Volume 29, Number 8—August 2023
Research
Economic Evaluation of Wastewater Surveillance Combined with Clinical COVID-19 Screening Tests, Japan
Table 4
Parameters | Parameter values | ROI† |
Relative ROI‡ | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Option 1 | Option 2 | |||
Test characteristics | ||||
Sensitivity | ||||
Wastewater surveillance | 0.46 | 0.21 | 0.12 | 2 |
0.84 | 0.21 | 0.26 | 80 | |
PCR | 0.64 | 0.18 | 0.22 | 32 |
0.83 | 0.23 | 0.22 | 4 | |
Ratio of antigen test against PCR test | 0.54 | 0.14 | 0.22 | −5.43 |
0.97 | 0.24 | 0.22 | 3 | |
PCR test after positive antigen test | 0.64 | 0.12 | 0.10 | 5 |
0.999 | 0.21 | 0.22 | 6 | |
Specificity | ||||
PCR | 0.96 | 0.21 | 0.21 | 5 |
0.995 | 0.21 | 0.25 | 9 | |
Antigen test | 0.97 | 0.19 | 0.22 | 9 |
0.995 |
0.22 |
0.22 |
6 |
|
Cost | ||||
Wastewater surveillance cost per day per facility | ||||
Laboratory cost | $189 | 0.21 | 0.25 | 9 |
$758 | 0.21 | 0.18 | 0.96 | |
Labor cost to sample | $152 | 0.21 | 0.50 | 20 |
$2,045 | 0.21 | 0.15 | −6.43 | |
Antigen test¶ | $10 | 0.33 | 0.22 | −4.91 |
$23 | 0.15 | 0.22 | 19 | |
Clinical PCR¶ | $20 | 0.215 | 0.24 | 7 |
$53 | 0.207 | 0.21 | 5 | |
Isolation per test-positive case | $379 | 0.209 | 0.222 | 6.33 |
$1,515 | 0.212 | 0.224 | 6.09 | |
Hospitalization per case# | $16,212 | 0.18 | 0.19 | 7 |
$25,227 |
0.26 |
0.27 |
5 |
|
Other | ||||
Incidence per day per 1 million population | 10 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 54 |
10,000 | 21 | 22 | 0.06 | |
No. residents at a facility | 50 | 0.21 | 0.12 | −14.89 |
1,000 | 0.21 | 0.94 | 25 | |
Mortality rate among persons who test positive | 0.0018 | 0.19 | 0.20 | 7 |
0.0104 | 0.30 | 0.32 | 4 | |
Ratio of mortality rate among persons >80 years of age vs.
the general population |
0.5 | 0.004 | 0.004 | 161 |
22 | 0.24 | 0.26 | 5 | |
Life-years saved by avoiding COVID-19 | 11.1 | 0.209 | 0.221 | 6.28 |
11.7 | 0.211 | 0.224 | 6.21 | |
Ratio to convert life-years saved to QALYs saved | 0.64 | 0.207 | 0.220 | 6.33 |
0.71 | 0.212 | 0.225 | 6.19 | |
Hospitalization rate among persons who test positive | 0.04 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 14 |
0.40 | 0.42 | 0.46 | 4 | |
Proportion of severe cases among hospitalized cases | 0.05 | 0.18 | 0.19 | 7 |
0.19 | 0.26 | 0.28 | 5 | |
Effective reproduction number of infected cases | 0.9 | 0.28 | 0.31 | 7 |
2.0 | 0.17 | 0.16 | 5 | |
Effectiveness of screening in reducing hospitalization and mortality
rates because of an earlier diagnosis |
0.23 | 0.09 | 0.10 | 14 |
0.62 | 0.24 | 0.26 | 5 | |
Ratio of loss value of missing and infected cases compared with benefit value of finding an infected case | 0.0 | 0.25 | 0.31 | 148 |
2.0 | 0.17 | 0.13 | 3 |
*The lower and upper bounds of each parameter are shown to illustration the association between a parameter and its ROI. Incidence was assumed to be 100 persons per day per 1 million residents in the area. All monetary values are expressed in 2022 US dollars. QALY, quality-adjusted life-years; ROI, return on investment. †Option 1 is clinical tests only; option 2 is wastewater surveillance and clinical tests. ‡Relative ROI of option 2 compared with option 1.
Page created: June 02, 2023
Page updated: July 20, 2023
Page reviewed: July 20, 2023
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.