Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 18, Number 9—September 2012
Research

Surveillance for Influenza Viruses in Poultry and Swine, West Africa, 2006–2008

On This Page
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
Cite This Article
Figures
Figure 1
Figure 2
Tables
Table 1
Table 2
Table 3
Table 4
Downloads
Article
RIS [TXT - 2 KB]
Article Metrics
Metric Details
34
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus
Related Articles
Swine Influenza A Viruses, Cambodia
HPAI A(H5N1) Virus in Cats, South Korea, 2023
Novel Eurasian Avian Influenza Virus, Australia
More articles on Influenza
Author affiliations: Central Laboratory for Animal Diseases, Bingerville, Côte d’Ivoire (E. Couacy-Hymann, V.A. Kouakou, C.K. Kouakou); Laboratoire de Diagnostic Vétérinaire et de Sérosurveillance, Parakou, Benin (G.L. Aplogan, L. Kakpo); Laboratoire Vétérinaire de Lomé, Lomé, Togo (F. Awoume); and St Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA (B.R. Sharp, L. McClenaghan, P. McKenzie, R.G. Webster, R.J. Webby, M.F. Ducatez)

Cite This Article

Abstract

To determine the extent of animal influenza virus circulation in Côte d’Ivoire, Benin, and Togo, we initiated systematic year-round active influenza surveillance in backyard birds (predominantly chickens, guinea fowl, and ducks) and pigs. A total of 26,746 swab specimens were screened by using reverse transcription PCR. Animal influenza prevalence was estimated at 0 (95% CIs for each of the 2 study years 0–0.04% to 0–1.48% [birds] and 0–0.28% to 0–5% [pigs]). In addition, 2,276 serum samples from the same populations were negative for influenza-specific antibodies. These data indicate that the environments and host populations previously identified as harboring high levels of influenza virus in Southeast Asia do not do so in these 3 countries. The combination of climate and animal density factors might be responsible for what appears to be the absence of influenza virus in the backyard sector of the 3 countries.

Relatively little is known about the emergence, prevalence, and circulation of animal influenza viruses in Africa. There is no recent evidence of influenza infection in pigs in West Africa. In 2007, Gaidet et al. (1) found a 3.5% prevalence of avian influenza virus in wild birds in Africa; the highest prevalence in Mauritania and Senegal, and the most frequently infected species were Eurasian and African ducks. In addition, low-pathogenic avian influenza viruses of subtypes H1N8, H3N8, H4N2, H4N6, H4N8, H5N1, H5N2, H5N8, H6N2, H7N7, H9N1, and H11N9 have now been detected in wild birds in Nigeria, Egypt, Zambia, and South Africa (2–7).

Even less is known about avian influenza in domestic poultry in Africa. South Africa has had numerous outbreaks of many distinct influenza subtypes in chickens and ostriches, including H5N2, H5N3, H6N2, H9N2, H10N7, and H6N8 (3,8–11). Egypt is still facing recurrent highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) (H5N1) outbreaks (12). In contrast, none of the other affected African countries have reported the pathogen since July 2008 (13).

We performed a systematic active surveillance study of animal influenza in Côte d’Ivoire, Benin, and Togo. These 3 West African countries reported cases of HPAI (H5N1) only in 2006, 2007, or 2008 (13,14). We aimed to confirm the current absence of HPAI (H5N1) from the region and determine whether any other influenza virus strains might circulate in domestic birds and pigs.

Materials and Methods

Sampling Sites

Samples were collected exclusively in live-bird markets and backyard farms. The latter were preferred to commercial farms because the outbreaks of HPAI (H5N1) reported during 2006–2008 occurred most often in backyard flocks (for 11/12, 4/5, and 2/3 outbreaks in Côte d’Ivoire, Benin, and Togo, respectively) or on small farms (308–7,771 birds per farm) (13,14). Sampling sites were selected in the 3 countries for 1) their density of poultry farms (backyard and commercial, even though we focused on the backyard sector, as in the district of Abidjan and in the Middle-Comoé region in Côte d’Ivoire; Lokossa in Benin; Lomé and the Maritime Province in Togo), 2) the presence of water bodies and the possible contact of domestic birds with wild waterfowl (South-Comoé in Côte d’Ivoire; Malanville in Benin); and 3) their past outbreaks of HPAI (H5N1) (district of Abidjan in Côte d’Ivoire; Lomé and the Maritime Province in Togo).

Figure 1

Thumbnail of Collection sites of bird and pig samples, West Africa, 2006–2008. Côte d’Ivoire, Benin, and Togo are in gray. Sampling provinces are indicated by black circles.

Figure 1. . Collection sites of bird and pig samples, West Africa, 2006–2008. Côte d’Ivoire, Benin, and Togo are in gray. Sampling provinces are indicated by black circles.

In Côte d’Ivoire, samples were collected during January 2009–December 2010. Three regions were selected (Figure 1). Specimens were collected in the district of Abidjan (i.e., Bingerville, Marcory, Treichville, Port-Bouet, Koumassi, Yopougon), the Middle-Comoé region (i.e., Agnibilékro, Takikro, Abengourou, Niablé), and the South-Comoé region (i.e., Aboisso, Adiaké). In Benin, samples were collected during November 2008–September 2010 in live-poultry markets in Malanville, Gogounou, and Dérasi in the provinces of Borgou and Alibori in the north of the country (Figure 1). A total of 200 swab samples were collected from birds in Lokossa (Mono Province) in 2009. The specimens from pigs were collected from animals in slaughterhouses in Parakou (Borgou Province).

In Togo, swab specimens from birds were collected in January and March 2009 and during February–December 2010. Locations were live-poultry markets in Adidogomé, Aklakou, Tabligbo, Vogan, Agoé, Akodesséwa, Aného, Tsévié, Adawlato, and Gbossimé, in Lomé and in the Maritime Province (Figure 1).

In each region in Côte d’Ivoire, a minimum of 5 villages were randomly selected among those willing to participate. Birds from live-bird markets were randomly selected before sampling (5 randomly selected birds per vendor, number of vendors randomly selected depending on the total number of specimens to collect in a given market).

Sample Collection

At each sampling site, >25 birds were clinically examined, and tracheal and cloacal swab samples were collected at least monthly. In Côte d’Ivoire, nasal swab samples from pigs were collected monthly in 2009 and every 3 months in 2010. In backyard flocks in Côte d’Ivoire, serum was collected every 3 months. Each selected market was visited 1×/month in Togo and 2×/month in Benin.

The samples were collected in viral transport media as described (15) and then stored in liquid nitrogen or on ice during sampling and transportation to the laboratory, which never exceeded 1 day. Swabs were then immediately stored either at –80°C in Côte d’Ivoire and Benin or in liquid nitrogen in Togo before further processing. Serum was stored at –20°C before further processing.

Serologic Testing

Serum was screened for influenza antibodies by performing ELISAs and/or hemagglutination inhibition (HI) assays. ELISAs were performed by using the FlockChek AI MultiS-Screen Ab Test Kit (Idexx, Westbrook, ME, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. HI assays to detect influenza virus were performed as described (15,16) by using inactivated H5 (A/whooper swan/Mongolia/244/05), H6 (A/turkey/Massachussetts/65), H7 (A/ruddy turnstone/New Jersey/65/85), and H9 (A/duck/Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People’s Republic of China/Y280/97) antigens and positive- and negative-control serum. Serum samples were screened for Newcastle disease virus (NDV)–specific antibodies by performing HI assays with inactivated reference antigen and positive- and negative-control serum.

Molecular Testing

Tracheal and cloacal swabs were processed as described (17,18). The samples were screened either individually or in pools of 2 or 5 swabs. RNA was isolated by using the RNeasy mini kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA, USA), the QIAmp viral RNA minikit (QIAGEN), or the MagMAXTM-96 AI/ND viral RNA isolation kit (Applied Biosystems/Ambion, Austin, TX, USA) with a Kingfisher Flex magnetic particle processor (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA). RNA was eluted in 50 μL of nuclease-free water.

The swab samples from Côte d’Ivoire were tested by using 2-step reverse transcription PCRs (RT-PCRs). The RT step was performed by using random hexamers (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) with 10 μL of extracted RNA and the First-Strand cDNA Synthesis kit (GE Healthcare Europe GmBH, Orsay, France,) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Next, 5 µL of the cDNA obtained was used as the template for the PCR step. The PCR was performed by using the Gene Amp PCR System 2400 (Perkin-Elmer, Applied Biosystem, Paris, France) as described (14).

The swabs from Benin and Togo were tested by using 1-step RT-PCRs performed with the Qiagen 1-step RT-PCR kit (QIAGEN) with either an ABI 9700, ABI 2720 (Applied Biosystems, Vienna, Austria) or ABI 7500 (Stratagene; Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA, USA) thermocycler. For conventional RT-PCR screenings, we used primers that target the influenza A matrix gene (19) and the following cycling conditions: 1 cycle of 50°C for 30 min; 1 cycle of 95°C for 15 min; 40 cycles of 95°C for 30 sec, 60°C for 30 sec, and 72°C for 1 min; and 1 cycle of 72°C for 10 min. For real-time RT-PCR screenings, we used influenza A primers (18) with the following cycling conditions: 1 cycle of 50°C for 30 min; 1 cycle of 95°C for 15 min; and 40 cycles of 95°C for 10 sec and 60°C for 30 sec.

Swab samples from birds were screened for other avian pathogens. We used PCR to screen for DNA viruses (infectious laryngotracheitis [ILTV], Marek’s disease virus [MDV], and chicken anemia virus [CAV]) and 2-step RT-PCR to screen for RNA viruses (NDV, infectious bronchitis virus [IBV], avian metapneumovirus [aMPV], and infectious bursal disease virus [IBDV]) as described (primers available on request).

Results

Sample Collection

We collected 25,136 swab and 1,819 serum samples from birds and 1,610 swab and 457 serum samples from pigs during the 2-year survey in the 3 countries. Of the bird samples, 70% were from live-poultry markets and 30% from backyard flocks (Table 1 and Table 2). Specimens were collected year-round, and monthly samples ranged from 20 to 160 and from 218 to 1,778 per month, from swine and poultry respectively.

RT-PCR Screening

Figure 2

Thumbnail of Prevalence of 8 avian viruses detected by reverse transcription PCRs of a subset of 2,427 tracheal and cloacal swab samples collected in live-bird markets, Benin and Togo, 2009. NDV, Newcastle disease virus; ILTV, infectious laryngotracheitis; CAV, chicken anemia virus; IBV, infectious bronchitis virus; aMPV, avian metapneumovirus; MDV, Marek’s disease virus; IBDV, infectious bursal disease virus; AIV, avian influenza virus.

Figure 2. . Prevalence of 8 avian viruses detected by reverse transcription PCRs of a subset of 2,427 tracheal and cloacal swab samples collected in live-bird markets, Benin and Togo, 2009. NDV, Newcastle...

The 26,746 total swab samples collected from birds and pigs in Côte d’Ivoire, Benin, and Togo all tested negative for influenza A genome by RT-PCR, irrespective of collection month or host, and the annual prevalence per country was null (95% CI 0.04–4.79%) (Table 1, Table 2, Table 3). To verify that cold-chain or storage problems had not simply degraded our samples’ nucleotides, we screened a subset of 2,427 swab samples collected from birds during early 2009 and 2010 from Benin and Togo for other RNA avian viruses (NDV, IBV, IBDV, or aMPV) and DNA viruses (CAV, ILTV, or MDV). Of the 2,427 samples collected in Benin and Togo, the prevalence of the other viral pathogens ranged from 0 for MDV and IBDV to 4.9% for NDV (119 positive samples), 2.8% for ILTV (68), 2.1% for CAV (51), 1.4% for IBV (34), and 0.3% for aMPV (7) (Figure 2). In addition, 3,330 swab samples collected from birds in Côte d’Ivoire in 2010 were screened for NDV; NDV prevalence ranged from 0.3% to 1.4% depending on time (data not shown). Taken together, these results show the fair quality of our specimens. Cold-chain and sample quality were unlikely to account for the absence of detected influenza virus RNA.

Serologic Testing

Because influenza virus infection might last only a few days in birds and pigs, we could have missed the virus in the animals sampled. Therefore, we conducted serologic screening, which provides insight into the infection history of an animal’s entire life. None of the serum samples collected in birds in Côte d’Ivoire, Benin, and Togo were positive for influenza antibodies by ELISA or HI assay. Although 16 of 457 pig serum samples from Côte d'Ivoire were weakly positive by ELISA, none were confirmed positive by HI; they most likely were all negative for influenza antibodies. NDV antibodies were detected in 20% of serum samples from birds in Côte d’Ivoire and in 32% of bird serum samples from Togo (data not shown).

Influenza Seasonality and Environmental Factors

Determining the factors contributing to the seasonality of influenza has been difficult because some countries report having influenza activity year-round and others report having 2 peaks of activity or a combination of these patterns. To follow up on recent results (20) seemingly confirming the year-round activity hypothesis that states that influenza spread in the tropics is due to contact rather than aerosol transmission, we compared the average livestock production, temperature, and relative humidity (RH) levels in Côte d’Ivoire, Benin, and Togo with those of Nigeria, Egypt, Vietnam, and Indonesia. Côte d’Ivoire, Benin, and Togo produce significantly less bird and pig meat and fewer bird eggs than do Nigeria, Egypt, Vietnam, or Indonesia (Table 4). West Africa is hot and humid all year, with temperatures ranging from 22°C to 32°C and RH ranging from 63% to 82% (Table 4).

Discussion

HPAI (H5N1) was detected in West Africa during February 2006–July 2008 (13,14), and all the strains characterized belonged to clade 2.2 (22,23). Whether wild birds or trade brought the virus to Africa remains unclear (24–26). However, evidence suggests that the pathogen was first detected in People’s Republic of China and might have transited through western Asia, Russia, or Europe (27), with wild birds probably playing a role in introducing HPAI (H5N1) to Africa (27–31). Incidentally, Côte d’Ivoire, Benin, and Togo are on the Black Sea–Mediterranean and East Atlantic flyways that these birds use for migration (32).

Within a year after the initial outbreaks, the clade 2.2 strains were thought to have become endemic in Nigeria, and intra–clade 2.2 reassortant viruses were characterized, highlighting the effects of the virus virus and its evolution within the country (33,34). Nigeria has not reported an HPAI (H5N1) outbreak since July 2008 and now seems free of the pathogen (13). The neighboring countries reported only isolated outbreaks in 2006, 2007, or 2008, but no sustained transmission has been reported (13).The subtype H5N1 outbreaks in backyard poultry in West Africa were associated with less severe symptoms and lower death rates than those usually described in such outbreaks.

That HPAI (H5N1) is endemic in several Southeast Asian countries and in Egypt but did not persist in West Africa, except for a couple of years in Nigeria, is intriguing. Despite the effect of viruses such as NDV, influenza virus was not detected in any of the swabs or serum samples collected during our active surveillance for animal influenza in Côte d’Ivoire, Benin, and Togo. Several factors, such as type of hosts available, animal density, and climate with its effect on virus persistence in the environment and on virus transmission, might have prevented continued circulation of the virus in the region.

Ducks in particular are a natural reservoir for influenza and play a major role in influenza transmission (35). Fewer ducks are raised in Africa than in Southeast Asia (Table 4), which might limit the virus pool and sustainability on the continent. Moreover, the few ducks in West African are backyard birds in low density flocks, not free-range birds in large flocks on lakes and rice paddies as they often are in Southeast Asia. Chickens have so far been the first host infected by subtype H5N1 in Egypt (36), but duck meat production is much higher in Egypt than in Côte d’Ivoire, Benin, Nigeria, or Togo (Table 4). The structure of live-bird markets in West Africa also differs substantially from that in Southeast Asia, with fewer birds, fewer species (large majority of chickens and guinea fowls), and often lower confinement (authors’ observations).

We believe that temperature and humidity might be critical parameters for the survival of influenza virus in West Africa. Temperature and humidity affect the duration of virus persistence in the environment. In the guinea pig model, influenza transmission by the aerosol route depends on humidity and temperature, although contact transmission does not (37,38). Of the experimental conditions tested, only 5°C, 20°C, and 35% RH allowed 100% aerosol transmission; thus, warmer and more humid environments might have less aerosol transmission of influenza virus (37). Côte d’Ivoire, Benin, Nigeria, and Togo are hot and humid countries year-round. Therefore, one would expect shorter virus persistence in the environment, and, according to the data obtained by using the guinea pig model, one would expect contact transmission rather than aerosol transmission of influenza in West Africa. Still, aerosol transmission may occur in Egypt because the RH is much lower than in West Africa and the temperature drops to 9°C in the winter. However, Vietnam and Indonesia (2 countries to which HPAI [H5N1] outbreaks are endemic) are just as hot and humid year-round as West Africa, yet subtype (H5N1) is maintained in birds. Thus, the climate cannot be the only factor limiting influenza in West Africa.

We considered an additional factor—animal density—while trying to determine why influenza might not be sustained in West Africa. The amount of eggs and bird meat and pork produced is considerably lower in Côte d’Ivoire, Benin, Nigeria, and Togo than in Egypt, Nigeria, Vietnam, and Indonesia. Thus, we hypothesized that a high animal density might be required for sustained transmission of the virus. This high density would explain why subtype H5N1 seems to have persisted in Nigeria, with its large avian commercial sector, for a couple of years while causing only sporadic outbreaks in neighboring countries. Our hypothesis is in agreement with the recent finding that influenza prevalence in Egypt is higher in commercial flocks than it is in backyard flocks (36).

If influenza virus transmission is limited by climate and animal density, then these limitations should apply to other similar pathogens. In that case, the high prevalence of NDV in Benin and Togo is surprising. However, we had a sampling period bias because all of the NDV (and noninfluenza virus) from screened specimens from Benin and Togo was from specimens collected during January–March when NDV is known to cause disease in the western African backyard sector. Moreover, Songer et al. showed that NDV aerosol transmission at 23°C is better at 10% RH than at 90% RH or 35% RH (39). Although we lack data on whether NDV transmission differs from influenza transmission, different viruses, even those with the same nucleic acid core, might have different sensitivities to aerosol generation, depending on the RH level (39). Further experiments are warranted to determine whether NDV and influenza A virus transmission patterns actually differ and whether temperature and humidity have any role in that process.

We cannot exclude the possibility that influenza might exist in areas that we did not check. Such influenza hot spots have been discovered for influenza, including 1 at Delaware Bay in the United States (40). The requirements for continued circulation of influenza virus in animals (and the role of domestic animals in maintenance and interspecies spread) are not well understood. Future surveillance in West Africa should include more collection sites and include the commercial sectors and wild bird population to survey putative faster transmission and new introductions.

Our systematic year-round active influenza surveillance program in the backyard sector in Côte d’Ivoire, Benin, and Togo showed a prevalence of 0 (95% CI 0–0.04% to 0–1.48% in birds and of 0–0.28% to 0–5% in pigs). We hypothesize that the combination of climate and animal density factors might be responsible for what appears to be the absence of influenza virus in the backyard sector of the 3 countries we studied.

Dr Couacy-Hymann is the Director of the Virology Laboratory of the Central Laboratory for Animal Diseases in Bingerville, Côte d’Ivoire. His research interests include the evolution of animal influenza virus strains in West and Central Africa.

Top

Acknowledgments

We thank Yapi Yapo, Danho Thérèse, Koffi Yao Mathurin, Gnabro Privat, Kouassi Sue Lou Antoinette, Nana Pauline, Agolai Innocent,Toussaint Lougbégnon, Tawaliou Alidou, Assana Garba Bankole, Tatiana Toure, Séverin Adjitore, Jeanne Abdoulaye, Rodrigue Setchegbe, Adimi Adje Sylvain, Alao Funmi, Lengo Kossiwa, Go-Maro Wolali, Dogno Koffi, Pali Magnoudéwa, Kpatina Alfred, Voedjo Koukpealedou, and Aketre Yawo for their excellent technical assistance. We thank Amanda Ball, James Knowles, Ashley Webb, Yolanda Griffin, and Jennifer DeBeauchamp for their help with the administrative and logistics aspects of the study and Scott Krauss and David Walker for providing valuable reagents. We also acknowledge Mathilde Paul and Fabien Corbière for fruitful discussions, Jerry Parker and Richard Elia for data management, Cherise Guess for editorial assistance, and Julie Groff for illustration assistance.

This study was supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health (contract no. HHSN266200700005C) and by the American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities.

Top

References

  1. Gaidet  N, Dodman  T, Caron  A, Balanca  G, Desvaux  S, Goutard  F, Avian influenza viruses in water birds, Africa. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13:626–9 .DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Abolnik  C. Detection of a North American lineage H5 avian influenza virus in a South African wild duck. Onderstepoort J Vet Res. 2007;74:177–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Abolnik  C, Gerdes  GH, Sinclair  M, Ganzevoort  BW, Kitching  JP, Burger  CE, Phylogenetic analysis of influenza A viruses (H6N8, H1N8, H4N2, H9N2, H10N7) isolated from wild birds, ducks, and ostriches in South Africa from 2007 to 2009. Avian Dis. 2010;54(Suppl):313–22 .DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Aly  MM, Arafa  A, Kilany  WH, Sleim  AA, Hassan  MK. Isolation of a low pathogenic avian influenza virus (H7N7) from a black kite (Milvus migrans) in Egypt in 2005. Avian Dis. 2010;54(Suppl):457–60 .DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Gaidet  N, Cattoli  G, Hammoumi  S, Newman  SH, Hagemeijer  W, Takekawa  JY, Evidence of infection by H5N2 highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses in healthy wild waterfowl. PLoS Pathog. 2008;4:e1000127 .DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Simulundu  E, Ishii  A, Igarashi  M, Mweene  AS, Suzuki  Y, Hang'ombe  BM, Characterization of influenza A viruses isolated from wild waterfowls in Zambia. J Gen Virol. 2011;92:1416–27 .DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Snoeck  CJ, Adeyanju  AT, De Landtsheer  S, Ottosson  U, Manu  S, Hagemeijer  W, Reassortant low pathogenic avian influenza H5N2 viruses in African wild birds. J Gen Virol. 2011;92:1172–83 .DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Abolnik  C. Molecular characterization of H5N2 avian influenza viruses isolated from South African ostriches in 2006. Avian Dis. 2007;51:873–9 .DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Abolnik  C, Bisschop  S, Gerdes  T, Olivier  A, Horner  R. Outbreaks of avian influenza H6N2 viruses in chickens arose by a reassortment of H6N8 and H9N2 ostrich viruses. Virus Genes. 2007;34:37–45 .DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Abolnik  C, Bisschop  SP, Gerdes  GH, Olivier  AJ, Horner  RF. Phylogenetic analysis of low-pathogenicity avian influenza H6N2 viruses from chicken outbreaks (2001–2005) suggest that they are reassortants of historic ostrich low-pathogenicity avian influenza H9N2 and H6N8 viruses. Avian Dis. 2007;51(Suppl):279–84 .DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Abolnik  C, Londt  BZ, Manvell  RJ, Shell  W, Banks  J, Gerdes  GH, Characterisation of a highly pathogenic influenza A virus of subtype H5N2 isolated from ostriches in South Africa in 2004. Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2009;3:63–8 .DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Update on human cases of highly pathogenic avian influenza A (H5N1) infection: 2009. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2010;85:49–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. World Organization for Animal Health. Animal health in the world. Update on highly pathogenic avian influenza in animals (type H5 and H7), 2011 [cited 2012 Mar 28]. http://www.oie.int/animal-health-in-the-world/update-on-avian-influenza/
  14. Couacy-Hymann  E, Danho  T, Keita  D, Bodjo  SC, Kouakou  C, Koffi  YM, The first specific detection of a highly pathogenic avian influenza virus (H5N1) in Ivory Coast. Zoonoses Public Health. 2009;56:10–5 .DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. World Health Organization. WHO manual on animal diagnosis and surveillance. 2002 [cited 2012 Mar 28]. http://www.who.int/vaccine_research/diseases/influenza/WHO_manual_on_animal-diagnosis_and_surveillance_2002_5.pdf
  16. World Organization for Animal Health. Manual of diagnostic tests and vaccines for terrestrial animals, 2009 [cited 2012 Mar 28]. http://web.oie.int/eng/normes/MMANUAL/A_Index.htm
  17. Lee  CW, Suarez  DL. Application of real-time RT-PCR for the quantitation and competitive replication study of H5 and H7 subtype avian influenza virus. J Virol Methods. 2004;119:151–8 .DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Spackman  E, Senne  DA, Myers  TJ, Bulaga  LL, Garber  LP, Perdue  ML, Development of a real-time reverse transcriptase PCR assay for type A influenza virus and the avian H5 and H7 hemagglutinin subtypes. J Clin Microbiol. 2002;40:3256–60 .DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Fouchier  RA, Bestebroer  TM, Herfst  S, Van Der Kemp  L, Rimmelzwaan  GF, Osterhaus  AD. Detection of influenza A viruses from different species by PCR amplification of conserved sequences in the matrix gene. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:4096–101.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Moura  FE. Influenza in the tropics. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2010;23:415–20 .DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. FAOSTAT [cited 2012 Mar 28]. http://faostat.fao.org/site/569/DesktopDefault.aspx?PageID=569#ancor
  22. World Health Organization/World Organization for Animal Health/Food and Agriculture Organization H5N1 Evolution Working Group. Toward a unified nomenclature system for highly pathogenic avian influenza virus (H5N1). Emerg Infect Dis. 2008;14:e1.
  23. World Health Organization/World Organization for Animal Health/Food and Agriculture Organization H5N1 Evolution Working Group. Continuing progress towards a unified nomenclature for the highly pathogenic H5N1 avian influenza viruses: divergence of clade 2.2 viruses. Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2009;3:59–62 .DOIGoogle Scholar
  24. Munster  VJ, Wallensten  A, Baas  C, Rimmelzwaan  GF, Schutten  M, Olsen  B, Mallards and highly pathogenic avian influenza ancestral viruses, northern Europe. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005;11:1545–51 .DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Normile  D. Avian influenza. Evidence points to migratory birds in H5N1 spread. Science. 2006;311:1225 .DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Sturm-Ramirez  KM, Ellis  T, Bousfield  B, Bissett  L, Dyrting  K, Rehg  JE, Reemerging H5N1 influenza viruses in Hong Kong in 2002 are highly pathogenic to ducks. J Virol. 2004;78:4892–901 .DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Ducatez  MF, Olinger  CM, Owoade  AA, De Landtsheer  S, Ammerlaan  W, Niesters  HG, Avian flu: multiple introductions of H5N1 in Nigeria. Nature. 2006;442:37 .DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Ducatez  MF, Olinger  CM, Owoade  AA, Tarnagda  Z, Tahita  MC, Sow  A, Molecular and antigenic evolution and geographical spread of H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses in western Africa. J Gen Virol. 2007;88:2297–306 .DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Gaidet  N, Newman  SH, Hagemeijer  W, Dodman  T, Cappelle  J, Hammoumi  S, Duck migration and past influenza A (H5N1) outbreak areas. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008;14:1164–6 .DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Prosser  DJ, Cui  P, Takekawa  JY, Tang  M, Hou  Y, Collins  BM, Wild bird migration across the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau: a transmission route for highly pathogenic H5N1. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e17622 .DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Saad  MD, Ahmed  LS, Gamal-Eldein  MA, Fouda  MK, Khalil  F, Yingst  SL, Possible avian influenza (H5N1) from migratory bird, Egypt. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13:1120–1 .DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Olsen  B, Munster  VJ, Wallensten  A, Waldenstrom  J, Osterhaus  AD, Fouchier  RA. Global patterns of influenza A virus in wild birds. Science. 2006;312:384–8 .DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Fusaro  A, Nelson  MI, Joannis  T, Bertolotti  L, Monne  I, Salviato  A, Evolutionary dynamics of multiple sublineages of H5N1 influenza viruses in Nigeria from 2006 to 2008. J Virol. 2010;84:3239–47 .DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Owoade  AA, Gerloff  NA, Ducatez  MF, Taiwo  JO, Kremer  JR, Muller  CP. Replacement of sublineages of avian influenza (H5N1) by reassortments, sub-Saharan Africa. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008;14:1731–5 .DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Kim  JK, Negovetich  NJ, Forrest  HL, Webster  RG. Ducks: the “Trojan horses” of H5N1 influenza. Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2009;3:121–8 .DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Kayali  G, El-Shesheny  R, Kutkat  MA, Kandeil  AM, Mostafa  A, Ducatez  MF, The continuing threat of influenza (H5N1) virus circulation in Egypt. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17:2306–8 .DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Lowen  A, Palese  P. Transmission of influenza virus in temperate zones is predominantly by aerosol, in the tropics by contact: a hypothesis. PLoS Curr. 2009;1:RRN1002 .DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Lowen  AC, Mubareka  S, Steel  J, Palese  P. Influenza virus transmission is dependent on relative humidity and temperature. PLoS Pathog. 2007;3:1470–6 .DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Songer  JR. Influence of relative humidity on the survival of some airborne viruses. Appl Microbiol. 1967;15:35–42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Krauss  S, Stallknecht  DE, Negovetich  NJ, Niles  LJ, Webby  RJ, Webster  RG. Coincident ruddy turnstone migration and horseshoe crab spawning creates an ecological “hot spot” for influenza viruses. Proc Biol Sci. 2010;277:3373–9 .DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Figures
Tables

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid1809.111296

1Current affiliation: Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique,Toulouse, France.

Table of Contents – Volume 18, Number 9—September 2012

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Mariette F. Ducatez, INRA UMR 1225 Interactions Hôtes-agents Pathogènes, ENVT; 23 Chemin des Capelles, 31076 Toulouse, France

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: August 16, 2012
Page updated: August 16, 2012
Page reviewed: August 16, 2012
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external