Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link

Volume 3, Number 3—September 1997

Synopsis

Flea-borne Rickettsioses: Ecologic Considerations

Abdu F. AzadComments to Author , Suzana Radulovic, James A. Higgins, B. H. Noden, and Jill M. Troyer
Author affiliations: University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

Main Article

Figure 3

Amplicons for various flea-borne bacterial pathogens. Lane 1: R. typhi 16SrRNA (600bp); Lane 2: R. felis 17 kDa (434bp); Lane 3: R. typhi citrate synthase(384bp); Lane 4: R. typhi 120 kDa (612bp); Lane 5: B. henselae 60 kDa (414bp); Lane 6: flea 12SrRNA (414bp); and Lane S: DNA standards, with 400 and 800bp sizes indicated.

Figure 3. Amplicons for various flea-borne bacterial pathogens. Lane 1: R. typhi 16SrRNA (600bp); Lane 2: R. felis 17 kDa (434bp); Lane 3: R. typhi citrate synthase(384bp); Lane 4: R. typhi 120 kDa (612bp); Lane 5: B. henselae 60 kDa (414bp); Lane 6: flea 12SrRNA (414bp); and Lane S: DNA standards, with 400 and 800bp sizes indicated.

Main Article

Page created: December 21, 2010
Page updated: December 21, 2010
Page reviewed: December 21, 2010
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external