Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 17, Number 9—September 2011
Dispatch

Wild Rodents and Novel Human Pathogen Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis, Southern Sweden

Martin AnderssonComments to Author  and Lars Råberg
Author affiliations: Author affiliation: Lund University, Lund, Sweden

Main Article

Figure 1

Collection locations for rodents and shrews tested for Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis and Bartonella spp. infections, southern Sweden, 2008. Prevalence of infection: Häglinge, n = 45 infections, 0% Candidatus N. mikurensis, 44.4% Bartonella spp.; Revinge, n = 623 infections, 9.3% Candidatus N. mikurensis, 33.7% Bartonella spp.; Istaby, n = 53 infections, 3.8% Candidatus N. mikurensis, 34% Bartonella spp.; Hemmeströ, n = 64 infections, 4.7% Candidatus N. mikurensis, 39.1% Bartonella spp.; Her

Figure 1. Collection locations for rodents and shrews tested for Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis and Bartonella spp. infections, southern Sweden, 2008. Prevalence of infection: Häglinge, n = 45 infections, 0% Candidatus N. mikurensis, 44.4% Bartonella spp.; Revinge, n = 623 infections, 9.3% Candidatus N. mikurensis, 33.7% Bartonella spp.; Istaby, n = 53 infections, 3.8% Candidatus N. mikurensis, 34% Bartonella spp.; Hemmeströ, n = 64 infections, 4.7% Candidatus N. mikurensis, 39.1% Bartonella spp.; Herseby, n = 49 infections, 12.5% Candidatus N. mikurensis, 45.0% Bartonella spp.

Download

Main Article

Page created: September 06, 2011
Page updated: September 06, 2011
Page reviewed: September 06, 2011
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external