Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link

Disclaimer: Early release articles are not considered as final versions. Any changes will be reflected in the online version in the month the article is officially released.

Volume 28, Number 2—February 2022
Research Letter

Genetic Diversity of Bartonella spp. in Cave-Dwelling Bats and Bat Flies, Costa Rica, 2018

Figures
Tables
Article Metrics
Miranda M. Mitchell1, Amanda Vicente-Santos1, Bernal Rodríguez-Herrera, Eugenia Corrales-Aguilar, and Thomas R. GillespieComments to Author 
Author affiliations: Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA (M.M. Mitchell, A. Vicente-Santos, T.R. Gillespie); University of Costa Rica, San José, Costa Rica (B. Rodríguez-Herrera, E. Corrales-Aguilar)

Suggested citation for this article

Abstract

To determine Bartonella spp. dynamics, we sampled bats and bat flies across 15 roosts in Costa Rica. PCR indicated prevalence of 10.7% in bats and 29.0% in ectoparasite pools. Phylogenetic analysis of 8 sequences from bats and 5 from bat fly pools revealed 11 distinct genetic variants, including 2 potentially new genotypes.

Bartonella, the causative agent of bartonellosis, is a genus of gram-negative bacteria. Bartonellosis causes a range of symptoms from severe to life-threatening (e.g., endocarditis and meningitis). Clinical syndromes from Bartonella infections include trench fever (B. quintana), cat scratch disease (B. henselae), and Carrion’s disease (B. bacilliformis) (1). Bats (Order Chiroptera) and their blood-feeding ectoparasitic bat flies (Superfamily Hippoboscoidea) host a diversity of Bartonella species, awakening interest in their potential role as natural reservoirs for this pathogen (2,3). To learn more about this interplay, we examined the genetic diversity and geographic sharing of Bartonella spp. in diverse assemblages of bats and bat flies across Costa Rica.

In 2018, we nonlethally sampled 321 bats (18 species) by using hand nets, mist nets, and harp traps across 15 roosts throughout Costa Rica (Appendix Figure). We took blood samples from 252 bats (16 species) and collected 114 ectoparasites from 48 bats, following Emory University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee protocol (DAR-4000049-ENTRPR-N) and with the approval of the National System of Conservation Areas (SINAC-Costa Rica) (research permit nos. R-SINAC-PNI-ACAHN-016–2018, M-P-SINAC-PNI-ACAT-035–2018, SINAC-ACC-PI-R-068–2018, R-SINAC-ACG-PI-030–2018, R-SINAC-PNI-ACLAC-044–2018, SINAC-ACOPAC-D-RES-063–2018, INV-ACOSA-046–18, ACT-OR-DR-066–18). We taxonomically identified the bats and bat flies (46), pooled the bat flies (1–8 bat flies/pool) by individual bat host and bat fly species (62 pools) and extracted DNA from bat blood and ectoparasite pooled samples. We screened extracted DNA for Bartonella spp. by amplifying a 770-bp portion of the partial citrate synthase gene (gltA) (7) and using B. doshiae as a positive control (provided by M. Kosoy, M. Rosales Rizzo, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). Samples positive by PCR were sequenced for confirmation.

To create global phylogenies, we trimmed obtained consensus sequences to 768 bp and aligned them to 45 genetic sequences: 28 from known Bartonella species, 12 Bartonella sequences from bats and bat flies in Costa Rica (8), 4 sequences from bats in Guatemala (9), and 1 sequence from Mexico (3). We used B. tamiae and Brucella melitensis as outgroups to root the tree. We created the alignment by using the multiple alignment program MAFFT (https://mafft.cbrc.jp/alignment/software), manually checked in MEGA X (https://www.megasoftware.net), and further refined with alignment refinement tool Gblocks version 0.91b (http://molevol.cmima.csic.es/castresana/Gblocks/Gblocks_documentation.html). We constructed the global phylogenetic tree by using Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo analyses (MrBayes 2.2.4, https://www.geneious.com) with 1 million generations and a burn-in fraction of 25% and determined the parameters for the nucleotide changes (MEGA X).

Figure

Phylogenetic tree of 768 bp partial gltA gene of Bartonella variants found in study of Bartonella spp. in bats and bat flies sampled from roost sites, Costa Rica, 2018 (blue), compared with globally named species and other variants found in bats and bat flies in Central America and Mexico. Each sequence is labeled with its GenBank accession number, the organism on which it was detected, and the country of origin. For species in this study, we included the specific site (accession numbers in Appendix Table). Underlining indicates the potential newly described genotypes. We constructed the global phylogenetic tree by using Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo (MrBayes 2.2.4, https://www.geneious.com), with 1 million generations and a burn-in fraction of 25%. We determined the parameters for the nucleotide changes by using MEGA X (https://mafft.cbrc.jp/alignment/software). Inner node labels identify consensus support. Scale bar indicates nucleotide substitutions/site (%).

Figure. Phylogenetic tree of 768 bp partial gltA gene of Bartonella variants found in study of Bartonellaspp. in bats and bat flies sampled from roost...

Bartonella prevalence from all samples, determined by PCR, was 14.3% (45/314), 10.7% (27/252) for bats and 29.0% (18/62) for ectoparasite pools (Table). Bartonella seems to be widespread and diverse in bats and bat flies in Costa Rica, where 6 of the 16 bat species and 9 of the 23 bat fly species were positive for the bacterium. Because of sequence quality, we included only 8 Bartonella sequences from bats and 6 from bat fly pools in phylogenetic analyses, which revealed 11 genetic variants, including 2 potentially new genotypes (93.2% similarity value; Figure; Appendix Table). These 11 genetic variants clustered into 9 clades of 96.0%–99.2% similarity.

Our results suggest that within Costa Rica variants are shared between bats and their flies in different parts of the country and in different years. For example, Bartonella sequences from Emus Cave (GenBank accession no. MW115627) and Túnel Arenal (GenBank accession no. MW115628) at opposite ends of the country (clade V; Appendix Figure) clustered together with sequences from a study conducted in Costa Rica in 2015 (8). In addition, Bartonella sequences from our study clustered with previously identified sequences from bats and bat flies from Guatemala (9) and Mexico (3), suggesting wide geographic distribution.

We also found a high level of diversity of Bartonella variants within caves and species (Figure). For example, Bartonella sequences from different bats (of same and different species) in Emus Cave clustered in 4 distinct clades. In addition, Carollia perspicillata bats, the most sampled species in our study, carried Bartonella with sequences from 6 distinct clades. This finding suggests that >1 Bartonella strain is circulating within bat species, even within the same cave.

When assessing spillover risk to humans and domestic animals, we found that the Bartonella sequences we detected did not cluster with Bartonella species known to cause infection in humans and other animals and did not significantly overlap with sequences from any globally identified species (Figure). To fully assess potential for Bartonella spillover from bat and bat fly species to other animals and humans, further analyses should be conducted.

In conclusion, we found Bartonella species to be diverse, prevalent, and potentially widely shared among species of bats and bat flies in Costa Rica and Mesoamerica. We expanded existing scientific knowledge on the prevalence and diversity of Bartonella in bats and bat flies in Costa Rica by including species that were not previously tested and described as positive by PCR for these bacteria. We also described 2 new Bartonella genotypes through phylogenetic analysis. Information about the dynamics of Bartonella in its natural hosts can be used to predict and avert further Bartonella emergence.

Ms. Mitchell is an ORISE Fellow at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. Her primary research interests include environmental health, infectious disease epidemiology, molecular biology, public health assessment, and bioinformatics.

Top

Acknowledgments

We thank the Anthros Speleology Group and Paula Ledezma-Campos for their assistance in the field and Hunter Seabolt and Christopher Phipps for guidance with molecular and phylogenetic analyses.

This investigation was funded by the American Museum of Natural History, the Fulbright Association, the American Society of Mammalogists, the Cave Research Foundation, the University of Costa Rica, the Emory University Global Health Institute, and the Emory University Department of Environmental Sciences.

Top

References

  1. Harms  A, Dehio  C. Intruders below the radar: molecular pathogenesis of Bartonella spp. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2012;25:4278. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. McKee  CD, Bai  Y, Webb  CT, Kosoy  MY. Bats are key hosts in the radiation of mammal-associated Bartonella bacteria. Infect Genet Evol. 2021;89:104719. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Stuckey  MJ, Chomel  BB, de Fleurieu  EC, Aguilar-Setién  A, Boulouis  HJ, Chang  CC. Bartonella, bats and bugs: A review. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2017;55:209. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. York  HA, Rodríguez-Herrera  B, LaVal  RK, Timm  RM, Lindsay  KE. Field key to the bats of Costa Rica and Nicaragua. J Mammal. 2019;100:172649. DOIGoogle Scholar
  5. Wenzel  RL. The streblid batflies of Venezuela (Diptera: Streblidae). Brigham Young Univ Sci Bull. 1976;20:1177.
  6. Wenzel  RL, Tipton  VJ. Ectoparasites of Panama. In: Chicago, Field Museum of Natural History. Chicago: University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; 1966. p. 882.
  7. Billeter  SA, Hayman  DTS, Peel  AJ, Baker  K, Wood  JLN, Cunningham  A, et al. Bartonella species in bat flies (Diptera: Nycteribiidae) from western Africa. Parasitology. 2012;139:3249. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Judson  SD, Frank  HK, Hadly  EA. Bartonellae are prevalent and diverse in Costa Rican bats and bat flies. Zoonoses Public Health. 2015;62:60917. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bai  Y, Kosoy  M, Recuenco  S, Alvarez  D, Moran  D, Turmelle  A, et al. Bartonella spp. in Bats, Guatemala. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17:126972. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Figures
Table

Top

Suggested citation for this article: Mitchell MM, Vicente-Santos A, Rodríguez-Herrera B, Corrales-Aguilar E, Gillespie TR. Genetic diversity of Bartonella spp. in cave-dwelling bats and bat flies, Costa Rica, 2018. Emerg. Infect Dis. 2022 Feb [date cited]. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2802.21686

DOI: 10.3201/eid2802.211686

Original Publication Date: January 14, 2022

1These authors contributed equally to this article.

Table of Contents – Volume 28, Number 2—February 2022

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Thomas Gillespie, Emory University, Ste E510, 400 Dowman Dr, Atlanta, GA 30222, USA

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: December 03, 2021
Page updated: January 14, 2022
Page reviewed: January 14, 2022
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external