Volume 19, Number 11—November 2013
Research
Use of National Pneumonia Surveillance to Describe Influenza A(H7N9) Virus Epidemiology, China, 2004–2013
Table 3
Location | 0–6 d before closure† |
1–7 d after closure† |
8–14 d after closure† |
p value | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No. PUE | A(H7N9) positive, no. (%) | No. PUE | A(H7N9) positive, no. (%) | No. PUE | A(H7N9) positive, no. (%) | ||||
Shanghai | 81 | 11 (14) | 188 | 4 (2) | 122 | 1 (1) | <0.001 | ||
Nanjing | 7 | 5 (71) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 (100) | 0.564 | ||
Hangzhou | 60 | 15 (25) | 34 | 4 (12) | 5 | 0 | 0.056 | ||
Total | 148 | 31 (21) | 222 | 8 (4) | 128 | 2 (2) | <0.001 |
*PUE, pneumonia of unknown etiology.
†Dates of market closures: Shanghai: April 6; Nanjing: April 8; Hangzhou: April 15, 2013.
‡χ2 test for trend for percentage of reported cases testing positive for A(H7N9).
Page created: October 31, 2013
Page updated: October 31, 2013
Page reviewed: October 31, 2013
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.