Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link

Volume 31, Number 7—July 2025

Synopsis

Assessing Readiness of International Investigations into Alleged Biological Weapons Use

Maximilian BrackmannComments to Author , Anja Blasse, Júlio Gouveia Carvalho, Cindi R. Corbett, Cédric Invernizzi, Una Jakob, Stefan Kloth, Filippa Lentzos, Ines Mergler, and Per Wikström
Author affiliation: Spiez Laboratory, Spiez, Switzerland (M. Brackmann, C. Invernizzi); Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany (A. Blasse, S. Kloth, I. Mergler); Biological Defense Laboratory, Lisbon, Portugal (J.G. Carvalho); National Microbiology Laboratory, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada (C.R. Corbett); Peace Research Institute Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany (U. Jakob); King’s College London, London, UK (F. Lentzos); Swedish Defense Research Agency FOI, Umea, Sweden (P. Wikström).

Main Article

Figure 2

Design of the exercise scenario and learnings and recommendations deduced from the 2020 and 2022 capstone exercises to strengthen international investigations of alleged biological weapons use. UN, United Nations.

Figure 2. Design of the exercise scenario and learnings and recommendations deduced from the 2020 and 2022 capstone exercises to strengthen international investigations of alleged biological weapons use. UN, United Nations.

Main Article

Page created: May 31, 2025
Page updated: June 25, 2025
Page reviewed: June 25, 2025
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external