Volume 22, Number 12—December 2016
Dispatch
Baylisascaris procyonis Roundworm Seroprevalence among Wildlife Rehabilitators, United States and Canada, 2012–2015
Table 2
Variable | No. (%) respondents | No. (%) seropositive |
---|---|---|
Involvement in wildlife rehabilitation, N = 347 | ||
Currently involved | 314 (90.5) | 22 (7.0) |
Formerly involved | 19 (5.5) | 0 (0) |
Other raccoon contact |
14 (4.0) |
2 (14.3) |
Rehabilitation experience, y, N = 322 | ||
<2.0 | 48 (14.9) | 2 (4.2) |
2.0–4.9 | 96 (29.8) | 7 (7.3) |
5.0–9.9 | 67 (20.8) | 1 (1.5) |
10.0–20.0 | 64 (19.9) | 8 (12.5) |
>20.0 |
47 (14.6) |
3 (6.4) |
Raccoon rehabilitation, N = 347 | ||
Rehabilitated raccoons in past year | 222 (64.0) | 16 (7.2) |
Rehabilitated raccoons (prior to past year) | 41 (11.8) | 2 (4.9) |
Never rehabilitated raccoons |
84 (24.2) |
6 (7.1) |
General raccoon contact, N = 329 | ||
Had contact in past year | 266 (80.9) | 19 (7.1) |
Had contact ever | 36 (10.9) | 3 (8.3) |
Never had contact |
27 (8.2) |
2 (7.4) |
B. procyonis prevalence among raccoons in state or province of residence, N = 347* | ||
Very high (>50%) | 79 (22.8) | 14 (21.5) |
High (25%–49%) | 127 (36.6) | 5 (4.6) |
Medium (10%–24%) | 92 (26.5) | 4 (4.3) |
Low (<10%), sporadic, or unknown | 49 (14.1) | 1 (2.1) |
*Prevalence levels in the various US states and Canadian Provinces are shown in the Figure.
1Current affiliation: Ronin Institute, Montclair, New Jersey, USA.
Page created: November 18, 2016
Page updated: November 18, 2016
Page reviewed: November 18, 2016
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.