Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 3, Number 3—September 1997

Flea-borne Rickettsioses: Ecologic Considerations

Abdu F. AzadComments to Author , Suzana Radulovic, James A. Higgins, B. H. Noden, and Jill M. Troyer
Author affiliations: University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

Cite This Article


Ecologic and economic factors, as well as changes in human behavior, have resulted in the emergence of new and the reemergence of existing but forgotten infectious diseases during the past 20 years. Flea-borne disease organisms, e.g., (Yersinia pestis, Rickettsia typhi, R. felis, and Bartonella henselae) are widely distributed throughout the world in endemic-disease foci, where components of the enzootic cycle are present. However, flea-borne diseases could reemerge in epidemic form because of changes in vector-host ecology due to environmental and human behavior modification. The changing ecology of murine typhus in southern California and Texas over the past 30 years is a good example of urban and suburban expansion affecting infectious disease outbreaks. In these areas, the classic rat-flea-rat cycle of R. typhi has been replaced by a peridomestic animal cycle involving, e.g., free-ranging cats, dogs, and opossums and their fleas. In addition to the vector-host components of the murine typhus cycle, we have uncovered a second typhuslike rickettsia, R. felis. This agent was identified from the blood of a hospitalized febrile patient and from opossums and their fleas. We reviewed the ecology of R. typhi and R. felis and present recent data relevant to the vector biology, immunology, and molecular characterization and phylogeny of flea-borne rickettsioses.

A complex matrix of ecologic and economic factors and human behavior changes has resulted in the emergence of new infectious diseases during the past 20 years. Ecologic changes lead to the emergence of both known and as yet unknown pathogens circulating in the complex host and vector systems of undisturbed habitats. A drastic increase of Rocky Mountain spotted fever in the late 1970s, Lyme disease in the early 1980s, and ehrlichioses in the 1990s in the United States attests to the strong correlation of these diseases to human-made ecologic changes and further illustrates the inability of existing monitoring systems to predict outbreaks and protect at-risk populations. Unmanaged growth and expansion of the suburbs into undisturbed habitats have generated ideal ecosystems for many displaced animals. The changing ecology of murine typhus in southern California and Texas over the past 30 years is a good example of suburban expansion and environmental modifications affecting infectious disease outbreaks. In suburban areas, vector fleas are most often associated with human habitation through their natural hosts, e.g., commensal rodents and peridomestic animals, such as free-ranging cats and dogs, opossums, raccoons, and squirrels. Fleas commonly found on these animals are picked up by household pets and brought into homes. These fleas, apart from being a nuisance, may carry pathogenic organisms of concern to human health.

Of the 2,000 species and subspecies of fleas, only a handful serve as vectors of human diseases. Several bacterial pathogens of public health importance are maintained and transmitted by fleas, among them, Yersinia pestis, the causative agent of plague (known in history as black death). Flea-borne human pathogens are maintained in a zoonotic cycle involving mammalian hosts and fleas. They seldom cause overt disease in their natural hosts but commonly result in clinical disease, e.g., plague, murine typhus, and cat-scratch disease, in humans. The rapid spread of pathogens to human populations is due to the frequent feeding behavior and extraordinary mobility of fleas. Flea-borne diseases are widely distributed throughout the world, in the form of endemic foci, where components of the cycle are present; however, these diseases become epidemic in human populations when infected mammalian hosts die and their fleas leave in search of a bloodmeal. Of flea-borne bacterial pathogens (e.g., Y. pestis, Rickettsia typhi, R. felis, and Bartonella henselae), the most studied and reviewed is Y. pestis. In this article, however, we want to examine the agents of flea-borne rickettsioses, namely R. typhi and the newly identified R. felis. Beginning with R. typhi ecology, we will review and discuss recent data relevant to the ecology, vector biology, immunologic and molecular characterization, and phylogeny of the flea-borne rickettsiae.

Natural History of Flea-borne Rickettsioses

Figure 1

Thumbnail of Urban and suburban life cycles of Rickettsia and mammalian hosts.

Figure 1. Urban and suburban life cycles of Rickettsia and mammalian hosts.

"Murine typhus is a good example of a disease whose importance is not adequately appreciated except by the patient, and, even today, in most parts of the world, he will never know what ails him because the diagnosis will not be made" (1). Murine typhus is one of the most widely distributed arthropod-borne infections endemic in many coastal areas and ports throughout the world. It occurs in epidemics or with high prevalence; is often unrecognized and substantially underreported; and, although it can be clinically mild, it can also cause severe illness and death (2,3). The severity of murine typhus infection has been associated with old age, delayed diagnosis, hepatic and renal dysfunction, central nervous system abnormalities, and pulmonary compromise. Death occurs in up to 4% of hospitalized patients (3). Thousands of human cases were reported annually in the United States (1,2). Outbreaks have been reported in Australia and recently in China, Greece, Israel, Kuwait, and Thailand (1,2,4). Recent serosurveys have demonstrated high prevalence of antityphus group (TG) rickettsiae in Asia and southern Europe (4). Despite the current level of reported human cases in the United States of fewer than 100 per year, murine typhus has been the subject of several recent studies (3,4). Rekindled interest in this disease is partially a result of field data and epidemiologic surveys, which have prompted a reconsideration of established components of the vector-reservoir cycle and their interaction with humans (5-7). The classic cycle of R. typhi, the etiologic agent of murine typhus, involves rats (Rattus rattus and R. norvegicus) and the rat flea, Xensopsylla cheopis (Figure 1). The flea has been considered the main vector, and the disease is transmitted by flea bites or contact with rickettsia-containing feces and tissues during or after blood feeding. Although the rat-flea-rat cycle is still the major route of human infection throughout the world, murine typhus exists in some endemic-disease foci where both rats and rat fleas are absent.

Reported cases of murine typhus in the United States are focused largely in central and southcentral Texas and the Los Angeles and Orange Counties in California; however, infected rats and their fleas are hard to document in these areas (5-7). Thirty-three cases of locally acquired murine typhus in Los Angeles County have been associated with seropositive domestic cats and opossums (7). More than 16 (40%) of 38 opossums and nine (90%) of 10 domestic cats collected from the case areas were seropositive for R. typhi antibodies. No seropositive cats (n=21) or opossums (n=36) were found in the control areas. Although flea infection was not investigated, opossums were the most heavily infested with the cat flea, Ctencephalides felis (104.7/animal). C. felis was also the most prevalent flea species (97%) collected from opossums, cats, and dogs (but not rats) in southern Texas. Surveys in other areas of the country (7,8) had similar results, which further minimizes the role of rat fleas in the maintenance of endemic typhus within the United States. The maintenance of R. typhi in the cat flea/opossum cycle (Figure 1) is, therefore, of potential public health importance since C. felis is a widespread pest that avidly bites humans (1,3,8-11).

During the past 3 years, we have investigated a new typhuslike rickettsia (initially designated as ELB and later named R. felis) identified in cat fleas and opossums from California and Texas murine typhus foci (8-12). Both R. typhi and R. felis were found in fleas and in opossum tissues (8-11). Additionally, a retrospective investigation of five murine typhus patients from Texas subsequently demonstrated that four patients were infected with R. typhi and a fifth had been infected with R. felis (8). Observation of human infection by R. felis underscores the usefulness of molecular techniques for diagnosing closely related rickettsial species. Furthermore, this documented human infection with R. felis and its presence in opossums and their fleas and possibly other wildlife associated with human habitation have raised concerns about the extent of R. felis spillover into human populations.

The Role of Household Pets and Peridomestic Animals and Their Fleas in the Maintenance of R. typhi and R. felis

Murine typhus field surveys in southern California indicated the presence of TG antibodies in opossums, striped skunks, rats, and resident cats but not in 11 other species of native mammals (5,7). The seropositive animals were associated with human cases and were heavily infested with C. felis fleas. Furthermore, the isolation of R. typhi from opossums and their fleas led these investigators to regard opossums as of epidemiologic significance. The presence of R. felis in cat fleas collected from opossums within the Los Angeles murine typhus focus stimulated further interest (8,10). To understand the potential role of the R. felis and nonrat hosts in the biology of endemic typhus, we examined the samples collected in southern Texas, a region accounting for approximately one-third of the current reported murine typhus cases in the United States. Restriction digests of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) products from 399 cat fleas collected from nine opossums had an infection rate of 3.8% for R. felis and 0.8% for R. typhi. Three of nine tested opossums were infected with R. felis (8,10). No R. typhi-infected rats (R. norvegicus) or rat fleas (X. cheopis) were found in surveyed samples. The persistence of murine typhus in both geographic foci appears to be better accounted for by infected cat fleas, opossums, and other nonrat hosts found near human populations (Figure 1, Table 1). The presence of both R. typhi and R. felis by PCR/restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) in opossums from murine typhus foci in southern California and Texas thus confirms the possible role of this marsupial in the maintenance of murine typhus infection. However, our attempt to isolate either R. felis or R. typhi from PCR-positive opossum blood or spleen collected in North Carolina, Texas, and California proved unsuccessful. Although isolating rickettsiae from blood samples has proved difficult, nevertheless, our data, as well as published information, support the role of opossums in maintaining these rickettsiae and infecting fleas.

We will now focus on the role of household pets, primarily cats, in the transmission of R. typhi/R. felis. Experimental infection of cats with R. typhi produces a subclinical infection with rapid recovery and seroconversion (1). Cats that were used to maintain commercial cat flea colonies displayed high antibody titers to TG rickettsiae. In addition, the report by Sorvillo et al. (7) that 90% of resident cats had demonstrable anti-TG immunofluorescence antibody assay (IFA) titers prompted us to extend our seroprevalence studies to household pets to determine the role of resident and feral cats in the urban and suburban foci of murine typhus. We accomplished this through collaboration with several veterinary schools and private practice veterinarians. For the northeast U.S. cohort, 143 cat serum samples were assayed. The sources of the samples were private practice veterinarians in the northeast United States (Michigan, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, Wisconsin), who had submitted them to the Cornell University College of Veterinary Medicine, Clinical Microbiology laboratory, for testing for common feline pathogens (e.g., feline infectious peritonitis virus and feline leukemia virus). For the North Carolina cohort, 513 serum samples were tested. These were banked samples, originally collected from native cats, for use in a study of B. henselae seroprevalence (E.B. Breitschwerdt et al., unpub. data). IFA was used to screen cat sera for reactivity against R. typhi (Wilmington strain) at a 1/64 dilution. Because of the serologic cross-reactivity between R. typhi and R. felis, we have performed the definitive epitope blocking enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (DEB-ELISA) using monoclonal anti-R. typhi 120 kDa surface protein antigen to rule out seropositivity to R. typhi. DEB-ELISA was performed on samples with an IFA titer of 1/64 (n=31 for northeast U.S. cats, n=49 for North Carolina cats) (13). For the northeast U.S. cohort, 143 samples were tested by IFA and 31 (21%) were seropositive. When these 31 positive samples were subjected to DEB-ELISA, 8 (25%) were positive, i.e., reactivity was not directed against R. typhi. Of 513 North Carolina cohort serum samples tested by IFA, 93 (18.1%) were seropositive at 1:64, and 49 were immunoreactive against an organism(s) other than R. typhi. Lack of R. felis monoclonal antibodies limited the usefulness of the DEB-ELISA in determining the source of infection in cats with high antibody titer against TG rickettsiae. Similar problems have been encountered in attempting to serologically identify the rickettsial species contributing to an unexplained febrile illness of dogs in the southern United States (14). Because of the antigenic cross-reactivity among the TG rickettsiae (R. prowazekii, R. typhi, and R. canada), and between the TG rickettsiae, R. felis, and R. bellii, serologic tests should be complemented by PCR/RFLP and/or direct isolation of rickettsiae by tissue culture.

A combination of IFA and DEB-ELISA used in our serosurvey represents the first attempt to define seroreactivity to TG rickettsiae among resident and feral cats. The positivity rate for these samples was unexpectedly high (18% to 21%), even though the sources of the samples were sick, febrile cats. The public health implications of these data are unclear. It is estimated that approximately one third of U.S. households have a pet cat; this translates into 57 million animals. If we conservatively estimate that only 5% of these animals have a patent rickettsial infection, 285,000 cats are possibly infected with a life-threatening zoonosis. Despite the serologic evidence presented above, the question of whether cats can serve as a reservoir host for R. typhi and R. felis and a source of infection for fleas remains to be elucidated.

R. typhi and R. felis Infection in Fleas

Cat fleas from eight commercial colonies in various regions of the United States were infected with R. felis (11). The infection rates as determined by selective PCR amplification and subsequent restriction digest analysis and Southern hybridization of PCR products were 43% to 93%. These flea colonies were initiated either with fleas from one supplier, in which R. felis was first identified (15), or with fleas from stray cats and dogs (11). In light of the latter study (11), we recently received alcohol-preserved flea samples from L. Durden (Georgia Southern University), collected from opossums, dogs, and a bobcat in Statesboro, Georgia, and Nashville, Tennessee, between 1986 and 1996. After PCR/RFLP and partial sequencing of selected PCR products, we found that more than 50% of the cat fleas obtained from the vertebrate hosts were infected with R. felis. However, none of the other flea species collected from the same hosts were infected (Table 1). Although R. felis has been detected in cat fleas from nine states (California, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, New York, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Tennessee, and Texas), it is probably more widespread than current data indicate. These findings demonstrate the wide distribution of R. felis in suburban habitats where opossums enter human habitations and share fleas with domestic dogs and cats.

Figure 2

Thumbnail of Direct fluorescent staining of the frozen sections of midguts of X. cheopis fleas showing R. typhi-infected epithelial cells at 3 (A) and 10 days (B) postinfectious feeding. Fleas were embedded individually in OCT compound (Miles Laboratories, Naperville, IL), sectioned (4-6 m)(16), and stained with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labeled guinea pig anti-R. typhi IgG. G: gut lumen.

Figure 2. Direct fluorescent staining of the frozen sections of midguts of X. cheopis fleas showing R. typhi-infected epithelial cells at 3 (A) and 10 days (B) postinfectious feeding. Fleas were embedded individually...

Experimental infections of various laboratory colonies of fleas, e.g., X. cheopis, Leptopsylla segnis, and C. felis, have demonstrated a similarity in the acquisition, propagation, dissemination, and transmission of R. typhi (2,16). Infection in the flea is initiated when the rickettsiae, ingested in a bloodmeal, enter the midgut epithelial cells. Three to four days after infection, rickettsiae can be detected in only a small group of midgut epithelial cells (Figure 2A). Over the next 3 to 5 days, rickettsial numbers increase exponentially and spread from the initial sites of infection to the entire midgut epithelial linings. Ten days must elapse before the infected fleas can transmit R. typhi to susceptible hosts through infectious feces. The dynamics of R. felis infection have not been studied in detail experimentally, but earlier electron microscopy using infected fleas demonstrates the presence of this rickettsia in gut epithelial linings, tracheal matrix, muscle, ovaries, and epithelial sheath of the testes (15). The high rates of infection in laboratory colonies of fleas and the presence of R. felis in their eggs and newly emerged nonblood-fed specimens indicate that the maintenance of this rickettsiosis occurs by transovarial transmission. However, fleas may acquire both R. typhi and R. felis from rickettsemic hosts and then pass on the infection to their progeny by transovarial transmission. Neither R. typhi nor R. felis infection is lethal to fleas. There is no evidence that massive infection of flea midgut (Figure 2B) affects the feeding behavior and survival of the infected fleas. In contrast, X. cheopis fleas infected with Y. pestis starve to death while the human body lice infected with R. prowazekii die of the infection within 2 weeks (17). Neither Y. pestis nor R. prowazekii is maintained transovarially, and in contrast to rickettsia-infected fleas, persistence of these organisms requires constant host turnover to allow the infection cycle to perpetuate in nature. The rickettsial relationship with their arthropod hosts is considered symbiotic, yet in other instances, they act as true parasites; e.g., members of the Rickettsia and Wolbachia alter reproduction and manipulate cellular processes in their hosts (18).

Calculations based on the quantity of rickettsiae in the blood of a rickettsemic rat and the minute volume of blood ingested by fleas indicate that the invasion of flea midgut epithelium by R. typhi is extremely efficient, requiring only a few rickettsial organisms to result in infection (19). During the rickettsemic period in the vertebrate host, R. typhi is found only in the cellular portion of the blood, particularly leukocytes. These blood cells are destroyed very rapidly (ca. 6 hours) within the flea gut (19). Experimental studies demonstrate that the rickettsial infection of flea midgut epithelium is facilitated by the flea's digestive processes. Presumably, the rapid liquefaction of the blood liberates intracellular rickettsiae from within infected blood cells. Since no peritrophic membrane is formed around the bloodmeal, there is no physical barrier to prevent freed rickettsiae from contacting and entering flea midgut epithelium. Therefore, the rapid breakdown in the cellular integrity of blood components within the flea gut lumen is probably an essential feature of the rickettsial infection of fleas. However, the biologic aspects of rickettsia-vector interactions has lagged behind other vector-borne disease studies, and only a few of the underlying phenomena involved in rickettsia-vector interactions have been partially elucidated.

Antigenic Characterization and Phylogeny of R. felis

Figure 4

Thumbnail of Coomassie blue stained polypeptide profiles of the R. felis, R. typhi, and R. akari plaque-purified seeds separated by SDS-PAGE (7.5%). Lane 1: 10kDa molecular mass marker, with 78 and 120kDa sizes indicated; Lane 2: R. felis; Lane 3: R. typhi (Wilmington); and Lane 4: R. akari (Kaplan).

Figure 4. Coomassie blue stained polypeptide profiles of the R. felis, R. typhi, and R. akari plaque-purified seeds separated by SDS-PAGE (7.5%). Lane 1: 10kDa molecular mass marker, with 78 and 120kDa sizes...

Figure 3

Thumbnail of Amplicons for various flea-borne bacterial pathogens. Lane 1: R. typhi 16SrRNA (600bp); Lane 2: R. felis 17 kDa (434bp); Lane 3: R. typhi citrate synthase(384bp); Lane 4: R. typhi 120 kDa (612bp); Lane 5: B. henselae 60 kDa (414bp); Lane 6: flea 12SrRNA (414bp); and Lane S: DNA standards, with 400 and 800bp sizes indicated.

Figure 3. Amplicons for various flea-borne bacterial pathogens. Lane 1: R. typhi 16SrRNA (600bp); Lane 2: R. felis 17 kDa (434bp); Lane 3: R. typhi citrate synthase(384bp); Lane 4: R. typhi 120 kDa...

The isolation of R. felis from cat flea homogenates after sequential passage from infected rat spleens through embryonated chicken eggs (20) allowed its further characterization. The identity of R. felis in tissue samples and fleas was achieved by a combination of PCR/RFLP (with primers based on the 17 and 120 kDa antigens, citrate synthase, and 16S rRNA gene sequences) (Figure 3), the lack of rOmpA, and seroreactivity with monospecific sera and monoclonal antibodies (Table 2,3). Furthermore, R. felis grown in culture more strongly resembles TG than spotted fever group rickettsiae in its morphology by light microscopy, growth pattern in Vero cells, and delayed formation of small plaques (20). Immunologic characterization of R. felis by a battery of monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies showed various degrees of reactivity with TG group and in particular R. typhi (Table 2). The T65-1 monoclonal antibody that recognizes 120 kDa surface protein of R. typhi, but not R. prowazekii or R. canada, reacts weakly with R. felis. Spotted fever group polyclonal or monoclonal antibodies also exhibited lower reactivity with R. felis. The SDS-PAGE profile obtained for R. felis here clearly resembled that of R. typhi and R. akari, lacking the prominent larger rOmpA protein found in spotted fever group rickettsiae and R. canada (Figure 4; 21). Immunoblot studies (20) using anti-R. felis polyclonal antibodies further demonstrate a strong cross-reactivity with R. typhi lipopolysaccharides but not spotted fever group rickettsiae.

The initial R. felis characterization of the sequence of a portion of the 17 kDa gene and its reactivity with anti-R. typhi polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies suggested resemblance to typhus rickettsiae

(Table 3; 20). However, its 16S rRNA sequence more closely resembled those of R. akari and R. australis, a distinct clade of the spotted fever group (22,23). PCR amplification with rOmpA primers Rr.190.70p and Rr.190.602n was unsuccessful with R. felis (21). This result is perhaps not surprising since these primers also do not amplify DNA from typhus rickettsiae, R. akari, or R. australis (22,23). Recently, Andersson et al (24) reported the presence of rOmpA gene sequences in R. prowazekii genome, even though there is no evidence that the 190kDa protein is expressed in TG rickettsiae.

Figure 5

Thumbnail of Consensus parsimony cladogram of rickettsial 16S ribosomal RNA sequences shows that R. felis (in bold) is a member of the spotted fever group.

Figure 5. Consensus parsimony cladogram of rickettsial 16S ribosomal RNA sequences shows that R. felis (in bold) is a member of the spotted fever group.

For phylogenetic studies, nucleotide sequences of all known rickettsial Citrate synthases, 17kDa surface antigen genes, and 16S r RNA sequences were obtained from Genbank and initially aligned by PILEUP (Genetics Computer Group, Madison WI) according to the progressive alignment algorithm of Feng and Doolittle (25). Nonoverlapping sequences at the trailing ends of the resulting multiple sequence file were removed and the sequences were realigned by PILEUP to give the final multiple sequence file. A distance matrix for all sequences was calculated by DNADIST, with differences between transition and transversion rates corrected according to Kimura's method (26). Evolutionary trees were computed by DNAPARS using parsimony, with the number of changes of base needed on a given tree calculated according to Fitch (27). Bootstrap analysis was performed on a 100x resampled set using SEQBOOT, with a 100x randomized input order, and the consensus tree topology was calculated by CONSENSE. The resulting cladograms for 16S rRNA and citrate synthase positioned R. felis within the same clade as R. akari, R. australis, and R. helvetica, and identified it as belonging to the spotted fever group of rickettsiae (22,23). The consensus tree for 16S rRNA is illustrated in Figure 5. The branching order within the clade comprising R. felis, R. helvetica, R. australis, and R. akari altered between different parsimony trees; however, the overall association was relatively stable. The sequence information from 17 kDa protein antigen, rOmpA, 16S rRNA, and citrate synthase genes places R. felis intermediate to the typhus and spotted fever group rickettsiae. The typhus and spotted fever group dichotomy, however, does not adequately reflect the evolutionary history of R. akari, R. felis, or R. australis.

Future Perspectives of Typhus Infections

Traditionally TG rickettsiae have been defined by antigenic characteristics of their lipopolysaccharides (4), but no fine line separates them from spotted fever group rickettsiae. Similarly the classification of rickettsiae on the basis of molecular and immunologic characterizations is also problematic because of high sequence homology and serologic crossreactivity within and between the members of TG and spotted fever group. Distinct biologic differences, however, occur between TG and SFG rickettsiae with regard to arthropod vectors, in vitro growth, antigenic repertoire, pathologic features, and clinical manifestations. Although the diagnosis can be made serologically and confirmed clinically for most of the pathogenic rickettsiae, it is unlikely to serologically distinguish R. felis from R. typhi infections. The extent of human infections with R. felis is unknown at this time, and the disease needs to be studied clinically. The detection and identification of R. felis in a single human case has been carried out by PCR/RFLP and Southern hybridization (8). The detection of both R. typhi and R. felis presents a difficult diagnostic challenge since prompt diagnosis of murine typhus or infections with R. felis can be established only when rickettsiae or rickettsia-PCR products from blood samples are directly isolated. DEB-ELISA using monoclonal antibodies specific to either R. typhi or R. felis would be a useful tool to differentiate between these rickettsiae and closely related species.

Reported cases of murine typhus in the United States are largely focused in central and southcentral Texas and Los Angeles and Orange Counties in California. However, murine typhus-infected rats and rat fleas are hard to document within these foci, which suggests the maintenance of R. typhi in the cat flea/opossum cycle. Destruction and reduction of natural habitats displace many animals and force them to move into the hospitable environments of the suburbs and cities and subsequently increase the potential for "old and new pathogens" to reemerge and generate new outbreaks. The current distribution of the opossum in more than 40 states in the United States and the invasion of urban and suburban habitats by this opportunistic marsupial have also been aided by human activities. Opossums, free-ranging cats, and rats in urban and suburban habitats, where food and hospitable environments are plentiful, may live their entire lives in the same backyards. Therefore, their potential role in the murine typhus cycle as hosts to both R. typhi, R. felis, and their fleas warrants further investigation.

Dr. Azad is professor of microbiology and immunology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore. His laboratory research focuses on host parasite interactions with particular interest in the molecular aspects of rickettsial pathogenesis.



  1. Traub  R, Wisseman  CL Jr, Azad  AF. The ecology of murine typhus: a critical review. Trop Dis Bull. 1978;75:237317.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Azad  AF. Epidemiology of murine typhus. Annu Rev Entomol. 1990;35:55369. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Dumler  JS, Taylor  JP, Walker  DH. Clinical and laboratory features of murine typhus in Texas, 1980 through 1987. JAMA. 1991;266:136570. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Walker  DH. Advances in understanding of typhus group rickettsial infections. In: Kazar J, Toman R, editors. Rickettsiae and rickettsial diseases. Bratislava, Slovak Republic: VEDA Press 1996;16-25.
  5. Adams  WH, Emmons  RW, Brooks  JE. The changing ecology of murine (endemic) typhus in southern California. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1970;19:3118.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Williams  SG, Sacci  JB Jr, Schriefer  ME, Anderson  EM, Fujioka  KK, Sorvilo  FJ. Typhus and typhus-like rickettsiae associated with opossums and their fleas in Los Angeles County, California. J Clin Microbiol. 1992;30:175862.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Sorvillo  FJ, Gondo  B, Emmons  R, Ryan  P, Waterman  SH, Tilzer  A, A suburban focus of endemic typhus in Los Angeles County: association with seropositive domestic cats and opossums. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1993;48:26973.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Schriefer  ME, Sacci  JB Jr, Dumler  JS, Bullen  MG, Azad  AF. Identification of a novel rickettsial infection in a patient diagnosed with murine typhus. J Clin Microbiol. 1994;32:94954.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Azad  AF, Sacci  JB Jr, Nelson  WM, Dasch  GA, Schmidtman  ET, Carl  M. Genetic characterization and transovarial transmission of a novel typhus-like Rickettsia found in cat fleas. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992;89:436. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Schriefer  ME, Sacci  JB Jr, Higgins  JA, Taylor  JP, Azad  AF. Murine typhus: updated role of multiple urban components and a second typhus-like rickettsiae. J Med Entomol. 1994;31:6815.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Higgins  JA, Sacci  JB Jr, Schriefer  ME, Endris  RG, Azad  AF. Molecular identification of rickettsia-like microorganisms associated with colonized cat fleas (Ctenocephalides felis). Insect Mol Biol. 1994;3:2733.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Higgins  JA, Radulovic  S, Schriefer  ME, Azad  AF. Rickettsia felis: a new species of pathogenic rickettsia isolated from cat fleas. J Clin Microbiol. 1996;34:6714.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Radulovic  S, Speed  R, Feng  HM, Taylor  C, Walker  DH. EIA with species-specific monoclonal antibodies: a novel seroepidemiologic tool for determination of the etiologic agent of spotted fever rickettsiosis. J Infect Dis. 1993;168:12925.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Breitschwerdt  EB, Hegarty  BC, Davidson  MG, Szabados  NS. Evaluation of the pathogenic potential of Rickettsia canada and Rickettsia prowazekii organisms in dogs. JAVMA. 1995;207:5863.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Adams  JR, Schmidtmann  ET, Azad  AF. Infection of colonized cat fleas, Ctenocephalides felis with a rickettsia-like microorganism. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1990;43:4009.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Azad  AF, Traub  R, Sofi  M, Wisseman  CL Jr. Experimental murine typhus infection in the cat flea, Ctenocephalides felis (Siphonaptera:Pulicidae). J Med Entomol. 1984;21:67580.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Azad  AF. Relationship to vector biology and epidemiology of louse and flea-borne rickettsioses. In: Walker DH, editor. Biology of rickettsial diseases. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 1988. p.52-62.
  18. Werren  JH, Zhang  W, Guo  W. Evolution and phylogeny of Wolbachia: reproductive parasites of arthropods. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1995;B261:5571. DOIGoogle Scholar
  19. Vaughan  JA, Azad  AF. Acquisition of murine typhus rickettsiae by fleas. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1990;590:705. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Radulovic  S, Higgins  JA, Jaworski  DC, Dasch  GA, Azad  AF. Isolation, cultivation and partial characterization of the ELB agent associated with cat fleas. Infect Immun. 1995;63:48269.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Regnery  RL, Spruill  CL, Plikaytis  BD. Genotypic identification of rickettsiae and estimation of intraspecies sequence divergence for portions of two rickettsial genes. J Bacteriol. 1991;173:157689.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Roux  V, Raoult  D. Phylogenetic analysis of the genus Rickettsia by 16S rDNA sequencing. Res Microbiol. 1995;146:38596. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Stothard  D, Fuerst  PA. Evolutionary analysis of the spotted fever and typhus group of Rickettsia using 16S rRNA gene sequences. Syst Appl Microbiol. 1995;18:5261.
  24. Andersson  S, Eriksson  A-S, Naslund  AK, Andersen  MS, Kurland  CG. The Rickettsia prowazekii genome: a random sequence analysis. Microb Comp Genomics. 1996;1:293315.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Feng  DF, Doolittle  RF. Progressive sequence alignment as a prerequisite to correct phylogenetic trees. J Mol Evol. 1987;25:35160. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Kimura  M. A simple model for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol. 1980;16:11120. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Fitch  WM. Toward defining the course of evolution: minimum change for a specified tree topology. Syst Zool. 1971;20:406616. DOIGoogle Scholar




Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid0303.970308

Table of Contents – Volume 3, Number 3—September 1997

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Abdu F. Azad, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 655 W. Baltimore Street, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA; fax: 410-706-0282

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: December 21, 2010
Page updated: December 21, 2010
Page reviewed: December 21, 2010
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.