Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 30, Number 1—January 2024
Dispatch

Increased Peripheral Venous Catheter Bloodstream Infections during COVID-19 Pandemic, Switzerland

Author affiliations: Infection Control Programme and World Health Organization Collaborating Center, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland (M.-C. Zanella, E. Pianca, G. Catho, B. Obama, M.E.A. De Kraker, A. Nguyen, M.-N. Chraiti, L. Fortchantre, S. Harbarth, M. Abbas, N. Buetti); University of Geneva, Geneva (J. Sobel); MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Jameel Institute, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK (M. Abbas); Université Paris-Cité, Paris, France (N. Buetti)

Cite This Article

Abstract

Studies suggest that central venous catheter bloodstream infections (BSIs) increased during the COVID-19 pandemic. We investigated catheter-related BSIs in Switzerland and found peripheral venous catheter (PVC) BSI incidence increased during 2021–2022 compared with 2020. These findings should raise awareness of PVC-associated BSIs and prompt inclusion of PVC BSIs in surveillance systems.

Peripheral intravenous catheters (PVCs) and central venous catheters (CVCs) are frequently used in hospitalized patients. Estimates from global device sales illustrated that ≈1.2 billion PVCs are used worldwide annually (1,2). PVC-related complications include phlebitis, hematoma, and extravasation (3,4). PVC-associated bloodstream infections (BSIs) often are disregarded in surveillance systems because of low incidence (5,6). However, because PVCs are widely used in hospitalized patients, the burden of PVC-associated or related BSIs might still be substantial. In contrast, only 10% of acute care inpatients have a CVC inserted (7), but the incidence of BSIs associated with CVCs is higher than that for PVCs, likely because infection prevention strategies mostly focus on CVCs.

Several studies have shown that intravascular catheter infections increased during the COVID-19 pandemic (811). Those studies mainly focused on BSIs associated with CVCs. COVID-19 might have substantially affected the frequency of PVC infections, but published reports are lacking. To assess the incidence of BSIs associated with or related to intravenous catheters, we used a large prospective database to study BSIs by catheter type during the COVID-19 pandemic in Switzerland.

The Study

We performed a cohort study at Geneva University Hospitals (HUG), a large network of tertiary care centers in Switzerland. HUG includes 5 rehabilitation or palliative care sites and 1 acute care, 1 geriatric, 1 pediatric, 1 gynecology-obstetrics, and 1 psychiatric site. HUG has ≈2,100 beds and receives 60,000 hospital admissions per year.

We included all patients hospitalized during January 1, 2020–December 31, 2022. All hospital-acquired BSIs during that timeframe were investigated as part of prospective hospital-wide surveillance, which has been conducted for >25 years by the HUG infection control program. We limited the analysis to catheter-related or -associated BSIs (CRABSIs), comprising catheter-related BSI (CRBSI) and catheter-associated BSI (CABSI). We classified CRABSI that were attributed to PVC, short-term CVC, and long-term CVC. The infection control program routinely collects patient data from CRABSI, including onset date, age, sex, ward of acquisition, catheter type, and microorganism identified.

The primary outcomes (i.e., CRABSI) were based on European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control definitions (12). A CRBSI required a positive blood culture <48 hours after catheter removal and the same microorganism isolated from a quantitative catheter tip culture or the same microorganism isolated in a culture from pus collected from a catheter site (Appendix). A CABSI required a positive blood culture occurring from time of insertion until 48 hours after catheter removal, resolution of symptoms within 48 hours after catheter removal, and no other infectious focus. We also tracked details of COVID-19 infections reported in the hospital system (Appendix).

Figure 1

Percentage of intravascular catheter infections stratified by catheter type in study of intravascular catheter bloodstream infections during the COVID-19 pandemic, Switzerland, January 1, 2020–December 31, 2022. CRABSI, catheter-related or -associated bloodstream infections; CVC, central venous catheter; PVC, peripheral venous catheter.

Figure 1. Percentage of intravascular catheter infections stratified by catheter type in study of intravascular catheter bloodstream infections during the COVID-19 pandemic, Switzerland, January 1, 2020–December 31, 2022. CRABSI, catheter-related or -associated...

We used patient-days as the main denominator, which we extracted from the electronic record system. We used a 5-step statistical plan. First, we determined the total monthly incidence of CRABSI, and CRABSI attributed to PVC, short-term CVC, and long-term CVC per 1,000 patient-days (Figure 1). Second, we evaluated incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for intravascular catheter infections stratified for catheter type for 2021 and 2022 by segmented Poisson regression models using aggregated monthly data and used 2020 as the referent and patient-days as the offset. We tested overdispersion by using the likelihood ratio test and subsequently fit a negative binomial model, if required. Third, we compared patient and microbiologic characteristics of CRABSI attributed to PVC between the different periods using χ2 test for categorical variables and Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous variables. Fourth, we determined the number of PVCs and PVCs in situ >4 days inserted per month. Fifth, we performed a sensitivity analysis by using catheter-days as a denominator for CRABSI attributed to PVC and CVC.

We used SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Inc., https://www.sas.com) to perform all analyses and considered p<0.05 statistically significant. This analysis complies with STROBE guidelines for observational studies (13).

During the study period, a total of 179,463 patients were hospitalized at HUG, corresponding to 1,978,177 patient-days. We included 249 CRABSI episodes. We observed 90 CRABSI attributed to PVC, 94 attributed to short-term CVC, 74 attributed to long-term CVC, and 9 cases were possibly attributable to >1 intravascular catheter. Overall, the median age of patients with a CRABSI was 61 (interquartile range [IQR] 47–73) years; 62.3% (n = 155) were male and 37.7% (n = 94) were female. Most (37.8%, n = 94) CRABSI were caused by coagulase-negative staphylococci (Appendix Table 1).

CRABSI incidence remained stable during the study period, but we observed peaks in CRABSI attributed to short-term and long-term CVC during November 2021–January 2022 (Appendix Figure 1). Of note, incidence of CRABSI attributed to PVC increased during late 2021 and in 2022. Similarly, the proportion of CRABSI attributed to PVC among all intravascular catheter infections increased during late 2021 and in 2022 (Figure 1).

Figure 2

Incidence rate ratios per 1,000 patient days in a study of intravascular catheter bloodstream infections during the COVID-19 pandemic, Switzerland, January 1, 2020–December 31, 2022. Squares indicate IRRs, bars indicate 95% CIs. Patient-days were used as the denominator; 2020 rates were used as the referent. BSI, bloodstream infection; CRABSI, catheter related or associated bloodstream infections; CVC, central venous catheter; IRR, incidence rate ratio; PVC, peripheral venous catheter.

Figure 2. Incidence rate ratios per 1,000 patient days in a study of intravascular catheter bloodstream infections during the COVID-19 pandemic, Switzerland, January 1, 2020–December 31, 2022. Squares indicate IRRs, bars indicate...

Overall, compared with 2020, IRRs for CRABSI did not significantly increase in 2021 (IRR 1.24, 95% CI 0.91–1.71; p = 0.18) and 2022 (IRR 1.19, 95% CI 0.87–1.64; p = 0.27) (Figure 2; Appendix Table 2). By contrast, rates of CRABSI attributed to PVC significantly increased during 2021 (IRR 2.08, 95% CI 1.14–3.78; p = 0.02) and 2022 (IRR 3.23, 95% CI 1.85–5.65; p<0.01) compared with 2020. Rates of CRABSI attributed to short-term and long-term CVC did not show statistically significant changes (Figure 2; Appendix Table 2).

Among patients with CRABSI attributed to PVC, we did not observe statistically significant differences for sex, age, ward of acquisition, or microorganism distribution (Appendix Table 1). We observed similar results for short-term and long-term CVC (Appendix Table 1). Furthermore, the monthly number of CVCs and PVCs inserted, and PVCs in situ >96 hours did not change over time (Appendix Table 3, Figures 2, 3). A sensitivity analysis using catheter-days as a denominator yielded similar results (Appendix Figure 4).

Conclusions

This study showed that CRABSI attributed to PVC increased during the 2021–2022 compared with 2020. Studies in different countries showed that CVC-related BSIs increased during the COVID-19 pandemic (10,11), but no data on PVC-related infections are available.

Several hypotheses might explain these findings. First, ward of acquisition and microorganism distributions from 2020–2022 did not substantially change among PVC-related BSIs. Nevertheless, we observed a nonsignificant increase of PVC-attributed CRABSI due to coagulase-negative staphylococci in surgery wards in 2022. Moreover, we did not observe a significant increase of blood culture contaminations during 2021–2022 compared with 2020 (14). Second, according to our institutional recommendations, PVCs should be routinely changed every 4 days. We did not observe an increase of PVCs inserted for >96 h, suggesting adequate compliance to that preventive measure (Appendix). Recent unpublished data from France showed similar alarming results in the surveillance system of devices associated infections (15).

Our study’s first limitation is that the study was single-center, limiting the generalizability of the results; however, HUG comprises several different sites, thus increasing the diversity of the patient population. Moreover, our data cannot be generalized to centers that routinely use midline catheters or that routinely use other infection control strategies, such as chlorhexidine-gluconate bathing post-CVC insertion or use of impregnated dressings. Second, we did not include confounders such as site of insertion, emergent versus elective insertions, immunocompromised states, chronic illnesses, body mass index, and nurse-to-patient ratio in our analysis. Third, our primary outcome, CRABSI, did not include pulmonary arterial, peripheral arterial, and umbilical arterial catheter infections.

In conclusion, our findings show that CRABSI attributed to PVC significantly increased during 2021–2022 in HUG. The observed increasing incidence of CRABSI attributed to PVC should raise awareness and warrants inclusion of PVC-related BSIs in national surveillance systems.

Dr. Zanella is an infectious disease and infection prevention control specialist in the infection control program and WHO Collaborating Centre on Patient Safety, University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland. Her primary research interests are in bloodstream infection surveillance and respiratory infection surveillance and prevention.

Top

Acknowledgment

We thank the COVID-19 hospital-based surveillance system, jointly coordinated by the Federal Office of Public Health, the institute of global health of the University of Geneva and the Infection Prevention and Control of Geneva University Hospitals (HUG) for providing data of COVID-19 hospitalizations at HUG.

Top

References

  1. Zingg  W, Pittet  D. Peripheral venous catheters: an under-evaluated problem. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2009;34(Suppl 4):S3842. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Newswire  PR. Global peripheral I.V. catheter market 2014–2018 [cited 2022 Jul 17]. https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/global-peripheral-iv-catheter-market-2014-2018-257019061.html
  3. Hadaway  L. Short peripheral intravenous catheters and infections. J Infus Nurs. 2012;35:23040. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Buetti  N, Abbas  M, Pittet  D, Chraiti  MN, Sauvan  V, De Kraker  MEA, et al. Lower risk of peripheral venous catheter-related bloodstream infection by hand insertion. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2022;11:80. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Buetti  N, Abbas  M, Pittet  D, de Kraker  MEA, Teixeira  D, Chraiti  MN, et al. Comparison of routine replacement with clinically indicated replacement of peripheral intravenous catheters. JAMA Intern Med. 2021;181:14718. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Mermel  LA. Short-term peripheral venous catheter–related bloodstream infections: a systematic review. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;65:175762. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Zingg  W, Metsini  A, Balmelli  C, Neofytos  D, Behnke  M, Gardiol  C, et al.; Swissnoso Network. National point prevalence survey on healthcare-associated infections in acute care hospitals, Switzerland, 2017. Euro Surveill. 2019;24:1800603.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Porto  APM, Borges  IC, Buss  L, Machado  A, Bassetti  BR, Cocentino  B, et al. Healthcare-associated infections on the ICU in 21 Brazilian hospitals during the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic: an ecological study. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2023;44:28490. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Rosenthal  VD, Myatra  SN, Divatia  JV, Biswas  S, Shrivastava  A, Al-Ruzzieh  MA, et al. The impact of COVID-19 on health care-associated infections in intensive care units in low- and middle-income countries: International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC) findings. Int J Infect Dis. 2022;118:838. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Baker  MA, Sands  KE, Huang  SS, Kleinman  K, Septimus  EJ, Varma  N, et al.; CDC Prevention Epicenters Program. The impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on healthcare-associated infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2022;74:174854. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Weiner-Lastinger  LM, Pattabiraman  V, Konnor  RY, Patel  PR, Wong  E, Xu  SY, et al. The impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on healthcare-associated infections in 2020: A summary of data reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2022;43:1225. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Surveillance of healthcare-associated infections and prevention indicators in European intensive care units 2017 [cited 2017 May 5]. https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/HAI-Net-ICU-protocol-v2.2_0.pdf
  13. von Elm  E, Altman  DG, Egger  M, Pocock  SJ, Gøtzsche  PC, Vandenbroucke  JP; STROBE Initiative. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ. 2007;335:8068. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Chraiti  M-N, Abbass  M, Nguyen  M, Zanella  M-C, Catho  G, Bosetti  D, et al. Contamination of blood cultures before and during COVID-19 in a large tertiary-care center in Switzerland. In: Abstracts of the 7th International Conference on Prevention and Infection Control 2023; Geneva; 2023 Sep 12–15. Abstract P476.
  15. Van der Mee-Marquet  N, Goube  F, Gimenes  R, Valentin  AS. Surveillance of infections linked to invasive devices, developments 2019–2022 [in French] [cited 2022 October 18]. https://www.santepubliquefrance.fr

Top

Figures

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid3001.230183

Original Publication Date: December 07, 2023

1These authors contributed equally to this article.

Table of Contents – Volume 30, Number 1—January 2024

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Niccolò Buetti, Infection Control Programme and World Health Organization Collaborating Center, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: October 31, 2023
Page updated: December 20, 2023
Page reviewed: December 20, 2023
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external