Volume 18, Number 12—December 2012
Migratory Birds, Ticks, and Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever Virus
Highlight and copy the desired format.
|EID||Lindeborg M, Barboutis C, Ehrenborg C, Fransson T, Jaenson T, Lindgren P, et al. Migratory Birds, Ticks, and Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever Virus. Emerg Infect Dis. 2012;18(12):2095-2097. https://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1812.120718|
|AMA||Lindeborg M, Barboutis C, Ehrenborg C, et al. Migratory Birds, Ticks, and Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever Virus. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2012;18(12):2095-2097. doi:10.3201/eid1812.120718.|
|APA||Lindeborg, M., Barboutis, C., Ehrenborg, C., Fransson, T., Jaenson, T., Lindgren, P....Olsen, B. (2012). Migratory Birds, Ticks, and Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever Virus. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 18(12), 2095-2097. https://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1812.120718.|
To the Editor: In a recently published study, Estrada-Peña et al. reported the finding of Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus (CCHFV) in adult Hyalomma lusitanicum ticks from red deer (Cervus elaphus) in Spain during 2010 (1). Phylogenetic analysis showed that the virus was most likely of African origin. Here, we present a model for the transfer of CCHFV-infected ticks by migratory birds from Africa to Europe.
CCHFV is an RNA virus in the genus Nairovirus, family Bunyaviridae. It is transmitted to humans through tick bites or by contact with blood or tissues from infected ticks, livestock, or humans. Manifestations of severe cases are internal and external hemorrhages and multiorgan failure; the case-fatality rate is ≈30% (2,3). CCHFV has the widest geographic distribution of any tick-borne virus, encompassing ≈30 countries from eastern China through Asia, the Middle East, and southeastern Europe to Africa (3,4). During the past decade, the virus has emerged in new areas of Europe, Africa, the Middle East, and Asia and has increased in disease-endemic areas (5) (Technical Appendix [PDF - 246 KB - 2 pages]).
In response to the emergence of CCHFV in Europe, during spring 2009 and 2010, we screened migratory birds for ticks as they traveled from Africa to Europe. At 2 bird observatories on the Mediterranean Sea (Capri, Italy, and Antikythira, Greece), 14,824 birds of 78 different species were caught and examined for ticks. Most (88%) of the 747 collected ticks were identified as members of the Hyalomma marginatum complex, most probably H. rufipes and H. marginatum sensu stricto (s.s.), i.e., the principal vectors of CCHFV (2). Of 10 morphologically representative ticks, 9 were identified by molecular methods as H. rufipes and 1 as H. marginatum s.s (6).
Ticks belonging to the H. marginatum complex are common in large parts of the African and Eurasian continents. The immature ticks feed mainly on birds and, to a lesser extent, on small mammals, whereas the adults actively seek larger mammals, including hares, wild and domesticated ungulates, or humans (4). In accordance with this pattern, 99% of the collected ticks in our study were larvae and nymphs.
On April 23, 2009, a woodchat shrike (Lanius senator senator) was caught at the Antikythira Bird Observatory in the Greek archipelago. The bird was a female in her second calendar year and harbored 19 H. marginatum complex ticks (3 larvae and 16 nymphs, most likely H. rufipes). Three of the nymphs, 1 half-fed and 2 fully engorged, were found positive by real-time PCR for the CCHFV small (S) segment by using methods previously described (7), amplifying a 127-bp product. The 3 positive samples were sequenced and found to be identical. Previous studies, based on the S segments, have identified 7 phylogenetically distinct genotypes: Africa 1–3, Asia 1–2, and Europe 1–2 (8). Europe 1 has been reported from Russia, Turkey, Greece, Bulgaria, and the Balkans, and Europe 2 is the nonpathogenic strain AP92 found in Greece. Alignment of the Antikythira strain with CCHFV S segment sequences deposited in GenBank showed that it had the greatest similarity with strains belonging to the genotype Africa 3 (8). In addition, a phylogenetic tree clearly places the Antikythira sequence within the Africa 3 clade (Figure).
The woodchat shrike winters in a belt from Senegal to Somalia and breeds in southern Europe and northern Africa (9). The Antikythira bird was caught during its rapid northward migration on a small island where birds normally stop over briefly just after crossing the Sahara Desert and the Mediterranean Sea. Also, the infected ticks were either half fed or fully engorged nymphs that, in the case of H. marginatum complex ticks, normally attach to the bird as larvae; this finding indicates that these ticks had attached before the bird began migration. Furthermore, 9/10 morphologically representative ticks were identified by molecular methods as H. rufipes, a species within the H. marginatum complex most common on the African continent (4,6). On the basis of these findings, we propose that this bird was infested somewhere in sub-Saharan Africa.
Migratory birds acting as long-distance transporters of ticks containing various human pathogens have been reported (10). Pre-adult ticks can stay attached to avian hosts during migration, thereafter detaching at breeding or stopover sites, where mammalian hosts can potentially establish new foci (4). Regarding the finding in Spain (1), one could speculate that new cycles of CCHFV transmission could be initiated through viremic or nonviremic (cofeeding) mechanisms involving, for example, transstadially infected adult H. rufipes ticks and susceptible H. lusitanicum ticks that are feeding on the same mammalian host.
Further research is needed on the interaction between birds and ticks in relation to the geographic distribution of CCHFV. Monitoring the influx of migratory birds carrying CCHFV-infected ticks might give disease-prevention authorities a useful tool for predicting the potential emergence of new disease foci in Europe.
We thank the staff at Villa San Michele, Capri, for support and the personnel at Capri and Antikythira bird observatories for collecting the ticks.
This study was funded by Carl Trygger’s Stiftelse, Längmanska Kulturfonden, Magnus Bergvall’s Stiftelse, The Research Council of South Eastern Sweden, and the A.G. Leventis Foundation.
- Estrada-Peña A, Palomar AN, Santibáñez P, Sánchez N, Habela MA, Portillo A, Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus in ticks, southwestern Europe, 2010. Emerg Infect Dis. 2012;18:179–80.
- Whitehouse CA. Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever. Antiviral Res. 2004;64:145–60.
- Ergönül O. Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever. Lancet Infect Dis. 2006;6:203–14.
- Hoogstraal H. The epidemiology of tick-borne Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever in Asia, Europe, and Africa. J Med Entomol. 1979;15:307–417.
- Leblebicioglu H. Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever in Eurasia. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2010;36(Suppl 1):S43–6.
- Molin Y, Lindeborg M, Nyström F, Madder M, Hjelm E, Olsen B, Migratory birds, ticks, and Bartonella. Infection Ecology & Epidemiology. 2011;1:5997.
- Wölfel R, Paweska JT, Petersen N, Grobbelaar AA, Leman PA, Hewson R, Virus detection and monitoring of viral load in Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus patients. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13:1097–100.
- Anagnostou V, Papa A. Evolution of Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever virus. Infect Genet Evol. 2009;9:948–54.
- Moreau RE. The Palaearctic–African bird migration systems. London and New York: Academic Press; 1972.
- Elfving K, Olsen B, Bergström S, Waldenström J, Lundkvist Å, Sjöstedt A, Dissemination of spotted fever rickettsia agents in Europe by migrating birds. PLoS ONE. 2010;5:e8572.
- Figure. . Neighbor-joining tree of Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus small segment sequences retrieved from GenBank and the novel 127-bp sequence isolated in this study (boxed). The tree is drawn to scale,...
- Technical Appendix. . Map showing emergence and reemergence of Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever in Africa since 2005. 246 KB
Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:
Erik Salaneck, Department of Medical Sciences, Section of Infectious Diseases, Uppsala University, Ing 33 75185, Uppsala, Sweden
Comment submitted successfully, thank you for your feedback.
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
- Page created: November 21, 2012
- Page last updated: November 21, 2012
- Page last reviewed: November 21, 2012
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,
National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases (NCEZID)
Office of the Director (OD)