Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 23, Number 12—December 2017

Deaths among Wild Birds during Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza A(H5N8) Virus Outbreak, the Netherlands

Erik Kleyheeg1Comments to Author , Roy Slaterus, Rogier Bodewes, Jolianne M. Rijks, Marcel A.H. Spierenburg, Nancy Beerens, Leon Kelder, Marjolein J. Poen, Jan A. Stegeman, Ron A.M. Fouchier, Thijs Kuiken2, and Henk P. van der Jeugd2
Author affiliations: Dutch Center for Avian Migration and Demography, Wageningen, the Netherlands (E. Kleyheeg, H.P. van der Jeugd); Sovon, Dutch Center for Field Ornithology, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R. Slaterus); Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands (R. Bodewes, J.A. Stegeman); Dutch Wildlife Health Center, Utrecht (J.M. Rijks); Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority, Utrecht (M.A.H. Spierenburg); Wageningen Bioveterinary Research, Lelystad, the Netherlands (N. Beerens); Staatsbosbeheer, Amersfoort, the Netherlands (L. Kelder); Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (M.J. Poen, R.A.M. Fouchier, T. Kuiken)

Cite This Article


During autumn–winter 2016–2017, highly pathogenic avian influenza A(H5N8) viruses caused mass die-offs among wild birds in the Netherlands. Among the ≈13,600 birds reported dead, most were tufted ducks (Aythya fuligula) and Eurasian wigeons (Anas penelope). Recurrence of avian influenza outbreaks might alter wild bird population dynamics.

Since 1996, highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) A viruses of the A/goose/Guangdong/1/96 lineage have caused major losses in the poultry industry worldwide and ≈800 confirmed human cases with a mortality rate of ≈50% (1,2). Wild waterbirds, the natural reservoir of low pathogenicity avian influenza viruses, are probably involved in long-distance spread of HPAI viruses (3,4).

In May–June 2016, a novel reassortant of HPAI virus subtype H5N8 clade was detected in diseased waterbirds in China (5) and on the border between Russia and Mongolia (6). In October 2016, a similar H5N8 strain was found in a dead mute swan (Cygnus olor) in Hungary (7). H5N8 viruses then spread rapidly across Europe, causing widespread death among wild waterbirds (8).

The Study

Concurrent with first detections in Austria, Germany, and Denmark, an H5N8 outbreak started in the Netherlands in early November 2016 (7). Unlike previous H5N8 outbreaks in the Netherlands during 2014–2015 (9,10), increased deaths among wild birds were observed this time.

To quantify deaths among species groups with known susceptibility (4,11) or that tested positive for H5N8 during the outbreak, we assembled daily mortality data from organizations gathering death reports or removing carcasses in the Netherlands during November 2016–January 2017 (Technical Appendix 1 Table 1). This collection was facilitated by close cooperation between ornithologists, virologists, animal health organizations, and other organizations involved in managing the H5N8 outbreak. After potential double-counts were excluded as much as possible, ≈13,600 wild birds of 71 species were reported dead (Table); 49% of all carcasses were identified by species, most of which were tufted duck (Aythya fuligula [39%]) and Eurasian wigeon (Anas penelope [37%]). Unidentified waterbird carcasses probably also mostly represented these species. H5N8 infection was confirmed in 21 species and not detected among the low numbers of sampled birds representing 13 other species (Technical Appendix 1 Table 2).

Figure 1

Thumbnail of Spatiotemporal pattern of wild bird deaths during an outbreak of HPAI A(H5H8) virus, the Netherlands, November 2016–January 2017. A) Outbreak chronology in tufted duck (red); Eurasian wigeon (blue); unidentified carcasses (light gray), probably also mostly tufted duck and Eurasian wigeon; and all other species combined (dark gray). Dashed vertical lines depict the first detections in wild birds and in poultry in the Netherlands. B–D) Spatial overview of the reported cumulative numbe

Figure 1. Spatiotemporal pattern of wild bird deaths during an outbreak of HPAI A(H5H8) virus, the Netherlands, November 2016–January 2017. A) Outbreak chronology in tufted duck (red); Eurasian wigeon (blue); unidentified carcasses (light...

After the first H5N8 detection in diseased waterbirds on November 8, hundreds of carcasses were found at Gouwzee (52°27′09′′N, 5°04′07′′E) and Wolderwijd (52°20′51′′N, 5°34′20′′E). Deaths at these locations peaked within 10 days, with ≈5,300 carcasses reported by November 18 (Figure 1). An estimated 85% were tufted ducks. Other species found dead during this period included common pochard (Aythya ferina [6%]) and Eurasian coot (Fulica atra [4%]), in addition to great crested grebe (Podiceps cristatus), mute swan, greater scaup (Aythya marila), and several goose and gull species (each <1%).


Thumbnail of Animated graphic of the weekly progression of an outbreak of highly pathogenic avian influenza A(H5N8) virus, the Netherlands, November 2016–January 2017 (video forthcoming).

Video. Animated graphic of the weekly progression of an outbreak of highly pathogenic avian influenza A(H5N8) virus, the Netherlands, November 2016–January 2017 (video forthcoming).

Beginning in late November, outbreak hotspots moved from open water to water-rich agricultural areas (Figure 1; Video). Deaths predominantly among Eurasian wigeon were reported from the island of Texel (≈883 birds) and the provinces Friesland (≈2,371), Noord-Holland (≈1,375), and Zuid-Holland (≈732). Reports of dead gulls, raptors and corvids, presumably infected after scavenging on carcasses, also increased.

Because these data are based on numbers of reported carcasses, they provide an underestimation of actual deaths. Although carcass detection rates during daily searches at Gouwzee and Wolderwijd were estimated to be 90%–95% (C. Oshaar, pers. comm., June 12, 2017), search efficiency was probably much lower at other outbreak hotspots. Collection rates of waterbird carcasses during typical avian botulism outbreaks are 10%–25% (12), suggesting that the number of carcasses reported during this H5N8 outbreak represented a limited proportion of total deaths.

We screened a relatively small proportion of carcasses for HPAI virus by real-time reverse transcription on tracheal and cloacal swab samples. We then determined pathogenicity and N-subtype by sequencing, as previously described (9,13). Testing confirmed H5N8 infection in a large proportion of sampled tufted ducks, Eurasian wigeons, gulls, raptors, and corvids (Table); another HPAI virus subtype was detected only twice (H5N5 in tufted duck and mute swan).

Figure 2

Thumbnail of Relative number of deaths among wild birds during an outbreak of highly pathogenic avian influenza A(H5N8) virus, the Netherlands, November 2016–January 2017. Number of reported deaths during November 2016–January 2017 (red asterisks) is shown relative to the normalized number of deaths reported over the same timeframe in the previous 5 years (average is 1, error bars indicate maximum and minimum from 2011–2012 to 2015–2016). The y-axis is on a log-scale (e.g., reported deaths among

Figure 2. Relative number of deaths among wild birds during an outbreak of highly pathogenic avian influenza A(H5N8) virus, the Netherlands, November 2016–January 2017. Number of reported deaths during November 2016–January 2017 (red...

We used the public science database of Sovon (Dutch Center for Field Ornithology, Nijmegen, the Netherlands) to compare the number of deaths per species group during November 2016–January 2017 with those occurring in the same timeframe from 2010–2011 to 2015–2016 (Figure 2). Death counts among diving ducks (including tufted ducks) were >2,000 times higher than average during November 2016–January 2017, and the relative prevalence of deaths substantially increased (4–177 times) for dabbling ducks, herons, geese, swans, and corvids. The same analysis based on another database ( yielded similar results (Technical Appendix 2 Figure).

The elevated number of deaths among wild birds raises concern about potential population effects. After accounting for detection probability (12), we found that up to 5% of the wintering populations of tufted ducks and Eurasian wigeons in the Netherlands might have died. In addition, 2%–10% of the wintering population of great black-backed gulls (Larus marinus) and 11%–39% of the wintering population of peregrine falcons (Falco peregrinus) were similarly affected. Stronger effects were observed locally. At Gouwzee, ≈6,000 tufted ducks were counted in December after ≈2,000 of them had died in November. Assuming that no migration occurred, we estimate that up to 25% of the local population of tufted ducks might have died, which might affect population dynamics substantially. Additional studies are needed to evaluate long-term impacts on these populations and to elucidate why high numbers of birds survived or escaped infection.

The first H5N8 outbreak among poultry in the Netherlands occurred on November 25, two weeks after the first detection in wild waterbirds and coinciding with increasing death reports in Eurasian wigeons. This time lag might be related to the limited mobility of wintering Aythya ducks, which, in contrast to Eurasian wigeons, rarely fly over land between foraging and roosting sites. Wild bird ecology might thus affect infection risk among poultry, which was further explored by researchers using network analyses of virus sequences obtained from wild birds and poultry during the same outbreak (14).

The quality of reporting of wild bird deaths during this H5N8 outbreak was vastly improved compared with earlier outbreaks, when species names, death rates, and spatiotemporal patterns of deaths were rarely recorded. However, documentation and management of future outbreaks in wild birds can be further improved. To contain outbreaks and minimize losses in the poultry sector, early HPAI virus detection in wild birds is crucial. Monitoring of wild bird deaths can be optimized (e.g., by timely investigation at sites where migratory birds first arrive, especially when surrounding countries report outbreaks). Awareness of clinical signs in wild birds (Technical Appendix 2) might facilitate this effort. Detailed, real-time, active and passive surveillance during outbreaks might help assess acute risk for infection in poultry. Such surveillance would require central coordination of information exchange during outbreaks, which would also facilitate evaluation afterward.

Readily available specific guidelines would help management of HPAI virus outbreaks in wild birds. National HPAI preparedness plans should include specific protocols about how to handle carcasses (e.g., biosafety and disposal instructions) and what to report (e.g., species, number of birds, demographic parameters, and presence of leg bands). Moreover, sufficient resources should be available for adequate sampling and testing of specimens to rule out other diseases and to track virus dynamics during an outbreak.


Our findings indicate that the 2016–2017 H5N8 outbreaks in the Netherlands were associated with unprecedented high HPAI-related mortality rates in a wide range of wild bird species. These latest H5N8 outbreaks have shifted the paradigm of wild birds as unaffected agents of HPAI viruses, with increasing concerns about potential effects on their populations. The Netherlands and other important staging areas for migratory waterbirds across Eurasia that have been affected by the 2016–2017 H5N8 outbreaks (3,15) are at risk for substantial numbers of bird deaths during future HPAI outbreaks. International responsibilities regarding migratory bird populations should stimulate national authorities to avert HPAI outbreaks not only in poultry and humans but also in wild birds.

Dr. Kleyheeg is a postdoctoral researcher at the Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, Radolfzell am Bodensee, Germany. His primary research interest is the relation between bird movement and the spread of pathogenic and nonpathogenic organisms.



We thank Menno Hornman, Jeroen Nienhuis, Natasha Buijs, Hanna Hesselink, Hisko de Vries, Eckard Boot, Cor Oshaar, Jan Regeling, Jan Roelsma, Geert Hamstra, Marko Cortel, Rommert Cazemier, Hoogheemraadschap Hollands Noorderkwartier, Natuurmonumenten, Rijkswaterstaat, Staatsbosbeheer, and Wetterskip Fryslân for kindly sharing data on wild bird deaths.

Financial support for this study was provided by the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs and the US National Health Institute’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (contract no. HHSN272201400008C).



  1. Lai  S, Qin  Y, Cowling  BJ, Ren  X, Wardrop  NA, Gilbert  M, et al. Global epidemiology of avian influenza A H5N1 virus infection in humans, 1997-2015: a systematic review of individual case data. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16:e10818. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. World Health Organization. Cumulative number of confirmed human cases of avian influenza A(H5N1) reported to WHO [cited 2017 June 12].
  3. Keawcharoen  J, van Riel  D, van Amerongen  G, Bestebroer  T, Beyer  WE, van Lavieren  R, et al. Wild ducks as long-distance vectors of highly pathogenic avian influenza virus (H5N1). Emerg Infect Dis. 2008;14:6007. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Lycett  SJ, Bodewes  R, Pohlmann  A, Banks  J, Bányai  K, Boni  MF, et al.; Global Consortium for H5N8 and Related Influenza Viruses. Role for migratory wild birds in the global spread of avian influenza H5N8. Science. 2016;354:2137. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Li  M, Liu  H, Bi  Y, Sun  J, Wong  G, Liu  D, et al. Highly pathogenic avian influenza A(H5N8) virus in wild migratory birds, Qinghai Lake, China. Emerg Infect Dis. 2017;23:63741. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Lee  DH, Sharshov  K, Swayne  DE, Kurskaya  O, Sobolev  I, Kabilov  M, et al. Novel Reassortant clade avian influenza A(H5N8) virus in wild aquatic birds, Russia, 2016. Emerg Infect Dis. 2017;23:35960. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE). Avian influenza portal [cited 2017 May 29].
  8. More  S, Bicout  D, Botner  A, Butterworth  A, Calistri  A, et al. Urgent request on avian influenza. EFSA J. 2017;15:4687.
  9. Verhagen  JH, van der Jeugd  HP, Nolet  BA, Slaterus  R, Kharitonov  SP, de Vries  PP, et al. Wild bird surveillance around outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza A(H5N8) virus in the Netherlands, 2014, within the context of global flyways. Euro Surveill. 2015;20:21069. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Poen  MJ, Verhagen  JH, Manvell  RJ, Brown  I, Bestebroer  TM, van der Vliet  S, et al. Lack of virological and serological evidence for continued circulation of highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N8 virus in wild birds in the Netherlands, 14 November 2014 to 31 January 2016. Euro Surveill. 2016;21:30349. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Breed  AC, Harris  K, Hesterberg  U, Gould  G, Londt  BZ, Brown  IH, et al. Surveillance for avian influenza in wild birds in the European Union in 2007. Avian Dis. 2010;54(Suppl):399404. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Bollinger  TK, Evelsizer  DD, Dufour  KW, Soos  C, Clark  RG, Wobeser  G, et al. Ecology and management of avian botulism on the Canadian prairies [cited 2017 Jun 20].
  13. Bouwstra  RJ, Koch  G, Heutink  R, Harders  F, van der Spek  A, Elbers  ARW, et al. Phylogenetic analysis of highly pathogenic avian influenza A(H5N8) virus outbreak strains provides evidence for four separate introductions and one between-poultry farm transmission in the Netherlands, November 2014. Euro Surveill. 2015;20:21174. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Beerens  N, Heutink  R, Bergervoet  SA, Harders  F, Bossers  A, Koch  G. Multiple reassorted viruses as cause of highly pathogenic avian influenza virus A(H5N8) epidemic, the Netherlands, 2016. Emerg Infect Dis. 2017;23:197481.
  15. Pohlmann  A, Starick  E, Harder  T, Grund  C, Höper  D, Globig  A, et al. Outbreaks among wild birds and domestic poultry caused by reassorted influenza A (H5N8) clade 2.3. 4.4 viruses, Germany, 2016. Emerg Infect Dis. 2017;23:6336. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar




Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2312.171086

1Current affiliation: Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, Radolfzell am Bodensee, Germany.

2These senior authors contributed equally to this article.

Table of Contents – Volume 23, Number 12—December 2017

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Erik Kleyheeg, Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, Am Obstberg 1, 78315 Radolfzell am Bodensee, Germany

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: November 16, 2017
Page updated: November 16, 2017
Page reviewed: November 16, 2017
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.