Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 18, Number 3—March 2012

A Systematic Approach for Discovering Novel, Clinically Relevant Bacteria

Robert Schlaberg1Comments to Author , Keith E. Simmon1, and Mark A. Fisher
Author affiliations: University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA (R. Schlaberg, M.A. Fisher); ARUP Laboratories, Salt Lake City (R. Schlaberg, K.E. Simmon, M.A. Fisher)

Main Article

Table 1

Taxonomic distribution, by order of best species-level matches, for 673 isolates of possibly novel species of bacteria

Order No. isolates
Actinomycetales 294
Bacillales 61
Pseudomonadales 56
Flavobacteriales 41
Burkholderiales 39
Lactobacillales 38
Enterobacteriales 33
Neisseriales 15
Pasteurellales 14
Rhizobiales 14
Clostridiales 10
Cardiobacteriales 9
Sphingomonadales 8
Caulobacterales 7
Rhodospirillales 7
Xanthomonadales 7
Fusobacteriales 6
Bacteroidales 5
Sphingobacteriales 4
Rhodocyclales 2
Desulfovibrionales 1
Micrococcineae 1
Rhodobacterales 1

Main Article

1These authors contributed equally to this article.

Page created: February 16, 2012
Page updated: February 16, 2012
Page reviewed: February 16, 2012
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.