Volume 30, Number 1—January 2024
Dispatch
Avian Influenza A(H5N1) Neuraminidase Inhibition Antibodies in Healthy Adults after Exposure to Influenza A(H1N1)pdm09
, and Hui-Ling Yen1
Abstract
We detected high titers of cross-reactive neuraminidase inhibition antibodies to influenza A(H5N1) virus clade 2.3.4.4b in 96.8% (61/63) of serum samples from healthy adults in Hong Kong in 2020. In contrast, antibodies at low titers were detected in 42% (21/50) of serum samples collected in 2009. Influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 and A(H5N1) titers were correlated.
The A/goose/Guangdong/1/1996-like (GsGD-like) highly pathogenic avian influenza A(H5N1) viruses were first identified in 1996 and have continuously evolved into antigenically distinct hemagglutinin (HA) clades that have substantially affected animal and human health. Before 2005, the GsGd-like virus mainly circulated in Asia among domestic poultry. Spillover infections from domestic poultry to wild migratory birds have enabled intercontinental spread to Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and North America, as previously observed in 2005 (clade 2.2 virus) and in 2014–2015 (clade 2.3.4.4c virus) (1). Since 2016, the clade 2.3.4.4b viruses have undergone a 3rd wave of intercontinental spread and have become enzootic among wild birds as of 2021 (2,3). Currently, the GsGD-like H5N1 viruses have been reported in all continents except Oceania and Antarctica. Expanded genetic diversity and geographic distribution has led to spillover events into numerous mammal species and sporadic human infections (4).
Highly pathogenic avian influenza A(H5N1) virus has not yet achieved efficient transmissibility in humans, but the current epidemiology of H5N1 2.3.4.4b lineage raises concerns of possible pandemic potential. Population immunity to an emerging influenza virus is one of the key parameters considered in assessing its pandemic risk according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention influenza risk assessment tool (https://www.cdc.gov/flu/pandemic-resources/national-strategy/risk-assessment.htm) and the World Health Organization tool for influenza pandemic risk assessment (https://www.who.int/teams/global-influenza-programme/avian-influenza/tool-for-influenza-pandemic-risk-assessment-(tipra)). Neutralizing antibodies targeting the HA receptor-binding domain and antibodies that inhibit neuraminidase (NA) activity have been shown to correlate with protection against influenza infection (5,6). We evaluated whether healthy adults possess cross-reactive hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) and neuraminidase inhibition (NAI) antibodies to H5N1 virus through previous exposure to seasonal influenza infections.
We collected serum samples from 63 healthy blood donors 18–73 years of age in 2020 in Hong Kong (HKU/HA HKW IRB #UW-132) to determine cross-reactive HAI antibodies and NAI antibodies to a clade 2.3.4.4b H5N1 virus (A/black-faced spoonbill/Hong Kong/AFCD-HKU-22-21429-01012/2022; Spoonbill/HK/22), which showed high homology to the HA and NA proteins of clade 2.3.4.4b candidate vaccine viruses A/chicken/Ghana/AVL-76321VIR7050-39/2021 (98.8% [HA] and 97.3% [NA]) and A/American wigeon/South Carolina/AH0195145/2021 (98.6% [HA] and 97.2% [NA]) (7). For comparison, we also determined the HAI and NAI antibody responses to the 2009 pandemic influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 (pH1N1) virus (A/California/04/2009; California/09) using an HAI assay and enzyme-linked lectin assay (detection limit at 1:10) (8,9).
Figure
Figure. Age-stratified HAI and NAI antibody responses to influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 (California/09) and A(H5N1) (Spoonbill/HK/22) viruses in serum samples collected from healthy adults in 2020 and 2009, Hong Kong, China. A, B)...
Among healthy adults, 56/63 (88.8%) possessed HAI antibodies to pH1N1 virus with a geometric mean titer (GMT) of 21.84; none showed detectable HAI antibodies to H5N1 virus (Figure, panel A). NAI antibodies against pH1N1 were detected in 57/63 (90.5%) healthy participants (GMT 41.80), and 61/63 (96.8%) also possessed cross-reactive NAI antibodies to H5N1 (GMT 41.34) (Figure, panel B). The NAI titers against pH1N1 and H5N1 were highly correlated (Spearman ρ = 0.8349; p<0.001) (Appendix Figure 1). Furthermore, 57 (90.5%) persons had NAI antibodies to both viruses at titers >1:10, and 32 (50.8%) persons had NAI antibodies to both viruses at titers >1:40. To evaluate whether the cross-reactivity extends to N1 proteins of other avian influenza viruses, we randomly selected 32 serum samples to determine NAI titers against an avian influenza A(H6N1) virus isolated from wild bird surveillance (A/environment/Hong Kong/HKU_MPT_2006/2015; Env/HK/15). DNA barcoding suggested that the specimen originated from Platalea minor (black-face spoonbill). Similarly, 93.75% (30/32) persons possessed cross-reactive NAI titers against H6N1 virus (GMT 26.50), and 40.6% (13/32) possessed NAI titers >1:40 (Appendix Figure 1). However, cross-reactivity did not extend to N4 protein of an avian influenza A(H6N4) virus isolated from wild bird surveillance (A/environment/Hong Kong/HKU_MPT_2022; Env/HK/22) originated from Anas acuta (northern pintail) (Appendix Figure 1). Overall, we observed high correlations between NAI titers against pH1N1 and H6N1 viruses (Spearman ρ = 0.875; p<0.001) and between H5N1 and H6N1 viruses (Spearman ρ = 0.874; p<0.001).
We examined NAI titers to the homologous virus and cross-reaction to H5N1 virus in archival ferret antiserum against seasonal A(H1N1) viruses and pH1N1 (Table 1). Ferret antiserum against H1N1 viruses circulating during 1977–2007 showed no cross-reactive NAI response to H5N1 but had NAI titers at 1:320–1:1280 against the homologous viruses. Ferret antiserum against pH1N1 virus showed a homologous NAI titer of 1:2,560 and cross-reactive NAI titers to H5N1 at 1:320 to 1:640.
To further confirm whether exposure to pH1N1 virus contributed to the cross-reactive NAI antibodies, we used serum samples of 50 healthy blood donors (17–55 years of age) collected in July 2009, before pH1N1 had become widespread in Hong Kong (11). HAI antibodies to pH1N1 were detected in 22% (11/50) of the samples; GMT was low, at 7.07 (Figure, panel C). We detected NAI antibodies to pH1N1 in 40% (20/50) of healthy blood donors; GMT was low, at 8.24. NAI antibodies to H5N1 were detected in 40% (22/50) of donors; GMT was 8.35 (Figure, panel D). Most participants (16/20) with detectable NAI antibodies to pH1N1 also had NAI antibodies to H5N1. Overall, the cross-reactive NAI titers detected in 2009 (Figure, panel D) were lower than the those detected in 2020 (Figure, panel B). This result suggests that previous exposure to pH1N1 virus is the potential source of cross-reactive NAI antibodies to H5N1 virus. The NA protein of Spoonbill/HK/22 differed from the pH1N1 (California/09) NA by 53 aa and from the seasonal H1N1 NA proteins by 68–76 aa; most changes occurred in the NA head domain (Table 2; Appendix Figure 2).
We detected high titers of cross-reactive NAI antibodies to clade 2.3.4.4b H5N1 virus, Spoonbill/HK/22, in samples collected from healthy adults 18–73 years of age in 2020. The N1 antibody cross-reactivity also extended to an H6N1 avian influenza virus isolated from wild bird samples in Hong Kong. Our results confirm and extend the findings from a recent study reporting cross-reactive NAI antibody responses to clade 2.3.4.4b H5N1 virus in healthy blood donors (12). The use of monospecific archival ferret antiserum against seasonal H1N1 and pH1N1 influenza showed that cross-reactive NAI response to H5N1 were elicited by pH1N1 but not by seasonal H1N1 viruses circulating during 1977–2007. The pH1N1 virus derived its NA protein from the avian-origin Eurasian-avian swine viruses (13) and appeared antigenically more closely related to the N1 of H5N1 and H6N1 avian influenza viruses but not to a N4 of H6N4 avian influenza virus. The use of serum samples collected from healthy blood donors in 2009 further confirmed that exposure to pH1N1 might have contributed to the cross-reactive NAI antibodies against H5N1.
HAI titer of >1:40 has long been established to correspond with a 50% reduction in influenza infection risk, which might be used to model the effects of cross-reactive HAI antibody titers on reducing the basic reproduction number (R0) of novel zoonotic viruses with pandemic potential (14). NAI antibodies have also been shown to protect against infection, reduce symptoms, and shorten the duration of viral shedding (5,6); however, the NAI antibody threshold that corresponds with protection has not been clearly defined.
In summary, we detected high titers of cross-reactive NAI antibodies against influenza A(H5N1) clade 2.3.4.4b virus in serum samples collected from healthy adults in 2020 but not detected in serum samples collected in 2009. Further studies are needed to confirm whether cross-reactive NAI antibodies confer protection against H5N1 infection or modulate disease severity, but our results suggest that the antibodies against H5N1 and H6N1 viruses might derive from exposure to the conserved epitopes shared between the avian-origin pH1N1 virus and avian N1 proteins.
Dr. Daulagala is a researcher at the School of Public Health, University of Hong Kong. Her primary research interest is understanding the role of neuraminidase antibodies in influenza infections.
Acknowledgments
We thank Christopher J. Brackman and the Agriculture Fisheries and Conservation Department, Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China, for sharing the A(H5N1) virus.
This study was supported by RGC Theme-based Research Schemes (T11-712/19-N) of the Research Grant Council and Health@InnoHK (Centre for Immunology and Infection) administered by Innovation and Technology Commission, Hong Kong, China.
References
- Lee DH, Bertran K, Kwon JH, Swayne DE. Evolution, global spread, and pathogenicity of highly pathogenic avian influenza H5Nx clade 2.3.4.4. J Vet Sci. 2017;18(S1):269–80. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pohlmann A, King J, Fusaro A, Zecchin B, Banyard AC, Brown IH, et al. Has epizootic become enzootic? Evidence for a fundamental change in the infection dynamics of highly pathogenic avian influenza in Europe, 2021. MBio. 2022;13:
e0060922 . DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar - Adlhoch C, Fusaro A, Gonzales JL, Kuiken T, Mirinaviciute G, Niqueux É, et al.; European Food Safety Authority, European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, European Union Reference Laboratory for Avian Influenza. Avian influenza overview March - April 2023. EFSA J. 2023;21:
e08039 .PubMedGoogle Scholar - World Health Organization. Antigenic and genetic characteristics of zoonotic influenza A viruses and development of candidate vaccine viruses for pandemic preparedness. 2022 [cited 2023 May 18]. https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/influenza/who-influenza-recommendations/vcmnorthern-hemisphere-recommendation-2022-2023/202203_zoonotic_vaccinevirusupdate.pdf
- Krammer F, Weir JP, Engelhardt O, Katz JM, Cox RJ. Meeting report and review: Immunological assays and correlates of protection for next-generation influenza vaccines. Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2020;14:237–43. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Maier HE, Nachbagauer R, Kuan G, Ng S, Lopez R, Sanchez N, et al. Pre-existing antineuraminidase antibodies are associated with shortened duration of influenza A(H1N1)pdm virus shedding and illness in naturally infected adults. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;70:2290–7. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- World Health Organization. Summary of status of development and availability of A(H5N1) candidate vaccine viruses and potency testing reagents. 2023 [cited 2023 Jun 7]. https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/influenza/cvvs/cvv-zoonotic-northern-hemipshere-2023-2024/h5n1_summary_a_h5n1_cvv_20230225.pdf
- World Health Organization. Manual for the laboratory diagnosis and virological surveillance of influenza. Geneva: The Organization; 2011.
- Couzens L, Gao J, Westgeest K, Sandbulte M, Lugovtsev V, Fouchier R, et al. An optimized enzyme-linked lectin assay to measure influenza A virus neuraminidase inhibition antibody titers in human sera. J Virol Methods. 2014;210:7–14. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Daulagala P, Mann BR, Leung K, Lau EHY, Yung L, Lei R, et al. Imprinted Anti-Hemagglutinin and Anti-Neuraminidase Antibody Responses after Childhood Infections of A(H1N1) and A(H1N1)pdm09 Influenza Viruses. MBio. 2023;14:
e0008423 . DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar - Wu JT, Ho A, Ma ES, Lee CK, Chu DK, Ho PL, et al. Estimating infection attack rates and severity in real time during an influenza pandemic: analysis of serial cross-sectional serologic surveillance data. PLoS Med. 2011;8:
e1001103 . DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar - Kandeil A, Patton C, Jones JC, Jeevan T, Harrington WN, Trifkovic S, et al. Rapid evolution of A(H5N1) influenza viruses after intercontinental spread to North America. Nat Commun. 2023;14:3082. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Garten RJ, Davis CT, Russell CA, Shu B, Lindstrom S, Balish A, et al. Antigenic and genetic characteristics of swine-origin 2009 A(H1N1) influenza viruses circulating in humans. Science. 2009;325:197–201. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cheung JTL, Tsang TK, Yen HL, Perera RAPM, Mok CKP, Lin YP, et al. Determining existing human population immunity as part of assessing influenza pandemic risk. Emerg Infect Dis. 2022;28:977–85. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
Figure
Tables
Cite This ArticleOriginal Publication Date: December 18, 2023
1These senior authors contributed equally to this article.
Table of Contents – Volume 30, Number 1—January 2024
| EID Search Options |
|---|
Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
|
Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
|
Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.
|
Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:
Hui-Ling Yen or Malik Peiris, L6-42, Laboratory Block, LKS Faculty of Medicine, 21 Sassoon Rd, Hong Kong, China
Top