Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link

Volume 31, Number 10—October 2025

Dispatch

Emergence of Bordetella holmesii–Associated Pertussis-Like Illness, Northern India, 2019–2023

Author affiliation: Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India (N. Shekhar, R. Kumar, R.S. Rawat, D. Chauhan, V. Gautam); World Health Organization Country Office India, New Delhi, India (D. Sharma, N. Kaundal, T. Avagyan); University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA (S. Chakraborty); India Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, New Delhi (P. Kumar); Yatharth Hospital, Noida, India (N. Jain); All India Institute of Medical Science−Bilaspur, Bilaspur, India (M. Sharma)

Cite This Article

Abstract

We investigated Bordetella holmesii and Bordetella pertussis in 935 suspected pertussis cases in northern India (2019–2023) using PCR and serology. B. holmesii showed increased prevalence in pertussis cases, particularly in older children, highlighting its emerging role and the need for ongoing surveillance and adjusted prevention strategies.

Pertussis, caused by Bordetella pertussis, is a serious, vaccine-preventable respiratory illness (1,2). India’s immunization program recommends multiple tetanus-diphtheria-pertussis vaccine doses (3). The COVID-19 pandemic impacted vaccination rates and pertussis reporting across India, leading to a resurgence in pertussis cases (Appendix Figure 1). Concerns exist regarding other Bordetella species, such as Bordetella holmesii, a bacterium known to cause pertussis-like symptoms but not covered by current vaccines (47). Laboratory confirmation is crucial in differentiating B. pertussis from B. holmesii for accurate surveillance (8). Our study aimed to determine the incidence of B. pertussis and B. holmesii in pertussis-like cases in northern India.

The Study

We analyzed 935 respiratory specimens collected from case patients clinically suspected of having pertussis in northern India during January 2019−August 2023. We sourced specimens from 2 cohorts: group I (n = 213), comprising patients hospitalized with acute respiratory illness at Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research’s Advanced Pediatric Center; and group II (n = 722), obtained through the Vaccine-Preventable Disease Surveillance Network according to guidelines (9). We subjected 778 samples (178 from group I, 600 from group II) to real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) (10) and examined 733 samples (101 from group I, 632 from group II) through serologic testing for pertussis toxin (PT) IgG using ELISA.

Figure

Yearwise trend of Bordetella pertussis and B. holmesii positivity from study of emergence of B. holmesii–associated pertussis-like illness, northern India, 2019–2023. Data based on real-time quantitative PCR using the IS481-ptxS1-hIS1001 gene profile. Positiviity is shown overall and for 2 cohorts: group I (n = 213), patients hospitalized with acute respiratory illness at Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research’s Advanced Pediatric Center; and group II (n = 722), obtained through the Vaccine-Preventable Disease Surveillance Network according to guidelines (9).

Figure. Yearwise trend of Bordetella pertussis and B. holmesii positivity from study of emergence of B. holmesii–associated pertussis-like illness, northern India, 2019–2023. Data based on...

Of 778 swab samples tested by qPCR, we determined 383 (49.2%) to be positive for Bordetella IS481. Among those, we identified B. pertussis monoinfection in 52 (13.6%) samples, B. holmesii monoinfection in 143 (37.3%), and co-infection with both species in 15 (3.9%) samples (Table 1). Of note, B. holmesii positivity surpassed that of B. pertussis in 2022–2023 in the North India catchment. (Figure).

Both species predominantly affected infants <1 year of age. However, B. holmesii was significantly more prevalent in the 5–10-year age group (≈30% compared with ≈9% B. pertussis; χ2 = 16.22; p = 0.00102). The mean patient age for B. holmesii infection was 3.4 years and for B. pertussis was 1.9 years (Appendix Figure 2). We detected PT IgG with overall seroprevalence (positive + intermediate) in 232 (31.6%) of the 733 samples tested. We collected serology samples from 174 of the 210 cases that tested positive by qPCR.

Stratifying the qPCR and serology results of the samples for which qPCR and serology results were obtained, we identified 121 B. holmesii qPCR-confirmed cases, 43 of which we determined to be positive for PT IgG by ELISA. By that same method, we identified 41 qPCR-confirmed B. pertussis cases, determining 9 to be positive for PT IgG by ELISA (Table 2). Among 91 cases with known diphtheria-pertussis-tetanus vaccination status, 28 ELISA‐negative, unvaccinated case-patients (i.e., received no pertussis-containing vaccine [zero‐dose]) tested positive for B. holmesii monoinfection and 8 ELISA-negative, unvaccinated case-patients tested positive for B. pertussis monoinfection.

Conclusions

Our study highlights the emergence of B. holmesii as a key contributor to pertussis-like illness in northern India during 2021−2023. Species-specific qPCR revealed that B. holmesii detection rates overtook those of B. pertussis in the 2022–2023 period, particularly among children 5–10 years of age, suggesting an evolving epidemiology distinct from classic pertussis and echoing observations noted by researchers investigating other B. holmesii outbreaks (1113). Our study demonstrates evidence of notable B. holmesii circulation in the India subcontinent, underscoring this pathogen’s potential role in co-infection and also as a primary etiologic agent, as demonstrated by the presence of this bacterium in unvaccinated PT IgG–negative case-patients (despite limitations in detailed clinical characterization of pertussis-like symptoms [e.g., cough duration, paroxysms] observed uniformly across cases).

In serology testing, PT IgG positivity (Table 1) among cases with B. holmesii monoinfection (qPCR-positive cases) might reflect recent B. pertussis exposure or vaccination. The absence of PT, pertactin, and fimbrial antigens from the B. holmesii genome and the lack of cross-protective immunity in whole-cell or acellular pertussis vaccines in animal models further reveals critical gaps in current immunization strategies (4,5). Although B. holmesii shares a filamentous hemagglutinin homologue and a conserved 66-kb pathogenicity island with B. pertussis, those shared elements have not yielded effective cross-protection or reliable serologic markers (14).

Our findings highlight the practicality of integrating molecular assays into routine surveillance to accurately distinguish Bordetella species and guide public health responses. Future research efforts should include more detailed clinical characterization of patients, population-based seroepidemiologic studies, and retrospective analysis of archived samples to clarify the historical prevalence of B. holmesii. Revisiting vaccine antigen composition to address nonpertussis Bordetella species might help close critical prevention gaps in pertussis-like disease control.

Mr. Shekhar is a doctoral candidate at the Department of Medical Microbiology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India. His research explores bacterial vaccine-preventable diseases through computational genomics and molecular biology to better understand infection patterns and support evolving therapeutic approaches in public health.

Top

Acknowledgment

The authors thank the World Health Organization’s Immunization Division’s Vaccine Preventable Disease project team for their support.

Top

References

  1. Tan  T, Dalby  T, Forsyth  K, Halperin  SA, Heininger  U, Hozbor  D, et al. Pertussis across the globe: recent epidemiologic trends from 2000 to 2013. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2015;34:e22232. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Kilgore  PE, Salim  AM, Zervos  MJ, Schmitt  HJ. Pertussis: microbiology, disease, treatment, and prevention. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2016;29:44986. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Vashishtha  VM, Bansal  CP, Gupta  SG. Pertussis vaccines: position paper of Indian Academy of Pediatrics (IAP). Indian Pediatr. 2013;50:10019. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Elgarini  M, Mennane  Z, Sobh  M, Hammoumi  A. Bordetella holmesii: Causative agent of pertussis. Arch Pediatr. 2024;31:1725. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Pittet  LF, Emonet  S, Schrenzel  J, Siegrist  CA, Posfay-Barbe  KM. Bordetella holmesii: an under-recognised Bordetella species. Lancet Infect Dis. 2014;14:5109. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Mir-Cros  A, Codina  G, Martín-Gómez  MT, Fàbrega  A, Martínez  X, Jané  M, et al. Emergence of Bordetella holmesii as a causative agent of whooping cough, Barcelona, Spain. Emerg Infect Dis. 2017;23:18569. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Rodgers  L, Martin  SW, Cohn  A, Budd  J, Marcon  M, Terranella  A, et al. Epidemiologic and laboratory features of a large outbreak of pertussis-like illnesses associated with cocirculating Bordetella holmesii and Bordetella pertussis—Ohio, 2010-2011. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;56:32231. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Templeton  KE, Scheltinga  SA, van der Zee  A, Diederen  BM, van Kruijssen  A, Goossens  H, et al. Evaluation of real-time PCR for detection of and discrimination between Bordetella pertussis, Bordetella parapertussis, and Bordetella holmesii for clinical diagnosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41:41216. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Ministry of Health & Family Welfare (India). Surveillance for diphtheria, pertussis and neonatal tetanus [updated 2020 Oct 14]. New Delhi: Ministry of Health & Family Welfare. [cited 2025 May 14]. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1mm96-ouH1A2ibefH8zBKWaUfpuD63G2h/view?usp=sharing
  10. Tatti  KM, Sparks  KN, Boney  KO, Tondella  ML. Novel multitarget real-time PCR assay for rapid detection of Bordetella species in clinical specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49:405966. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Kamiya  H, Otsuka  N, Ando  Y, Odaira  F, Yoshino  S, Kawano  K, et al. Transmission of Bordetella holmesii during pertussis outbreak, Japan. Emerg Infect Dis. 2012;18:11669. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Yih  WK, Silva  EA, Ida  J, Harrington  N, Lett  SM, George  H. Bordetella holmesii-like organisms isolated from Massachusetts patients with pertussis-like symptoms. Emerg Infect Dis. 1999;5:4413. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Pittet  LF, Emonet  S, François  P, Bonetti  EJ, Schrenzel  J, Hug  M, et al. Diagnosis of whooping cough in Switzerland: differentiating Bordetella pertussis from Bordetella holmesii by polymerase chain reaction. PLoS One. 2014;9:e88936. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Diavatopoulos  DA, Cummings  CA, van der Heide  HG, van Gent  M, Liew  S, Relman  DA, et al. Characterization of a highly conserved island in the otherwise divergent Bordetella holmesii and Bordetella pertussis genomes. J Bacteriol. 2006;188:838594. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Figure
Tables

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid3110.241659

Original Publication Date: September 18, 2025

Table of Contents – Volume 31, Number 10—October 2025

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Vikas Gautam, Department of Medical Microbiology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: September 02, 2025
Page updated: September 25, 2025
Page reviewed: September 25, 2025
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external