Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 17, Number 9—September 2011

Wild Rodents and Novel Human Pathogen Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis, Southern Sweden

Martin AnderssonComments to Author  and Lars Råberg
Author affiliations: Author affiliation: Lund University, Lund, Sweden

Cite This Article


We examined small mammals as hosts for Anaplasmataceae in southern Sweden. Of 771 rodents, 68 (8.8%) were infected by Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis, but no other Anaplasmataceae were found. Candidatus N. mikurensis has recently been found in human patients in Germany, Switzerland, and Sweden, which suggests that this could be an emerging pathogen in Europe.

The rickettsial family Anaplasmataceae contains several tick-transmitted bacteria of considerable medical and veterinary importance, including known human pathogens such as Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Ehrlichia chaffeensis. Recently, a case of human disease in a Swedish patient with recurrent fever episodes caused by another member of Anaplasmataceae was reported. The infectious agent was shown by PCR amplification of the 16S rRNA gene to be identical to Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis (1).

This published report was followed by the description of a patient from Switzerland (2) and 2 German patients with severe febrile illness caused by Candidatus N. mikurensis (3). This member of the family Anaplasmataceae was first discovered in ticks in the Netherlands in 1999; it was originally designated as an Ehrlichia spp.–like species (4). Similar organisms were later detected in Russia (5) as well as in other parts of Europe (6). In 2004, a closely related organism was detected in Japan in wild rodents and was named Candidatus N. mikurensis (7). In the United States, a similar organism (Candidatus N. lotori) has been detected in wild raccoons (8). The distribution and reservoir hosts of Candidatus N. mikurensis in Europe are largely unknown. It has, however, been detected in a blood sample from a single bank vole in Italy (9), indicating that rodents are possible reservoir hosts.

In this study, we collected blood samples from 7 small mammal species (rodents and shrews) at 5 localities in southern Sweden to investigate their role as hosts for Anaplasmataceae to determine whether these small mammals serve as natural hosts for Candidatus N. mikurensis.

The Study

Figure 1

Thumbnail of Collection locations for rodents and shrews tested for Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis and Bartonella spp. infections, southern Sweden, 2008. Prevalence of infection: Häglinge, n = 45 infections, 0% Candidatus N. mikurensis, 44.4% Bartonella spp.; Revinge, n = 623 infections, 9.3% Candidatus N. mikurensis, 33.7% Bartonella spp.; Istaby, n = 53 infections, 3.8% Candidatus N. mikurensis, 34% Bartonella spp.; Hemmeströ, n = 64 infections, 4.7% Candidatus N. mikurensis, 39.1% Bartone

Figure 1. Collection locations for rodents and shrews tested for Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis and Bartonella spp. infections, southern Sweden, 2008. Prevalence of infection: Häglinge, n = 45 infections, 0% Candidatus N. mikurensis, 44.4%...

From May through October 2008, we trapped small mammals at 5 sites in southern Sweden (Figure 1). Animals were captured with live traps and released after sampling. Our primary objective was to obtain samples from bank voles, Myodes glareolus, but other species were also sampled when captured. A total of 829 animals of 7 species were caught (Table). Approximately 20 µL of blood was taken from each animal. A nested PCR was performed with primers for Anaplasmataceae specific for the 16S rRNA gene (10).

All amplified fragments were sequenced, and a BLAST ( search showed that 68 animals were infected by Candidatus N. mikurensis. The primers were chosen to be specific for bacteria belonging to the families Rickettsiaceae and Anaplasmataceae (10), but they also amplified Bartonella spp. under the given PCR conditions. In total, 35.5% of the animals were infected by Bartonella spp. Double infections with both Candidatus N. mikurensis and Bartonella spp., as indicated by double peaks on the sequencing chromatogram, occurred in 12 cases.

Figure 2

Thumbnail of Phylogenetic network of 16s rRNA sequences (1,231 bp) from Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis, southern Sweden, 2008. Black nodes indicate intermediate inferred sequences on the most parsimonious route between observed sequences. Numbers on branches represents mutations, numbered according to nucleotide position in the alignment. The sequence obtained in this study is shown in boldface and is identical with sequences from human patients in Germany (3) and Switzerland (2). The Japane

Figure 2. Phylogenetic network of 16s rRNA sequences (1,231 bp) from Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis, southern Sweden, 2008. Black nodes indicate intermediate inferred sequences on the most parsimonious route between observed sequences. Numbers on...

To further characterize the obtained Candidatus N. mikurensis, we sequenced 1,426 bp of the 16S rRNA and 1,233 bp of the groEL gene (1). The obtained 16S rRNA Candidatus N. mikurensis sequences in this study were identical (1,426/1,426 bp) to sequences obtained from human patients in Germany and Switzerland (2,3). The groEL sequence was identical to the isolate from Germany (1,233/1,233 bp) but differed slightly from the isolate from Switzerland (1,072/1,084 bp, 98.9% pairwise identity). A phylogenetic network containing unique 16s rRNA sequences from Candidatus N. mikurensis available at the National Center for Biotechnology Information was made with the program Network ( by using the median-joining algorithm (11) (Figure 2).

The prevalence of Candidatus N. mikurensis at the 5 sites ranged from 0% to 12.5%, and Bartonella spp. occurred in 33.7% to 45.0% of the animals (Figure 1). The prevalence of Candidatus N. mikurensis and Bartonella spp. in each host species is given in the Table. Candidatus N. mikurensis occurred in all 4 rodent species, but not in the shrews; the difference in prevalence between rodents and shrews was statistically significant (p = 0.011, by Fisher exact test). Bartonella spp. were found in all rodent species and the common shrew.


In the present field survey of Anaplasmataceae in Swedish rodents, we have amplified 16s rRNA and groEL sequences identified as Candidatus N. mikurensis identical to sequences obtained from humans. This organism has been amplified from humans with febrile illness on ≥4 occasions (13), demonstrating that Candidatus N. mikurensis can cause human infections, at least occasionally.

Apart from the first human case, to our knowledge, Candidatus N. mikurensis has not been detected in Sweden. However, we identified Candidatus N. mikurensis at 4 of 5 sites, indicating that this organism is widespread in southern Sweden. Identical or similar sequences have been detected in Ixodes ricinus ticks from several European countries (36,13), showing that it is distributed over a large area of Europe. In contrast, we found no evidence of infection by any other Anaplasmataceae. I. ricinus is the dominating tick species in Sweden, and animals at all our study sites were heavily infested with larvae of this species and occasionally with nymphs (M. Andersson and L. Råberg, unpub. data). Reservoir hosts are essential for several tick-borne pathogens that lack the capacity for transovarial transmission from female ticks to larvae, such as A. phagocytophilum (14). Approximately 70% of the tick larvae in Sweden engorge on small mammals, such as voles, mice, and shrews (15).

The prevalence of Candidatus N. mikurensis was similar in all investigated rodent species in our study with a mean value of 8.8%. These results are consistent with several studies in Japan, which also found Candidatus N. mikurensis in several different rodent species (7,10). This finding indicates that rodents play a role in the natural cycle of Candidatus N. mikurensis in Europe and that rodents are likely to be competent reservoir hosts. In contrast, the closely related Candidatus N. lotori, found in the United States, seems to use raccoons rather than rodents as hosts (12). Whether the European variant of Candidatus Neoehrlichia is capable of infecting animals other than rodents and humans remains to be investigated. We found the organism was completely absent in shrews, which suggests that they might not be competent hosts for these bacteria.

We conclude that Candidatus N. mikurensis is geographically widespread in southern Sweden and that several rodent species, the main source of blood meals for larvae of I. ricinus in Sweden (15), can be infected. The relatively high prevalence in common rodent species suggests that the risk for humans and domestic animals to encounter infected I. ricinus nymphs and adults is substantial. Thus, Candidatus N. mikurensis should be considered when diagnosing bacterial infections associated with tick bites.

Mr Andersson is a PhD student in the Department of Biology, Lund University. His major research interests focus on the ecology and evolution of tick-borne diseases.

Dr Råberg is an assistant professor in the Department of Biology, Lund University. His research interest focuses on the evolutionary ecology of host-parasite interactions.



We thank Kristin Scherman and Staffan Bensch for comments on the manuscript and Olof Hellgren, Barbara Tschirren, Mimi Lannefors, Pär Söderberg, and Sandra Chiriac for field assistance.

Financial support was provided by the Swedish Research Council for Environment, Agricultural Sciences and Spatial Planning and the Swedish Research Council to L.R.



  1. Welinder-Olsson  C, Kjellin  E, Vaht  K, Jacobsson  S, Wennerås  C. First case of human “Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis” infection in a febrile patient with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48:19569. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Fehr  JS, Bloemberg  GV, Ritter  C, Hombach  M, Lüscher  TF, Weber  R, Septicemia caused by tick-borne bacterial pathogen Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010;16:11279. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. von Loewenich  FD, Geißdörfer  W, Disqué  C, Matten  J, Schett  G, Sakka  SG, Detection of “Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis” in two patients with severe febrile illnesses: evidence for a European sequence variant. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48:26305. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Schouls  LM, Van de Pol  I, Rijpkema  SG, Schot  CS. Detection and identification of Ehrlichia, Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato, and Bartonella species in Dutch Ixodes ricinus ticks. J Clin Microbiol. 1999;37:221522.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Alekseev  AN, Dubinina  HV, Van de Pol  I, Schouls  LM. Identification of Ehrlichia spp, and Borrelia burgdorferi in Ixodes ticks in the Baltic regions of Russia. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39:223742. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Brouqui  P, Sanogo  YO, Caruso  G, Merola  F, Raoult  D. Candidatus Ehrlichia walkerii—a new Ehrlichia detected in Ixodes ricinus tick collected from asymptomatic humans in northern Italy. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003;990:13440. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Kawahara  M, Rikihisa  Y, Isogai  E, Takahashi  M, Misumi  H, Suto  C, Ultrastructure and phylogenetic analysis of “Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis” in the family Anaplasmataceae, isolated from wild rats and found in Ixodes ovatus ticks. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2004;54:183743. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Dugan  VG, Gaydos  JK, Stallknecht  DE, Little  SE, Beall  AD, Mead  DG, Detection of Ehrlichia spp. in raccoons (Procyon lotor) from Georgia. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2005;5:16271. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Beninati  T, Piccolo  G, Rizzoli  A, Genchi  C, Bandi  C. Anaplasmataceae in wild rodents and roe deer from Trento province (northern Italy). Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2006;25:6778. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Tabara  K, Arai  S, Kawabuchi  T, Itagaki  A, Ishihara  C, Satoh  H, Molecular survey of Babesia microti, Ehrlichia species and Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis in wild rodents from Shimane Prefecture, Japan. Microbiol Immunol. 2007;51:35967.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Bandelt  H-J, Forster  P, Röhl  A. Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol. 1999;16:3748.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Yabsley  MJ, Murphy  SM, Luttrell  MP, Wilcox  BR, Ruckdeschel  C. Raccoons (Procyon lotor), but not rodents, are natural and experimental hosts for an ehrlichial organism related to “Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis.”. Vet Microbiol. 2008;131:3018. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Spitalská  E, Boldis  V, Kostanova  Z, Kocianova  E, Stefanidesova  K. Incidence of various tick-borne microorganisms in rodents and ticks of Central Slovakia. Acta Virol. 2008;52:1759.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Dumler  JS, Barbet  AF, Bekker  CP, Dasch  GA, Palmer  GH, Ray  SC, Reorganization of genera in the families Rickettsiaceae and Anaplasmataceae in the order Rickettsiales: unification of some species of Ehrlichia with Anaplasma, Cowdria with Ehrlichia and Ehrlichia with Neorickettsia, descriptions of six new species combinations and designation of Ehrlichia equi and “HGE agent” as subjective synonyms of Ehrlichia phagocytophila. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2001;51:214565. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Tälleklint  L, Jaenson  TG. Transmission of Borrelia burgdorferi s.l from mammal reservoirs to the primary vector of Lyme borreliosis, Ixodes ricinus (Acari: ixodidae), in Sweden. J Med Entomol. 1994;31:8806.PubMedGoogle Scholar




Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid1709.101058

Table of Contents – Volume 17, Number 9—September 2011

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Martin Andersson, Department of Biology, Lund University, Ecology Building, 22362, Lund, Sweden

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: September 06, 2011
Page updated: September 06, 2011
Page reviewed: September 06, 2011
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.