hu  Y, Liang  WH, Ou  CQ, He  JX, et al.; China Medical Treatment Expert Group for Covid-19. Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:170820. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Muder  RR, Yu  VL, Fang  GD. Community-acquired Legionnaires’ disease. Semin Respir Infect. 1989;4:329.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Fields  BS, Benson  RF, Besser  RE. Legionella and Legionnaires’ disease: 25 years of investigation. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2002;15:50626. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Guidance for reopening buildings after prolonged shutdown or reduced operation; 2019 [cited 2020 Jul 19]. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/php/building-water-system.html
  5. ESCMID Study Group for Legionella Infections. ESGLI Guidance for managing Legionella in building water systems during the COVID-19 pandemic. 2020 [cited 2020 Dec 15]. https://www.pwtag.org/esgli-guidance-managing-legionella-building-water-systems-covid-19-pandemic
  6. Arashiro  T, Nakamura  S, Asami  T, Mikuni  H, Fujiwara  E, Sakamoto  S, et al. SARS-CoV-2 and legionella co-infection in a person returning from a Nile cruise. J Travel Med. 2020;27:taaa053. DOIGoogle Scholar
  7. Rota  MC, Fontana  S, Montaño-Remacha  C, Scaturro  M, Caporali  MG, Vullo  V, et al. Legionnaires’ disease pseudoepidemic due to falsely positive urine antigen test results. J Clin Microbiol. 2014;52:227980. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Pierre  DM, Baron  J, Yu  VL, Stout  JE. Diagnostic testing for Legionnaires’ disease. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2017;16:59. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Kohler  RB, Winn  WC Jr, Wheat  LJ. Onset and duration of urinary antigen excretion in Legionnaires disease. J Clin Microbiol. 1984;20:6057. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Dionne  M, Hatchette  T, Forward  K. Clinical utility of a Legionella pneumophila urinary antigen test in a large university teaching hospital. Can J Infect Dis. 2003;14:858. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Table

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2705.203388

Original Publication Date: April 12, 2021

Table of Contents – Volume 27, Number 5—May 2021

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Hedda Luise Verhasselt, Institute of Medical Microbiology, University Hospital Essen, Virchowstr 179, 45147 Essen, Germany

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: April 05, 2021
Page updated: April 21, 2021
Page reviewed: April 21, 2021
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external