Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 11, Number 1—January 2005

Distribution and Characteristics of Escherichia coli Clonal Group A1

James R. Johnson*†Comments to Author , Andrew C. Murray*†, Michael A. Kuskowski*†, Sören Schubert‡, Marie-Francoise Prère§, Bertrand Picard¶, Raul Colodner#, Raul Raz#**, and TIARAInvestigators
Author affiliations: *VA Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA; †University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA; ‡Max von Pettenkofer-Institut für Hygiene und Medizinische Mikrobiologie, München, Germany; §Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Purpan, Toulouse, France; ¶Hôpital Morvan, Brest, France; #HaEmek Medical Center, Afula, Israel; **Technion School of Medicine, Afula, Israel

Cite This Article


Among 1,102 recent Escherichia coli clinical isolates, clonal group A was identified in 17 of 20 (U.S. and non-U.S.) geographic locales, mainly among U.S. isolates (9% vs. 3%; p < 0.001) and those resistant to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (10% vs. 1.7%; p < 0.001). The extensive antimicrobial resistance and virulence profiles of clonal group A may underlie its recent widespread emergence.

The Study

The recently recognized Escherichia coli clonal group A (CGA) accounts for up to 50% of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMZ)–resistant E. coli from U.S. women with acute uncomplicated cystitis and pyelonephritis (13). Available data show CGA to exhibit a stereotypical virulence factor (VF) profile and a conserved multidrug antimicrobial resistance phenotype, i.e., to ampicillin, chloramphenicol, streptomycin, sulfonamides, tetracycline, and trimethoprim (ACSSuTTp), which is conjugally transferable on a large plasmid (1,2). Together with CGA’s unusual O antigens (O11, O17, O73, and O77), these findings suggested that CGA represents a newly emerged virulent clonal group (1,2). CGA’s homogeneity across geographic locales, and the indistinguishable pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) profiles of clustered CGA isolates within 1 community (1), suggested recent and possibly ongoing dissemination, a novel paradigm for extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli (ExPEC) (4).

To date, CGA has been studied only within the United States, predominantly among women with uncomplicated urinary tract infections (UTI). Its occurrence in some locales has been questioned (5), and its antimicrobial susceptibility profile has been assessed for only 12 drugs (1,2,6). Accordingly, we sought to more fully define the global distribution, host range, virulence characteristics, and resistance phenotypes of CGA.

Twenty clinical microbiology laboratories (10 U.S., 10 non-U.S.) each provided approximately 25 consecutive TMP-SMZ–resistant and TMP-SMZ–susceptible E. coli isolates, except for 2 that provided resistant isolates only (Table 1). Isolates were distributed by specimen type (urine/other) and source (inpatient/outpatient). Antimicrobial drug–resistant and –susceptible isolates were collected approximately concurrently in 2001 from each site, except London (1999) (7) and Columbus (1999 and 2002). When available, data regarding specimen type and host gender, age, and inpatient/outpatient status were provided.

Phylogenetic group (A, B1, B2, or D) was defined by triplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (8). Group D isolates were defined as CGA if by random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis they resembled CGA controls with primers 1254 and 1290, or with one of these plus ≥2 of primers 1247, 1281, or 1283 (2). PFGE analysis used XbaI (1).

CGA isolates and (2:1) geographically matched controls selected randomly based on the local TMP-SMZ resistance prevalence were tested for 35 ExPEC-associated virulence markers and 13 papA alleles by PCR (2). Such typing predicts experimental in vivo virulence (9). Isolates were defined as ExPEC if positive for > 2 of papA and/or papC, sfa/foc, afa/dra, iutA, and kpsM (10). The aggregate virulence score was the number of different virulence markers detected in an isolate, adjusted for multiple detection of certain operons.

O typing was carried out by the E. coli Reference Center (University Park, PA). O antigens O1, O2, O4, O6, O7, O16, O18, O25, and O75 were considered UTI-associated (O-UTI) (10).

Susceptibility testing of the isolates to 30 drugs was carried out by broth microdilution (11) or disk diffusion (nitrofurantoin) (11), by using E. coli ATCC 25299 for reference and National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS)–specified interpretative criteria (12), except for kanamycin, spectinomycin, and streptomycin (resistant at MICs of >25 mg/L, >128 mg/L, and >8 mg/L, respectively). The aggregate resistance score was the number of different agents to which an isolate exhibited resistance.

Statistical analysis used a Fisher exact or a chi-square test for comparisons of proportions and the Mann-Whitney U test for comparisons of scores. Multiple variables were assessed as predictors of selected outcomes by multivariate logistic regression or multiple linear regression.

The 1,102 clinical E. coli isolates were divided evenly by U.S. and non-U.S. origin and TMP-SMZ resistance status (Table 2). Overall, phylogenetic group B2 predominated (44%), followed by group D (27%). Group D was significantly more prevalent among U.S. than non-U.S. isolates (34% vs. 21%: p < 0.001). TMP-SMZ–resistant isolates exhibited significant shifts from group B2 toward groups A, D, or both. The nearly 2-fold greater prevalence of group D among TMP-SMZ-resistant isolates reversed, for U.S. isolates, the “B2 > D” pattern of susceptible isolates.

By RAPD analysis, 23% of group D isolates (6% overall) represented CGA (Table 2). CGA was strongly associated with TMP-SMZ resistance (10% of resistant isolates, 1.7% of susceptible: p < 0.001) and a U.S. origin (9% vs. 3%: p < 0.001). CGA accounted for 15% of U.S. TMP-SMZ–resistant isolates and 5% of those from abroad (p < 0.001), but for a similarly low proportion of U.S. (2%) and non-U.S. (1.5%) susceptible isolates. According to multivariate logistic regression analysis, after accounting for TMP-SMZ resistance and U.S. origin, none of the other source variables (specimen type and host gender, age, and inpatient/outpatient status) was significantly associated with CGA status or appreciably altered the association of TMP-SMZ resistance or U.S. origin with CGA status (not shown).

Figure 1

Thumbnail of XbaI pulsed-field gel electrophoresis profiles of Escherichia coli clonal group A (CGA) isolates and E. coli O157:H7. Lane numbers are shown below the gel image. Six CGA isolates from Chicago, IL (“A” series identifiers; lanes 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, and 8) exhibit similar profiles to reference CGA isolates SEQ102 (from California; lane 2) and UMN26 (from Minnesota; lane 6) (1). E. coli O157:H7 isolate G5244 (lane 9) exhibits a distinctive profile.

Figure 1. XbaI pulsed-field gel electrophoresis profiles of Escherichia coli clonal group A (CGA) isolates and E. coli O157:H7. Lane numbers are shown below the gel image. Six CGA isolates from Chicago, IL...

CGA occurred in all but 3 locales (1–10 isolates per locale), accounting for up to 29% of local resistant isolates (median, 9.5%) (Table 1). CGA was highly prevalent (20%–25%) among resistant isolates from the 3 pediatric centers (Columbus, Houston, and Toulouse) and the veterans’ hospital (Tucson). Toulouse exhibited the highest non-U.S. CGA prevalence, whereas nearby Brest lacked CGA (Table 1). CGA accounted for 29% of the ostensibly nonclonal (5) TMP-SMZ–resistant isolates from Chicago. Consistent with this, XbaI PFGE profiles of 6 Chicago and 2 reference CGA isolates were highly similar (Figure 1).

Figure 2

Thumbnail of Virulence traits (top) and antimicrobial resistance phenotypes (bottom) of Escherichia coli clonal group A (CGA) isolates versus non-CGA controls. Percent of isolates positive for each virulence trait (top) or resistance phenotype (bottom) is shown by pink bars to left of midline (for CGA) or blue bars to right of midline (for controls). No isolates were positive for bmaE (M fimbriae), or resistant to amikacin, aztreonam, cefepime, ceftazidime, ertapenem, imipenem-cilistatin, nitrof

Figure 2. Virulence traits (top) and antimicrobial resistance phenotypes (bottom) of Escherichia coli clonal group A (CGA) isolates versus non-CGA controls. Percent of isolates positive for each virulence trait (top) or resistance phenotype...

CGA isolates differed significantly from controls, according to almost all characteristics analyzed; they were significantly enriched with the O11, O17, and O77 antigens, certain VFs (F16 papA allele, papAHCEFG, papG allele II, iha, iutA, kpsM II, traT, and ompT), and ExPEC status, but lacked other traits (Figure 2). Aggregate virulence scores were similar for CGA and controls (medians, 8.0) but were less diverse for CGA (range 5–9, vs. 1–13).

By multivariate logistic regression, both CGA status and phylogenetic group B2 were significant independent predictors of ExPEC status, with CGA exhibiting an odds ratio (OR) of 21.9 (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.1–78.2; p < 0.001), and group B2 an OR of 2.4 (CI, 1.7–3.4; p < 0.001). Additionally, by multiple linear regression, CGA status (standardized regression coefficient [β] = 0.57; p < 0.001) and group B2 status (β = 0.596; p < 0.001) predicted VF score better than did O-UTI (β = 0.32; p = 0.002).

Antimicrobial resistance phenotypes were compared between CGA isolates and a subset of the controls, which had been selected to provide an unbiased distribution of TMP-SMZ resistance (Figure 2). CGA exhibited a higher prevalence of resistance to 10 individual drugs, any drug, and ACSSuTTp, whereas controls exhibited a low but measurable prevalence of resistance to 7 drugs to which all CGA isolates were susceptible. Accordingly, resistance scores were significantly higher for CGA than controls (median 8.0 [range 1–11] vs. 5.5 [range 0–15]; p = 0.001). Among TMP-SMZ–resistant isolates, TMP-SMZ MICs ranged from 32/608 mg/L to >520/9,880 mg/L; 61% of resistant isolates had MICs >520/9,880 mg/L. CGA accounted for 67% of this highly resistant population (p = 0.01 vs. controls).

The U.S. and non-U.S. CGA isolates exhibited only 2 statistically significant differences for VF profiles, O antigens, and resistance phenotypes, with iroN (p = 0.03) and absence of ompT (p = 0.008) associated with non-U.S. isolates.


We found that the recently described E. coli CGA is globally but heterogeneously distributed and more prevalent within the United States than abroad. Clonal group A affects diverse host populations (including inpatients, outpatients, adults, children, men, and women), infects urinary tract and nonurinary tract sites, is strongly associated with TMP-SMZ resistance (including high-level resistance), and exhibits a robust virulence profile suggesting enhanced extraintestinal virulence. This combination of resistance and virulence may account for CGA’s recent emergence as a broadly disseminated “epidemic clone” (13,6,13,14).

The greater overall prevalence of CGA within the United States suggests a U.S. origin for CGA. However, it also could reflect more rapid clonal expansion within the United States due to enhanced dissemination or more favorable conditions for outgrowth, including possibly less competition from other potential occupants of the same niche(s). The variable prevalence of CGA among even closely situated locales, both within the United States and abroad, might reflect true geographic heterogeneity, versus locale-specific differences in patient populations, selection criteria, and collection intervals. Studies that compare well-defined, homogeneous, concurrent populations from different locales are needed.

The new evidence of CGA as a prominent TMP-SMZ–resistant pathogen among children and veterans extends the known host range of CGA, consistent with a recent report of CGA as a community-wide TMP-SMZ-resistant pathogen in Denver, Colorado (6). This finding illustrates CGA’s pathogenic versatility.

That 29% of the TMP-SMZ–resistant isolates from Chicago, Illinois, proved to be CGA and resembled reference CGA isolates by PFGE, despite a previous PFGE-based assessment of nonclonality (5), illustrates the limitations of conventional PFGE analysis as a screen for CGA. We have developed a CGA-specific PCR assay, based on a single nucleotide polymorphism within fumC, to provide improved screening for CGA (15).

CGA’s robust, highly homogeneous consensus VF profile (F16 papA allele, papG allele II, iutA, kpsM II, traT, and ompT) suggests considerable extraintestinal virulence potential, an inference supported by experimental data indicating that CGA is able to compete successfully with classic group B2-derived pathogens in a mouse UTI model (J.R. Johnson, unpub. data). Determination of which VFs of CGA contribute most to pathogenicity may identify future targets for preventive interventions.

In our study, antimicrobial resistance was more extensive and, with TMP-SMZ, more potent for CGA than controls. These factors may be contributing to CGA’s global emergence. Conceivably, high-level TMP-SMZ resistance could allow CGA to out-compete even other TMP-SMZ–resistant strains. CGA’s resistance involved primarily older agents, whereas fluoroquinolone and cephalosporin resistance was confined to controls. However, the emergence of fluoroquinolone resistance within the closely related O15:K52:H1 clonal group (2,13) suggests that this potential exists also for CGA.

The study’s strengths include large population, broad geographic sampling, matching of CGA and control isolates, and extensive range of traits analyzed. Limitations include the heterogeneous inclusion criteria, gaps in global surveillance, possible type I errors from multiple comparisons, and limited sampling per locale.

In summary, we found CGA to be a globally disseminated, multidrug-resistant clonal group of pathogenic E. coli with a broad range of human hosts. Although more prevalent within the United States than abroad, CGA exhibits characteristic O antigens, resistance markers, and virulence traits wherever encountered. Further study is needed of the origins, virulence mechanisms, geographic distribution, clinical associations, and modes of dissemination of CGA.

Dr. Johnson is professor of medicine and director of the Infectious Diseases Fellowship Program at the University of Minnesota, and head of the molecular epidemiology laboratory at the Minneapolis VA Medical Center. His research focuses on the molecular epidemiology, ecology, evolution, and virulence of extraintestinal pathogenic and antimicrobial-resistant E. coli.



We thank Dave Prentiss for preparing the figures; Sheldon Finver, Abby Gajewski, and Timothy T. O’Bryan for invaluable laboratory assistance; the clinical microbiology laboratory of the Minneapolis VA Medical Center for assisting with antimicrobial susceptibility testing; and Amee Manges and Lee Riley for providing strain SEQ102.

This material is based upon work supported by Office of Research and Development, Medical Research Service, Department of Veterans Affairs, and by Bayer Inc., Merck, and Procter & Gamble (J.R.J.). J.R.J. has received grants, honoraria, or both, from Bayer, Merck, Ortho-McNeill, Procter and Gamble, and Wyeth-Ayerst.



  1. Manges  AR, Johnson  JR, Foxman  B, O’Bryan  TT, Fullerton  KE, Riley  LW. Widespread distribution of urinary tract infections caused by a multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli clonal group. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:100713. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Johnson  JR, Manges  AR, O’Bryan  TT, Riley  LR. A disseminated multi-drug resistant clonal group of extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli as a cause of pyelonephritis. Lancet. 2002;359:224951. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Manges  AR, Dietrich  PS, Riley  LW. Multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli clonal groups causing community-acquired pyelonephritis. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;38:32934. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Stamm  WE. An epidemic of urinary tract infections? N Engl J Med. 2001;345:10557. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Petrof  EO, Schwartz  DN, Quinnn  JP. Urinary tract infections and a multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli clonal group [letter]. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:535. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Burman  WJ, Breese  PE, Murray  BE, Singh  KV, Batal  HA, MacKenzie  TA, Conventional and molecular epidemiology of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole resistance among urinary Escherichia coli isolates. Am J Med. 2003;115:35864. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Enne  VI, Livermore  DM, Stephens  P, Hall  LCM. Persistence of sulphonamide resistance in Escherichia coli in the UK despite national prescribing restriction. Lancet. 2001;357:13258. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Clermont  O, Bonacorsi  S, Bingen  E. Rapid and simple determination of the Escherichia coli phylogenetic group. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000;66:45558. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Johnson  JR, Kuskowski  M, Denamur  E, Elion  J, Picard  B. Clonal origin, virulence factors, and virulence [letter and reply]. Infect Immun. 2000;68:4245. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Johnson  JR, Murray  AC, Gajewski  A, Sullivan  M, Shippes  P, Kuskowski  MA, Isolation and molecular characterization of nalidixic acid-resistant extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli from retail chicken products. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003;47:21618. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically, 6th ed. Vol. 23, no. 2. M7-A6. Wayne (PA): The Committee; 2003.
  12. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; fourteenth informational supplement. Vol. 24, no. 1. M100-S14. Wayne (PA): The Committee; 2004.
  13. Johnson  JR, Kuskowski  MA, Owens  K, Gajewski  A, Winokur  PL. Phylogenetic origin and virulence genotype in relation to resistance to fluoroquinolones and/or extended spectrum cephalosporins and cephamycins among Escherichia coli isolates from animals and humans. J Infect Dis. 2003;188:75968. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Johnson  JR, Russo  TA. “Uropathogenic” Escherichia coli as agents of diverse non-urinary-tract extraintestinal infections. J Infect Dis. 2002;186:85964. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Johnson  JR. Owens, Manges A, Riley L. Rapid and specific detection of Escherichia coli clonal group A by gene-specific PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42:261822. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar




Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid1101.040418

1Presented at the American Society for Microbiology 103rd General Meeting, May 18–22, 2003, Washington, D.C.

2The TIARA investigators include the following: Sacared Bodison (University of Maryland, College Park, MD), Franklin R. Cockerill, III (Mayo Clinic and Mayo Medical School, Rochester, MN), Clovis Arns da Cunha (Curitiba-PR, Brazil), Peter Echeverria and Sriluck Simasathien (Armed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences and Phramonkutkho Army Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand), Wim Gaastra (University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands), Lucinda M.C. Hall (St Bartholomew's and the Royal London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK), Marina Klein (McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada), Hank A. Lockman (Battelle Memorial Institute, Columbus, OH), Imad Omer and Jane R. Schwebke (University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL), Guillem Prats (Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain), Robert M. Rakita (Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA), Susan Rossman (Texas Childrens Hospital, Houston, TX), Ronald Schiffman (Southern Arizona VA Medical Center, Tucson, AZ), Ronald Smith (Billings Clinic and Providence Medical Center, Billings, MT), and Patricia L. Winokur (VA Medical Center and University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA).

Table of Contents – Volume 11, Number 1—January 2005

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

James R. Johnson, Infectious Diseases (111F), Minneapolis VA Medical Center, 1 Veterans Drive, Minneapolis, MN 55417, USA; fax: 612-727-5995,

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: April 14, 2011
Page updated: April 14, 2011
Page reviewed: April 14, 2011
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.