Volume 18, Number 11—November 2012
Research
Lack of Evidence for Zoonotic Transmission of Schmallenberg Virus
Table 4
Animal species† | No. farms (no. animals/farm) [median]) | Laboratory-confirmed SBV infection in animals, no. (%) |
No. human participants |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCR | VNT | PCR and/or VNT | Total (no. per farm) | No. (%) from farms with laboratory-confirmed SBV infection | |||
Sheep | 69 (5–1,676 [83]) | 48 (70) | 44 (64) | 61 (88) | 130 (1–6) | 112 (86) | |
Goat | 4 (4–1144 [759]) | 1 (25) | 2 (50) | 2 (50) | 8 (1–4) | 2 (25) | |
Cattle | 50 (23–468 [136]) | 4 (8) | 37 (74) | 39 (78) | 96 (1–5) | 78 (81) | |
Total | 123 | 53 (43)‡ | 83 (68)§ | 102 (83) | 234 | 192 (82) |
*A total of 240 farms were invited to participate in the study (113 sheep, 7 goat, and 120 cattle farms; all were highly suspected to be SBV infected on the basis of pathologic findings consistent with typical malformations in calves or lambs). 123 (51%) farms responded. SBV, Schmallenburg virus; VNT, virus neutralization test.
†Mixed farms were classified according to the main animal species.
‡For 9 farms, PCR results not available.
§For 38 farms, VNT results not available.
1These authors contributed equally to this article.
Page created: October 16, 2012
Page updated: October 16, 2012
Page reviewed: October 16, 2012
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.