Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 16, Number 8—August 2010

West Nile Virus Range Expansion into British Columbia

Article Metrics
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus
David RothComments to Author , Bonnie Henry, Sunny Mak, Mieke Fraser, Marsha Taylor, Min Li, Ken Cooper, Allen Furnell, Quantine Wong, Muhammad Morshed, and Members of the British Columbia West Nile Virus Surveillance Team1
Author affiliations: British Columbia Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (D. Roth, B. Henry, S. Mak, M. Fraser, M. Taylor, M. Li, K. Cooper, A. Furnell, Q. Wong, M. Morshed; University of British Columbia, Vancouver (D. Roth, B. Henry, M. Morshed)

Cite This Article


In 2009, an expansion of West Nile virus (WNV) into the Canadian province of British Columbia was detected. Two locally acquired cases of infection in humans and 3 cases of infection in horses were detected by ELISA and plaque-reduction neutralization tests. Ten positive mosquito pools were detected by reverse transcription PCR. Most WNV activity in British Columbia in 2009 occurred in the hot and dry southern Okanagan Valley. Virus establishment and amplification in this region was likely facilitated by above average nightly temperatures and a rapid accumulation of degree-days in late summer. Estimated exposure dates for humans and initial detection of WNV-positive mosquitoes occurred concurrently with a late summer increase in Culex tarsalis mosquitoes (which spread western equine encephalitis) in the southern Okanagan Valley. The conditions present during this range expansion suggest that temperature and Cx. tarsalis mosquito abundance may be limiting factors for WNV transmission in this portion of the Pacific Northwest.

West Nile virus (WNV) is a vector-borne flavivirus that is transmitted in an enzootic cycle between birds by mosquitoes; incidental transmission to humans occurs during periods of intense amplification, typically in late summer in the Northern Hemisphere (1). WNV activity is inherently dependent on environmental and ecologic conditions that affect avian and vector populations because of the role these groups play in WNV transmission (2). Environmental factors such as temperature (3,4), precipitation (4), and drought (5), and ecologic conditions such as vector abundance (6) have been identified as possible determinants of WNV activity.

Canada represents the northernmost range of WNV in North America. The first positive WNV indicators appeared in Canada in 2001 when the virus was detected in birds and mosquitoes in Ontario (7). A total of 394 human cases occurred in Ontario and 20 in Quebec during 2002 (7). The virus quickly spread westward into the prairie provinces: 947 confirmed cases in Saskatchewan in 2003, of which 63 were West Nile neurologic syndrome (WNNS) (8), 144 in Manitoba (35 WNNS) (9), and 275 (48 WNNS) in Alberta (10). A second major outbreak occurred in Canada in 2007, a total of 1,456 (113 WNNS) cases were confirmed in Saskatchewan (8), 587 (72 WNNS) in Manitoba (9), and 318 (21 WNNS) in Alberta (10). Although mostWNV activity has occurred in the southern parts of the country, the virus has been detected as far north as Meadow Lake, Saskatchewan (54°08′N) (11).

Despite this widespread activity, no local WNV transmission was detected in Canada’s westernmost province, British Columbia, during the WNV seasons (May to October) of 1999–2008 (7,11). The absence of WNV in British Columbia during this period puzzled provincial public health experts, who had been preparing for the virus’s arrival since 2002; some speculated that British Columbia did not contain the prerequisite environmental and ecologic conditions essential for WNV activity. However, in August 2009, a long-delayed range expansion of WNV into British Columbia was confirmed; 2 locally acquired cases in humans, 10 positive mosquito pools, and 3 cases in horses were detected by provincial surveillance.

The official arrival of WNV in British Columbia puts to rest the question of whether the province can sustain within-season WNV activity. However, new questions have been raised relating to the mechanism of viral introduction, the environmental conditions that limited previous WNV activity in the province, the focus of WNV activity in the southern Okanagan Valley, and whether British Columbia can sustain activity between seasons. We examined spatial and temporal patterns of WNV activity in British Columbia in relation to mosquito abundance and temperature conditions present during the observed range expansion of 2009. Our goal was to identify potential determinants of WNV activity along this portion of British Columbia’s northern and western ranges and to provide additional information regarding factors that facilitate the spread of WNV in North America.

Material and Methods

Study Area

Figure 1

Thumbnail of Select cities (lower case) in British Columbia, Canada, and Regional Health Authorities (RHA, upper case). Each RHA undertakes West Nile Virus surveillance under the guidance and recommendations of the British Columbia Centre for Disease Control. The dashed oval encompasses the Okanagan Valley, which was the primary focal point of West Nile Virus activity in British Columbia during 2009. WA, Washington, USA; ID, Idaho, USA; MT, Montana, USA.

Figure 1. Select cities (lower case) in British Columbia, Canada, and Regional Health Authorities (RHA, upper case). Each RHA undertakes West Nile Virus surveillance under the guidance and recommendations of the British Columbia...

The province of British Columbia is an ecologically, climatically, and geomorphologically diverse area covering 947,000 km2 that contains a lengthy coastline, high mountain ranges, and a desert region (Figure 1). British Columbia has the most geological, climatic, and biological diversity in Canada (12). This province is dominated by vast regions of temperate forests in mountainous areas >1,000 m above sea level (13). Temperatures in the coastal regions of British Columbia are among the mildest in Canada; daily average temperatures are above freezing year-round (14). The coastal regions receive >1,100 mm of rain per year as moisture-laden air from the Pacific Ocean rises above the Coast Mountain Range, resulting in orographic precipitation. In contrast, the southern interior of the province is part of the semiarid steppe highlands ecoregion, which has near desert-like conditions including hot dry summers, cool winters, and average rainfall of 260 mm per year (14).

Provincial WNV Surveillance

The British Columbia Centre for Disease Control (BCCDC) and the BCCDC Public Health Microbiology and Reference Laboratory (PHMRL), in partnership with regional health authorities, municipalities, and regional governments, have conducted human surveillance, mosquito sampling, and dead corvid surveillance and testing since 2003. During the WNV seasons of 2003–2007, mosquito surveillance covered the southern extent of the province and extended as far north as 55°N latitude. However, in response to the prolonged absence of the virus, mosquito surveillance was reduced in 2008; mosquito traps were placed only at or below 50°N latitude (Table 1; Figure 1). An additional 16 traps were placed in the southern Okanagan Valley in 2009 as part of a research project to supplement the 91 traps operated by the province, effectively acting as targeted surveillance in this area. CDC light traps (Model 512; John W. Hock Company, Gainsville, FL, USA) baited with dry ice were run 1 or 2 nights per week from June through September.

Collected mosquitoes were sent to the BCCDC PHMRL where they were sorted by gender, identified to the genus and/or species level, and pooled to a maximum of 50 mosquitoes per pool. All pools of female Culex spp. mosquitoes were homogenized, and RNA was extracted by using a QIAamp Viral RNA Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA, USA). RNA extracts were subjected to an in-house–developed TaqMan real-time reverse transcription–PCR (RT-PCR) screening specific for the 3′ noncoding region and nonstructural protein 5′ of the WNV genome. Positive pools were then confirmed by using a second TaqMan real-time RT-PCR specific for the WNV envelope protein (15,16).

Passive dead corvid surveillance in British Columbia is conducted by regional health authorities and includes 1) online reporting of dead bird sightings by the public, and/or 2) collection of dead corvids, which are then submitted for testing at the British Columbia Ministry of Agriculture and Lands Animal Health Centre (AHC). Oropharyngeal swabs from dead birds are screened for WNV by using the VecTest (Microgenics Corporation, Fremont, CA, USA); RT-PCR was used as the confirmatory test on pooled tissues from suspected positive birds (17).

WNV infection is a reportable disease in British Columbia, and information about probable human cases is communicated to the requesting physician and to public health officials; a case questionnaire is then administered to collect information on symptoms, travel history, and likely mode of transmission. Cases are classified as West Nile nonneurologic syndrome or WNNS according to the case definitions of the Public Health Agency of Canada (7). Cases are further categorized as probable or confirmed, depending on the level of specificity associated with the laboratory testing. All potential human case-patients are tested for WNV immunoglobulin M (IgM) and IgG by using ELISA (FOCUS Technologies, Cypress, CA, USA) and acute-phase and convalescent-phase serum samples; in-house hemagglutination inhibition (HI) tests are conducted when needed (16). Positive test results from the BCCDC are sent to the National Microbiology Laboratory in Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, for confirmatory plaque reduction neutralization testing.

Equine surveillance in British Columbia is passive. Positive equine cases are reported by local veterinarians to the AHC and the provincial chief veterinarian. WNV in horses is identified by using ELISA, serum neutralization, and/or plaque-reduction neutralization test. Horses suspected to have died of WNV are brought to the AHC for diagnostic necropsy. Although equine vaccinations are available in British Columbia, coverage is not widespread with the exception of horses that travel to the United States.

Temperature Analysis and Degree-Day Calculations

Development of WNV vectors and of the virus within an infected mosquito depends on temperature (3,4). Degree-day calculations use the product of temperature and time to estimate the cumulative energy required for an organism to develop (18). An estimated 109 degree-days are required for the completion of the extrinsic incubation period of WNV in Cx. tarsalis mosquitoes; the virus is unable to develop in this species at temperatures <14.3°C (3). We used the single-sign method (19) with a 14.3°C base to calculate the accumulated degree-days between January 1 and August 1 during 2003–2009 for select British Columbia communities. This method combines a 24-h sine wave with daily minimum and maximum thresholds to calculate the accumulated degree-days over 24 hours. The single-sine method provides the most accurate degree-day quantification when daily temperatures are below the minimum development threshold (20), and has been used in other WNV studies to estimate risk (21). Daily minimum temperature was evaluated for the southern Okanagan community of Osoyoos because it was the closest center to the focal point of WNV activity in British Columbia that also contains an official weather station. The daily minimum temperature for 2009 was compared with the 10-year average by using data from the Canadian National Weather Service, Environment Canada (14).


Provincial and Regional WNV Activity

In early August 2009, serum samples from 2 residents of Kelowna (49°55′N, 119°30′W) were positive for WNV (Table 1; Figure 1). Travel histories indicated that neither person had been outside of interior British Columbia during the period of potential exposure and that each had recently traveled in the southern Okanagan Valley, which is 70–80 km south of Kelowna (Figure 1). During the same week, provincial surveillance detected a positive mosquito pool; 9 more were detected over the subsequent 2 weeks. All positive pools came from the southern Okanagan Valley and were located up to 35 km apart. Three WNV-positive horses were reported to the chief veterinarian and the AHC in early September: 2 from the southern Okanagan Valley and 1 from the more eastern Fraser Valley (Figure 1). None of the horses had traveled during their exposure period.

With the exception of British Columbia, WNV activity in Canada in 2009 (only 8 human cases nationwide) was among the lowest recorded (7). Washington, however, had its greatest WNV activity on record in 2009 (38 cases in humans and 73 cases in horses), up from previous highs of 3 cases in humans and 41 cases in horses or other mammals in 2008 (22).

Mosquito Abundance and Infection Rates

Figure 2

Thumbnail of Nightly average catch for Culex pipiens (A) and Cx. tarsalis (B) mosquitoes across all trapping locations in British Columbia, Canada, during 2005–2009. Provincial vector surveillance data are aggregated by week beginning January 1, and the dates provided represent the first day of a given week. Vertical dashed line represents the estimated exposure date for human cases and the collection date for the first positive mosquito pools.

Figure 2. Nightly average catch for Culex pipiens (A) and Cx. tarsalis (B) mosquitoes across all trapping locations in British Columbia, Canada, during 2005–2009. Provincial vector surveillance data are aggregated by week beginning...

A total of 181,942 mosquitoes were collected in 2009 from 107 traps (Table 1). The most common mosquitoes in British Columbia are Coquillettidia purturbans and members of the genus Aedes. British Columbia is the only area in western Canada that has Cx. tarsalis and Cx. pipiens mosquitoes; the former are rare east of the Mississippi River, and the latter are absent in the prairie provinces (23). However, the abundance of these species is typically lower than in the prairie provinces of Saskatchewan and Manitoba, which experience the most intense WNV transmission in Canada (8,9). Cx. pipiens mosquito abundance in the Fraser Valley in 2009 increased relative to previous years; an average of 36.1 mosquitoes were caught per trap-night. An average of 33.1 Cx. tarsalis mosquitoes were caught per trap-night in the provincial interior, which was the highest abundance of this species reported in the previous 5 years (Table 1). This average from the southern Okanagan Valley includes data from 16 novel traps placed as part of a targeted research project. However, the average provincial count was still the highest since 2006 when these traps were excluded (Table 1). Peaks in the abundance of Cx. tarsalis mosquitoes have been observed previously in British Columbia in late June, but a second substantial increase in the abundance of this species was observed in early August 2009. Several locations in the southern Okanagan Valley showed maximum nightly trap counts >800 Cx. tarsalis mosquitoes (Figure 2). The first WNV-positive mosquito pools were collected during this period of elevated Cx. tarsalis mosquito abundance; the estimated exposure period for both human cases also occurred at this time (Figure 2). Cx. pipiens mosquitoes consistently increased in the Fraser region throughout the summer; some traps caught up to 750 mosquitoes in a single night in 2009. Although the average trap catch of this species has been increasing continuously in this area since 2003, the abundance of WNV vectors in British Columbia remains much lower than in areas of Canada that have experienced large WNV outbreaks (8,9).

Cx. tarsalis was the only vector species in British Columbia that was positive for WNV in 2009. However, only Cx. tarsalis and Cx. pipiens mosquitoes are tested for WNV in British Columbia. Bias-corrected maximum-likelihood estimates (MLEs) of vector infection rates were calculated by using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC’s) PooledInfRate Microsoft Excel add-on (24). The virus reached detectable levels in late July and peaked in the latter half of August (Table 2) with 2-week MLEs of mosquito infection rates reaching 4.97/1,000 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.89–16.63) for the weeks of August 23, 2009, to Sepember 5, 2009 (Table 2). Low mosquito abundance has, however, limited the precision of these estimates. Minimum infection rates are larger than comparable MLEs from July 26–August 8 and smaller than MLEs thereafter (Table 2), indicating that >1 infected mosquito may be present per pool as is common when infection rates are high (24).

Bird Surveillance

A total of 6,681 corvids were tested for WNV during 2003–2009; none were positive (Table 1). The decreasing number of dead corvids reported since 2006 likely results from a combination of changes to regional surveillance strategies, decreases in the frequency of education campaigns, and changing public perception given the prolonged absence of the virus. We do not believe that the observed decrease resulted from a die-off of WNV-infected birds.


Figure 3

Thumbnail of Minimum daily temperature for Osoyoos, British Columbia, Canada, January–September 2009. The solid line represents values observed in 2009; the dashed line represents the best-fit 10-year average. The horizontal dotted line at 14.3°C represents estimated temperature required for Culex tarsalis mosquito development and transmission (3). The vertical dashed line represents the estimated exposure date for human cases and the collection date for the first positive mosquito pools

Figure 3. Minimum daily temperature for Osoyoos, British Columbia, Canada, January–September 2009. The solid line represents values observed in 2009; the dashed line represents the best-fit 10-year average. The horizontal dotted line at...

More degree-days were accumulated in 2009 for most locations in the province, including Osoyoos, than in any year since 2003–2004 (Table 3). Daily minimum temperatures in the winter and spring in Osoyoos in 2009 were below the 10-year average yet quickly increased in late May and early June and remained above the 10-year-average for much of the summer (Figure 3). The average minimum temperature in July 2009 in Osoyoos (15.5°C) was nearly a full degree higher than the 20-year average; average minimum temperatures in August (15.3°C) were the highest seen in 20 years (14). Maximum temperatures reached 34.9°C, 38.6°C, and 39.5°C in June, July, and August, respectively (14).


The delayed establishment of WNV in British Columbia may stem from 1) limited or failed introduction of the virus from adjacent areas with WNV activity before 2009, and/or 2) previously unsuitable environmental or ecologic conditions that prevented establishment, persistence, and amplification of WNV to detectable levels. Although both factors have contributed to the delayed establishment of WNV in British Columbia, they should be clearly separated because virus introduction and persistence are unique events (25). The comparative role of these processes in explaining the prolonged absence of WNV in British Columbia is difficult to determine, but the timing and location of British Columbia’s initial WNV activity do provide clues as to potential drivers of this range expansion.

WNV activity in British Columbia in 2009 was centered in the south-central part of the province in the southern Okanagan Valley (Figure 1). Provincial risk maps created by the BCCDC identified this area as having relatively high WNV risk for reasons other than its proximity to the United States. WNV activity is negatively associated with mountainous landscapes (26), and the Okanagan Valley is one of the few nonmountainous areas in southern British Columbia. Valleys may act as paths of least resistance for local vector- or reservoir-mediated introduction of the virus into British Columbia from Washington (27,28) or by migrating birds along the Pacific Flyway (29). The southern Okanagan Valley also contains abundant irrigated landscapes that are clustered along with human habitation near the rivers and lakes in the southern Okanagan Valley. This aggregation of favorable habitats brings vectors, reservoirs, and humans into close proximity and may facilitate virus amplification and transmission to humans and horses (30).

Not only does the southern Okanagan Valley contain favorable habitats, but it also has a climate that, unlike much of British Columbia, is favorable for WNV amplification and transmission. The southern Okanagan Valley is the hottest region in British Columbia during the summer months. Temperature is positively related to mosquito development rates and the frequency with which mosquitoes take blood meals (31). Rates of virus development within mosquito vectors also increase with temperature, and such relationships have consequences for disease transmission because failure of the virus to replicate before mosquito death can halt virus amplification (3).

Temperatures in 2009 were above average for much of British Columbia, including the southern Okanagan Valley. WNV outbreaks in the United States and Canada have occurred primarily during years with above-normal temperatures (7,32), and a recent case-crossover study (an epidemiologic study design in which each case serves as its own control, allowing comparison of exposure at the time of disease onset to exposure at another time point) of 16,298 WNV cases in the United States showed that a 5°C increase in mean maximum weekly temperature is associated with a 32%–50% increase in WNV incidence (4). The first positive mosquito pool in the southern Okanagan Valley was detected ≈1 week after heavy rainfall and immediately after a period of extreme heat during which nightly temperatures were well above the 14.3°C limit for virus replication in Cx. tarsalis mosquitoes (3) (Figure 3). This rainfall likely increased the number of vector development sites; the ensuing period of high temperatures facilitated rapid mosquito development, virus amplification, and subsequent transmission in avian and mosquito populations.

The above-average abundance of Cx. tarsalis mosquitoes observed in 2009 is likely another key driver of the observed WNV range expansion (Table 1). Cx. tarsalis mosquitoes are bridge vectors that feed on birds and mammals (33). The elevated abundance of this species in 2009, especially the large peaks observed at the end of July and beginning of August (Figure 2), likely facilitated virus transmission from avian populations into humans and horses. However, Cx. tarsalis mosquitoes are much less common in British Columbia compared with other areas of Canada that experience large WNV outbreaks (8,9); this rarity may be 1 factor that has prevented past WNV activity in this region. Little is currently known about the ecology of Cx. tarsalis mosquitoes in the southern Okanagan Valley, and specific information is needed regarding the habitat preferences and overwintering practices of this species to enable more focused prevention efforts.

The detection of WNV in British Columbia in 2009 proves that the southern portion of the province contains the prerequisite environmental and ecologic conditions for within-season WNV amplification and transmission, at least in some years. What is less certain is whether the observed range expansions along the virus’s northern limit will lead to yearly endemic activity or to rare instances of sporadic disease as is typical in Washington State. WNV can overwinter in adult mosquitoes (34), thereby increasing the probability of future virus transmission in areas that had positive WNV indicators in 2009. Historic trends in some areas of the United States show marked increases in outbreak severity in the year after WNV introduction (32). Furthermore, the presence of a WNV-positive horse in the Fraser Valley is concerning given its proximity to British Columbia’s populated urban areas where Cx. pipiens mosquitoes are a consistent presence between June and August. Urban transmission of WNV in British Columbia in 2010 could lead to an increase in human cases and identifies a need for continued surveillance programs and appropriate prevention.

Outbreaks in human populations do require specific sequential weather conditions that may not be met in 2010 despite predictions for an El Niño year (35). In addition, the historically low abundance of key WNV vectors in British Columbia may limit WNV transmission in this region, and a return to provincial norms for Cx. tarsalis mosquito abundance could disrupt WNV transmission in the rural areas of the southern Okanagan Valley. St. Louis encephalitis virus, an arbovirus that shares vectors and reservoirs with WNV, was detected in southern British Columbia in mammals and humans in 1968 (36). Yet St. Louis encephalitis virus has caused no locally acquired human cases since, which indicates that arboviruses can circulate endemically in animal populations in the area without resulting in human cases.

In summary, the introduction and within-season amplification of WNV in 2009 represent a long-delayed range expansion. Although reasons for the delay remain unknown, we hypothesize that WNV activity in Washington State in 2009 provided, for the first time, a sufficient nearby source of WNV for northward introduction of the virus into British Columbia through cross-border mountain valleys. This introduction likely combined with uniquely warm nightly temperatures and elevated numbers of Cx. tarsalis mosquitoes in the southern Okanagan Valley; this combination of factors presented a convergence of favorable events that facilitated establishment and amplification in mosquito and avian populations. WNV activity levels in British Columbia in 2010 will provide valuable insight into the nature of WNV expansion and transmission along British Columbia’s northern and western borders. The presence of WNV activity in 2010, despite a return to normal temperatures and vector abundance, would suggest that ineffective virus introduction may be responsible for the prolonged absence of WNV in the province. Conversely, a return to normal temperatures and vector abundance combined with a lack of WNV activity in 2010 would suggest that environmental and ecologic conditions in this part of the Pacific Northwest are typically unsuitable for yearly WNV establishment, amplification, and transmission. Regardless, surveillance and ongoing consideration of appropriate prevention strategies are required to lessen the possibility of future WNV transmission to human populations in the region.

Mr Roth is a PhD candidate at the School of Population and Public Health at the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. He also works with the British Columbia Centre for Disease Control Vector Borne and Emerging Zoonotic Pathogens Team. His research interests focus on the effects of environment and ecology on the transmission and control of vector-borne and zoonotic diseases.



We thank British Columbia’s regional health authorities, municipalities, regional governments, and the Osoyoos Indian Band for their help with WNV surveillance in the province; the Parasitology and Zoonotic and Emerging Pathogen Sections of BCCDC PHMRL for their role in morphologic and molecular identification of samples submitted for WNV testing; the Ministry of Agriculture and Lands and the Animal Health Centre for their help in WNV testing of collected birds; the National Microbiology Laboratory in Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, for its help with confirmatory human testing; and Phil Curry for his valuable input on WNV surveillance and control in Canada.

Partial funding for mosquito surveillance on First Nations lands in the southern Okanagan Valley was provided by the First Nations and Inuit Health branch of Health Canada and the BC First Nations Environmental Contaminants Program. Personal funding for D.R. came from a Canadian graduate scholarship from the Canadian Institute for Health Research (CIHR) and a CIHR/Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research Bridge Program Fellowship.



  1. Campbell  GL, Marfin  AA, Lanciotti  RS, Gubler  DJ. West Nile virus. Lancet Infect Dis. 2002;2:51929. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Eisenberg  JNS, Desai  MA, Levy  K, Bates  SJ, Liang  S, Naumoff  K, Environmental determinants of infectious disease: a framework for tracking causal links and guiding public health research. Environ Health Perspect. 2007;115:121623. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Reisen  WK, Fang  Y, Martinez  VM. Effects of temperature on the transmission of West Nile virus by Culex tarsalis (Diptera: Culicidae). J Med Entomol. 2006;43:30917. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Soverow  JE, Wellenius  GA, Fisman  DN, Mittleman  MA. Infectious disease in a warming world: how weather influenced West Nile virus in the United States (2001–2005). Environ Health Perspect. 2009;117:104952.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Landesman  WJ, Allan  BF, Langerhans  RB, Knight  TM, Chase  JM. Inter-annual associations between precipitation and human incidence of West Nile virus in the United States. Vector-Borne Zoonot. 2007;7:33743. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Kilpatrick  AM, Kramer  LD, Campbell  SR, Alleyne  EO, Dobson  AP, Daszak  P. West Nile virus risk assessment and the bridge vector paradigm. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005;11:4259.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Public Health Agency of Canada. West Nile virus monitor [cited 2009 Dec 14].
  8. Government of Saskatchewan. West Nile virus: surveillance results [cited 2010 Mar 23].
  9. Manitoba Health. West Nile virus: surveillance statistics [cited 2010 Mar 23].
  10. Government of Alberta. Health and wellness: West Nile virus—surveillance evidence in Alberta [cited 2010 Mar 23].
  11. British Columbia Centre for Disease Control. West Nile virus activity in British Columbia: 2009 surveillance program results [cited 2009 March 1].
  12. Farley  AL. Atlas of British Columbia. Vancouver (Canada): University of British Columbia Press, 1979. p. 30.
  13. Campbell  RW, Branch  B. The birds of British Columbia. Vancouver (Canada): University of British Columbia Press, 1990. p. 55.
  14. Government of Canada. Canada’s national climate archive [cited 2009 Dec 14].
  15. Eisler  DL, McNabb  A, Jorgensen  DR, Isaac-Renton  JL. Use of an internal positive control in a multiplex reverse transcription-PCR to detect West Nile virus RNA in mosquito pools. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42:8413. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Lanciotti  RS, Kerst  AJ, Nasci  RS, Godsey  MS, Mitchell  CJ, Savage  HM, Rapid detection of West Nile virus from human clinical specimens, field-collected mosquitoes, and avian samples by a TaqMan reverse transcriptase-PCR assay. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:406671.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Stone  WB, Okoniewski  JC, Therrien  JE, Kramer  LD, Kauffman  EB, Eidson  M. VecTest as diagnostic and surveillance tool for West Nile virus in dead birds. [PMID 15663856]. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004;10:217581.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Wilson  LT, Barnett  WW. Degree-days: an aid in crop and pest management. Calif Agric. 1983;37:47.
  19. Allen  JC. A modified sine wave method for calculating degree-days. Environ Entomol. 1976;5:38896.
  20. Pruess  KP. Day-degree methods for pest management. Environ Entomol. 1983;12:6139.
  21. Zou  L, Miller  SN, Schmidtmann  ETA. GIS tool to estimate West Nile virus risk based on a degree-day model. Environ Monit Assess. 2007;129:41320. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Washington State Department of Health. West Nile virus in Washington [cited 2009 May 12].
  23. Conly  JM, Johnston  BL. Why the west in West Nile virus infections? Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2007;18:2858.[REMOVED HYPERLINK FIELD]PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Biggerstaff  BJ. PooledInfRate: a Microsoft Excel add-in to compute prevalence estimates from pooled samples. Fort Collins (CO): Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2006 [cited 2009 Dec 14]. http://www.cdc.gv/ncidod/dvbid/westnile/software.htm
  25. Hudson  P, Perkins  S, Cattadori  I. The emergence of wildlife disease and the application of ecology, In: Ostfeld R, Keesing F, Eviner, VT, editors. Infectious disease ecology: the effect of ecosystems on disease and of disease on ecosystems. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press, 2008. p. 347–67.
  26. Gibbs  SEJ, Wimberly  MC, Madden  M, Masour  J, Yabsley  MY, Stallknecht  DE. Factors affecting the geographic distribution of West Nile virus in Georgia, USA: 2002–2004. Vector-Borne Zoonot. Dis. 2006;6:7382.
  27. Bailey  SF, Eliason  DA, Hoffmann  BL. Flight and dispersal of the mosquito Culex tarsalis coquillett in the Sacramento Valley of California. Hilgardia. 1965;37:73113.
  28. Rappole  JH, Compton  BW, Leimgruber  P, Robertson  J, King  DI, Renner  SC. Modeling movement of West Nile virus in the Western Hemisphere. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2006;6:12839. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Rappole  JH, Derrickson  SR, Hubalek  Z. Migratory birds and West Nile virus. J Appl Microbiol. 2003;94(Suppl):47S58S. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Shaman  J, Day  JF, Stieglitz  M. Drought-induced amplification and epidemic transmission of West Nile virus in southern Florida. J Med Entomol. 2005;42:13441. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Becker  N. Influence of climate change on mosquito development and mosquito-borne diseases in Europe. Parasitol Res. 2008;103:1928. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Reisen  W, Brault  AC. West Nile virus in North America: perspectives on epidemiology and intervention. Pest Manag Sci. 2007;63:6416. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Kent  R, Juliusson  L, Weissmann  M, Evans  S, Komar  N. Seasonal blood-feeding behavior of Culex tarsalis (Diptera: Culicidae) in Weld County, Colorado, 2007. J Med Entomol. 2009;46:38090. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Nasci  RS, Savage  HM, White  DJ, Miller  JR, Cropp  BC, Godsey  MS, West Nile virus in overwintering Culex mosquitoes, New York City, 2000. Emerg Infect Dis. 2001;7:7424. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. National Weather Service. Climate Prediction Center. El Niño/southern oscillation (ENSO) diagnostic discussion [cited 2009 Dec 14].
  36. McLean  DM, Chernesky  MA, Chernesky  SJ, Goddard  EJ, Ladyman  SR, Peers  RR, Arbovirus prevalence in the East Kootenay region, 1968. Can Med Assoc. 1969;100:320236.PubMedGoogle Scholar




Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid1608.100483

1Members of the British Columbia WNV Surveillance Team: Lucy Beck, Victoria Bowes, Elizabeth Brodkin, Steve Chong, Ken Christian, Dalton Cross, Murray Fyfe, Roland Guasparini, Paul Hasselback, Randy Heilbron, Mira Leslie, James Lu, Craig Nowakowski, Robert Parker, Tim Shum, Kevin Touchet, and Eric Young.

Table of Contents – Volume 16, Number 8—August 2010

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

David Roth, British Columbia Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, 655 W 12th Ave, Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z4R4, Canada

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: March 30, 2011
Page updated: March 30, 2011
Page reviewed: March 30, 2011
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.