Disclaimer: Early release articles are not considered as final versions. Any changes will be reflected in the online version in the month the article is officially released.
Volume 32, Number 8—August 2026
Research Letter
Antibodies Cross-Reactive with Bundibugyo Virus in Ferrets Vaccinated with Ebola Virus Vaccine
Suggested citation for this article
Abstract
Banked serum samples from ferrets previously immunized with the Ebola virus vaccine revealed a prominent but limited humoral immune response that cross-reacted with Bundibugyo virus. The supporting immunogenicity data we report may help guide the ongoing response to the current outbreak of Bundibugyo virus in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.
On May 15, 2026, the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) declared an outbreak of Ebola disease after laboratory confirmation of persons infected with Bundibugyo virus (BDBV) in the country’s Ituri Province (1). At the time, DRC reported 246 suspected cases and 65 deaths associated with an outbreak that probably began weeks earlier. Since the declaration, the outbreak has expanded substantially; 695 confirmed cases and 138 deaths have been reported as of June 13, including 19 cases and 2 deaths in neighboring Uganda (2). On May 16, the World Health Organization classified the outbreak as a Public Health Emergency of International Concern. This outbreak marks only the third known emergence of BDBV, which previously caused outbreaks in Uganda in 2007 and in DRC in 2012.
Currently, no therapeutics or vaccines are available to treat or prevent BDBV disease. Although countermeasures are available for the closely related Ebola virus (EBOV), their efficacy against BDBV is unclear. Of particular interest is the recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus (rVSV)–based vaccine encoding the EBOV glycoprotein (rVSV-EBOV) (tradename ERVEBO; Merck, https://www.merck.com), which has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency for prevention of EBOV disease (EVD). A previous study by Falzarano et al. (3) showed that 3 of 4 cynomolgus macaques vaccinated with rVSV-EBOV were protected against subsequent challenge with BDBV. Conversely, a separate study by Mire et al. (4) demonstrated that cynomolgus macaques vaccinated with a blend of rVSV-EBOV and an analogous Sudan virus (SUDV) vaccine (rVSV-SUDV) protected only 1 of 3 animals from BDBV challenge, although a prime dose of rVSV-SUDV followed by a booster dose of rVSV-EBOV protected 3 of 3 animals. To help establish whether cross-reactive immune responses against BDBV can be elicited by heterologous rVSV-based vaccines, we sought to evaluate the levels of BDBV-specific IgG in the context of the ferret model (5).
We collected serum samples from ferrets 27 days after vaccination with rVSV-EBOV or rVSV-SUDV and quantified EBOV, SUDV, and BDBV glycoprotein-specific IgG levels by using ELISA (Appendix). Both rVSV-EBOV and rVSV-SUDV elicited strong humoral responses to their homologous antigens; serum from all animals exhibited maximum absorbance at dilutions of 1:400 (Figure 1). As expected, the animals survived subsequent challenge with a uniformly lethal dose of the corresponding virus (J. Wight, H. Schulz, L. Banadyga, unpub. data). Serum samples from ferrets vaccinated with rVSV-EBOV exhibited moderate levels of absorbance against BDBV glycoprotein, in contrast with serum samples from animals vaccinated with rVSV-SUDV, which exhibited very low levels of absorbance (Figure 1). Since those data suggested that vaccination with rVSV-EBOV—but not rVSV-SUDV—elicits a heterologous immune response to BDBV, we further quantified the levels of glycoprotein-specific IgG in the serum from animals vaccinated with rVSV-EBOV by endpoint titration (Figure 2). Reciprocal endpoint titers for EBOV glycoprotein-specific IgG ranged from 25,600 to 76,800, with a geometric mean of 56,554. At 16,582, the geometric mean endpoint titer for BDBV glycoprotein-specific IgG was significantly lower than that for EBOV glycoprotein (Wilcoxon statistical test = 3; p = 1.6 × 10–4), despite limited overlap in the range of titers, which extended from 3,200 to 30,270. We detected no EBOV- or BDBV-specific IgG in the control animals.
The macaque studies by Falzarano et al. (3) and Mire et al. (4) suggest that BDBV cross-protection from rVSV-EBOV vaccination may be possible in some cases; however, apparently conflicting results, combined with different vaccination schemes, small group sizes, and a model system that is not uniformly lethal, make meaningful conclusions hard to draw. Thus, those studies do not provide conclusive evidence either for or against cross-protection. Although our data do not definitively answer the questions regarding the ability of rVSV-EBOV to confer protection against BDBV, they do suggest a mechanistic foundation that might underlie cross-protection. Because nonneutralizing antibodies are key to rVSV-EBOV–mediated protection from EVD (6,7), a cross-reactive humoral immune response probably is a prerequisite for any potential BDBV cross-protection that this vaccine might confer. Future work by our group will directly assess the ability of rVSV-EBOV to elicit cross-protection against a uniformly lethal dose of BDBV in ferrets. We are particularly interested in understanding whether a homologous or heterologous vaccine boost may improve cross protection, given our data suggesting that rVSV-SUDV vaccination produces a meager cross-reactive response and data from Mire et al. demonstrating that rVSV-SUDV vaccination followed by rVSV-EBOV boost resulted in complete cross-protection (4).
Although limited in scope, our analysis of cross-reactive antibodies in vaccinated ferrets provides further evidence that rVSV-EBOV vaccination elicits BDBV-specific antibodies, extending observations that have already been made in humans (8). In the midst of an ongoing public health response against BDBV, this study provides supportive, albeit not conclusive, immunogenicity evidence that may be critical in determining the potential utility of the rVSV-EBOV vaccine, which was already administered to >200,000 persons in DRC during the 2018–2020 EVD outbreak (9).
Dr. Wight is a postdoctoral researcher in the Special Pathogens Program at the Public Health Agency of Canada’s National Microbiology Laboratory in Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada. His research interests focus on the ecology, molecular epidemiology, and seroepidemiology of zoonotic pathogens and their implications for human and animal health.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Jonathan Audet, David Safronetz, and Hannah L. Wallace for their assistance in reviewing this manuscript.
This work was supported by the Public Health Agency of Canada.
References
- Africa CDC. Africa CDC calls for urgent regional coordination following Ebola outbreak in Ituri Province, DRC, and imported Ebola Bundibugyo case reported by Uganda. 15 May 2026 [cited 2026 Jun 2]. https://africacdc.org/news-item/africa-cdc-calls-for-urgent-regional-coordination-following-ebola-virus-disease-outbreak-in-ituri-province-drc-and-imported-ebola-bundibugyo-case-reported-by-uganda
- World Health Organization. Ebola disease caused by Bundibugyo virus, Democratic Republic of the Congo & Uganda. Dis Outbreak News. 2026 Jun 13 [cited 2026 Jun 18]. https://www.who.int/emergencies/disease-outbreak-news/item/2026-DON607
- Falzarano D, Feldmann F, Grolla A, Leung A, Ebihara H, Strong JE, et al. Single immunization with a monovalent vesicular stomatitis virus-based vaccine protects nonhuman primates against heterologous challenge with Bundibugyo ebolavirus. J Infect Dis. 2011;204(Suppl 3):S1082–9. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mire CE, Geisbert JB, Marzi A, Agans KN, Feldmann H, Geisbert TW. Vesicular stomatitis virus-based vaccines protect nonhuman primates against Bundibugyo ebolavirus. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7:
e2600 . DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar - Schiffman Z, Liu G, Cao W, Zhu W, Emeterio K, Qiu X, et al. The ferret as a model for filovirus pathogenesis and countermeasure evaluation. ILAR J. 2022;61:62–71. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Marzi A, Engelmann F, Feldmann F, Haberthur K, Shupert WL, Brining D, et al. Antibodies are necessary for rVSV/ZEBOV-GP-mediated protection against lethal Ebola virus challenge in nonhuman primates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:1893–8. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jones SM, Feldmann H, Ströher U, Geisbert JB, Fernando L, Grolla A, et al. Live attenuated recombinant vaccine protects nonhuman primates against Ebola and Marburg viruses. Nat Med. 2005;11:786–90. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ehrhardt SA, Zehner M, Krähling V, Cohen-Dvashi H, Kreer C, Elad N, et al. Polyclonal and convergent antibody response to Ebola virus vaccine rVSV-ZEBOV. Nat Med. 2019;25:1589–600. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Muyembe JJ, Pan H, Peto R, Diallo A, Touré A, Mbala-Kingebene P, et al.; Ebola Ring Vaccination Team in the DRC. Ebola outbreak response in the DRC with rVSV-ZEBOV-GP ring vaccination. N Engl J Med. 2024;391:2327–36. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
Figures
Suggested citation for this article: Wight J, Schulz H, Banadyga L. Antibodies cross-reactive with Bundibugyo virus in ferrets vaccinated with Ebola virus vaccine. Emerg Infect Dis. 2026 Aug [date cited]. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid3208.260948
Original Publication Date: June 24, 2026
Table of Contents – Volume 32, Number 8—August 2026
| EID Search Options |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|


Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:
Logan Banadyga, Special Pathogens Program, National Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of Canada, 1015 Arlington St, Winnipeg, MB R3E 3E2, Canada
Top