Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link

Disclaimer: Early release articles are not considered as final versions. Any changes will be reflected in the online version in the month the article is officially released.

Volume 32, Number 7—July 2026

Research Letter

New World Ocular Dirofilariasis Caused by Dirofilaria repens Infection, United States

Author affiliation: University of California Los Angeles David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA (B.J. Glasgow, M. Collins, L. Helminiak, S. Yang); University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA (J.A. Lieberman); ARUP Laboratories and University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA (B.A. Mathison)

Suggested citation for this article

Abstract

We describe an infection caused by Dirofilaria repens nematodes in California, USA. A firm nodule developed after an insect bite on a patient’s eyelid. Excision with morphologic and molecular analysis confirmed D. repens infection. Our findings confirm the necessity of both molecular and histological studies to identify nematode infections.

Dirofilariasis is caused by Dirofilaria (family Onchocercidae) nematodes. Old World infections are commonly caused by Dirofilaria repens nematodes. New World infections are generally caused by species other than D. repens, such as D. immitis, D. tenuis, D. subdermata, D. striata, and D. ursi (1). Canids, felids, and raccoons are the definitive hosts for most zoonotic infections, and mosquitoes serve as intermediate vectors. In humans, ocular dirofilariasis, which includes eyelid, subconjunctival, orbital, and intraocular infections, accounts for <35% of all cases (2). The eyelid and orbit are the sites of ≈42% of ocular dirofilariasis cases (3). The species causing ocular dirofilariasis have distinct geographic associations (3). We describe ocular dirofilariasis caused by D. repens nematodes in California, USA.

Figure 1

Images from patient with ocular dirofilariasis caused by Dirofilaria repens in California, USA. A) Axial plane of T-2–weighted orbital magnetic resonance imaging revealing a well circumscribed cystic lesion in the left lower eyelid. The center of the lesion is hyperintense and circumscribed by a hypointense signal. The interpretation was a benign inflammatory lesion. B) Histopathologic image from hematoxylin and eosin–stained slide that reveals a 500-micron diameter cross section of a nematode with a thick cuticular wall featuring external cuticular ridges (indicated by r) and vertically oriented muscle (indicated by m) extending toward the internal cavity (coelomyarian) that are numerous per quadrant (polymyarian), as well as paired reproductive tubes (indicated by t), and simple intestine (indicated by i).

Figure 1. Images from patient with ocular dirofilariasis caused by Dirofilaria repensin California, USA. A) Axial plane of T-2–weighted orbital magnetic resonance imaging revealing a well circumscribed cystic lesion in...

A 74-year-old man from California was bitten by an insect on his left lower eyelid. Initially, he experienced transient pain, swelling, and weeping at the wound. Six weeks later, his dermatologist noted an 8-mm diameter, firm, nontender subcutaneous nodule at this site. The patient had no medical history or recent travel of note. After referral to an ophthalmologist, magnetic resonance imaging of the orbits confirmed a well-circumscribed cystic lesion on the eyelid (Figure 1, panel A). The mass persisted for 5 months, and an excisional biopsy was performed. The mass was dissected from closely adherent surrounding tissue and submitted to pathology in formalin. The patient was asymptomatic 6 months after the surgery.

The tissue was processed routinely and sectioned after paraffin embedding. Microscopy revealed a parasite surrounded by fibrosis with marked chronic inflammation. The cross section of the parasite revealed features of a nematode consistent with Dirofilaria sp. (Figure 1, panel B).

Figure 2

Dirofilaria repens phylogenetic trees from study of ocular dirofilariasis in California, USA. A) ITS gene sequences; B) 28S gene sequences C) COX1 gene sequences. All 3 marker gene comparisons confirmed the study sample belonged to D. repens. Genbank accession numbers are indicated. Branch numbers indicate nucleotide substitutions per site. ITS, internal transcribed spacer.

Figure 2. Dirofilaria repensphylogenetic trees from study of ocular dirofilariasis in California, USA. A) ITS gene sequences; B) 28S gene sequences C) COX1 gene sequences. All 3 marker gene comparisons confirmed...

The formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue was sent to the University of Washington Reference Laboratories (Seattle, WA, USA) for species identification, where we conducted broad-range 28S and internal transcribed spacer (ITS) rDNA PCR and sequencing (4). We detected D. repens DNA. We conducted an in-house ITS-based targeted next-generation sequencing assay on the same formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue, as previously described (5), confirming the species as D. repens. The ITS sequence matched reference sequences from GenBank with 100% pairwise identity. In addition, we conducted shotgun sequencing by using Illumina Miseq (Illumina, https://www.illumina.com) to acquire more genetic information about the parasite. We submitted raw sequence reads to Chan Zuckerberg ID (https://czid.org) for metagenomic analysis, gathering reads aligning to Dirofilaria species. We generated consensus sequence of the COX1 gene by mapping the aligned reads to a D. repens mitochondrial DNA reference (GenBank accession no. KX265049). We conducted phylogenetic analysis on the basis of all 3 marker genes (ITS, 28S, and COX1), which further confirmed the species identification (Figure 2).

The identification of D. repens infection in the United States is noteworthy because of the parasite’s previous absence. Microfilariae of D. repens have been reported in ring-tailed coati in Brazil and Chile (6,7). A nationwide survey of domestic hosts in the United States identified D. immitis parasites in 6.3% of 1,080 dogs and 0.3% of 1,254 cats, but all samples were negative for D. repens parasites (8). The case-patient’s chronology of infection is consistent with the development of infective third-state larvae into juvenile worms, ≈50 days (2). Infection from a domestic host is likely. The recently increased population of Aedes mosquitoes in southern California might have contributed, but the lack of available D. repens surveys in wildlife hosts from California hampers conclusive findings.

Most cases of ocular dirofilariasis and all previous cases of dirofilariasis infections of the eyelid reported in the United States were attributed to D. tenuis infection (3). D. repens is the most common infection of the eyelid in the Old World, with only rare cases of D. asiatica infection reported (9). Various species share common characteristics including a multilayered cuticle, coelomyarian or polymyarian muscle cells, simple intestine, paired sterile reproductive tubes, and internal lateral ridges (3). D. tenuis and D. repens nematodes both have external ridges, which D. immitis nematodes lack. For cases in which speciation was on the basis of morphologic assessment alone, we cannot exclude possible errors.

Most previous D. repens eyelid infections were localized and did not result in patent infection. Young adult nematodes are usually seen in the human, an unsuitable or accidental host. Of note, rare exceptions exist in which the worm was able to mature subcutaneously and produce microfilariae (10).

Eyelid dirofilariasis frequently masquerades as other entities, such as a neoplasm, chalazion, or benign cyst. In this case, a chalazion was suspected. Prior cases in the literature of dirofilariasis have shown similar cystic changes with enhancement on magnetic resonance imaging (Figure 1). Other parasitic infections, such as cysticercosis, leishmaniasis, and rarely loiasis, can produce single eyelid cysts.

We report a case of D. repens human infection in California, USA. Suspicion of this disorder is predicated on a careful history of the environment with mosquitos, raccoons, canids, or felids. The identification of D. repens nematodes in the United States warrants continued surveillance. Careful histologic examination and molecular studies are critical for parasite identification.

Dr. Glasgow is an eye pathologist at the Jules Stein Eye Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA. His research interests include ocular diseases.

Top

Acknowledgments

The consensus COX1 gene sequence was deposited to into GenBank (accession no. PZ357936).

This study was supported by the Edith and Lew Wasserman Professorship in Ophthalmology awarded to B.J.G.

Top

References

  1. Dantas-Torres  F, Otranto  D. Dirofilariosis in the Americas: a more virulent Dirofilaria immitis? Parasit Vectors. 2013;6:288. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Simón  F, Siles-Lucas  M, Morchón  R, González-Miguel  J, Mellado  I, Carretón  E, et al. Human and animal dirofilariasis: the emergence of a zoonotic mosaic. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2012;25:50744. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Camacho  M, Antonietti  M, Sayegh  Y, Colson  JD, Kunkler  AL, Clauss  KD, et al. Ocular dirofilariasis: a clinicopathologic case series and literature review. Ocul Oncol Pathol. 2024;10:4352. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Cao  XZ, Mi  TY, Li  L, Vermeer  MA, Zhang  CC, Huang  N, et al. HPLC-FLD determination of NBD-cholesterol, its ester and other metabolites in cellular lipid extracts. Biomed Chromatogr. 2013;27:9105. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Larkin  PMK, Lawson  KL, Contreras  DA, Le  CQ, Trejo  M, Realegeno  S, et al. Amplicon-based next-generation sequencing for detection of fungi in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues: correlation with histopathology and clinical applications. J Mol Diagn. 2020;22:128793. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Moraes  MFD, da Silva  MX, Magalhães-Matos  PC, de Albuquerque  ACA, Tebaldi  JH, Mathias  LA, et al. Filarial nematodes with zoonotic potential in ring-tailed coatis (Nasua nasua Linnaeus, 1766, Carnivora: Procyonidae) and domestic dogs from Iguaçu National Park, Brazil. Vet Parasitol Reg Stud Reports. 2017;8:19. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. López  J, Valiente-Echeverría  F, Carrasco  M, Mercado  R, Abarca  K. Morphological and molecular identification of canine filariae in a semi-rural district of the Metropolitan Region in Chile [in Spanish]. Rev Chilena Infectol. 2012;29:24889. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Smith  R, Murillo  DFB, Chenoweth  K, Barua  S, Kelly  PJ, Starkey  L, et al. Nationwide molecular survey of Dirofilaria immitis and Dirofilaria repens in companion dogs and cats, United States of America. Parasit Vectors. 2022;15:367. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Tirakunwichcha  S, Sansopha  L, Putaporntip  C, Jongwutiwes  S. Case report: an eyelid nodule caused by Candidatus Dirofilaria hongkongensis diagnosed by mitochondrial 12s rrna sequence. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2021;106:199203. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Blaizot  R, Receveur  MC, Millet  P, Otranto  D, Malvy  DJM. Systemic infection with Dirofilaria repens in southwestern France. Ann Intern Med. 2018;168:2289. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Figures

Top

Suggested citation for this article: Glasgow BJ, Collins M, Helminiak L, Lieberman JA, Mathison BA, Yang S. New world ocular dirofilariasis caused by Dirofilaria repens infection, United States. Emerg Infect Dis. 2026 Jul [date cited]. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid3207.251596

DOI: 10.3201/eid3207.251596

Original Publication Date: June 23, 2026

Table of Contents – Volume 32, Number 7—July 2026

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Ben J. Glasgow, University of California Los Angeles David Geffen School of Medicine 100 Stein Pl, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: May 28, 2026
Page updated: June 23, 2026
Page reviewed: June 23, 2026
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external