Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 18, Number 4—April 2012

Detection of Plasmodium spp. in Human Feces

Milan Jirků1, Kateřina Pomajbíková1, Klára J. Petrželková, Zuzana Hůzová, David Modrý, and Julius LukešComments to Author 
Author affiliations: Author affiliations: Biology Centre, Institute of Parasitology, ASCR, České Budějovice, Czech Republic (M. Jirků, D. Modrý, J. Lukeš); Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice (M. Jirků, J. Lukeš); University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic (K. Pomajbíková, D. Modrý); CEITEC, Brno (D. Modrý); Institute of Vertebrate Biology, ASCR, Brno, and Zoo Liberec, Liberec, Czech Republic (K.J. Petrželková); Health Institute, Prague, Czech Republic (Z. Hůzová)

Cite This Article


Comparison of diagnostic methods for Plasmodium spp. in humans from Uganda and the Central African Republic showed that parasites can be efficiently detected by PCR in fecal samples. These results, which rely solely on PCR-based examination of feces, validate numerous estimates of the prevalence of malaria in great apes.

In spite of a century of research, knowledge of Plasmodium spp. affecting the African great apes is limited. However, molecular tools have recently shown unexpectedly high diversity of these species (15). Available evidence supports the scenario in which humans acquired P. falciparum from western gorillas (3,6) and carried it in their blood throughout the world after migrating from Africa (7). However, recent discovery of a P. falciparum–related parasite in the African putty-nosed monkey calls into question this theory of the origin of this most malignant and widespread Plasmodium species (8). All data for identification of Plasmodium spp. were obtained only by PCR-based amplification of feces of free-living great apes (9). Because it is difficult to obtain their blood samples, which are used from for detection of Plasmodium spp. in other hosts, estimation of the prevalence of Plasmodium spp. in great apes is problematic.

Plasmodium spp. cause >200 million malaria cases in humans (10). The availability, sensitivity, and accuracy of diagnostic methods often rely on use of blood samples (11), making any attempts to inspect other material from humans for these pathogens unnecessary or impractical. Furthermore, a blood parasite would not be expected to be present in feces at detectable amounts (12). No attempts to identify Plasmodium spp. in feces of infected persons have been reported.

Studies of great apes (3,4,9) have focused on diversity and phylogeny of Plasmodium spp. However, fecal-based diagnostics open a plethora of questions regarding the prevalence, epidemiology, and clinical role of malaria in apes. To answer these questions, we urgently need to assess the reliability of fecal-based diagnostics. Motivated by prior feasibility of such an approach in closely related great apes, we examined whether malarial infection is detectable in feces of infected humans, and if so, in what fraction of infected persons does the parasite penetrate into feces?

The Study

We analyzed fecal samples from 16 patients given a diagnosis of malaria at Lwanga Hospital in Buikwe, Uganda, who were undergoing treatment during October–December 2010; twenty-eight employees of Dzanga-Sangha Protected Areas, Central African Republic, who when samples were obtained during November–December 2010, did not show any symptoms of malaria but were considered a high risk group; and 6 Europeans who had repeated cases of malaria during 2003–2010 (samples were provided in April 2011). Samples obtained from 2 Europeans who never visited regions to which malaria was endemic were used as negative controls. Blood and fecal samples were obtained from each person. Blood smears were also prepared from the 16 patients in Uganda. We adhered to the research protocol defined by Dzanga-Sangha Protected Areas. Permission to collect samples was obtained from all examined persons before samples were obtained.

Thick blood smears were prepared by spreading 2–3 drops of fresh blood on a slide. Slides were dried, stained for 20 min with a 1:9 dilution of Giemsa, washed with tap water for 3–5 min, dried, and inspected for Plasmodium stages by light microscopy (100 fields at a magnification of ×1,000). Parasitemia levels in positive samples were determined according to standard protocols (13). Feces and blood were fixed in 96% ethanol and stored at room temperature until processed by using the QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany). DNA from blood samples stored on filter paper in ethanol was isolated as follows. The ethanol was evaporated; the filter paper was then transferred into 200 μL of 5% Chelex 100 (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), incubated at 56°C for 1 hour, boiled for 10 min, and stored at 4°C. Before use, samples were centrifuged for 1 min at 15,000 rpm.


Thumbnail of Top, agarose gel electrophoresis of nested PCR products of human fecal samples amplified with primers (pairs DW2-F + DW2-R and CYTB1-F + CYTB2-R) and stained with ethidium bromide. Bottom, autoradiograph of a Southern blot of the same gel. α-32P-ATP–labeled acytochrome B gene of Plasmodium falciparum was used as a probe. Lanes 1–6, samples from humans with malaria (the infection sample in lane 6 is weak); lane 2, spurious amplicon; lane 7, sample from an uninfected person; lane M, 1

Figure. Top, agarose gel electrophoresis of nested PCR products of human fecal samples amplified with primers (pairs DW2-F + DW2-R and CYTB1-F + CYTB2-R) and stained with ethidium bromide. Bottom, autoradiograph of...

We amplified part of the apocytochrome (cyB) gene of Plasmodium spp. by using a reported protocol (9) and primers DW2-F and DW4-R in a first-round PCR and primers CYTB1-F and CYTB2-R in a second-round nested PCR. The amplified 938-bp fragment was resolved by agarose gel electrophoresis (Figure). Samples were subsequently blotted onto membranes and hybridized with the same PCR product labeled by random priming with 32P-dATP (ICN, Costa Mesa, CA, USA). The membrane was hybridized at 65°C overnight and washed 3× in SSC (0.15 M NaCl, 0.015 M sodium citrate, 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate) at 65°C (20 min/wash), and analyzed by using a phosphoimager. The cyB gene of P. falciparum was used as a positive control.

We analyzed fecal and blood samples obtained from persons in Uganda and determined their suitability for identification of Plasmodium spp. Parasites in various stages were detected in 13 blood smears (Table); all were identified as P. falciparum. PCR amplified a band of expected size from blood of 15 persons, and a weak band was consistently obtained from 6 samples. Amplification of Plasmodium cyB from feces of these patients was equally efficient; only 2 negative samples were identified (Table). A good correlation was observed between intensity of PCR products obtained from blood and feces, indicating that low parasitemia levels result in poor amplification regardless of the biological material used.

PCR products for 2 fecal samples were then subjected to Southern blotting, which in 1 of 2 negative samples detected the cyB amplicon, which was not visible on an agarose gel (Figure). This method also confirmed that 1 band of slightly different mobility was a spurious amplicon (Figure). Therefore, with 1 exception, samples from 15 persons with Plasmodium–spp. positive blood samples contained Plasmodium DNA in their feces. Ten amplicons were sequenced and confirmed as being from P. falciparum.

We compared the capacity of blood and feces from persons clinically asymptomatic for malaria from the Central African Republic to amplify cyB. Blood and fecal samples from 5 of 28 persons showed bands of expected size, indicating asymptomatic or chronic malaria. Samples with positive and negative PCR results were also subjected to Southern blotting, which confirmed these results. In this dataset, the ability of blood and feces to accurately diagnose malaria was equal. All blood and fecal samples obtained from the 8 Europeans showed negative PCR results.


We have shown that similar to apes, infected humans shed a detectable amount of P. falciparum in their feces, which correlates with results obtained by PCR. Southern blotting slightly enhanced the sensitivity of the PCR, but visual inspection of gel-resolved PCR products from feces was nearly equally sufficient (Table and Figure). We conclude that feces are as suitable as blood for malaria diagnostics for humans.

Although informative in terms of parasite diversity, prevalence of Plasmodium spp. amplified from feces of gorillas and chimpanzees was not determined in blood samples. A cautionary note regarding this issue and other issues has been reported (14). Our results show that in humans, P. falciparum efficiently penetrates the feces at levels detectable by PCR. Use of humans as proxies in our study validates previous estimates of malaria infection rates determined from feces of great apes (3,4,7,9,12). The diagnostic method we describe is suitable in situations in which feces are easier to obtain than blood and for use with small children.

Dr Jirků is a research scientist at the Institute of Parasitology in České Budějovice, Czech Republic. His research interests include kinetoplastid and apicomplexan parasites.



We thank R. Ssentongo, K. Karásková, M. Chmelařová, B. Kalousová, P. Smejkalová, and K. A. Shutt for assistance with collecting and transporting material; the government of the Central African Republic and the World Wildlife Fund for granting permission to conduct our research in the Central African Republic; the Ministre de l’Education Nationale, de l’Alphabetisation, de l’Enseignement Superieur, et de la Recherche for providing research permits; and Primate Habituation Project and A. Todd for providing logistical support in the field.

This study was conducted with support from the Czech Science Foundation (grant #206/09/0927) awarded to K.J.P. and D.M. and a Praemium Academiae award to J.L.



  1. Duval  L, Nerrienet  E, Rousset  D, Mba  SA, Houze  S, Fourment  M, Chimpanzee malaria parasites related to Plasmodium ovale in Africa. PLoS ONE. 2009;4:e5520. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Krief  S, Escalante  AA, Pacheco  MA, Mugisha  L, André  C, Halbwax  M, On the diversity of malaria parasites in African apes and the origin of Plasmodium falciparum from bonobos. PLoS Pathog. 2010;6:e1000765. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Liu  W, Li  Y, Learn  GH, Rudicell  RS, Robertson  JD, Keele  BF, Origin of the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum in gorillas. Nature. 2010;467:4205. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Rayner  JC, Liu  W, Peeters  M, Sharp  PM, Hahn  BH. A plethora of Plasmodium species in wild apes: a source of human infection? Trends Parasitol. 2011;27:2229. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Ollomo  B, Durand  P, Prugnolle  F, Douzery  E, Arnathau  C, Nkoghe  D, A new malaria agent in African hominids. PLoS Pathog. 2009;5:e1000446. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Duval  L, Fourment  M, Nerrienet  E, Rousset  D, Sadeuh  SA, Goodman  SM, African apes as a reservoir of Plasmodium falciparum and the origin and diversification of Laverania subgenus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:105616. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Tanabe  K, Mita  T, Jombart  T, Eriksson  A, Horibe  S, Palacpac  N, Plasmodium falciparum accompanied the human expansion out of Africa. Curr Biol. 2010;20:12839. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Prugnolle  F, Ollomo  B, Durand  P, Yalcindag  E, Arnathau  C, Elguero  E, African monkeys are infected by Plasmodium falciparum nonhuman primate–specific strains. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:1194853. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Prugnolle  F, Durand  P, Neel  C, Ollomo  B, Ayala  FJ, Arnathau  C, African great apes are natural hosts of multiple related malaria species, including Plasmodium falciparum. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:145863. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Hay  SI, Guerra  CA, Gething  PW, Patil  AP, Tatem  AJ, Noor  AM, A world malaria map: Plasmodium falciparum endemicity in 2007. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000048. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Chotivanich  K, Silamut  K, Day  NP. Laboratory diagnosis of malaria infection: a short review of the methods. New Zealand Journal of Medical Laboratory Science. 2007;61:47.
  12. Prugnolle  F, Durand  P, Ollomo  B, Duval  L, Ariey  F, Arnathau  C, A fresh look at the origin of Plasmodium falciparum, the most malignant malaria agent. PLoS Pathog. 2011;7:e1001283. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Garcia  LS, Bullock-Lacullo  SL, Fristche  TR, Grady  KK, Healy  GR, Palmer  J, Laboratory diagnosis of blood-borne parasitic diseases. Approved guideline M15-A. 2000; 20(12) [cited 2012 Jan 5].
  14. Valkiūnas  G, Ashford  RW, Bensch  S, Killick-Kendrick  R, Perkins  S. A cautionary note concerning Plasmodium in apes. Trends Parasitol. 2011;27:2312. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar




Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid1804.110984

1These authors contributed equally to this article.

Table of Contents – Volume 18, Number 4—April 2012

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Julius Lukeš, Biology Centre, Branišovská 31, 37005 České Budějovice, Czech Republic

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: March 15, 2012
Page updated: March 15, 2012
Page reviewed: March 15, 2012
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.