Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 22, Number 2—February 2016
Letter

Malaria in French Guiana Linked to Illegal Gold Mining

Cite This Article

Figure

Thumbnail of Geographic distribution of presumed places of exposure for 742 single-infection Plasmodium vivax (586) and P. falciparum (156) malaria cases reported among French Armed Forces in French Guiana, 2008–2014. Numbers on map show illegal gold mining sites where entomologic investigations were conducted; 1 indicates Eau Claire; 2 indicates Dagobert.

Figure. Geographic distribution of presumed places of exposure for 742 single-infection Plasmodium vivax (586) and P. falciparum (156) malaria cases reported among French Armed Forces in French Guiana, 2008–2014. Numbers on map...

To the Editor: French Guiana, an overseas territory of France and part of the European Union, is located on the northeast coast of South America (Figure). During 2008– 2014, the number of malaria cases reported in French Guiana drastically decreased (1). The littoral area (≈30 km–wide Atlantic Ocean coastal band between the cities of Awala-Yalimapo and Ouanary) and the lower part of the Maroni River bordering Suriname (between the cities of Maripasoula and Saint-Laurent du Maroni) are considered malaria free, but this status may not reflect malaria transmission in the inland rainforest (24). Since 2008, French Armed Forces have been involved in military operations to control and reduce illegal gold mining activities in forested areas. Soldiers and military policemen usually spend 1–3 weeks in illegal gold mining sites in remote rainforest areas before returning to the littoral area or to bases on rivers bordering Suriname and Brazil. Despite malaria prevention strategies (5), these deployments have resulted in several outbreaks and increased malaria incidence among French forces (6). Most malaria episodes occurred during or just after deployments, so presumed locations of exposure can be easily identified.

Information about malaria cases was collected during 2008–2014 by the French Armed Forces’ epidemiologic surveillance system by using a mandatory, specific form that captured putative place of malaria exposure and biologic data for case-patients (6). Geographic coordinates of presumed places of contamination were uploaded into a geographic information system (ArcGIS; http://www.esri.com/software/arcgis/) to produce a malaria distribution map.

During 2008–2014, a total of 1,070 malaria cases were reported to the French Armed Forces’ epidemiologic surveillance system. Plasmodium vivax accounted for 78.8% (843/1,070), P. falciparum for 18.0% (193/1,070), and mixed infection (P. vivax and P. falciparum) for 3.2% (34/1,070). Places where malaria exposure occurred were identified for 742 cases of single malaria (586 P. vivax and 156 P. falciparum) infections (Figure). Cases occurring along the Maroni and Oyapock Rivers delimiting the frontiers with Suriname and Brazil, respectively, accounted for 25.3% (188/742). The other cases (74.7%, 554/742) were associated with exposures during military operations in illegal gold mining sites.

Entomologic investigations were conducted in 2 malaria epidemic locations where French forces were deployed: Eau-Claire and Dagobert. Collected Anopheles spp. mosquito specimens were identified by using morphologic keys specific to the Guyana Shield, a geomorphologic formation underlying French Guiana and other areas (7). Nonidentifiable Anopheles mosquito specimens were further identified molecularly (8). PCR products from the internal transcribed spacer 2 gene were sequenced, and Anopheles species were identified by comparing sequences to those in GenBank (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/) by searching with BLAST (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi). Testing for P. falciparum and P. vivax infections was conducted for all Anopheles spp. specimens by using nested PCR, as described (9).

In May 2013, a malaria outbreak occurred 1 month after military deployment of 100 soldiers at Eau Claire (3.56075°N, −53.21268°E; Figure), where 1 Mosquito Magnet trap (Woodstream Corporation, Lititz, PA, USA) baited with octenol was used to sample Anopheles mosquitoes during April 22–May 12, 2013 (10). The attack rate among the soldiers was 5.0% (5/100): 4 P. vivax and 1 P. falciparum malaria cases. Fifty-three Anopheles mosquito specimens were caught during the 20 days before the outbreak and identified as comprising 4 species (Technical Appendix Table). P. falciparum infection was detected in 2 Anopheles species: 1 (12.5%) of 8 An. ininii and 1 (5.0%) of 19 An. nuneztovari s.l. mosquitoes collected; P. vivax infection was found in 1 (5.5%) of 19 An. nuneztovari s.l. mosquitoes.

In September 2013, another malaria outbreak occurred 3 weeks after the deployment of 15 soldiers in Dagobert (4.06028°N, −53.70667°E; Figure). The attack rate among these soldiers was 53.3% (8/15): 7 P. vivax infections and 1 co-infection with P. vivax and P. falciparum. Mosquitoes were collected 3 months later by using human landing catches during 5 consecutive days. The area had been free of illegal gold mining activities since the 15 soldiers were deployed. A total of 321 Anopheles mosquitoes were collected in this location; 95.6% were identified as the same 4 species as in the Eau Claire mosquito collection (Technical Appendix Table). Only 1 specimen (0.4%, 1/282), An. darlingi mosquito, was infected with P. vivax.

These results suggest a high level of malaria transmission involving An. darlingi and other Anopheles species as primary vectors of malaria in the rainforest. The findings probably highlight malaria hyperendemicity in communities of undocumented gold miners, who are often mobile and pose a challenge for controlling malaria and other infectious diseases in the region. Indeed, these gold miners could reintroduce malaria in areas where competent vectors exist in the coastal part of French Guiana and in Surinam and Brazil, which border French Guiana. This potential for transmission could seriously threaten the success of malaria elimination programs in the Guiana Shield. Further studies are needed to better evaluate malaria epidemiology in these undocumented populations to determine how best to adapt strategies to control malaria transmission in this subregion of South America.

Top

Acknowledgment

We thank military physicians who participated in malaria epidemiologic surveillance in French Guiana and France during 2008–2014, especially E. de Parseval, N. Barthes, J.-P. Boudsocq, C. Ilcinkas, P.-A. Poutou, G. Samy, E. Martinez, F.-X. Le Flem, and C. Marchand. We also thank P. Gaborit, R. Carinci, and J. Issaly for their support in the entomologic studies.

Top

Vincent Pommier de SantiComments to Author , Aissata Dia, Antoine Adde, Georges Hyvert, Julien Galant, Michel Mazevet, Christophe Nguyen, Samuel B. Vezenegho, Isabelle Dusfour, Romain Girod, and Sébastien Briolant

Author affiliations: Army Center of Epidemiology and Public Health, Marseille, France (V. Pommier de Santi, A. Dia); Direction Interarmées du Service de Santé en Guyane, Cayenne, French Guiana (V. Pommier de Santi, G. Hyvert, J. Galant, M. Mazevet, C. Nguyen, S. Briolant); Institut Pasteur, Cayenne (A. Adde, C. Nguyen, S.B. Vezenegho, I. Dusfour, R. Girod, S. Briolant); Institut de Recherche Biomédicale des Armées, Brétigny-sur-Orge, France (C. Nguyen, S. Briolant)

Top

References

  1. Ardillon  V, Carvalho  L, Prince  C, Abboud  P, Djossou  F. Bilans 2013 et 2014 de la situation du paludisme en Guyane. Bulletin de veille sanitaire Antilles–Guyane. 2015 [cited 2015 Jul 15]. p. 16–20. http://www.invs.sante.fr/fr/Publications-et-outils/Bulletin-de-veille-sanitaire/Tous-les-numeros/Antilles-Guyane/Bulletin-de-veille-sanitaire-Antilles-Guyane.-n-1-Janvier-2015
  2. Musset  L, Pelleau  S, Girod  R, Ardillon  V, Carvalho  L, Dusfour  I, Malaria on the Guiana Shield: a review of the situation in French Guiana. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2014;109:52533. DOIPubMed
  3. Carme  B. Substantial increase of malaria in inland areas of eastern French Guiana. Trop Med Int Health. 2005;10:1549. DOIPubMed
  4. Berger  F, Flamand  C, Musset  L, Djossou  F, Rosine  J, Sanquer  MA, Investigation of a sudden malaria outbreak in the isolated Amazonian village of Saul, French Guiana, January–April 2009. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2012;86:5917. DOIPubMed
  5. Migliani  R, Pradines  B, Michel  R, Aoun  O, Dia  A, Deparis  X, Malaria control strategies in French armed forces. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2014;12:30717. DOIPubMed
  6. Queyriaux  B, Texier  G, Ollivier  L, Galoisy-Guibal  L, Michel  R, Meynard  JB, Plasmodium vivax malaria among military personnel, French Guiana, 1998–2008. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17:12802. DOIPubMed
  7. Floch  H, Abonnenc  E. Anophèles de la Guyane Française. Arch Inst Pasteur Guyane. 1951;236:192.
  8. Beebe  NW, Saul  A. Discrimination of all members of the Anopheles punctulatus complex by polymerase chain reaction–restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1995;53:47881.PubMed
  9. Snounou  G, Viriyakosol  S, Zhu  XP, Jarra  W, Pinheiro  L, do Rosario  VE, High sensitivity of detection of human malaria parasites by the use of nested polymerase chain reaction. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1993;61:31520. DOIPubMed
  10. Vezenegho  SB, Adde  A, Gaborit  P, Carinci  R, Issaly  J, Pommier de Santi  V, Mosquito magnet® liberty plus trap baited with octenol confirmed best candidate for Anopheles surveillance and proved promising in predicting risk of malaria transmission in French Guiana. Malar J. 2014;13:384. DOIPubMed

Top

Figure

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2202.151292

Related Links

Top

Table of Contents – Volume 22, Number 2—February 2016

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Vincent Pommier de Santi, Military Center for Epidemiology and Public Health, Camp Militaire de Sainte Marthe, BP 40026, 13568 Marseille CEDEX 02, France

Send To

character(s) remaining.

Comment submitted successfully, thank you for your feedback.

Top

Page created: January 19, 2016
Page updated: January 19, 2016
Page reviewed: January 19, 2016
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external