Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link

Disclaimer: Early release articles are not considered as final versions. Any changes will be reflected in the online version in the month the article is officially released.

Volume 30, Number 9—September 2024
Synopsis

Clinical Significance, Species Distribution, and Temporal Trends of Nontuberculous Mycobacteria, Denmark, 1991–2022

Author affiliations: Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark (V.N. Dahl, A. Norman, E.M. Rasmussen, T. Lillebaek); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (V.N. Dahl, C.M. Wejse); Aarhus University, Aarhus (V.N. Dahl, C.M. Wejse); Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark (A.A. Pedersen); Lillebaelt Hospital, Vejle, Denmark (A.A. Pedersen); Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J. van Ingen); Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen (A.B. Andersen); University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen (T. Lillebaek)

Suggested citation for this article

Abstract

Nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are emerging as notable causative agents of opportunistic infections. To examine clinical significance, species distribution, and temporal trends of NTM in Denmark, we performed a nationwide register-based study of all unique persons with NTM isolated in the country during 1991–2022. We categorized patients as having definite disease, possible disease, or isolation by using a previously validated method. The incidence of pulmonary NTM increased throughout the study period, in contrast to earlier findings. Mycobacterium malmoense, M. kansasii, M. szulgai, and M. avium complex were the most clinically significant species based on microbiologic findings; M. avium dominated in incidence. This study shows the need for surveillance for an emerging infection that is not notifiable in most countries, provides evidence to support clinical decision-making, and highlights the importance of not considering NTM as a single entity.

Nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are emerging as important causative agents of opportunistic infections globally (1). NTM can cause a wide spectrum of disease, leading to various clinical manifestations depending on the exposure, species virulence, host immunity, and site of infection (2). Clinical management and studies of pulmonary NTM infections are often challenged by difficulties in discriminating between transient NTM findings in nonsterile body sites after environmental exposure (often referred to as colonization, contamination, or isolation) as opposed to true NTM disease, because positive NTM cultures do not necessarily reflect disease.

For NTM pulmonary disease, the diagnostic criteria are based on the presence of symptoms along with radiologic and microbiologic findings (3). Although those criteria have been widely implemented, the application still relies on the individual clinician’s subjective assessment and decision. As an alternative strategy, previous studies have validated infections by using microbiologic data only as a proxy for clinically significant pulmonary NTM disease, dividing NTM into categories reflecting the likelihood of disease (46). In Denmark and elsewhere, data on the clinical significance of NTM, including specific NTM species, is sparse. Consequently, in this nationwide study, we examined the clinical significance, species distribution, and temporal trends of NTM isolates over 32 years.

Methods

For decades, mycobacterial diagnostics and surveillance in Denmark have been centralized at the International Reference Laboratory of Mycobacteriology (IRLM) at Statens Serum Institut in Copenhagen. IRLM stores nationwide data and cultures from patients tested for mycobacterial infections as the only such laboratory in the country. In this nationwide register-based study, we combined mycobacteriologic data from IRLM with population data from Statistics Denmark (https://www.dst.dk).

We evaluated the clinical significance of NTM isolates in Denmark by using only microbiologic data for all persons in Denmark who had >1 NTM isolate identified during 1991–2022. We only counted an incident case of NTM once and thereafter excluded the affected person from the population at risk for NTM infection. We excluded from our study patients with Mycobacterium gordonae isolates only, because that species is considered a clinically irrelevant contaminant (6,7). We also excluded patients with multiple NTM isolated concomitantly.

As part of routine diagnostics, samples were cultured on liquid media with BACTEC MGIT 960 (BD Diagnostic Systems, https://www.bd.com) and on solid Löwenstein–Jensen slants (Statens Serum Institut Diagnostica, https://ssidiagnostica.com) for up to 8 weeks. Throughout the study period, NTM species were identified using different methods, including AccuProbe (Gen-Probe, https://www.hologic.com) and supplementary biochemical tests during 1991–2001, InnoLipa Mycobacteria version 2 (InnoGenetics, https://www.fujirebio.com) during 2001–2012, GenoType Mycobacterium CM/AS (Hain Lifescience, https://www.hain-lifescience.de) during 2012–2022, and GenoType NTM-DR (Hain Lifescience) during 2016–2022. Supplementary species identification also was used, targeting the 16S (2006–2022) and internal transcribed spacer (2015–2022) regions with Sanger sequencing.

Using a previously validated method and modifying guideline criteria (3), we categorized patients as having either definite disease, possible disease, or isolation (4,5). For pulmonary NTM, including gastric lavages, we defined definite disease as either >3 positive samples, 3 positive samples including >1 obtained by bronchoscopy or pleurocentesis, or >1 positive sample from a lung or transbronchial biopsy. We defined NTM isolation as only 1 positive NTM sample and categorized the remaining patients as having possible disease. We defined all patients with a positive NTM sample from an extrapulmonary location as having definite disease, except for patients with only 1 sample of urine or feces, who we categorized as possible disease. We categorized patients with samples from both pulmonary and extrapulmonary locations as having disseminated disease. We grouped species by using phylogenetic classifications described by Tortoli et al. (7). As we considered the discrimination of NTM species identification within a complex or group to have changed much over time, we grouped NTM species for main analyses.

We compiled descriptive statistics by using counts and percentages for categorical data and medians and interquartile ranges (IQRs) for continuous data. As an illustration of the clinical significance of pulmonary NTM, we calculated the number and corresponding percentage of patients fulfilling the modified disease criteria by each species for definite disease only and for definite and possible disease combined. We calculated annual incidence rates (IRs) as the number of new patients with NTM in the numerator and the total number of patients in Denmark in the denominator for the given year. We evaluated trends over time by using a Poisson model with age groups, sex, and calendar year as explanatory variables, and we calculated IRs by using the population of Denmark as response variables. We conducted statistical analyses and generated figures by using R version 4.2.3 (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, https://www.r-project.org). The study was approved by Denmark’s Data Protection Agency through the Department of Compliance at Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen (approval no. 22/00845).

Results

A total of 4,123 unique patients had a positive NTM culture, excluding 896 with M. gordonae and 34 with multiple species isolated concomitantly, equaling 129 new patients annually on average. Median patient age was 59 years (IQR 33–72 years); 1,977 (48%) were female and 2,146 (52%) male, and 3,673 (89%) were born in Denmark.

Most samples were pulmonary (2,851 [69%]), whereas approximately one fourth were extrapulmonary (1,106 [27%]); few patients had disseminated NTM (166 [4.0%]) (Table). The most frequent isolates were M. avium complex (MAC) (2,547 [62%]), whereas other species were seen much less frequently. M. avium (2,046 [80%]) and M. intracellulare (334 [13%]) accounted for most cases of MAC.

Figure 1

Absolute numbers and corresponding percentages of patients fulfilling modified criteria for nontuberculous mycobacteria pulmonary disease, based on microbiologic data only, Denmark, 1991–2022. A) Definite disease; B) definite and possible disease combined. Species were grouped by using phylogenetic classifications described by Tortoli et al. (7).

Figure 1. Absolute numbers and corresponding percentages of patients fulfilling modified criteria for nontuberculous mycobacteria pulmonary disease, based on microbiologic data only, Denmark, 1991–2022. A) Definite disease; B) definite and possible disease...

Approximately half of patients had definite disease (2,158 [52%]), whereas 26% (1,060) had possible disease and 22% (905) had isolation. One third of patients with pulmonary samples had definite disease (932 [33%]) and one third had possible disease (1,014 [36%]). We assessed clinical significance by species for patients with pulmonary samples (Figure 1). M. malmoense (55%), M. kansasii (46%), and MAC (36%) were most often associated with definite pulmonary NTM disease, whereas M. kansasii (86%), M. malmoense (81%), and M. szulgai (78%) were the most significant species when combing definite and possible disease. We also assessed the clinical significance of NTM isolation by species for any sample type and by age group and sex (Appendix Table 1, Figures 1, 2).

In all disease categories, MAC isolates were highly predominant, accounting for 68% (1,478/2,158) of definite disease cases and 65% (692/1,060) of possible disease cases but was slightly less common for isolation cases (42% [377/905]) (Appendix Table 1). M. phocaicum/mucogenicum, M. parascrofulaceum/scrofulaceum, and M. terrae group more often represented isolation cases. Disseminated NTM infections were mainly caused by MAC (87% [144/166]) (Appendix Table 2). All NTM species and groups were mostly isolated from pulmonary samples except for M. marinum, which was only found in extrapulmonary samples. M. marinum was the second-most common NTM isolated from extrapulmonary samples after MAC.

Figure 2

Annual incidence rates (infections/100,000 persons) of unique patients with a first culture positive for nontuberculous mycobacteria, by disease localization (A) and disease category for patients with pulmonary isolates only (B), Denmark, 1991–2022. Patients with samples from both pulmonary and extrapulmonary locations were categorized as having disseminated disease.

Figure 2. Annual incidence rates (infections/100,000 persons) of unique patients with a first culture positive for nontuberculous mycobacteria, by disease localization (A) and disease category for patients with pulmonary isolates only (B),...

Figure 3

Annual absolute number of patients with a first culture positive for MAC, corresponding incidence rates, and annual incidence rates for the most frequent nontuberculous mycobacteria species for patients with definite and possible pulmonary disease combined, Denmark, 1991–2022. A) Numbers of first MAC cases by year and annual incidence (infections/1 million persons). B) Annual incidence rates (infections/1 million persons) of the most frequent nontuberculous mycobacteria species. Species were grouped by using phylogenetic classifications described by Tortoli et al. (7). Other was defined as Mycobacteria spp. and species with <15 cases reported throughout the study period. MAC, Mycobacterium avium complex.

Figure 3. Annual absolute number of patients with a first culture positive for MAC, corresponding incidence rates, and annual incidence rates for the most frequent nontuberculous mycobacteria species for patients with definite...

Figure 4

Annual absolute number of patients with a first culture positive for MAC, corresponding incidence rates, and annual incidence rates for the most frequent nontuberculous mycobacteria species for extrapulmonary and disseminated nontuberculous mycobacteria, Denmark, 1991–2022. Patients with samples from both pulmonary and extrapulmonary locations were categorized as having disseminated disease. A) Numbers of first MAC cases by year and annual incidence (infections/1 million persons). B) Annual incidence rates (infections/1 million persons) of the most frequent nontuberculous mycobacteria species. Species were grouped by using phylogenetic classifications described by Tortoli et al. (7). Other was defined as Mycobacteria spp. and species with <15 cases reported throughout the study period. MAC, Mycobacterium avium complex.

Figure 4. Annual absolute number of patients with a first culture positive for MAC, corresponding incidence rates, and annual incidence rates for the most frequent nontuberculous mycobacteria species for extrapulmonary and disseminated...

After adjustment for age and sex group differences, annual IRs of a positive NTM culture per 100,000 persons increased throughout the period (0.8%/year; p<0.001). This increase was driven mainly by an increase in patients with pulmonary NTM (2.3%/year; p<0.001), whereas the rate of extrapulmonary (−1.7%/year; p<0.001) and disseminated NTM (−9.5%/year; p<0.001) decreased (Figure 2, panel A). For pulmonary NTM, we also calculated annual IRs by disease categories (Figure 2, panel B). Annual IRs of patients with definite and possible pulmonary MAC increased over time (4.6%/year; p<0.001) (Figure 3), whereas the incidence of extrapulmonary and disseminated MAC decreased (Figure 4). These changes were mainly caused by subspecies M. avium (Appendix Figure 3). Infections attributable to M. celatum group (4.9%/year; p<0.001), M. kansasii (3.8%/year; p = 0.012), and M. xenopi (2.2%/year; p = 0.0152) also increased over time for definite and possible pulmonary NTM combined. The annual species distribution was comparable throughout the study period with discrete variations (Table).

Discussion

Using nationwide mycobacteriologic data from Denmark during a 32-year period, we found that 52% of patients in whom NTM were isolated had clinically significant disease (i.e., definite); that percentage increased to 78% when possible disease was included. Species most often associated with definite NTM pulmonary disease, on the basis of microbiologic findings, were M. malmoense, M. kansasii, and MAC, whereas M. kansasii, M. malmoense, and M. szulgai were the most clinically significant species when possible disease was included as a sensitivity analysis. MAC infections, mainly attributable to M. avium, were predominant across disease categories and localizations, underscoring its status as the clinically most important species. However, the considerable differences in clinical significance and epidemiology identified in our study highlight that NTM should not be considered as a single entity. We observed that pulmonary NTM incidence has been increasing in Denmark during the study period, in contrast to earlier reports (4,5).

Comparable to our findings, a previous study from Denmark that included data from a clinical survey found that approximately half of pulmonary NTM patients (31/58 [53.4%]) received treatment with >2 antimycobacterial drugs or were considered to have clinically significant NTM infection on the basis of signs and symptoms (8). Slightly less than half of those patients (39/85 [45.9%]) fulfilled clinical, radiologic, and microbiologic criteria for disease for those that had information available on all criteria.

Identifying NTM species, including to subspecies level, is crucial for selection of a treatment regimen and because different species are associated with varying clinical significance and outcomes (i.e., severity) (911). Several studies have investigated the clinical significance of NTM species (1220), predominantly smaller studies with clinical data, whereas the larger studies have been based on laboratory data without clinical information. Many of those laboratory studies use the microbiologic component of the international guide criteria by the American Thoracic Society, European Respiratory Society, European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, and Infectious Diseases Society of America (3,17,2124). Jankovic et al. found the positive predictive value of the microbiologic component compared with the full criteria was 59.8% (17); however, that value increased to 93.3% when a stricter definition was applied (25). Because many epidemiologic NTM studies use different approaches for defining NTM infection and disease (26), a consensus for reporting surveillance data is warranted to enable fair comparisons across countries and regions.

In our study, we applied stricter criteria than those used in many other studies, enabling comparisons with previous studies (4,5). Those criteria have been shown to have high positive predictive values for clinically significant disease (4). We found that 33% of patients with pulmonary NTM had definite disease, comparable to the number of patients fulfilling American Thoracic Society and Infectious Diseases Society of America criteria in other studies, albeit slightly higher (12,15,20). A previous study of pulmonary NTM in eastern Asia found that 31% (582/1,744) of patients fulfilled those criteria (16). In studies from northwestern Europe, M. kansasii, M. szulgai, and M. malmoense have been associated with a high degree of clinical significance (>70%) (27,28). In other regions of the world, those species are considered less clinically significant, demonstrating that clinical significance varies with geography.

MAC was the most predominant group of pulmonary NTM (58%) in Denmark (5). In contrast, M. xenopi (7.8%) and M. kansasii were rare (2.3%) compared with findings in eastern and southern Europe, whereas M. malmoense was much more incident (4.2%) than in countries outside Scandinavia (29,30). M. abscessus-chelonae complex accounted for the second-most frequently observed NTM group (7.5%). We observed clear differences in trends over time for the different species. For instance, the incidence of M. malmoense has previously been shown to rise in northern Europe (31), and although we did not observe an increase (–1.3%/year; p = 0.113), we could confirm the relative significance in our region, finding similar proportions of clinical significance (up to 81%) as reported in a systematic review of clinical data (70%–80%) (31). The abundance of M. malmoense in northern Europe, compared with southern Europe (0.6% of 3,696 isolates) and rest of the world (1% of ≈20,000 isolates), remains unexplained (30). The most extensive evaluations of geographic differences in the distribution of NTM species are older (30,32), and because NTM epidemiology is clearly changing over time, reevaluations of geographic differences are necessary.

Until recently, no increasing trends in NTM incidence had been reported in Denmark (4,5), in contrast to most other parts of the world (33). However, recent studies based on diagnostic codes from the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, a potential proxy for NTM-treated patients, also found that NTM incidence and prevalence have been increasing in Denmark (34,35). Again, those findings show that temporal and geographic differences are essential when evaluating NTM epidemiology, underlining the need for surveillance. Diagnostic codes may have a lower sensitivity but a good positive predictive value (36), suggesting that combining the different approaches could be useful. Our study, showing an increase of pulmonary NTM incidence over time but not of extrapulmonary and disseminated NTM, suggests that structural lung disease and advancing age could be among the main determinants for those changes. This hypothesis is supported by the fact that structural lung disease is the strongest risk factor for NTM pulmonary disease (37). Still, sampling for NTM from pulmonary sites probably evolved over time, especially with increasing awareness of chronic lung conditions predisposing to NTM, whereas sampling from extrapulmonary sites is mainly based on disease manifestations (37). Hence, in the past decade, or even longer, patients living with chronic lung disease might have had cultures examined regularly as part of standard of care, leading to a higher number of positive NTM cultures. Further discussion of potential explanations for the increasing trends is available elsewhere (1,33).

One limitation of our study is the lack of clinical information, including data on symptoms, underlying conditions, risk factors for NTM, radiologic findings, and treatment. Although the use of microbiologic data as a measure of clinical significance may be flawed, lacking clinical information and a description of sampling strategy, we believe microbiologic data are a useful proxy for NTM disease and a valuable tool for NTM surveillance (33).

In conclusion, M. malmoense, M. kansasii, M. szulgai, and MAC are the most clinically significant NTM in Denmark based on microbiologic findings, with M. avium being of greatest importance because of its dominance in incidence. In contrast to earlier findings, the incidence of pulmonary NTM has been increasing in Denmark. This study shows the critical need for surveillance for an emerging infection that is not notifiable in most countries, provides evidence to support clinical decision-making, and highlights the importance of not considering NTM as a single entity.

Dr. Dahl is a medical doctor and PhD student in the Department of Infectious Diseases, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark. He is interested in complicated respiratory infections, such as tuberculosis and nontuberculous mycobacteria infections, and mainly works with clinical epidemiology and systematic reviews.

Top

Acknowledgments

We thank biostatistician Morten Overgaard for providing essential advice on statistical analyses. Responsibility and interpretations of the statistical analyses remain solely with the authors.

This study, performed as part of a PhD project, has been funded by a 2024 grant from the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (to V.N.D.). In addition, V.N.D. received funding from the Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Fonden af 17-12-1981, Skibsreder Per Henriksen, R. og hustrus fond, Health Research Foundation of Central Denmark Region, Christian Larsen og dommer Ellen Larsens Legat, Helga og Peter Kornings Fond, Beckett Foundation, the A.P. Moller Foundation (Fonden for Lægevidenskabens Fremme) and Denmark’s Ministry of Higher Education and Science (Elite Research Travel Grant, 2023). The funders of the study had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report.

Top

References

  1. Dahl  VN, Mølhave  M, Fløe  A, van Ingen  J, Schön  T, Lillebaek  T, et al. Global trends of pulmonary infections with nontuberculous mycobacteria: a systematic review. Int J Infect Dis. 2022;125:12031. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Griffith  DE, Aksamit  T, Brown-Elliott  BA, Catanzaro  A, Daley  C, Gordin  F, et al.; ATS Mycobacterial Diseases Subcommittee; American Thoracic Society; Infectious Disease Society of America. An official ATS/IDSA statement: diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of nontuberculous mycobacterial diseases. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007;175:367416. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Daley  CL, Iaccarino  JM, Lange  C, Cambau  E, Wallace  RJ Jr, Andrejak  C, et al. Treatment of nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease: an official ATS/ERS/ESCMID/IDSA clinical practice guideline. Eur Respir J. 2020;56:2000535. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Andréjak  C, Thomsen  VO, Johansen  IS, Riis  A, Benfield  TL, Duhaut  P, et al. Nontuberculous pulmonary mycobacteriosis in Denmark: incidence and prognostic factors. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;181:51421. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Hermansen  TS, Ravn  P, Svensson  E, Lillebaek  T. Nontuberculous mycobacteria in Denmark, incidence and clinical importance during the last quarter-century. Sci Rep. 2017;7:6696. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Winthrop  KL, McNelley  E, Kendall  B, Marshall-Olson  A, Morris  C, Cassidy  M, et al. Pulmonary nontuberculous mycobacterial disease prevalence and clinical features: an emerging public health disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;182:97782. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Tortoli  E, Fedrizzi  T, Meehan  CJ, Trovato  A, Grottola  A, Giacobazzi  E, et al. The new phylogeny of the genus Mycobacterium: The old and the news. Infect Genet Evol. 2017;56:1925. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Thomsen  VO, Andersen  AB, Miörner  H. Incidence and clinical significance of non-tuberculous mycobacteria isolated from clinical specimens during a 2-y nationwide survey. Scand J Infect Dis. 2002;34:64853. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Kwak  N, Dalcolmo  MP, Daley  CL, Eather  G, Gayoso  R, Hasegawa  N, et al. M ycobacterium abscessus pulmonary disease: individual patient data meta-analysis. Eur Respir J. 2019;54:1801991. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Diel  R, Ringshausen  F, Richter  E, Welker  L, Schmitz  J, Nienhaus  A. Microbiological and clinical outcomes of treating non–Mycobacterium avium complex nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Chest. 2017;152:12042. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Diel  R, Nienhaus  A, Ringshausen  FC, Richter  E, Welte  T, Rabe  KF, et al. Microbiologic outcome of interventions against Mycobacterium avium complex pulmonary disease: a systematic review. Chest. 2018;153:888921. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. van Ingen  J, Bendien  SA, de Lange  WC, Hoefsloot  W, Dekhuijzen  PN, Boeree  MJ, et al. Clinical relevance of non-tuberculous mycobacteria isolated in the Nijmegen-Arnhem region, The Netherlands. Thorax. 2009;64:5026. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Vande Weygaerde  Y, Cardinaels  N, Bomans  P, Chin  T, Boelens  J, André  E, et al. Clinical relevance of pulmonary non-tuberculous mycobacterial isolates in three reference centres in Belgium: a multicentre retrospective analysis. BMC Infect Dis. 2019;19:1061. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Al-Mahruqi  SH, van-Ingen  J, Al-Busaidy  S, Boeree  MJ, Al-Zadjali  S, Patel  A, et al. Clinical relevance of nontuberculous Mycobacteria, Oman. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009;15:2924. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Schiff  HF, Jones  S, Achaiah  A, Pereira  A, Stait  G, Green  B. Clinical relevance of non-tuberculous mycobacteria isolated from respiratory specimens: seven year experience in a UK hospital. Sci Rep. 2019;9:1730. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Simons  S, van Ingen  J, Hsueh  PR, Van Hung  N, Dekhuijzen  PN, Boeree  MJ, et al. Nontuberculous mycobacteria in respiratory tract infections, eastern Asia. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17:3439. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Jankovic  M, Samarzija  M, Sabol  I, Jakopovic  M, Katalinic Jankovic  V, Zmak  L, et al. Geographical distribution and clinical relevance of non-tuberculous mycobacteria in Croatia. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2013;17:83641. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Gerogianni  I, Papala  M, Kostikas  K, Petinaki  E, Gourgoulianis  KI. Epidemiology and clinical significance of mycobacterial respiratory infections in Central Greece. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2008;12:80712.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Dabó  H, Santos  V, Marinho  A, Ramos  A, Carvalho  T, Ribeiro  M, et al. Nontuberculous mycobacteria in respiratory specimens: clinical significance at a tertiary care hospital in the north of Portugal. J Bras Pneumol. 2015;41:2924. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Al-Harbi  A, Al-Jahdali  H, Al-Johani  S, Baharoon  S, Bin Salih  S, Khan  M. Frequency and clinical significance of respiratory isolates of non-tuberculous mycobacteria in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Clin Respir J. 2016;10:198203. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Brode  SK, Marchand-Austin  A, Jamieson  FB, Marras  TK. Pulmonary versus nonpulmonary nontuberculous mycobacteria, Ontario, Canada. Emerg Infect Dis. 2017;23:1898901. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Russell  CD, Claxton  P, Doig  C, Seagar  AL, Rayner  A, Laurenson  IF. Non-tuberculous mycobacteria: a retrospective review of Scottish isolates from 2000 to 2010. Thorax. 2014;69:5935. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Prevots  DR, Shaw  PA, Strickland  D, Jackson  LA, Raebel  MA, Blosky  MA, et al. Nontuberculous mycobacterial lung disease prevalence at four integrated health care delivery systems. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;182:9706. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Wetzstein  N, Dahl  VN, Lillebaek  T, Lange  C. Clinical spectrum and relevance of Mycobacterium malmoense: Systematic review and meta-analysis of 859 patients. J Infect. 2024;89:106203. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Jankovic  M, Sabol  I, Zmak  L, Jankovic  VK, Jakopovic  M, Obrovac  M, et al. Microbiological criteria in non-tuberculous mycobacteria pulmonary disease: a tool for diagnosis and epidemiology. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2016;20:93440. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Marras  TK, Nelson  P, Peci  A, Richard-Greenblatt  M, Brode  S, Sullivan  A, et al. Pulmonary nontuberculous mycobacteria, Ontario, Canada, 2020. Emerg Infect Dis. 2023;29:14159. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. van Ingen  J. Microbiological diagnosis of nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease. Clin Chest Med. 2015;36:4354. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Yan  M, Brode  SK, Marras  TK. Treatment of the less common nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease. Clin Chest Med. 2023;44:799813. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Dahl  VN, Laursen  LL, He  Y, Zhang  YA, Wang  MS. Species distribution among patients with nontuberculous mycobacteria pulmonary disease in Europe. J Infect. 2023;87:46972. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Hoefsloot  W, van Ingen  J, Andrejak  C, Angeby  K, Bauriaud  R, Bemer  P, et al.; Nontuberculous Mycobacteria Network European Trials Group. The geographic diversity of nontuberculous mycobacteria isolated from pulmonary samples: an NTM-NET collaborative study. Eur Respir J. 2013;42:160413. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Hoefsloot  W, Boeree  MJ, van Ingen  J, Bendien  S, Magis  C, de Lange  W, et al. The rising incidence and clinical relevance of Mycobacterium malmoense: a review of the literature. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2008;12:98793.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Zweijpfenning  SMH, Ingen  JV, Hoefsloot  W. Geographic distribution of nontuberculous mycobacteria isolated from clinical specimens: a systematic review. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2018;39:33642. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Prevots  DR, Marshall  JE, Wagner  D, Morimoto  K. Global epidemiology of nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease: a review. Clin Chest Med. 2023;44:675721. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Dahl  VN, Fløe  A, Wejse  C. Nontuberculous mycobacterial infections in a Danish region between 2011 and 2021: evaluation of trends in diagnostic codes. Infect Dis (Lond). 2023;55:43943. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Pedersen  AA, Løkke  A, Fløe  A, Ibsen  R, Johansen  IS, Hilberg  O. Nationwide increasing incidence of nontuberculous mycobacterial diseases among adults in Denmark: eighteen years of follow-up. Chest. 2024;S0012-3692(24)00393-3.
  36. Mejia-Chew  C, Yaeger  L, Montes  K, Bailey  TC, Olsen  MA. Diagnostic accuracy of health care administrative diagnosis codes to identify nontuberculous mycobacteria disease: a systematic review. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2021;8:ofab035. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Loebinger  MR, Quint  JK, van der Laan  R, Obradovic  M, Chawla  R, Kishore  A, et al. Risk factors for nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Chest. 2023;164:111524. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Figures
Table

Top

Suggested citation for this article: Dahl VN, Pedersen AA, Norman A, Rasmussen EM, van Ingen J, Andersen, AB, et al. Clinical significance, species distribution, and temporal trends of nontuberculous mycobacteria, Denmark, 1991–2022. Emerg Infect Dis. 2024 Sep [date cited]. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid3009.240095

DOI: 10.3201/eid3009.240095

Original Publication Date: August 09, 2024

1These authors contributed equally to this article.

Table of Contents – Volume 30, Number 9—September 2024

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Victor Næstholt Dahl, Department of Infectious Diseases, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Blvd 99, DK-8200, Aarhus, Denmark

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: July 08, 2024
Page updated: August 09, 2024
Page reviewed: August 09, 2024
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external