Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 3, Number 3—September 1997

Flea-borne Rickettsioses: Ecologic Considerations

Abdu F. AzadComments to Author , Suzana Radulovic, James A. Higgins, B. H. Noden, and Jill M. Troyer
Author affiliations: University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

Main Article

Table 2

Reactivity of Rickettsia felis, R. typhi, and R. akari with rat and mouse typing sera and species-specific monoclonal antibodies

Reciprocal IFA titer
MAbs/Antisera Antigen R. felis R. typhi R. akari
T65-1 (IgG2a)a 120kDa 64 8,192 16
77-244-20b 120-135kDa 16 16 4,096
7911-A2-H9 (IgG2a)c 190kDa 16 16 16
1F3-G2 (IgG2a)d 120-135kDa 64 128 16
Rat anti-R. felis 4,096 2,048 256
Rat anti-R.typhi 1,024 8,192 16
Mouse anti-R. akari 512 16 4,096

aMAb against R. typhi 120kDa (also referred to rOmpB).
bMAb against R. akari.
cMAb against R. rickettsii 190kDa (= rOmpA).
dMAb against R. rickettsii 120-135kDa (= rOmpB).

Main Article

Page created: December 21, 2010
Page updated: December 21, 2010
Page reviewed: December 21, 2010
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.