Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 28, Number 4—April 2022

SARS-CoV-2 Outbreak among Malayan Tigers and Humans, Tennessee, USA, 2020

Heather N. GromeComments to Author , Becky Meyer, Erin Read, Martha Buchanan, Andrew Cushing, Kaitlin Sawatzki, Kara J. Levinson, Linda S. Thomas, Zachary Perry, Anna Uehara, Ying Tao, Krista Queen, Suxiang Tong, Ria Ghai, Mary-Margaret Fill, Timothy F. Jones, William Schaffner, and John Dunn
Author affiliations: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA (H.N. Grome, A. Uehara, Y. Tao, K. Queen, S. Tong, R. Ghai); Tennessee Department of Health, Nashville, Tennessee, USA (H.N. Grome, M.-M. Fill, T.F. Jones, J. Dunn); Knox County Health Department, Knoxville, Tennessee (B. Meyer, E. Read, M. Buchanan); University of Tennessee College of Veterinary Medicine, Knoxville (A. Cushing); Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine at Tufts University, North Grafton, Massachusetts, USA (K. Sawatzki); Tennessee Laboratory Services, Nashville (K.J. Levinson, L.S. Thomas, Z. Perry); Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville (W. Schaffner)

Cite This Article


We report an outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 involving 3 Malayan tigers (Panthera tigris jacksoni) at a zoo in Tennessee, USA. Investigation identified naturally occurring tiger-to-tiger transmission; genetic sequence change occurred with viral passage. We provide epidemiologic, environmental, and genomic sequencing data for animal and human infections.

In October 2020, the Tennessee Department of Health (Nashville, Tennessee, USA) was notified of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in 3 Malayan tigers (Panthera tigris jacksoni) at a zoo in the state. Felids, including domestic cats and exotic big cats, have greater susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection than other species (14). Infected domestic cats can transmit the virus to other cats via respiratory droplets or direct contact (46). However, the risk for cat-to-human transmission remains unclear. We investigated the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak in Tennessee to determine its source and provide recommendations to control the spread of infection.

The Study

Tiger 1, the index case, began showing clinical signs of coronavirus disease (COVID-19), including lethargy, anorexia, and nonproductive cough, on October 12, 2020. Subsequent onset of clinical signs occurred in tiger 2 on October 16 and in tiger 3 on October 17. Oropharyngeal swab specimens were collected under sedation on October 19 and October 27 for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic testing and submitted to the Runstadler Laboratory, Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine at Tufts University (North Grafton, Massachusetts, USA) for initial testing for open reading frame (ORF) 1b-nsp14 (7). Presumptive positive SARS-CoV-2 diagnoses were made in all 3 animals by real-time reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) performed by using Mag-Bind Viral RNA Xpress Kit (Omega BioTek, and UltraPlex 1-Step ToughMix (Quantabio, Tiger specimens were then sent to the US Department of Agriculture National Veterinary Services Laboratories (Ames, Iowa, USA) for confirmation by RT-PCR and whole-genome sequencing (3).

We conducted an environmental assessment at the zoo on October 29, 2020. The tiger exhibit has 3 primary outdoor visitor viewing areas: 2 outdoor viewing areas with fencing between humans and animals creating a separation of ≈6 feet, and 1 outdoor overhead viewpoint where visitors could view animals from a platform >8 feet above the tiger enclosure. The tiger’s off-exhibit den areas have concrete walls between each animal enclosure and metal interior caging with open airflow that enables keepers to see the tigers. The den areas are directly adjacent to or across from each other.

We observed consistent use of personal protective equipment by zoo employees and veterinary students according to zoo policy. All employees and students in close contact with the tigers before the animals began to show signs of illness wore disposable gloves and cloth facemasks. After the onset of clinical signs of illness and SARS-CoV-2 testing in tigers, persons in the tiger den area wore protective coveralls, disposable gloves, and plastic face shields. At the time of this outbreak in October 2020, fewer data existed for relative mask efficacy, and mask types were not further specified by zoo policy.

Before and after onset of animal illness, cleaning practices in the off-exhibit cages included use of high-pressure water hoses to clean the floors. Staff used disinfectants daily in the den area, and we confirmed disinfectants were on the US Environmental Protection Agency’s List N: Disinfectants for Coronavirus (COVID-19) ( All zoo employees and veterinary students used a self-reported evaluation tool via mobile phone that screened for COVID-19 symptoms before their shifts. Zoo visitors were encouraged to wear masks; masks were not required in outdoor spaces at the time of this outbreak.

We also conducted an epidemiologic investigation on October 29, 2020. Our investigation focused on the timeframe beginning 2 weeks before onset of index tiger clinical signs (starting September 28) until date of investigation (October 29). We identified 18 zoo employees and veterinary students who prepared food for or were in close contact with the tigers during this timeframe. For this investigation, we defined close contact to tigers as being within 6 feet of any tiger at the zoo for any length of time during the observation period (September 28–October 29). We selected these proximity criteria based on the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) definition of close contact defined (8); however, SARS-CoV-2 transmission can occur from inhalation of virus in the air >6 feet from an infectious source (9,10). During the week after the index tiger showed signs of illness, community transmission of SARS-CoV-2 was at a 7-day average of 101 new cases/day in the county where this zoo is located, and the 7-day test positivity rate was 10.2%.

Figure 1

Timeline of events identified during the epidemiologic investigation of an outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 infection among Malayan tigers and humans at a zoo, Tennessee, USA, October 12–30, 2020. Dates related to tiger events are shown above the timeline; dates related to human events are shown below the timeline. Ct values for the first positive open reading frame 1b reverse transcription PCR test per animal are shown; methods for extraction and Ct value calculation were described previously by Sawatzki et al. (11). Ct, cycle threshold; SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.

Figure 1. Timeline of events identified during the epidemiologic investigation of an outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 infection among Malayan tigers and humans at a zoo, Tennessee, USA, October 12–30, 2020. Dates related to...

We identified 2 employees with COVID-19 during the September 28–October 29 timeframe: a tiger keeper and veterinary clinic assistant. Contact tracing identified an additional household contact to the SARS-CoV-2–positive tiger keeper, but no other SARS-CoV-2–positive contacts were identified. We created a timeline comparing signs of animal illness onset and RT-PCR cycle threshold values with dates of zoo employee symptom onset and testing (Figure 1).

We sent specimens from all zoo employees and veterinary students who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 to CDC for sequencing and genomic analyses. CDC staff performed whole-genome sequencing as previously described (12). We phylogenetically compared tiger sequences with 30 sequences from geographically-associated human SARS-CoV-2 cases collected from the county surrounding the zoo during October 29–November 12, 2020. We also compared tiger sequences with 233 statewide background sequences from specimens collected in Tennessee during March 1–November 12, 2020.

Figure 2

Whole-genome phylogenetic analysis from of an outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 infection among Malayan tigers and humans at a zoo, Tennessee, USA, October 2020. The tree shows a close-up view of clade 20G divergence estimates from the SARS-CoV-2 Wuhan-Hu-1 reference genome and sequences from humans living in Tennessee and Malayan tigers sampled during the outbreak investigation. Sequence analysis showed 3–6 SNP differences between 1 human tiger keeper and all 3 tiger sequences (GISAID accession nos. EPI_ISL_292844–6). Differences are indicated by 1-step edges (lines) between colored dots (individual SARS-CoV-2 sequenced infections). Numbers indicate unique sequences. Phylogenetic relationships were inferred through approximate maximum-likelihood analyses implemented in TreeTime (13) by using the NextStrain pipeline (14). All high-quality genome sequences from Tennessee were downloaded from the GISAID ( database on March 16, 2021. Pangolin lineages for investigation sequences were assigned on March 16, 2021. Not all analyzed sequences are shown in this figure because some were outside clade 20G. CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphism.

Figure 2. Whole-genome phylogenetic analysis from of an outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 infection among Malayan tigers and humans at a zoo, Tennessee, USA, October 2020. The tree shows a close-up view of clade...

Most viral sequences clustered into NextStrain Clade 20G and Pangolin lineage B.1.2, which correspond to the predominant clades observed for human specimens from Tennessee during the time of the outbreak at the zoo. Nucleotide sequence analysis of viral sequences from the tigers (GISAID accession nos. EPI_ISL_2928444–6; and the tiger keeper (GenBank accession no. OK170070) also clustered in SARS-CoV-2 clade 20G by Nextstrain tree (Figure 2). The multiple alignment of 4 SARS-CoV-2 genome sequences (tigers 1, 2, and 3 and the tiger keeper) showed a total of 6 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) across 4 genomes. Sequences from tigers 1 and 2 were identical and had no substitutions compared with the reference sequence at those 6 SNP positions. Tiger 3’s SARS-CoV-2 sequence contained 3 substitutions that were nonsynonymous G12565T (ORF1a: Q4100H), C17822T (ORF1b: P1452L), and G19889A (ORF1b: R2141K), and the tiger keeper’s SARS-CoV-2 genome sequence had 3 synonymous substitutions (C1498T, C24904T, T26048C) compared with tigers 1 and 2. SARS-CoV-2 genome sequences from the tiger keeper and tiger 3 had 6 SNP differences. Genomic and epidemiologic data suggest that tiger-to-tiger transmission occurred under natural conditions, and genetic change occurred in vivo for tiger 3’s sequence.


We describe SARS-CoV-2 infection in captive tigers with respiratory clinical signs and provide additional evidence for nonhuman species as hosts for SARS-CoV-2. Findings of this study support tigers’ susceptibility to the virus and potential for sustained transmission among large cats and a risk for zoonotic transmission to humans. The SARS-CoV-2 sequence from the tiger keeper was 3 SNPs different from tigers 1 and 2 and 6 SNPs different from tiger 3. The close genetic relationship between viruses of the tigers and tiger keeper is consistent with the timing of clinical signs of illness and job duties of the tiger keeper, although transmission source or zoonotic transmission cannot be proven from these data alone.

These findings have implications for both the public health and zoologic communities. Zoos should be aware of the possibility of animal infection through incidental exposure by the public or asymptomatic staff members. Humans with known or suspected infection should avoid direct or indirect exposure to susceptible species unless completely unavoidable to avoid potential transmission. Results of this investigation should also prompt zoo and wildlife organizations to reevaluate biosecurity and administrative protocols to minimize risk to and from employees, students, volunteers, and the visiting public interacting with susceptible species.

Dr. Grome is an infectious diseases physician and Epidemic Intelligence Service officer in the Center For Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia. She is currently assigned to the Tennessee Department of Health in Nashville, Tennessee. Her research interests include communicable disease prevention for vulnerable populations.



This work was support by the National Institutes of Health (grant no. HHSN272201400008C/AI/NIAID to K.S.)



  1. Bosco-Lauth  AM, Hartwig  AE, Porter  SM, Gordy  PW, Nehring  M, Byas  AD, et al. Experimental infection of domestic dogs and cats with SARS-CoV-2: Pathogenesis, transmission, and response to reexposure in cats. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020;117:263828. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bao  L, Song  Z, Xue  J, Gao  H, Liu  J, Wang  J, et al. Susceptibility and attenuated transmissibility of SARS-CoV-2 in domestic cats. J Infect Dis. 2021;223:131321. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. McAloose  D, Laverack  M, Wang  L, Killian  ML, Caserta  LC, Yuan  F, et al. From people to Panthera: natural SARS-CoV-2 infection in tigers and lions at the Bronx Zoo. MBio. 2020;11:e0222020. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Shi  J, Wen  Z, Zhong  G, Yang  H, Wang  C, Huang  B, et al. Susceptibility of ferrets, cats, dogs, and other domesticated animals to SARS-coronavirus 2. Science. 2020;368:101620. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Halfmann  PJ, Hatta  M, Chiba  S, Maemura  T, Fan  S, Takeda  M, et al. Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in domestic cats. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:5924. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Barrs  VR, Peiris  M, Tam  KWS, Law  PYT, Brackman  CJ, To  EMW, et al. SARS-CoV-2 in quarantined domestic cats from COVID-19 households or close contacts, Hong Kong, China. Emerg Infect Dis. 2020;26:30714. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Case investigation & contact tracing guidance 2021 [cited 2021 September 30].
  9. Cai  J, Sun  W, Huang  J, Gamber  M, Wu  J, He  G. Indirect virus transmission in cluster of COVID-19 cases, Wenzhou, China. Emerg Infect Dis. 2020;26:13435. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Jang  S, Han  SH, Rhee  JY. Cluster of coronavirus disease associated with fitness dance classes, South Korea. Emerg Infect Dis. 2020;26:191720. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Sawatzki  K, Hill  NJ, Puryear  WB, Foss  AD, Stone  JJ, Runstadler  JA. Host barriers to SARS-CoV-2 demonstrated by ferrets in a high-exposure domestic setting. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021;118:e2025601118. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Paden  CR, Tao  Y, Queen  K, Zhang  J, Li  Y, Uehara  A, et al. Rapid, sensitive, full-genome sequencing of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. Emerg Infect Dis. 2020;26:24015. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Sagulenko  P, Puller  V, Neher  RA. TreeTime: Maximum-likelihood phylodynamic analysis. Virus Evol. 2018;4:vex042. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Hadfield  J, Megill  C, Bell  SM, Huddleston  J, Potter  B, Callender  C, et al. Nextstrain: real-time tracking of pathogen evolution. Bioinformatics. 2018;34:41213. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar




Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2804.212219

Table of Contents – Volume 28, Number 4—April 2022

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Heather N. Grome, Tennessee Department of Health, Communicable Diseases and Emergency Preparedness Division, 710 James Robertson Pkwy, Nashville, TN 37243, USA

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: February 18, 2022
Page updated: March 19, 2022
Page reviewed: March 19, 2022
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.