Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 5, Number 6—December 1999

Supplementing Tuberculosis Surveillance with Automated Data from Health Maintenance Organizations

Deborah S. Yokoe*Comments to Author , Girish S. Subramanyan*, Edward Nardell†, Sharon Sharnprapai†, Eugene McCray‡, and Richard Platt*§
Author affiliations: *Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; †Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Jamaica Plain, Massachusetts, USA; ‡Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA; and §Harvard Medical School, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

Main Article

Table 2

Performance of health maintenance organization-based screening criteria for tuberculosis (TB)

Screening criteria No. meeting screening criteria No. TB cases detected using screening criteria No. TB cases unknown to public health dept Sensitivity (95% CI) Positive predictive value (95% CI)
All patients (45 incident TB cases)
Two or more anti-TB drugsa 133 40 7 89 (76,96) 30 (22, 39)
Two or more anti-TB drugsa dispensed on the same date 108 39 7 87 (73,95) 36 (27,50)
Three or more anti-TB drugsa 76 38 7 84 (71,94) 50 (38,62)
Only patients with automated medical records (41 incident TB cases)
One or more anti-TB drugs,a a microbiology code,b and a radiology codec 132 21 2 51 (35, 67) 16 (10, 23)
At least one anti-TB druga and a CPTc code for mycobacterial culture/stain 106 17 2 42 (26,58) 16 (10,24)
Diagnosis coded for tuberculosis, a microbiology code,b and a radiology codec 49 16 0 39 (24,56) 33 (20,48)
Diagnosis coded for positive PPD,e a microbiology code,b and a radiology codec 157 8 1 20 (9,35) 5 (2,10)
At least one anti-TB druga and an ICD-9 diagnosis code for tuberculosis 14 7 1 17 (7,32) 50 (23,77)
ICD-9 procedure code for bronchoscopy, a microbiology code,b and a radiology codec 15 1 0 2 (0.1,13) 7 (0.2,32)
Diagnosis coded for active tuberculosis 4 1 0 2 (0.1,13) 25 (1,81)
Diagnosis coded for pulmonary tuberculosis 75 0 0 0 0
Diagnosis coded for tuberculin conversion, a microbiology code,b and a radiology codec 1 0 0 0 0
Only patients without automated medical records (4 incident TB cases)
ICD-9 diagnosis code for tuberculosis 251 4 2 100 (40, 100) 2 (0.4, 40)
A CPT code relating to mycobacterial culture/stain or a radiology code 92 2 1 50 (7, 93) 2 (0.3, 8)

aPharmacy dispensing data; antituberculosis drugs include isoniazid, rifampin, pyrazinamide, ethambutol, streptomycin, capreomycin, kanamycin, ethionamide, para-aminosalicyclic acid, and cycloserine.
bMicrobiology codes include COSTAR (coding system for automated ambulatory-patient records [10]) or ICD-9CM (International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision Clinical Modification) procedure codes for acid fast bacilli smear, culture and sensitivities and microscopy examination of sputum.
cRadiology codes include current procedures terminology (CPT), COSTAR, or ICD-9 procedure codes for chest radiograph, thoracic computer assisted tomography (CT), or thoracic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
dAmbulatory codes were obtained from automated ambulatory-patient records in the staff model division and from claims in the network and group model division.
ePPD, purified protein derivative.

Main Article

  1. Platt  R. Studies of prescription drugs at Harvard Community Health Plan. In: Strom B, editor. Pharmacoepidemiology. 2d ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1994. p. 278-87.
  2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Case definitions for infectious conditions under public health surveillance. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1997;46(RR-10):401.
  3. Subramanyan  G, Yokoe  D, Sharnprapai  S, Tang  Y, Platt  R. An algorithm to match registries with minimal disclosure of individual identities. Public Health Rep. 1999;114:913. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Stata statistics and data analysis [computer program]. Version 5.0. College Station (TX): Stata Corporation; 1997.
  5. Marier  R. The reporting of communicable diseases. Am J Epidemiol. 1977;105:58790.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. McCray  E, Weinbaum  CM, Braden  CR, Onorato  IM. The epidemiology of tuberculosis in the United States. Clin Chest Med. 1997;18:99113. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Driver  C, Braden  CR, Nieves  R, Navarro  AM, Rullan  JV, Valway  SE, Completeness of tuberculosis case reporting, San Juan and Caguas Regions, Puerto Rico, 1992. Public Health Rep. 1996;111:15761.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Maggini  M, Salmaso  S, Alegiani  SS, Caffari  B, Raschetti  R. Epidemiological use of drug prescriptions as markers of disease frequency: An Italian experience. J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44:1299307. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Hripcsak  G, Knirsch  C, Jain  N, Pablos-Mendez  A. Automated tuberculosis detection. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1997;4:37681.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Winickoff  RN, Barnett  GO, Morgan  M, Coltin  KL. Quality assurance in a prepaid group practice. J Ambul Care Manage. 1979;2:1928.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Main Article

Page created: December 15, 2010
Page updated: December 15, 2010
Page reviewed: December 15, 2010
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.