Volume 6, Number 2—April 2000
Research
Multivariate Markovian Modeling of Tuberculosis: Forecast for the United States
Table 1
New ACRa | ARI b | ARI/TB c | |
---|---|---|---|
Alabama | 0.13 | 38.2 | 293.6 |
Arizona | 0.30 | 52.7 | 178.3 |
Arkansas | 0.15 | 39.7 | 261.6 |
California | 0.16 | 36.4 | 228.1 |
Colorado | 0.19 | 18.9 | 97.4 |
Connecticut | 0.12 | 15.7 | 134.2 |
Delaware | 0.12 | 30.1 | 243.2 |
District of Columbia | 0.15 | 55.6 | 376.1 |
Florida | 0.07 | 27.4 | 410.5 |
Georgia | 0.08 | 31.8 | 395.7 |
Idaho | 0.10 | 13.2 | 135.3 |
Illinois | 0.15 | 39.6 | 269.3 |
Indiana | 0.16 | 30.7 | 198.0 |
Iowa | 0.07 | 9.2 | 130.4 |
Kansas | 0.07 | 12.6 | 176.9 |
Kentucky | 0.28 | 50.6 | 177.9 |
Louisiana | 0.10 | 35.4 | 339.6 |
Maine | 0.14 | 25.2 | 179.9 |
Maryland | 0.22 | 36.4 | 164.4 |
Massachusetts | 0.14 | 28.9 | 203.9 |
Michigan | 0.14 | 29.7 | 205.3 |
Minnesota | 0.10 | 17.3 | 181.8 |
Mississippi | 0.09 | 30.3 | 334.3 |
Missouri | 0.14 | 32.9 | 231.8 |
Montana | 0.11 | 13.6 | 123.2 |
Nebraska | 0.09 | 16.4 | 174.5 |
Nevada | 0.07 | 53.8 | 747.9 |
New Hampshire | 0.11 | 16.8 | 153.6 |
New Jersey | 0.15 | 23.7 | 161.6 |
New Mexico | 0.22 | 29.1 | 130.9 |
New York | 0.17 | 36.6 | 218.1 |
North Carolina | 0.08 | 26.1 | 342.8 |
North Dakota | 0.07 | 8.6 | 122.5 |
Ohio | 0.14 | 27.1 | 198.2 |
Oklahoma | 0.13 | 24.0 | 185.8 |
Oregon | 0.12 | 32.0 | 257.0 |
Pennsylvania | 0.17 | 32.1 | 183.8 |
Rhode Island | 0.12 | 27.9 | 235.7 |
South Carolina | 0.04 | 26.7 | 615.2 |
South Dakota | 0.06 | 9.2 | 163.8 |
Tennessee | 0.19 | 45.8 | 244.7 |
Texas | 0.21 | 29.2 | 138.7 |
Utah | 0.04 | 7.6 | 197.1 |
Vermont | 0.18 | 18.3 | 99.3 |
Virginia | 0.13 | 32.1 | 237.9 |
Washington | 0.11 | 25.7 | 231.9 |
West Virginia | 0.21 | 39.1 | 189.4 |
Wisconsin | 0.08 | 22.1 | 260.1 |
Wyoming | 0.15 | 10.3 | 66.7 |
Total | 0.14 | 30.1 | 210.3 |
aACR, Active case rate per 100,000 per year tuberculosis
bARI, annual rate of infection per 100,000 per year
cContagious parameter
Page created: December 16, 2010
Page updated: December 16, 2010
Page reviewed: December 16, 2010
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.