Volume 15, Number 10—October 2009
Appropriate Screening for Leishmaniasis before Immunosuppressive Treatments
Highlight and copy the desired format.
|EID||Cascio A, Iaria C. Appropriate Screening for Leishmaniasis before Immunosuppressive Treatments. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009;15(10):1706-1707. https://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1510.090881|
|AMA||Cascio A, Iaria C. Appropriate Screening for Leishmaniasis before Immunosuppressive Treatments. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2009;15(10):1706-1707. doi:10.3201/eid1510.090881.|
|APA||Cascio, A., & Iaria, C. (2009). Appropriate Screening for Leishmaniasis before Immunosuppressive Treatments. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 15(10), 1706-1707. https://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1510.090881.|
We read with great interest the article by Xynos et al. reporting 2 cases of leishmaniasis in patients treated with biologic drugs (1). Although we agree with most of the article, we are not totally convinced that serologic analysis alone could be used to screen for leishmaniasis before initiation of biologic or immunosuppressive treatments. Evidence indicates that serologic analysis can identify only symptomatic or asymptomatic cases with recent and still active infection (2,3).
Leishmania spp. are pathogens that infect hematopoietic cells, where they establish chronic intracellular parasitism and survive for an infected person’s lifetime. In leishmaniasis-endemic countries, asymptomatic visceral leishmaniasis (VL) infections occur more frequently than clinically apparent VL cases. An estimated 10%–20% of persons with asymptomatic infections develop clinically overt VL (4). The leishmanin skin test (LST) (Montenegro test), an intradermal injection of a suspension of killed promastigotes, measures delayed hypersensitivity reactions and appears to be the only screening test capable of detecting asymptomatic leishmania infections.
A positive LST result is thought to indicate durable cell-mediated immunity after asymptomatic infection or clinical cure of VL. LST positivity may appear months to years postinfection, but once positivity appears, it persists in immunocompetent patients. A survey of VL in Ethiopia showed LST positivity in 32.2% of the population, but leishmania antibodies were found in only 4.1% (5).
Because different antigen preparations may affect test sensitivity, LST should use promastigotes of the Leishmania spp. present in an area. We believe that ideal screening for leishmaniasis should include LST along with serologic analysis. Unfortunately, little data exist on the use of antileishmania therapies for LST-positive or serologically positive patients. VL with unusual signs and symptoms may develop in immunocompromised patients with previous LST positivity after immunosuppressive treatments. Information about LST positivity is useful for calling attention to this potential risk for VL that may have unusual manifestations in these persons.
- Xynos ID, Tektonidou MG, Pikazis D, Sipsas NV. Leishmaniasis, autoimmune rheumatic disease, and anti–tumor necrosis factor therapy, Europe. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009;15:956–9.
- Barao SC, de Fonseca Camargo-Neves VL, Resende MR, da Silva LJ. Human asymptomatic infection in visceral leishmaniasis: a seroprevalence study in an urban area of low endemicity. Preliminary results. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007;77:1051–3.
- Braz RF, Nascimento ET, Martins DR, Wilson ME , Pearson RD , Reed SG , et al. The sensitivity and specificity of Leishmania chagasi recombinant K39 antigen in the diagnosis of American visceral leishmaniasis and in differentiating active from subclinical infection. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2002;67:344–8.
- Badero R, Jones TC, Carvalho EM, Sampaio D, Reed SG, Barral A, New perspectives on a subclinical form of visceral leishmaniasis. J Infect Dis. 1986;154:1003–11.
- Hailu A, Berhe N, Sisay Z, Abraham I, Medhin G. Seroepidemiological and leishmanin skin test surveys of visceral leishmaniasis in south and southwest Ethiopia. Ethiop Med J. 1996;34:11–23.
Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:
Antonio Cascio, Unita’ Operativa di Medicina Tropicale e Parassitologia, Policlinico “G. Martino,” Via Consolare Valeria n. 1, 98125 Messina, Italy
Comment submitted successfully, thank you for your feedback.
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
- Page created: December 08, 2010
- Page last updated: December 08, 2010
- Page last reviewed: December 08, 2010
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,
National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases (NCEZID)
Office of the Director (OD)