Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 17, Number 4—April 2011

Sequence Analysis of Feline Coronaviruses and the Circulating Virulent/Avirulent Theory

Cite This Article

To the Editor: Feline coronaviruses (FCoVs) occur as 2 pathotypes, feline infectious peritonitis virus (FIPV) and feline enteric coronavirus (FECV). FECV is common in cats, causing mild transient enteritis in kittens, but is asymptomatic in adult cats. In contrast, FIPV occurs sporadically but is lethal. It replicates in monocytes and macrophages and rapidly disseminates throughout the body causing systemic immunopathologic disease (14).

The relationship between FECV and FIPV has become a matter of debate. Genetic and animal experimental evidence indicates that FIPV arises by mutation from FECV in the intestinal tract of a persistently infected cat; the virus thereby acquires the monocyte or macrophage tropism that enables it to spread systemically and cause FIP (57,8). According to another view, the 2 pathotypes circulate independently in the field. This circulating virulent/avirulent FCoV theory recently was advocated by Brown et al. (9). Their conclusion was based on sequence analyses of parts of the viral genome including the matrix (M) gene, phylogenetic analysis of which revealed reciprocal monophyly of the sequences obtained from FIP cases versus those of asymptomatic FECV-infected animals. In addition, the authors suggested 5 aa residues in the M protein to represent potential diagnostic markers for distinguishing virulent FIPV from avirulent FECV (9).

To try to verify the findings of Brown et al. (9), we determined and analyzed M genes from 43 FCoV genomes, 20 of which came from cats in single-cat households, and 23 from cattery animals. The latter group consisted of 10 asymptomatic healthy cats (FECV; test specimens: feces) and 13 dead cats with FIP confirmed through pathology (FIPV; test specimens: organs, ascites). These animals came from 8 catteries. FECV and FIPV cases were found in 7 (designated A to G); the remaining cattery (H) provided 2 cats with FIP. The genomes from individually living cats were from 15 FIPV- and 5 FECV-infected animals.


Thumbnail of A) Phylogenetic relationships of feline coronaviruses (FCoVs) detected in feces of healthy cats and in organs/ascites of cats with feline infectious peritonitis. Alignment of the matrix (M) gene sequences was used to generate a rooted neighbor-joining tree with the M gene sequence of canine coronavirus strain NJ17 (Genbank accession no. AY704917) as outgroup. Bootstrap confidence values (percentages of 1,000 replicates) are indicated at the relevant branching points. Branch lengths

Figure. A) Phylogenetic relationships of feline coronaviruses (FCoVs) detected in feces of healthy cats and in organs/ascites of cats with feline infectious peritonitis. Alignment of the matrix (M) gene sequences was used...

Using specific primers (sense 5′-CGTCTCAATCAAGGCATATAATCCCGACGAAG-3′, antisense 5′-CAGTTGACGCGTTGTCCCTGTG-3′), we amplified the same 575-bp M gene fragment as studied by Brown et al. (9). GenBank accession numbers for the FCoV M gene sequences determined in this study are HQ738691–HQ738733. When compared by phylogenetic analysis, the nucleotide sequences of FIPV and FECV M genes distributed into paraphyletic patterns rather than in monophyletic clusters (Figure, panel A).

Thus, as we observed earlier for the 3c gene (10), M gene sequences generally clustered according to the cattery from where they originated, irrespective of their pathotype (e.g., FECV 586 and FIPVs 584 and 585 from cattery A; FECV 620 and FIPVs 615 and 622 from cattery G; FECV 10 and FIPV 8 from cattery F). Such a distribution pattern is consistent with the mutation theory, according to which FIPVs originate from FECVs and are thus closely related (7,9). Exceptions in this picture were FIPV 9 in cattery F and FECVs 406 and 407 in cattery D, presumably caused by multiple FCoV lineages in these open catteries (an open cattery is one in which cats can move in and out, usually for breeding purposes).

We also examined the 5 aa sites in the M protein identified by Brown et al. (9) as being potentially diagnostic of FIP. An alignment of the relevant part of the polypeptide sequence, comprising the presumed signature residues at positions 108, 120, 138, 163 and 199, is shown in the Figure, panel B, for all FIPV and FECV genomes sequenced in this study. Within this sample collection, we observed complete sequence conservation at positions 108 and 199, virtually complete conservation (1 difference) at position 163. The 2 aa identities (Val and Ile) found at position 120 and 138 occurred with similar frequencies in FIPV and FECV (position 120: Ile in 16/36 [44%] FIPVs and in 6/14 [43%] FECVs; position 138: Ile in 29/36 [81%] FIPVs and in 12/14 [86%] FECVs). These observations do not indicate the slightest tendency of sequence segregation among the 2 pathotypes. In the alignment of the Figure, panel B, we also included M protein sequences translated from several FCoV genomes from the Americas, 7 FIPV, and 1 FECV (8). The comparison does not reveal peculiarities indicative of geographic segregation. Hence, our data do not confirm the diagnostic potential of the M protein sequence nor do they support the suggested role of the membrane protein in FIP pathogenesis (9).

Informative as it may be, comparative sequence analysis will eventually not be sufficient to answer the FECV/FIPV question. What will be needed is a reverse genetics system to generate and manipulate the FCoV genome as well as a cell culture system to propagate the viruses, both of which have thus far not been achieved.



We thank the veterinarians and cat owners in the Netherlands who provided FIP cases and fecal material for this study. We also thank Raoul de Groot for his constructive remarks regarding the manuscript.


Hui-Wen Chang, Herman F. Egberink, and Peter J.M. RottierComments to Author 

Author affiliations: Author affiliation: Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands



  1. Addie  D, Belák  S, Boucraut-Baralon  C, Egberink  H, Frymus  T, Gruffydd-Jones  T, Feline infectious peritonitis. ABCD guidelines on prevention and management. J Feline Med Surg. 2009;11:594604. DOIPubMed
  2. de Groot  RJ, Horzinek  MC. Feline infectious peritonitis. In: The Coronaviridae. Siddell SG, editor. New York: Plenum Press; 1995. p. 293–309.
  3. Haijema  BJ, Rottier  PJ, de Groot  RJ. Feline coronaviruses: a tale of two-faced types. In: Thiel V, editor. Coronaviruses. Molecular and cellular biology. Norfolk (UK): Academic Press; 2007. p. 183–203.
  4. Pedersen  NC. A review of feline infectious peritonitis virus infection: 1963-2008. J Feline Med Surg. 2009;11:22558. DOIPubMed
  5. Herrewegh  AA, Vennema  H, Horzinek  MC, Rottier  PJM, de Groot  RJ. The molecular genetics of feline coronaviruses: comparative sequence analysis of the ORF7a/7b transcription unit of different biotypes. Virology. 1995;212:62231. DOIPubMed
  6. Poland  AM, Vennema  H, Foley  JE, Pedersen  NC. Two related strains of feline infectious peritonitis virus isolated from immunocompromised cats infected with a feline enteric coronavirus. J Clin Microbiol. 1996;34:31804.PubMed
  7. Vennema  H, Poland  A, Foley  J, Pedersen  NC. Feline infectious peritonitis viruses arise by mutation from endemic feline enteric coronaviruses. Virology. 1998;243:1507. DOIPubMed
  8. Pedersen  NC, Liu  H, Dodd  KA, Pesavento  PA. Significance of coronavirus mutants in feces and diseased tissues of cats suffering from feline infectious peritonitis. Viruses. 2009;1:16684. DOI
  9. Brown  MA, Troyer  JL, Pecon-Slattery  J, Roelke  ME, O’Brien  SJ. Genetics and pathogenesis of feline infectious peritonitis virus. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009;15:144552. DOIPubMed
  10. Chang  HW, de Groot  RJ, Egberink  HF, Rottier  PJ. Feline infectious peritonitis: insights into feline coronavirus pathobiogenesis and epidemiology based on genetic analysis of the viral 3c gene. J Gen Virol. 2010;91:41520. DOIPubMed




Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid1704.102027

Related Links


Table of Contents – Volume 17, Number 4—April 2011


Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Peter J.M. Rottier, Virology Division, Department of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Veterinary Faculty, Utrecht University, Yalelaan 1, 3584 CL Utrecht, the Netherlands

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: July 29, 2011
Page updated: July 29, 2011
Page reviewed: July 29, 2011
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.