Volume 19, Number 11—November 2013
    
    Research
Use of National Pneumonia Surveillance to Describe Influenza A(H7N9) Virus Epidemiology, China, 2004–2013
Table 3
Reported PUE cases that were positive for influenza A(H7N9) virus before and after closure of live-bird markets in 3 cities, mainland China, March 30–May 3, 2013*
| Location | 0–6 d before closure† | 1–7 d after closure† | 8–14 d after closure† | p value | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. PUE | A(H7N9) positive, no. (%) | No. PUE | A(H7N9) positive, no. (%) | No. PUE | A(H7N9) positive, no. (%) | ||||
| Shanghai | 81 | 11 (14) | 188 | 4 (2) | 122 | 1 (1) | <0.001 | ||
| Nanjing | 7 | 5 (71) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 (100) | 0.564 | ||
| Hangzhou | 60 | 15 (25) | 34 | 4 (12) | 5 | 0 | 0.056 | ||
| Total | 148 | 31 (21) | 222 | 8 (4) | 128 | 2 (2) | <0.001 | ||
*PUE, pneumonia of unknown etiology.
†Dates of market closures: Shanghai: April 6; Nanjing: April 8; Hangzhou: April 15, 2013.
‡χ2 test for trend for percentage of reported cases testing positive for A(H7N9).
Page created: October 31, 2013
                            Page updated: October 31, 2013
                            Page reviewed: October 31, 2013
        
    The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
