Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 7, Number 2—April 2001
THEME ISSUE
4th Decennial International Conference on Nosocomial and Healthcare-Associated Infections
State of the Art

New Disinfection and Sterilization Methods

William A. RutalaComments to Author  and David J. Weber
Author affiliations: University of North Carolina (UNC) Health Care System; UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA

Main Article

Table 3

Effect on vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) survival of wiping Surfacine on a treated surface over an extended period

Surface Intervention Day 1 Day 6 Day 13
Formica Control 50 95 120
Treated 0 (100%)a 0 (100%) 0 (100%)
Treated & Wiped 0 (100%) 0 (100%) 0 (100%)

aPercent reduction of VRE counts per Rodac plate ([treated/control] x 100) (11).

Main Article

References
  1. Rutala  WA; APIC Guidelines Committee. APIC guideline for selection and use of disinfectants. Am J Infect Control. 1996;24:31342. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Rutala  WA, Weber  DJ. Disinfection of endoscopes: review of new chemical sterilants used for high-level disinfection. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1999;20:6976. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Advanced Sterilization Products. Johnson & Johnson. Cidex OPA high level disinfection solution: technical information. Irvine (CA): Advanced Sterilization Products; 1999.
  4. Gregory  AW, Schaalje  B, Smart  JD, Robison  RA. The mycobactericidal efficacy of ortho-phthalaldehyde and the comparative resistances of Mycobacterium bovis, Mycobacterium terrae, and Mycobacterium chelonae. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1999;20:32430. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Walsh  SE, Maillard  JY, Russell  AD. Ortho-phthalaldehyde: a possible alternative to glutaraldehyde for high level disinfection. J Appl Microbiol. 1999;86:103946. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Alfa  MJ, Sitter  DL. In-hospital evaluation of ortho-phthalaldehyde as a high level disinfectant for flexible endoscopes. J Hosp Infect. 1994;26:1526. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen  X. A comparison of the useful life of Cidex activated dialdehyde solution and Cidex OPA in AER system. Irvine (CA): Advanced Sterilization Products; 1999.
  8. Weber  DJ, Rutala  WA. Role of environmental contamination in the transmission of vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1997;18:3069. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Rutala  WA, Stiegel  MM, Sarubbi  FA, Weber  DJ. Susceptibility of antibiotic-susceptible and antibiotic-resistant hospital bacteria to disinfectants. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1997;18:41721. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Anderson  RL, Carr  JH, Bond  WW, Favero  MS. Susceptibility of vancomycin-resistant enterococci to environmental disinfectants. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1997;18:1959. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Rutala  WA, Gergen  MF, Weber  DJ. Evaluation of a new surface germicide (SurfacineTM) with antimicrobial persistence. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2000;21:103.
  12. Fraise  AP. Choosing disinfectants. J Hosp Infect. 1999;43:25564. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Tanaka  H, Hirakata  Y, Kaku  M, Yoshida  R, Takemura  H, Mizukane  R, Antimicrobial activity of superoxidized water. J Hosp Infect. 1996;34:439. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Selkon  JB, Babb  JR, Morris  R. Evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of a new super-oxidized water, Sterilox®, for the disinfection of endoscopes. J Hosp Infect. 1999;41:5970. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Shetty  N, Srinivasan  S, Holton  J, Ridgway  GL. Evaluation of microbicidal activity of a new disinfectant: Sterilox® 2500 against Clostridium difficile spores, Helicobacter pylori, vancomycin resistant Enterococcus species, Candida albicans and several Mycobacterium species. J Hosp Infect. 1999;41:1015. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Advanced Sterilization Products new automated endoscope reprocessing system with NSX sterilant. Technical report. Irvine (CA): Advanced Sterlization Products; 2000.
  17. Rutala  WA, Weber  DJ. Clinical effectiveness of low-temperature sterilization technologies. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1998;19:798804. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Rutala  WA, Gergen  MF, Weber  DJ. Evaluation of a rapid readout biological indicator for flash sterilization with three biological indicators and three chemical indicators. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1993;14:3904. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Rutala  WA, Jones  SM, Weber  DJ. Comparison of a rapid readout biological indicator for steam sterilization with four conventional biological indicators and five chemical indicators. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1996;17:4238. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 3M Attest Rapid Readout Ethylene Oxide Biological Indicator. Product Profile. Minneapolis (MN): 3M.
  21. Rutala  WA, Gergen  MF, Weber  DJ. Sporicidal activity of a new low-temperature sterilization technology: the Sterrad 50 sterilizer. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1999;20:5146. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Rutala  WA, Gergen  MF, Weber  DJ. Comparative evaluation of the sporicidal activity of new low-temperature sterilization technologies: ethylene oxide, 2 plasma sterilization systems, and liquid peracetic acid. Am J Infect Control. 1998;26:3938. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Main Article

Page created: April 17, 2012
Page updated: April 17, 2012
Page reviewed: April 17, 2012
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external