Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 19, Number 1—January 2013

Subcutaneous Infection with Dirofilaria immitis Nematode in Human, France

Cite This Article

To the Editor: In March 2012, a 48-year-old woman was hospitalized with a subcutaneous nodule on her right thigh that was present for 4 weeks. She was living in Martigues near Marseille in southeastern France, owned cats and dogs, and never traveled out of France. Ultrasonography examination showed a diffuse subcutaneous edema without abscess. Results of initial blood count; ionogram; and tests for urea, creatinine, and liver enzyme levels were within reference ranges, but slight hypereosinophilia (0.7 × 109 cells/L) was noted 1 month later. Serologic results for toxocariasis, schistosomiasis, trichinosis, distomatosis, cysticercosis, and microfilaremia (3 assays) were negative. However, the result of an ELISA for Dipetalonema viteae nematodes was positive.

After surgical removal of the nodule, histopathologic analysis showed a female nematode surrounded by an aspecific inflammatory reaction. Transverse sections showed a parasite with a diameter of 300 µm and a layered cuticle <20 µm thick. The surface of the cuticle had numerous external, cuticular, longitudinal ridges. The nematode had 2 uterine tubules without microfilaremia, 1 intestinal tube, and a polymyarian-type musculature interrupted by 2 lateral chords. This worm showed similarities to an immature Dirofilaria repens female.

To identify the worm, we performed PCR amplification of a 12S rRNA gene fragment (1). PCR products (International Nucleotide Sequence Database Collaboration accession no. JX502021) were compared with sequences deposited in GenBank. Analysis showed 92% similarity and 89% coverage with the 12S rRNA gene of the D. repens nematode reference sequence (GenBank accession no. GQ292761.1) (2) but 100% similarity and 100% coverage with the 12S rRNA gene of the Dirofilaria immitis nematode reference sequence (GenBank accession no. EU169125.1) (3).

To confirm this result, we amplified cytochrome c oxidase 1 (cox-1) and internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS-2) genes by using a duplex real-time PCR as described (4). Results were positive for D. immitis (International Nucleotide Sequence Database Collaboration accession no. HE979797 [100% similarity and 100% coverage with the cox-1 gene of the D. immitis reference sequence] and GenBank accession no. JF461464.1) (5) and negative for the D. repens ITS-2 gene. These results confirmed an unexpected D. immitis subcutaneous infection that would have been misdiagnosed without molecular analysis.

D. repens and D. immitis nematodes are the most common species causing dirofilariasis in temperate and tropical areas. Dogs and cats are usual hosts, and main vectors are Aedes, Culex, and Anopheles spp. mosquitoes (6). In dogs and cats, D. immitis nematodes cause severe infections that affect lung vessels and heart cavities. In humans, this nematode is mainly responsible for benign asymptomatic pulmonary nodules, but D. repens nematodes usually induce periocular or subcutaneous lesions, as in our patient (6).

Until 2001, three areas in Europe (Iberian Peninsula, southern France, and Italy) were greatly affected by dirofilariasis. Its incidence has since increased in animals, and epidemiologic surveys showed spread of both nematode species to areas previously free of Dirofilaria nematodes, such as Germany and eastern Europe (Romania, Croatia, Serbia, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, and Rostov region in Russia) (7). Increased transport of microfilaremic pets throughout Europe, building construction and other human activities in new areas, emergence of new competent vectors (such as highly adaptable Ae. albopictus mosquitoes), and climate changes affected this spread (6). Climate changes indirectly influenced abundance of mosquitoes in specific areas, their period of activity, and development of Dirofilaria nematodes in vectors (6). Thus, incidence of human dirofilariasis is also expected to increase, although many asymptomatic infections are not diagnosed.

Fewer than 30 cases of human D. immitis infections have been reported in Europe since 1981, including only 4 in France. Moreover, 16 of these cases were questioned by Pampiglione et al. (8) because of unreliable diagnostic tools (serologic testing without a negative control) or atypical histologic criteria. Although other cases attributed to D. immitis nematodes have been reported, we found only 1 case in Europe attributed to D. immitis nematodes for which the diagnosis was confirmed by PCR (9).

Definitive diagnosis of dirofilariasis remains a difficult challenge. Noninvasive tests (mainly dirofilarial serologic assays) lack sensitivity, specificity, and standards to be considered reliable methods (6). Until recently, the standard test was histologic identification on the basis of diameter of the nematode, thickness of the cuticle, number and distribution of the fibers in the muscular layer, and study of external cuticular ridges (8). However, diagnosis by histopathologic analysis may be unreliable if worms are immature or subjected to necropsy, and D. immitis nematodes may be misidentified as D. repens nematodes.

Our case indicates the difficulties with histopathologic analysis (e.g., the nematode showed similarity with D. repens nematodes because of external cuticular ridges). However, using validated molecular techniques (4,5), we showed that infection with D. immitis nematodes would have been erroneously identified as infection with D. repens nematodes. Thus, we believe that PCR-based identification should be considered as a new diagnostic method for dirofilariasis.


Maud Foissac, Matthieu Million, Charles Mary, Jean-Philippe Dales, Jean-Baptiste Souraud, Renaud Piarroux, and Philippe ParolaComments to Author 
Author affiliations: Author affiliations: Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille, France (M. Foissac, M. Million, C. Mary, J.-P. Dales, R. Piarroux, P. Parola); Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille (M. Foissac, M. Million, C. Mary, J.-P. Dales, P. Parola); Hôpital d’Instruction des Armées, Sainte-Anne, Toulon, France (J.-B. Souraud)



  1. Gioia  G, Lecová  L, Genchi  M, Ferri  E, Genchi  C, Mortarino  M. Highly sensitive multiplex PCR for simultaneous detection and discrimination of Dirofilaria immitis and Dirofilaria repens in canince peripheral blood. Vet Parasitol. 2010;172:1603. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Poppert  S, Hodapp  M, Krueger  A, Hegasy  G, Niesen  WD, Kern  WV, Dirofilaria repens infection and concomitant meningoencephalitis. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009;15:18446. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Huang  H, Wang  T, Yang  G, Zhang  Z, Wang  C, Yang  Z, Molecular characterization and phylogenetic analysis of Dirofilaria immitis of China based on COI and 12S rDNA genes. Vet Parasitol. 2009;160:1759. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Latrofa  MS, Dantas-Torres  F, Annoscia  G, Genchi  M, Traversa  D, Otranto  D, A duplex real-time polymerase chain reaction assay for the detection of and differentiation between Dirofilaria immitis and Dirofilaria repens in dogs and mosquitoes. Vet Parasitol. 2012;185:1815. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Otranto  D, Diniz  DG, Dantas-Torres  F, Casiraghi  M, de Almeida  IN, de Almeida  LN, Human intraocular filariasis caused by Dirofilaria sp., nematode, Brazil. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17:8636. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Simón  F, Siles-Lucas  M, Morchón  R, González-Miguel  J, Mellado  I, Carretón  E, Human and animal dirofilariasis: the emergence of a zoonotic mosaic. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2012;25:50744. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Morchón  R, Carretón  E, González-Miguel  J, Mellado-Hernández  I. Heartworm disease (Dirofilaria immitis) and their vectors in Europe: new distribution trends. Front Physiol. 2012;3:196.
  8. Pampiglione  S, Rivasi  F, Gustinelli  A. Dirofilarial human cases in the Old World, attributed to Dirofilaria immitis: a critical analysis. Histopathology. 2009;54:192204. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Avellis  FO, Kramer  LH, Mora  P, Bartolino  A, Benedetti  P, Rivasi  F. A case of human conjunctival dirofilariosis by Dirofilaria immitis in Italy. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2011;11:4512. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar


Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid1901.120281

Related Links


Table of Contents – Volume 19, Number 1—January 2013

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Philippe Parola, Institut Hospitalo-Universitaire en Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales, Centre Hospitale Universitaire Nord, 13015 Marseille, France

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: December 20, 2012
Page updated: December 20, 2012
Page reviewed: December 20, 2012
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.