During 2012–2015, we collected serum samples from and administered questionnaires to wildlife rehabilitators (details in Technical Appendix). We tested serum samples for B. procyonis IgG using a recombinant B. procyonis repeat antigen 1 protein Western blot as described (7).

Of 347 enrolled persons (Table 1), 315 (91%) reported current involvement in rehabilitation activities. Participants had an average of 10.5 (median 7.0) years of animal rehabilitation experience. Most respondents (92%) reported having contact with raccoons at some point; 64% reported actively rehabilitating raccoons in the past year (Table 2).

Figure

Figure. Locations for participant sampling in a study of Baylisascaris procyonis roundworm seroprevalence among wildlife rehabilitators, United States and Canada, 2012–2015. Yellow dots indicate counties (USA) or township/municipality (Canada) in which enrolled...

Twenty-four (7%; 95% CI 4.7%–10.1%) participants tested positive for B. procyonis antibodies; adjusted prevalence, considering assay performance characteristics, was 5.7% (95% CI 2.2%–9.2%) (Figure) (12). Of those 24 participants, 22 (92%) were actively rehabilitating wildlife; the other 2 reported occasional wildlife contact, including contact with raccoons, through veterinary clinic activities. All but 2 seropositive persons reported raccoon contact, and 2 practiced rehabilitation in the same household. Nineteen (79%) of the 24 seropositive persons resided in a US state or Canadian province classified as having very high or high B. procyonis prevalence among raccoons (Table 2).

We detected antibodies to B. procyonis roundworms in 7% of wildlife rehabilitators we tested, suggesting that exposure to this zoonotic parasite may occur without clinical disease. Participants reported various degrees of raccoon contact. Although the transmission source could not be determined (i.e., from rehabilitation of raccoons or from exposure to eggs during other activities), use of gloves and handwashing was generally inconsistent among the seropositive persons in this study (S.G.H. Sapp, data not shown). B. procyonis is transmitted by ingestion of larvated eggs; thus, proper use of personal protective equipment (PPE), adherence to cleaning and disinfection protocols, and proper hand hygiene should minimize the risk associated with exposure to feces.

Transmission risk can also occur when handling animals whose fur has been contaminated by infective raccoon eggs, as shown for Toxocara canis parasites and dog fur (13). More investigations are needed regarding the occurrence of B. procyonis eggs on raccoon fur and transmission implications. Lapses in PPE use and hand hygiene may indicate a lack of caution or risk awareness for other pathogens.

Wildlife rehabilitators in areas with a very high prevalence of B. procyonis infection among raccoons may be at elevated risk for subclinical infections. Only 1 B. procyonis–seropositive wildlife rehabilitator resided in a state with low or sporadic prevalence (Alabama); however, that person lived in an area adjacent to a Florida county where the prevalence of B. procyonis infection in raccoons was 9% (M.J. Yabsley, unpub. data) (Figure). Data on B. procyonis prevalence in raccoons are outdated or missing for many US states and Canadian provinces. Furthermore, raccoon infections with B. procyonis are now being reported in areas where the parasite has historically been absent (e.g., the southeastern United States); thus, awareness of this parasite may be limited in those areas (8). More surveillance is needed on the distribution and prevalence of B. procyonis infection among raccoons to assess the association with exposure risks among humans.

Rehabilitation facilities housing raccoons can easily be contaminated with B. procyonis because high numbers of environmentally hardy eggs are passed by infected raccoons (1). Our finding of 2 seropositive raccoon rehabilitators operating out of the same household highlights the importance of infection-control practices. Facility contamination can be prevented by treating raccoons for parasites at intake and at regular intervals thereafter and by sterilizing enclosures using heat-based methods (14). Several anthelmintic drugs can kill adult B. procyonis, but raccoons with high worm burdens may require retreatment (15). Raccoon enclosures and housing should be constructed with materials that are easy to clean and disinfect using heat-based methods.

We tested persons with wildlife (mostly raccoon) contact, so our results describe an exposure risk that likely does not apply to the general public. However, persons in other occupations or activities (e.g., zoo keepers, wildlife biologists) may have similar exposure risks. Domestic dogs, other wildlife species (e.g., skunks, bears), and some exotic pets (e.g., kinkajous) are hosts for Baylisascaris spp. parasites and may present exposure risks (1). Although the assay we used has a sensitivity of 88% and specificity of 98%, it is time-consuming and not ideal for large-scale epidemiologic studies (7). Development of a high-quality ELISA would facilitate larger epidemiologic studies on the risk for baylisascariasis among different demographic groups and help further elucidate specific risk factors.

Our study had several limitations. We used a convenience sampling, so not all regions were well represented, and sample size was relatively small. Our prevalence estimate may be inflated because positive predictive value is reduced in populations in which prevalence is low. The assay we used is the reference standard for clinical diagnosis but has not been used to test asymptomatic persons. Although an association between human B. procyonis exposure and seroconversion has not been established, asymptomatic seropositive infections would be expected because clinical disease probably occurs only when larvae cause damage to neural tissue or eyes (1). An estimated 95% of migrating larvae enter muscle or visceral organs, where they may stimulate an immune response but not cause clinical disease (1). In support of this presumption, the assay we used indicated that experimental infections of Peromyscus rodents with low numbers of B. procyonis parasites resulted in no clinical disease with seroconversion (S.G.H. Sapp, unpub. data). Last, participants were primarily licensed rehabilitators who belonged to professional organizations, and many practiced rehabilitation in large, dedicated facilities. Such facilities generally have safety protocols that may encourage more consistent PPE use and awareness of zoonotic diseases, so the risk for infection may be greater in smaller or informal rehabilitation settings.

To prevent infection with B. procyonis parasites, proper PPE and hand hygiene practices should be used consistently when handling animals and when contact with animal feces might occur. Education materials and outreach efforts discussing PPE use, infection control, and zoonotic pathogens should be directed to wildlife rehabilitators to increase awareness of potential occupational risks.