Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 10, Number 5—May 2004
Research

Endemic Venezuelan Equine Encephalitis in Northern Peru

Article Metrics
56
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus
Author affiliations: *University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA; †Naval Medical Research Center Detachment, Lima, Peru; ‡U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Fort Detrick, Maryland, USA; §University of California, Davis, California, USA; ¶Instituto Nacional de Salud, Lima, Peru

Cite This Article

Abstract

Since Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus (VEEV) was isolated in Peru in 1942, >70 isolates have been obtained from mosquitoes, humans, and sylvatic mammals primarily in the Amazon region. To investigate genetic relationships among the Peru VEEV isolates and between the Peru isolates and other VEEV strains, a fragment of the PE2 gene was amplified and analyzed by single-stranded conformation polymorphism. Representatives of seven genotypes underwent sequencing and phylogenetic analysis. The results identified four VEE complex lineages that cocirculate in the Amazon region: subtypes ID (Panama and Colombia/Venezuela genotypes), IIIC, and a new, proposed subtype IIID, which was isolated from a febrile human, mosquitoes, and spiny rats. Both ID lineages and the IIID subtype are associated with febrile human illness. Most of the subtype ID isolates belonged to the Panama genotype, but the Colombia/Venezuela genotype, which is phylogenetically related to epizootic strains, also continues to circulate in the Amazon basin.

Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus (VEEV) is an emerging mosquito-borne RNA virus in the family Togaviridae, genus Alphavirus. Since its isolation in 1938, many equine epizootics and epidemics have been reported in Colombia, Venezuela, Trinidad, Peru, Ecuador, Mexico, and the United States, and other countries (15); the number of reports of human and equine cases have increased during recent years (68). At least 13 distinct subtypes and varieties, including several different species, make up the VEE complex (Table 1). Only subtype I varieties A, B, and C have caused major outbreaks involving hundreds of thousands of equine and human cases. Subtypes II through VI and subtype I varieties D, E, and F are enzootic, equine-avirulent strains not associated with major equine outbreaks or epidemics, although they do cause human illness, which can be fatal (9,10).

Figure 1

Thumbnail of Map of Peru showing the geographic distribution of the Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus (VEEV) complex isolates included in the study. Numbers in parenthesis indicate the number of isolates compared to the total number of febrile cases during the year. ID, IAB, IIIC, IIID correspond to VEEV subtypes isolated during the indicated year.

Figure 1. Map of Peru showing the geographic distribution of the Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus (VEEV) complex isolates included in the study. Numbers in parenthesis indicate the number of isolates compared to the...

In Peru, VEEV was first isolated in the 1940s, when subtype IAB strains caused equine epizootics and epidemics along the Pacific coast (7,8). Field investigations were later conducted to determine the origin of the IAB strains. Initial ecologic studies in the Amazon region of northeastern Peru (11,12) yielded 11 VEE complex isolates from mosquitoes and sentinel hamsters during 1970 and 1971 in Quistococha, near Iquitos (Figure 1). Antigenic analyses identified 10 isolates as subtype ID VEEV (11) and one strain as subtype IIIC in the VEE complex (12,13). Because these viruses were isolated only from sentinel hamsters and mosquitoes, whether they were human pathogens remained unclear. Not until 1993 through 1995, when VEEV subtype ID was isolated from persons with febrile illness in the Amazon region of Peru (4,14), was there clear evidence that VEEV causes human disease in this region. Two subtype ID strains were isolated from patients in Pantoja in 1994, and 10 other subtype ID strains were obtained from febrile patients in and around the city of Iquitos from 1993 to 1995.

Nucleotide sequences and phylogenetic analyses recently performed on Peruvian VEEV isolates indicated that the 1970s VEEV subtype ID mosquito isolates and the 1994 Pantoja human isolates belong to the Colombia/Venezuela ID genotype, whereas the 1993–1995 Iquitos human isolates belonged to the Panama ID genotype (9). Lack of detection of the Colombia/Venezuela genotype in the Iquitos area during 1993 through 1995, when the Panama genotype was repeatedly isolated, suggested that the Colombia/Venezuela genotype had been replaced by virus strains from Panama. Because the Colombia/Venezuela VEEV genotype is believed to give rise to epizootic viruses through mutations of the E2 envelope glycoprotein (1518), disappearance of this genotype from the Iquitos area could have important public health implications.

Since 1995, 75 VEEV strains have been isolated from mosquitoes, humans, and sentinel hamsters in Peru. We determined the genetic relationships among strains isolated from 1995 through 2002 and compared them with other VEEV strains isolated from the Americas. Our results indicate that the VEEV subtype ID Colombia/Venezuela genotype continues to circulate in Iquitos but may infect people at a lower rate than the Panama genotype. We also demonstrated that a recent subtype III isolate is genetically distinct from the subtype IIIC strain isolated in 1971 (12). This strain, which we propose as subtype IIID in the VEE complex, and both subtype ID genotypes cause human febrile disease in the Iquitos area.

Methods

Study Sites

VEEV isolates were obtained from several locations in Peru. The main study site was centered around Iquitos, a city of 300,000 people on the Amazon River in the Department of Loreto (Figure 1). The major occupations of the inhabitants are housekeeping, teaching, military work, agriculture, fishing, and tourism. The climate is tropical, with a mean annual temperature of 27.5°C and mean annual precipitation of 2.7 m (4).

Virus Isolates

The VEE complex isolates included in this study are shown in Table 2. These viruses were provided by the University of Texas Medical Branch World Health Organization Collaborating Reference Center for Arboviruses, the United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, and the U.S. Naval Medical Research Center Detachment, Lima, Peru (NMRCD). Most of the viruses were isolated in Vero cells from serum of febrile patients, sentinel hamsters, and mosquitoes. These viruses were passaged once in Vero cells, and supernatant fluid was stored at –70°C for subsequent extraction of viral RNA.

Extraction of Viral RNA and cDNA Synthesis

Viral RNA was extracted from cell culture media as described elsewhere (19). Briefly, 250 μL of infected cell culture supernatant was mixed with 750 μL of Trizol LS (Gibco BRL, Bethesda, MD), and RNA was extracted following the manufacturer’s protocol. For cDNA synthesis, 5 μL of the extracted RNA was mixed with 1 μmol of reverse primer V9207B (Table 3), 1X First Strand Buffer (Gibco BRL, Bethesda, MD), 1 mmol deoxynocleoside triphosphate (dNTPs), 80U RNAsin (Promega, Madison, WI), and 200 U SuperScript II Reverse Transcriptase (Gibco BRL, Bethesda, MD), and then incubated at 42°C for 1 h.

PCR Amplification

Primers used for the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and sequencing are listed in Table 3. For amplification of the N-terminus of the PE2 envelope glycoprotein precursor gene, primers V8369(+) and V9207B(-) were used, and the resulting product was sequenced with primers V8659(+) and V8953(-) (19). PCRs included 2.5 U of Taq polymerase (Promega, Madison, WI), 1X Promega Taq buffer, 300 nmol of each primer, 1 mmol MgCl2, 0.2 mmol dNTPs, and 10 μL of the cDNA reaction; 30 amplification cycles included heat-denaturation at 95°C for 30 s, primer annealing at 48°C for 30 s, and extension at 72°C for 1 min. A final extension of 10 min was used to ensure complete double-stranded DNA synthesis. In the case of the proposed subtype IIID strains, the reverse primer used for cDNA synthesis and PCR was V9257B(-). In some cases, PE2 amplicons were not obtained, and those isolates were amplified by using alphavirus-specific nsP1 primers described previously (20). The complete 26S gene of one subtype IIID strain (human isolate FSL190) was amplified and sequenced for further comparison with other VEE complex subtypes; two overlapping PCR amplicons were obtained by using primer pairs E/V 7514(+)/VIIID 10471(-), and α10247A(+)/Mlu-T25(-), and sequenced by gene walking.

Single-Stranded Conformation Polymorphism (SSCP)

SSCP analysis was performed as previously described (16). PCR products were purified with the Qiaquick gel extraction kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA), and 2 μL of the purified PCR amplicon DNA was mixed with 8 μL of SSCP loading buffer (95% formamide, 0.05% bromophenol blue, 0.05% xylene cyanol). To denature the DNA, the reaction was heated to 95°C for 5 min and immediately cooled on ice, loaded onto an 8% polyacrylamide gel, and electrophoresed in 1 x Tris-borate-EDTA buffer at room temperature for 20 h at 8 mA. The single-stranded DNA products were visualized with silver staining (21). Single-strand conformational polymorphism genotypes were determined by comparing the migration patterns of the double-stranded DNA of the various isolates with one another and against a standard DNA ladder. Unique migration patterns were designated as distinct SSCP genotypes.

Sequencing and Phylogenetic Analysis

Two or three representatives of each SSCP genotype were selected randomly for sequencing and phylogenetic analysis. Most PCR products were sequenced directly with an Applied Biosystems (Foster City, CA) Prism automated DNA sequencing kit according to the manufacturer’s protocol. In some cases, PCR products were cloned into the PCR II vector (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), and at least two clones were sequenced by using vector-specific primers. Sequences were aligned by using the Clustal program in the MacVector (Oxford Molecular Group, Campbell, CA) software package, and phylogenetic analyses were conducted by using maximum parsimony, neighbor-joining, and maximum likelihood programs implemented in the PAUP 4.0 software (22). For the neighbor joining analysis, the HKY85 distance formula was used. Bootstrap analyses were conducted with 1,000 replicates to place confidence values on groupings within trees (23).

Plaque Reduction Neutralization Tests

To obtain immune sera against VEEV subtypes IIIA, IIIB, IIIC and IIID, cotton rats (Sigmodon hispidus, Harlan, Indianapolis, IN) were infected subcutaneously with 1,000 PFUs of virus. Three weeks after injection, the animals were bled for antibody testing using plaque reduction neutralization tests (PRNT) with Vero cells (24). Viruses were tested against all antibody preparations, and the endpoint titers were defined as the reciprocal of the highest dilution inhibiting >80% of approximately 100 PFU of virus.

Results

Distribution and Characterization of Human VEEV Cases in Iquitos

Figure 2

Thumbnail of Map of Iquitos showing the locations of human Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus cases in the city.

Figure 2. Map of Iquitos showing the locations of human Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus cases in the city.

Studies to identify the cause of human febrile illness in the Amazon region of Peru since 1995 (Watts et al., unpub. data) identified at least 183 cases of VEEV on the basis of immunoglobulin (Ig) M antibody detection, virus isolation, or both. The VEEV cases in the Iquitos area were localized into two major clusters: the region surrounding Lake Morona Cocha, which typically floods during the rainy season, and cases near the Itaya and the Amazon rivers (Figure 2). Cases were also observed to the north and southwest of Iquitos. Most patients with VEEV did not report travel outside their home region, suggesting that many infections occurred in the city of Iquitos. Common signs and symptoms of VEEV infection included fever, headache, chills, malaise, diarrhea, vomiting, arthralgia, and abdominal pain. Clinical information obtained by NMRCD provided no indication of neurologic disease, and no deaths were reported.

Sequencing and Phylogenetic Analysis

An 856-bp fragment from the N terminus of the PE2 gene was obtained for most of the VEEV subtype ID isolates using primers V8369(+)/V9207(-). This region was chosen because it has been used previously in similar phylogenetic analyses, resulting in a large database that allows for genetic comparison with new isolates (4,9,25). In addition, the fragment sequenced contains the N-terminal portion of the E2 glycoprotein gene, which has been shown to undergo critical amino acid substitutions associated with epizootic VEEV emergence (18).

To screen the amplified isolates for genetic differences and to eliminate the cost and effort in sequencing each virus isolate, SSCP analyses were performed as previously described (19). At least 2–3 representatives of each SSCP genotype were selected at random for sequence and phylogenetic analysis. Some isolates could not be amplified with primers V8369(+)/V9207B(-), and later phylogenetic analyses indicated that they corresponded mainly to subtypes other than ID. For these isolates, primer V9257(-) was substituted for V9207B(-) in the cDNA syntheses and PCR amplifications. In addition, alphavirus consensus primers (20) that amplify a portion of the nsP1 gene were used to confirm the identity of these isolates and to look for evidence of recombination within the VEE complex (data not shown).

Figure 3

Thumbnail of Phylogenetic tree of the Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus (VEEV) complex derived from partial PE2 gene sequences of Peruvian VEEV isolates and homologous sequences published previously, using the neighbor joining program implemented in PAUP 4.0 (22). The tree was rooted using an outgroup comprised of four major lineages of Eastern Equine Encephalitis virus (26). Virus strains are labeled by VEE complex subtype, abbreviated country (FL=Florida, USA) and year of isolation, followe

Figure 3. Phylogenetic tree of the Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus (VEEV) complex derived from partial PE2 gene sequences of Peruvian VEEV isolates and homologous sequences published previously, using the neighbor joining program implemented...

Phylogenetic analyses performed using maximum parsimony, neighbor-joining, and distance-matrix methods generated similar tree topologies. The neighbor-joining tree based on the PE2 gene (Figure 3) showed that the newly sequenced VEEV Peruvian strains grouped into four major clades: the subtype ID Colombia/Venezuela genotype, the ID Panama/Peru genotype, subtype IIIC isolated in 1971 in the Iquitos area of Peru from a mosquito, and a newly identified group of viruses that fell within subtype III but were distinct from IIIC, which we propose as a new genetic subtype IIID.

The greatest number of human isolates from Peru fell into VEEV subtype ID. In agreement with previous studies (9), genetic analysis of the ID strains delineated two distinct genotypes that differ by approximately 5% in their nucleotide sequences: the Colombia/Venezuela genotype, which is believed to have generated the epizootic IAB and IC viruses (1518), and the Panama/Peru genotype. The Colombia/Venezuela ID genotype was represented by isolates in Peru during the 1970s and two isolates made from Pantoja in 1994. Previous data suggested that this genotype was no longer circulating in Iquitos and had been replaced by the Panama genotype; however, the evidence that these viruses continued to circulate in Iquitos was supported by human isolates from 1998 and 2002, which grouped into the Colombia/Venezuela clade with strong bootstrap support (Figure 3). However, most of the Peruvian VEEV isolates from the Iquitos region grouped into the ID Panama/Peru genotype and were obtained from humans, rodents, and mosquitoes.

The VEE complex subtype IIIC strain, first isolated in 1971 from mosquitoes collected near Iquitos (12,13), was isolated again in 2002 from a sentinel hamster in the Amazon region. Several other isolates from mosquitoes, humans, and rodents also grouped into subtype III (88% bootstrap support) but were quite distinct from the subtype IIIC isolates (18% nucleotide sequence, 8% amino acid sequence divergence in the PE2 protein genes). These levels of divergence are equal to or greater than those of other VEE complex antigenic subtypes, so we propose the designation of subtype IIID for these strains.

Figure 4

Thumbnail of Unrooted phylogenetic tree of the Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus (VEEV) complex and other representative alphaviruses derived from complete structural polyprotein sequences using the neighbor joining program implemented in PAUP 4.0 (22). Viruses are labeled by species according to the International Committee for Taxonomy of Viruses (27). VEEV subtype IIIC and IIID strain names are in parentheses. Numbers indicate bootstrap values for clades to the right.

Figure 4. Unrooted phylogenetic tree of the Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus (VEEV) complex and other representative alphaviruses derived from complete structural polyprotein sequences using the neighbor joining program implemented in PAUP 4.0 (<>

To further document these relationships within subtype III and to investigate possible recombination, phylogenetic trees on the basis of the nsP1 gene were also constructed. The nsP1 trees did not show any evidence of recombination and also supported the sister-group relationship between subtype IIIC and the related IIID isolates (data not shown). To further genetically characterize this new subtype III strains, trees based on the complete 26S structural gene sequences were generated. All trees, including the neighbor-joining tree shown in Figure 4, confirmed the close relationship between the IIIC and IIID subtypes, as well as their level of divergence.

Antigenic Characterization of Proposed Subtype IIID

To characterize antigenically the putative new VEEV subtype IIID, PRNTs were performed to determine the antigenic relationships among the subtype III viruses (Table 4). Mucambo virus (subtype IIIA) versus Tonate virus (subtype IIIB) showed a fourfold difference in only one direction, which, based on the traditional serologic classification criteria (26), indicates that these are virus subtypes. When subtype IIIC was compared with the IIIA and IIIB subtypes, a fourfold or greater difference was observed in both directions, indicating that IIIC is a different virus. However, only a twofold difference existed in endpoint titers between subtype IIIC and the new IIID, which indicated that they are not distinct subtypes according to traditional antigenic criteria (28).

Discussion

VEEV is considered an emerging human pathogen in Latin America because a resurgence of VEE disease has occurred in Mexico and South America during the past decade (8). Our results indicate that VEEV is also endemic in Peru, with cases occurring regularly in the Iquitos area from 1993 through 2002. Analysis of a larger number of VEEV isolates allowed us to generate a more accurate and complete description of VEE complex circulating in the Amazon Basin of Peru than was possible previously (9). Most human isolates belong to subtype ID, and phylogenetic analyses distinguish two distinct ID genotypes: the Colombia/Venezuela genotype, which is currently circulating in Peru, contrary to previous suggestions (9), and the Panama/Peru genotype, which represents most human isolates. Several hypotheses explain the apparently higher rate of human infection in the Iquitos area by the ID Panama/Peru genotype: 1) viruses from the Colombia/Venezuela genotype are not transmitted efficiently to humans compared to those in the Panama-Peru genotype; 2) the Panama/Peru genotype circulates at higher levels in urban areas such as Iquitos, resulting in more infections; 3) the Panama/Peru genotype causes more severe disease, with more patients visiting clinics and participating in the NMRCD febrile illness study, resulting in more virus isolations and; 4) the Panama/Peru genotype produces higher titer human viremia, resulting in more human isolates. Further ecologic, epidemiologic, and entomologic studies are needed to test these hypotheses. The mosquito vector(s) that transmit VEEV to humans in Peru are unknown. VEEV has been isolated from Culex (Melanoconion) spp. mosquitoes in Peru, known vectors of enzootic VEEV in many other locations. Several different species (Culex [Mel.] gnomatos, Cx. [Mel.] pedroi, Cx. [Mel.] vomerifer, and Psorophora albigenu) are competent laboratory vectors of the ID viruses currently circulating in the Iquitos area (29,30). Further studies are required to determine whether these mosquitoes, other species, or both transmit VEEV to humans in Peru. This information will be important in understanding human exposure and infection with these different VEE complex strains.

Epidemiologic information available from 1995 through 2002 suggests that many VEE cases occurred within the city of Iquitos. Interviews indicated that many patients had not traveled during the time of probable infection, suggesting urban transmission. Studies carried out in other VEEV-enzootic areas indicate that transmission is confined to rural and forest habitats (3032). Whether the viruses have adapted to infect peridomestic mosquitoes or whether Amazonian deforestation and urbanization is increasing the risk for VEEV transmission to humans through changes in Cx. Melanoconion spp. host preference and larval habitats remains to be determined.

Subtype III VEE Complex Strains

Before the strain reported herein, the only isolate of subtype IIIC was obtained in 1971 from a pool of mosquitoes collected near Iquitos (12,13). Although epidemiologic and ecologic studies were conducted in the same area between 1971 and 1995, no evidence was obtained that the IIIC virus was still circulating in the Peruvian Amazon until we isolated it from a sentinel hamster in 2002. The 2002 IIIC isolate did not produce fatal disease in the sentinel animal nor in other hamsters infected experimentally in our laboratory (data not shown). The failure to isolate the subtype IIIC virus from febrile patients in Iquitos suggests that it is not transmitted readily to humans, that the viremia generated in humans is relatively low and usually undetectable by virus isolation, or that the virus simply does not cause clinical human disease.

We propose that the newly identified subtype III strain be defined as a new genetic variety: subtype III, variety D in the VEE complex. These strains do not represent a new antigenic subtype (28) because they exhibit a twofold difference in homologous versus heterologous PRNT antibody titers when compared to the IIIC strain. Arbovirus varieties are described as “isolates differentiable only by the application of special tests or reagents [kinetic hemagglutination inhibition (HI), monoclonal antibody assays, etc.] (28).” We propose that this definition of special tests for variety assignment be extended to include sequence and phylogenetic differentiation of major lineages, such as IIIC versus the proposed IIID genetic variety. These lineages are equivalent in genetic divergence to other VEEV varieties defined previously based on serologic reactions using kinetic HI (8,33).

Both subtype III variants isolated in the Iquitos area are antigenically distinct from Mucambo (IIIA) and Tonate (IIIB) viruses, based on greater than fourfold endpoint antibody titer differences in both directions. The variants are also quite distinct genetically from Mucambo and Tonate viruses (23% nucleotide and 14% amino acid sequence divergence in the structural protein genes) and appear to be geographically distinct as well. We do not have enough information available to know whether the IIIA, IIIB, IIIC, and IIID variants share vectors or reservoir hosts, although IIIA, IIIC, and IIID probably infect Proechimys spp., and Tonate virus (IIIB) may use birds as its reservoir hosts (34).

The newly identified subtype IIID strain was isolated from spiny rats (Proechimys spp.), Culex (Melanoconion) spp. mosquitoes and from a patient with fever, chills, and malaise. The symptoms are typical of human VEEV (subtype I) infection. Using diagnoses based on virus isolation and serology, Watts et al. (4,14) previously reported that VEEV was responsible for at least 3% of febrile illnesses in the city of Iquitos in the Amazon basin of Peru. Subtype ID was the thought to be the cause of these human VEEV cases, including those diagnosed only by serologic findings. However, our study demonstrated that both VEEV subtype ID and the newly recognized subtype IIID are responsible for human illness in the Peruvian Amazon basin. Whether subtype IIID was responsible for any other of the 183 human cases diagnosed serologically in Peru since 1995 is unclear. More detailed studies to retrospectively examine serum samples from these cases are required to evaluate this possibility.

Human Disease and Virulence of Enzootic VEEV Strains

In Peru, human VEE does not appear to result in neurologic manifestations, and fatal human disease has never been reported. In contrast, during recent VEEV epidemics with subtype IC strains in Colombia and Venezuela, an estimated 3,000 cases with neurologic complications and 300 fatal cases (5,35) were reported. Overall, human death rates have generally been estimated at approximately 0.5% during these epidemics, with most of the neurologic disease and fatal cases reported in children. Most of the human VEEV cases we studied in Peru occurred in adults (94.6%), which suggests an occupational exposure or possibly an age-biased recruitment into the NMRCD febrile illness study. The lack of any evidence for neurologic disease in any of the NMRCD cases studied from 1994 to 2003 (D. Watts, unpub. data) suggests a possible difference in virulence compared with epizootic IAB and IC strains. Because we characterized only 183 VEEV cases, and only 10 of these were children, whether a virulence difference exists between enzootic subtype ID and epizootic VEEV strains is impossible to determine with any statistical certainty. Strains of the Panama-Peru genotype of subtype ID are known to have caused fatal human disease (10).

Ms. Aguilar is a Peruvian citizen and a graduate student in the Microbiology and Immunology Program, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas. Her main research interests are the genetics and pathogenesis of alphaviruses and other arthropod-borne viral diseases and the development of antiviral vaccines.

Top

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Leslie Angulo, Zonia Rios, Marie Lefevre, and Vidal Felices for their invaluable assistance in the execution of this project.

This work was supported by grant No. AI49725-01 from the NIH, and by Work UNIT NUMBER (WUN) No.847705 8200 25GB B0016. IRB Protocol Number: 31535 “Surveillance and Etiology of Acute Febrile Diseases in Peru.” The study protocol was approved by the Naval Medical Research Center Institutional Review Board (Protocol # 31535) in compliance with all U.S. federal regulations governing the protection of human study participatns. The opinions expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy of the Department of Navy, Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government.

Top

References

  1. Kubes  V, Rios  FA. The causative agent of infectious equine encephalomyelitis in Venezuela. Science. 1939;90:201. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Oberste  MS, Fraire  M, Navarro  R, Zepeda  C, Zarate  ML, Ludwig  GV, Association of Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus subtype IE with two equine epizootics in Mexico. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1998;59:1007.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Lord  RD. History and geographic distribution of Venezuelan equine encephalitis. Bull Pan Am Health Organ. 1974;8:10010.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Watts  DM, Callahan  J, Rossi  C, Oberste  MS, Roehrig  JT, Wooster  MT, Venezuelan equine encephalitis febrile cases among humans in the Peruvian Amazon River region. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1998;58:3540.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Weaver  SC, Salas  R, Rico-Hesse  R, Ludwig  GV, Oberste  MS, Boshell  J, Re-emergence of epidemic Venezuelan equine encephalomyelitis in South America. VEE Study Group. Lancet. 1996;348:43640. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Weaver  SC. Recurrent emergence of Venezuelan equine encephalomyelitis. In: Scheld WM and J Hughes. Emerging infections I. Washington: ASM Press; 1998. p. 27–42.
  7. Johnson  KM, Martin  DH. Venezuelan equine encephalitis. Adv Vet Sci Comp Med. 1974;18:79116.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Walton  TE, Grayson  MA. Venezuelan equine encephalomyelitis. In: Monath TP. The arboviruses: epidemiology and ecology, vol. IV. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 1988. p. 203–31.
  9. Oberste  MS, Weaver  SC, Watts  DM, Smith  JF. Identification and genetic analysis of Panama-genotype Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus subtype ID in Peru. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1998;58:416.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Johnson  KM, Shelokov  A, Peralta  PH, Dammin  GJ, Young  NA. Recovery of Venezuelan equine encephalomyelitis virus in Panama. A fatal case in man. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1968;17:43240.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Scherer  WF, Madalengoitia  J, Flores  W, Acosta  M. The first isolations of eastern encephalitis, group C, and Guama group arboviruses from the Peruvian Amazon region of western South America. Bull Pan Am Health Organ. 1975;9:1926.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Scherer  WF, Anderson  K. Antigenic and biologic characteristics of Venezuelan encephalitis virus strains including a possible new subtype isolated from the Amazon region of Peru in 1971. Am J Epidemiol. 1975;101:35661.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Scherer  WF, Chin  J. An unusual strain of Venezuelan encephalitis virus existing sympatrically with subtype I-D strains in a Peruvian rain forest. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1983;32:8716.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Watts  DM, Lavera  V, Callahan  J, Rossi  C, Oberste  MS, Roehrig  JT, Venezuelan equine encephalitis and Oropouche virus infections among Peruvian army troops in the Amazon region of Peru. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1997;56:6617.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Powers  AM, Oberste  MS, Brault  AC, Rico-Hesse  R, Schmura  SM, Smith  JF, Repeated emergence of epidemic/epizootic Venezuelan equine encephalitis from a single genotype of enzootic subtype ID virus. J Virol. 1997;71:6697705.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Wang  E, Barrera  R, Boshell  J, Ferro  C, Freier  JE, Navarro  JC, Genetic and phenotypic changes accompanying the emergence of epizootic subtype IC Venezuelan equine encephalitis viruses from an enzootic subtype ID progenitor. J Virol. 1999;73:426671.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Weaver  SC, Bellew  LA, Rico-Hesse  R. Phylogenetic analysis of alphaviruses in the Venezuelan equine encephalitis complex and identification of the source of epizootic viruses. Virology. 1992;191:28290. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Weaver  SC, Pfeffer  M, Marriott  K, Kang  W, Kinney  RM. Genetic evidence for the origins of Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus subtype IAB outbreaks. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1999;60:4418.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Moncayo  AC, Medina  GM, Kalvatchev  Z, Brault  AC, Barrera  R, Boshell  J, Genetic diversity and relationships among Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus field isolates from Colombia and Venezuela. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2001;65:73846.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Pfeffer  M, Proebster  B, Kinney  RM, Kaaden  OR. Genus-specific detection of alphaviruses by a semi-nested reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1997;57:70918.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Black  WC, Vanlandingham  DL, Sweeney  WP, Wasieloski  LP, Calisher  CH, Beaty  BJ. Typing of LaCrosse, snowshoe hare, and Tahyna viruses by analyses of single-strand conformation polymorphisms of the small RNA segments. J Clin Microbiol. 1995;33:317982.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Swofford  DL. PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and Other Methods). Version 4. Sunderland (MA): Sinauer Associates; 1998. p.
  23. Felsenstein  J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution. 1985;39:78391. DOIGoogle Scholar
  24. Beaty  BJ, Calisher  CH, Shope  RE. Arboviruses. In: Schmidt NJ, RW Emmons, editors. Diagnostic procedures for viral, rickettsial and chlamydial infections. 6th ed. Washington: American Public Health Association; 1989. p. 797–855.
  25. Rico-Hesse  R, Weaver  SC, de Siger  J, Medina  G, Salas  RA. Emergence of a new epidemic/epizootic Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus in South America. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92:527881. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Brault  AC, Powers  AM, Chavez  CL, Lopez  RN, Cachon  MF, Gutierrez  LF, Genetic and antigenic diversity among eastern equine encephalitis viruses from North, Central, and South America. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1999;61:57986.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Weaver  SC, Dalgarno  L, Frey  TK, Huang  HV, Kinney  RM, Rice  CM, Family Togaviridae. In: van Regenmortel MHV, Fauquet CM, Bishop DHL, Carstens EB, Estes MK, Lemon SM, et al. Virus taxonomy. Classification and nomenclature of viruses. Seventh report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. San Diego: Academic Press; 2000. p. 879–89.
  28. Calisher  CH, Shope  RE, Brandt  W, Casals  J, Karabatsos  N, Murphy  FA, Proposed antigenic classification of registered arboviruses I. Togaviridae, Alphavirus. Intervirology. 1980;14:22932. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Turell  MJ, Jones  JW, Sardelis  MR, Dohm  DJ, Coleman  RE, Watts  DM, Vector competence of Peruvian mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) for epizootic and enzootic strains of Venezuelan equine encephalomyelitis virus. J Med Entomol. 2000;37:8359. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Ferro  C, Boshell  J, Moncayo  AC, Gonzalez  M, Ahumada  ML, Kang  W, Natural enzootic vectors of Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus, Magdalena Valley, Colombia. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003;9:4954.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Salas  RA, Garcia  CZ, Liria  J, Barrera  R, Navarro  JC, Medina  G, Ecological studies of enzootic Venezuelan equine encephalitis in north-central Venezuela, 1997–1998. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2001;64:8492.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Briceno Rossi  AL. Rural epidemic encephalitis in Venezuela caused by a group A arbovirus (VEE). Prog Med Virol. 1967;9:176203.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Young  NA, Johnson  KM. Antigenic variants of Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus: their geographic distribution and epidemiologic significance. Am J Epidemiol. 1969;89:286307.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Vasconcelos  PF, Travassos da Rosa  JF, Travassos da Rosa  AP, Degallier  N, Pinheiro  FP, Sa Filho  GC. [Epidemiology of encephalitis caused by arbovirus in the Brazilian Amazonia]. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 1991;33:46576. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Rivas  F, Diaz  LA, Cardenas  VM, Daza  E, Bruzon  L, Alcala  A, Epidemic Venezuelan equine encephalitis in La Guajira, Colombia, 1995. J Infect Dis. 1997;175:82832. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Figures
Tables

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid1005.030634

1Current affiliation is Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Científicas, Caracas, Venezuela.

2Current affiliation is Department of Biological Sciences, Ohio Northern University, Ada, Ohio.

Table of Contents – Volume 10, Number 5—May 2004

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Scott Weaver, Keiller 4.128, Department of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77555-0609, USA; fax: 409-747-2415

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: February 22, 2011
Page updated: February 22, 2011
Page reviewed: February 22, 2011
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external