Volume 15, Number 5—May 2009
Research
A Case–Control Study on the Origin of Atypical Scrapie in Sheep, France
Table 3
Variable | Controls | Cases | Odds ratio | p value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Contact with other flocks during C0–C2006 | ||||
No | 189 | 79 | 1.1 | 0.85 |
Yes | 36 | 16 | ||
Purchase of rams during C0–C2006 | ||||
No | 30 | 17 | 0.7 | 0.29 |
Yes | 195 | 78 | ||
Purchase of ewes during C0–C2006 | ||||
No | 139 | 68 | 0.6 | 0.10 |
Yes | 86 | 27 | ||
No. flocks of origin of ewes purchased during C2005–C2006 | ||||
0 | 139 | 68 | 1.0 | 0.22 |
1 | 35 | 13 | 0.8 | |
2 | 25 | 9 | 0.7 | |
>4 | 26 | 5 | 0.4 | |
Disposal of placenta in C0 | ||||
Never | 82 | 37 | 1.0 | 0.51 |
Sometimes | 36 | 19 | 1.2 | |
Always | 107 | 39 | 0.8 | |
Use of adoption cases in C0 | ||||
No | 41 | 12 | 1.5 | 0.22 |
Yes | 184 | 83 |
*C0, birth cohort assuming that in each flock all animals born during the same birth campaign (defined from July 1 of year n – 1 to June 30 of year n) shared the same exposure; C2006, birth campaign 2006; C2005, birth campaign 2005.
Page created: December 21, 2010
Page updated: December 21, 2010
Page reviewed: December 21, 2010
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.