Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 23, Number 12—December 2017
Research Letter

Incentives for Bushmeat Consumption and Importation among West African Immigrants, Minnesota, USA

Emily WalzComments to Author , David Wilson, Jacob C. Stauffer, Danushka Wanduragala, William M. Stauffer, Dominic A. Travis1, and Jonathan D. Alpern1
Author affiliations: University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA (E. Walz, W.M. Stauffer, D.A. Travis, J.D. Alpern); African Career, Education, and Resources, Inc., Brooklyn Park, Minnesota, USA (D. Wilson); Stillwater High School, Stillwater, Minnesota, USA (J.C. Stauffer); Minnesota Department of Health, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA (D. Wanduragala)

Cite This Article

Abstract

The knowledge, attitudes, and practices surrounding bushmeat consumption and importation in the United States are not well described. Focus groups of West African persons living in Minnesota, USA, found that perceived risks are low and unlikely to deter consumers. Incentives for importation and consumption were multifactorial in this community.

Bushmeat hunting and butchery are risk factors for zoonotic disease transmission (13). However, less is known about health risks to those who consume products that are already butchered when purchased. Bushmeat in this report refers to meat from wild African animals such as rodents, hooved animals, carnivores, primates, and bats (3).

Thousands of pounds of bushmeat are illegally imported into the United States annually (4), mostly from West Africa (5). A previous study of bushmeat consumption by African immigrants in the United States described mixed perceptions regarding the risks and benefits of consuming bushmeat (5). Improved understanding of the complex social drivers of these practices is needed to better characterize risk and formulate communication strategies.

To identify the cultural perspectives and knowledge, attitudes, and practices surrounding bushmeat importation and consumption, we held focus groups with members of the Liberian community living in the Minneapolis–St. Paul area of Minnesota, USA. Minneapolis–St. Paul has the largest Liberia-born population in the United States, and ranks fifth in overall African population in US metropolitan areas (6). Recognizing the history of stigmatization associated with increased risk for Ebola virus among persons from West Africa, we engaged a community-based organization to partner in the planning and execution of this study (7,8). Creating a comfortable environment where participants share personal experiences and insights freely is a key tenet of focus group methodology (9); this partnership was essential in gaining trust and maintaining cultural sensitivity.

Inclusion criteria for participant selection included: 1) minimum age 18 years, 2) self-identification as West African, and 3) willingness to discuss bushmeat in a group setting. The partner organization recruited community members by using a combination of purposeful sampling and social media advertisement and facilitated 3 focus groups (10–12 participants, each for 90 min) in January and February 2016; a designated research team member attended each session. A standard guide for questions was used for each session (Technical Appendix). The University of Minnesota Institutional Review Board approved this study.

Sessions were audio recorded and transcribed; participants were not identified. Nonverbal cues (i.e., gestures, emotions, points of hesitation, nods of agreement) and other participant interactions were added to the transcript by a notetaker. We analyzed the collected data by using a modified grounded theory method with inductive analysis as previously described (10). Two authors (E.W., J.D.) analyzed each transcript by using an open and selective coding approach. Subsequently, all transcripts were analyzed together by using axial coding further describing relationships among themes (Table); representative quotes from participants were selected to exemplify a relationship or common theme (9) (Table). We supported validity of findings by using member-checking, triangulation of findings with multiple sources, and peer debriefing (9). Many themes were repeated in all groups; however, this study was limited by inability to confirm that we had reached saturation of perspectives. According to Creswell, it is ideal to repeat focus group sessions with new participants until novel perspectives no longer arise (9).

Participants had resided in the United States from 6 months to 35 years; approximately half were female (Technical Appendix Table 1). All had consumed bushmeat, either abroad or in the United States. The 2 fundamental drivers of consumption in the United States were to 1) strengthen connection with African roots or 2) share the social experience with friends or relatives (Table). Many participants also reported frequent consumption of bushmeat while visiting West Africa (Table).

Most participants reported preference for what they described as “dried bushmeat.” “Drying” involved varying degrees of smoking, aging, and desiccation. Dried bushmeat, compared with raw or partially smoked products, was preferred for importation because its decreased odor is believed to reduce detection.

Concern about zoonotic or foodborne disease dissuaded few participants from obtaining or consuming bushmeat, despite heightened awareness that wildlife could harbor Ebola virus. Among those who acknowledged this potential, most believed careful preparation and thorough cooking mitigated risk. For instance, participants cited traditional Liberian cooking techniques (extensive boiling for long durations) as a protective factor (Table).

Some participants were knowledgeable of hunting and butchering techniques, but most participants purchased dried consumer products and had not participated in the processing of carcasses. Although there were consistent gaps in knowledge of import regulations, it was commonly perceived that political, public health, or discriminatory (e.g., racist, xenophobic) justifications were factors (Table).

These focus groups yielded detailed and nuanced information on the knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to bushmeat use and consumption among Liberians and Liberian Americans in a US metro area. Although this study did not directly enumerate the volume and type of bushmeat imported into the United States, our results provide a description of sociocultural factors involved on the demand side of the supply chain, a common gap in most risk assessments, and give insight into potential education and risk management strategies. We found that engaging the community in a culturally appropriate manner encouraged open dialogue, creating opportunities for education regarding import regulations and risk mitigation strategies (e.g., careful preparation and thorough cooking).

Dr. Walz is a researcher in the Department of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, at the University of Minnesota. Her research focuses on risks for infectious diseases in animals and humans.

Top

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge African Career, Education, and Resources Inc. for assistance in planning, hosting, and conducting the focus groups. Particular thanks to Nelima Sitati Munene, Denise Butler, and Wynfred Russell for initial planning stages and contributions to wording of the question script and to Wokie Freeman for moderating the focus groups. We thank Arnold Vang for contributions in planning and information on local airport confiscations. Additional thanks to Jared Erdmann with the Minneapolis Health Department for providing collaborative training with partners.

This study was funded by the International Society of Travel Medicine (ISTM) 2014–2015 Research Award, as well as the Department of Veterinary Population Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota.

Top

References

  1. Paige  SB, Frost  SDW, Gibson  MA, Jones  JH, Shankar  A, Switzer  WM, et al. Beyond bushmeat: animal contact, injury, and zoonotic disease risk in Western Uganda. EcoHealth. 2014;11:53443. DOIPubMed
  2. Subramanian  M. Zoonotic disease risk and the bushmeat trade: assessing awareness among hunters and traders in Sierra Leone. EcoHealth. 2012;9:47182. DOIPubMed
  3. Friant  S, Paige  SB, Goldberg  TL. Drivers of bushmeat hunting and perceptions of zoonoses in Nigerian hunting communities. Bausch DG, editor. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9:e0003792.
  4. US Fish and Wildlife Service. Bushmeat [cited 2016 Mar 25]. http://www.fws.gov/international/wildlife-without-borders/global-program/bushmeat.html
  5. Bair-Brake  H, Bell  T, Higgins  A, Bailey  N, Duda  M, Shapiro  S, et al. Is that a rodent in your luggage? A mixed method approach to describe bushmeat importation into the United States. Zoonoses Public Health. 2014;61:97104. DOIPubMed
  6. US Census Bureau. American Community Survey. 2015 [cited 2017 Apr 3]. https://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?src=bkmk
  7. Sell  TK, Boddie  C, McGinty  EE, Pollack  K, Smith  KC, Burke  TA, et al. Media messages and perception of risk for Ebola virus infection, United States. Emerg Infect Dis. 2017;23:10811. DOIPubMed
  8. Sepic  M. Minnesota’s Liberian immigrants fear stigma from Ebola. NPR. 2014 Oct 10 [cited 2017 Mar 23]. http://www.npr.org/2014/10/10/355187977/minnesotas-liberian-immigrants-fear-stigma-from-ebola
  9. Creswell  JW. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 4th ed. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications; 2009.
  10. Betancourt  TS, Abdi  S, Ito  BS, Lilienthal  GM, Agalab  N, Ellis  H. We left one war and came to another: resource loss, acculturative stress, and caregiver-child relationships in Somali refugee families. Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2015;21:11425. DOIPubMed

Top

Table

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2312.170563

1These senior authors contributed equally to this article.

Table of Contents – Volume 23, Number 12—December 2017

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Emily Walz, University of Minnesota, 1971 Commonwealth Ave, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA

Send To

character(s) remaining.

Comment submitted successfully, thank you for your feedback.

Top

Page created: November 16, 2017
Page updated: November 16, 2017
Page reviewed: November 16, 2017
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external