Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 29, Number 5—May 2023
Research Letter

Genome Analysis of Triploid Hybrid Leishmania Parasite from the Neotropics

Author affiliations: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (F. Van den Broeck, S. Heeren); Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium (F. Van den Broeck, S. Heeren, I. Maes, J.-C. Dujardin, G. Van der Auwera); Wellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK (M. Sanders, J.A. Cotton); Instituto Oswaldo Cruz–Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (E. Cupolillo); Cayetano Heredia University, Lima, Peru (E. Alvarez); Universidad Mayor de San Simon, Cochabamba, Bolivia (L. Garcia); Centre Hospitalier Universitaire St. Pierre, Brussels, Belgium (M. Tasia, A. Marneffe)

Cite This Article

Abstract

We discovered a hybrid Leishmania parasite in Costa Rica that is genetically similar to hybrids from Panama. Genome analyses demonstrated the hybrid is triploid and identified L. braziliensis and L. guyanensis–related strains as parents. Our findings highlight the existence of poorly sampled Leishmania (Viannia) variants infectious to humans.

Leishmania are intracellular protozoan parasites that cause the vectorborne disease leishmaniasis, which occurs in ≈88 countries (1). Human infection can result in 2 main forms of disease, cutaneous and visceral leishmaniasis, and different Leishmania species cause diverse clinical manifestations and sequelae (1). Correct species typing is thus required to clinically manage leishmaniasis (2).

In August 2020, a patient returning from Costa Rica sought care at the Hospital St. Pierre (Brussels, Belgium) with a single, well-demarcated, ulcerated erythematous plaque on the left flank indicative of cutaneous leishmaniasis. Molecular diagnosis confirmed the presence of Leishmania parasites on the basis of 18S ribosomal DNA (3). A 1,245-bp fragment of the multicopy heat-shock protein 70 gene (hsp70) was sequenced for species typing (4). This sequencing revealed an atypical sequence related to both the L. guyanensis and L. braziliensis species that showed sequence variation across copies at 10 positions, suggesting either a mixed infection or hybrid parasite. Despite the atypical nature of the infecting species, the patient had good therapeutic response after 5 intralesional injections with meglumine antimoniate (Glucantime, Sanofi, https://www.sanofi.com), leaving only a slightly hyperpigmented scar. The clinical sample was cultured in vitro (referred to as MHOM/CR/2020/StPierre) and subjected to HSP70 typing (4) and whole-genome sequencing (5).

Compared with results for the clinical sample, the consensus sequence of the hsp70 locus in the cultured isolate revealed sequence variation in 1 extra site, bringing the total to 11 (Appendix 1). Of those sites, 10 were shared with 6 cutaneous leishmaniasis strains described from Panama (6). Comparison with all available Leishmania hsp70 sequences from GenBank (Appendix 1) revealed 2 monophyletic groups as the possible origin of the different hsp70 copies in the Costa Rica sequence: first, a subgroup of the L. guyanensis species complex found in Ecuador, Panama, and Colombia; and second, a subgroup of the L. braziliensis species complex described from Panama, Guatemala, and Brazil. Even though such analysis is biased by available sequences and the use of a single chromosomal locus, the geography of the hypothetical parents is compatible with Costa Rica. To further investigate the nature of the Costa Rica isolate, we resorted to genome analysis.

We identified 125,632 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within the sample from Costa Rica after mapping genomic sequences against the L. braziliensis M2904 reference genome (5) (Appendix 2). This total included 21,168 homozygous SNPs (both haplotypes were different from M2904) and 104,464 heterozygous SNPs (one haplotype was similar to M2904 and the other different). Chromosomes 1 and 11, the first 140 kb of chromosome 20, and the last 60 kb of chromosome 27 were highly homozygous, almost completely lacking in heterozygous variants, whereas most variants in the rest of the genome were heterozygous (Appendix 2). This observation of a largely heterozygous genome that is interrupted by homozygous stretches strongly suggests that the isolate is a hybrid parasite, rather than the result of a mixed infection (7).

We investigated chromosome copy numbers by using the distribution of allelic read depth frequencies at heterozygous sites (7), which should be centered around 0.5 in diploid organisms (both alleles represented equally). However, we discovered a bimodal distribution with modes 0.33 and 0.67 (Appendix 2), suggesting that the hybrid is triploid (7).

Figure

Midpoint rooted maximum-likelihood phylogenetic trees based on single-nucleotide polymorphisms called in chromosome 1 and the first 140kb of the telomeric region of chromosome 20 of a hybrid Leishmania parasite from Costa Rica. For each strain, sequences were composed based on concatenated single-nucleotide polymorphisms that were each coded by 2 base pairs, after which invariant sites were removed, resulting in 2,382 bp sequences for chromosome 1 and 3,015 bp sequences for chromosome 20. Consensus phylogenetic trees were generated from 1,000 bootstrap trees using IQ-TREE (http://www.iqtree.org) with 37 taxa (excluding L. naiffi and L. lainsoni strains) under the  transversion with empirical base frequencies, ascertainment bias correction, and discrete gamma with 4 rate categories substitution model, which was the best-fit model revealed by ModelFinder as implemented in IQTREE. Branch support values are presented near each node following 1,000 bootstrap replicates; bootstrap values within the clade containing L. panamensis strains were omitted for clarity reasons. Scale bar indicates number of substitutions per site. Appendix 2) includes a description of the L. braziliensis 1–4 lineages.

Figure. Midpoint rooted maximum-likelihood phylogenetic trees based on single-nucleotide polymorphisms called in chromosome 1 and the first 140kb of the telomeric region of chromosome 20 of a hybrid Leishmaniaparasite...

We analyzed the genomic ancestry of the hybrid compared with 40 genomes of 7 Leishmania (Viannia) species (Appendix 2) using phylogenies based on genomic regions that were homozygous in the hybrid (where both haplotypes originate from the same parental species). In the chromosome 20 phylogeny, the Costa Rica hybrid clusters with L. braziliensis 1 strain Lb8102 from Colombia (Figure; Appendix 2 Figure 8), which could be close to one of the parental strains. The ancestry of the other parental genome remains unclear, because in the chromosome 1 phylogeny it clusters with L. panamensis strains from Colombia and Panama (Figure), even though it is also tightly linked with a cluster of L. guyanensis strains from Venezuela, Brazil, and French Guiana in the mitochondrial maxicircle phylogeny (Appendix 2 Figures 3, 9). We could not resolve the geographic origin of the 2 parents in greater detail because of the lack of available Leishmania (Viannia) genomes.

Our study provides a detailed genomic description of a hybrid between the L. braziliensis and the L. guyanensis species complexes. The first report of such hybrids in Central America dates back to the early 1990s, concerning putative L. braziliensisL. panamensis hybrids from the north of Nicaragua (8). Those hybrids were reported again in 2021 in Panama (6). Further, parasites with signatures from both L. braziliensis and L. guyanensis relatives have been described in South America, more specifically from Ecuador, Peru, Brazil, and Venezuela (9,10). Together with our report from Costa Rica, these reports point to a widespread circulation in the Neotropical region of recombinant strains, the epidemiology and clinical significance of which remain elusive.

Dr. Van den Broeck is a researcher specializing in genetics and population genomics of eukaryote parasites, particularly parasites that cause neglected tropical diseases. He has contributed multiple research papers investigating the complex hybrid ancestry of protozoan parasites, such as Trypanosoma cruzi (agent of Chagas disease) and Leishmania braziliensis (agent of cutaneous leishmaniasis).

Top

Acknowledgments

We thank Pieter Monsieurs for help with generating whole-genome sequence data and Isabel Micalessi and Lara Balcaen for molecular diagnosis of the case.

Genomic sequence reads of MHOM/CR/2020/StPierre are available on the European Nucleotide Archive (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena) under accession no. PRJNA881292. The hsp70 sequence is available from GenBank under accession no. OQ200658.

F.V.D.B. and S.H. acknowledge support from the Research Foundation Flanders (grant nos. 1226120N and G092921N).

Top

References

  1. Torres-Guerrero  E, Quintanilla-Cedillo  MR, Ruiz-Esmenjaud  J, Arenas  R. Leishmaniasis: a review. F1000 Res. 2017;6:750. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Pan American Health Organization. Guideline for the treatment of leishmaniasis in the Americas. 2nd ed. Washington: The Organization; 2022.
  3. van Griensven  J, van Henten  S, Mengesha  B, Kassa  M, Adem  E, Endris Seid  M, et al. Longitudinal evaluation of asymptomatic Leishmania infection in HIV-infected individuals in North-West Ethiopia: A pilot study. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019;13:e0007765. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Van der Auwera  G, Maes  I, De Doncker  S, Ravel  C, Cnops  L, Van Esbroeck  M, et al. Heat-shock protein 70 gene sequencing for Leishmania species typing in European tropical infectious disease clinics. Euro Surveill. 2013;18:20543. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Van den Broeck  F, Savill  NJ, Imamura  H, Sanders  M, Maes  I, Cooper  S, et al. Ecological divergence and hybridization of Neotropical Leishmania parasites. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020;117:2515968. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Miranda  ADC, González  KA, Samudio  F, Pineda  VJ, Calzada  JE, Capitan-Barrios  Z, et al. Molecular identification of parasites causing cutaneous leishmaniasis in Panama. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2021;104:132634. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Tihon  E, Imamura  H, Dujardin  JC, Van Den Abbeele  J, Van den Broeck  F. Discovery and genomic analyses of hybridization between divergent lineages of Trypanosoma congolense, causative agent of Animal African Trypanosomiasis. Mol Ecol. 2017;26:652438. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Belli  AA, Miles  MA, Kelly  JM. A putative Leishmania panamensis/Leishmania braziliensis hybrid is a causative agent of human cutaneous leishmaniasis in Nicaragua. Parasitology. 1994;109:43542. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Brito  MEF, Andrade  MS, Mendonça  MG, Silva  CJ, Almeida  EL, Lima  BS, et al. Species diversity of Leishmania (Viannia) parasites circulating in an endemic area for cutaneous leishmaniasis located in the Atlantic rainforest region of northeastern Brazil. Trop Med Int Health. 2009;14:127886. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Tabbabi  A, Cáceres  AG, Bustamante Chauca  TP, Seki  C, Choochartpong  Y, Mizushima  D, et al. Nuclear and kinetoplast DNA analyses reveal genetically complex Leishmania strains with hybrid and mito-nuclear discordance in Peru. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020;14:e0008797. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Figure

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2905.221456

Original Publication Date: April 11, 2023

1Current affiliation: Wellcome Center for Integrative Parasitology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.

Table of Contents – Volume 29, Number 5—May 2023

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Frederik Van den Broeck or Gert Van der Auwera, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nationalestraat 155, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: March 22, 2023
Page updated: April 19, 2023
Page reviewed: April 19, 2023
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external