Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 5, Number 6—December 1999
Research

Supplementing Tuberculosis Surveillance with Automated Data from Health Maintenance Organizations

Deborah S. Yokoe*Comments to Author , Girish S. Subramanyan*, Edward Nardell†, Sharon Sharnprapai†, Eugene McCray‡, and Richard Platt*§
Author affiliations: *Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; †Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Jamaica Plain, Massachusetts, USA; ‡Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA; and §Harvard Medical School, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

Main Article

Table 3

Reasons for meeting screening criteria among individuals without incident tuberculosis (TB) who had automated ambulatory-patient records

Screening criteria that include a TB diagnosis code or multiple anti-TB drugs
Reasons why non-TB cases met screening criteria Two or more anti-TB drugsa Diagnosis codeb for active TB Diagnosis codeb for pulmonary TB Diagnosis codeb for TB, a microbiology codec, and a radiology coded At least one anti-TB druga and an ICD-9 diagnosis code for TB
Active TB diagnosed outside study window 9 (13%) 0 0 0 0
Suspected active TB 26 (37%) 2 (67%) 4 (5%) 19 (58%) 6 (86%)
TB prophylaxis 11 (15%) 0 0 0 0
Prenatal TB screening 0 0 57 (76%) 0 0
Prior history of TB 0 0 5 (7%) 7 (21%) 0
Other mycobacterial infections 23 (32%) 0 0 0 0
Treatment of other conditions 2 (3%) 0 0 0 0
No documentation of reason in HMO medical record 0 1 (33%) 9 (12%) 7 (21%) 1 (14%)
Total no. without incident active TB 71 3 75 33 7

aPharmacy dispensing data; antituberculosis drugs include isoniazid, rifampin, pyrazinamide, ethambutol, streptomycin,capreomycin, kanamycin, ethionamide, para-aminosalicyclic acid, and cycloserine.
bAmbulatory codes were obtained from automated ambulatory records in the staff model division and from claims in the network and group model division.
cMicrobiology codes include COSTAR (coding system for automated ambulatory-patient records [10]) or ICD-9CM (International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision Clinical Modification) procedure codes for acid fast bacilli smear, culture and sensitivities and microscopy examination of sputum.
dRadiology codes include current procedures terminology (CPT), COSTAR, or ICD-9 procedure codes for chest radiograph,thoracic computer- assisted tomography (CT), or thoracic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Main Article

References
  1. Platt  R. Studies of prescription drugs at Harvard Community Health Plan. In: Strom B, editor. Pharmacoepidemiology. 2d ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1994. p. 278-87.
  2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Case definitions for infectious conditions under public health surveillance. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1997;46(RR-10):401.
  3. Subramanyan  G, Yokoe  D, Sharnprapai  S, Tang  Y, Platt  R. An algorithm to match registries with minimal disclosure of individual identities. Public Health Rep. 1999;114:913. DOIPubMed
  4. Stata statistics and data analysis [computer program]. Version 5.0. College Station (TX): Stata Corporation; 1997.
  5. Marier  R. The reporting of communicable diseases. Am J Epidemiol. 1977;105:58790.PubMed
  6. McCray  E, Weinbaum  CM, Braden  CR, Onorato  IM. The epidemiology of tuberculosis in the United States. Clin Chest Med. 1997;18:99113. DOIPubMed
  7. Driver  C, Braden  CR, Nieves  R, Navarro  AM, Rullan  JV, Valway  SE, Completeness of tuberculosis case reporting, San Juan and Caguas Regions, Puerto Rico, 1992. Public Health Rep. 1996;111:15761.PubMed
  8. Maggini  M, Salmaso  S, Alegiani  SS, Caffari  B, Raschetti  R. Epidemiological use of drug prescriptions as markers of disease frequency: An Italian experience. J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44:1299307. DOIPubMed
  9. Hripcsak  G, Knirsch  C, Jain  N, Pablos-Mendez  A. Automated tuberculosis detection. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1997;4:37681.PubMed
  10. Winickoff  RN, Barnett  GO, Morgan  M, Coltin  KL. Quality assurance in a prepaid group practice. J Ambul Care Manage. 1979;2:1928.PubMed

Main Article

Page created: December 15, 2010
Page updated: December 15, 2010
Page reviewed: December 15, 2010
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external